What does the process of pursuing your passion look like? What’s the next step down that path?
The good news is that it’s not nearly as nebulous as you might think. Our research has shown that there is a clear link between understanding what you love and identifying tangible elements of the work environment that would be best for you.
Imagine that you’re in the job market, with offers in hand from three firms. All three are attractive—the type of opportunities you’ve been looking for, with competitive compensation packages. You decide to meet with each firm one more time, specifically to talk about what your entry experience might be like—what to expect in your first six months on the job. Here’s what representatives from the three companies say. Which job will you take?
Company A: Probation and a Team Voting Approach
Actually, your first month will be a probationary period in which you’ll get to know and work closely with your assigned teammates. They’ll see how well you work with the group and contribute to its success. At the end of that period, your teammates—your peers—will vote on whether or not you will get to stay in the organization.
Company B: Fishbowl Challenge Approach
We can’t tell you what your exact role will be or who you’ll be working with. For the first three months, you’ll be in our “fishbowl,” performing a series of weekly challenges, perhaps designing new products or marketing campaigns, under the close scrutiny of our CEO and other senior executives. At the end of the time, depending on what we observe, we’ll help you find the right position for your skills.
Company C: Training and Apprentice Approach
Your first three months will be spent learning our way of doing business. We have a specific way of operating, and we expect you to follow our processes closely. We’re convinced that the ways we’ve outlined are the most productive and successful. After an extensive training program, you’ll get a chance to apprentice with one of our strongest performers.
If you’re like most people, these three ways of starting work at a new company are not equally appealing. In fact, I suspect most of you would probably have a distinct preference for one over the others.
If social relationships at work are important to you, if teamwork is something you enjoy and believe you excel at, then the first offer would probably sound good. The entry process certainly drives home the point that this is a company that puts a high priority on team behavior.
If you love the challenge of creating new things and see work as a platform to express yourself, and if you have a high tolerance for ambiguity, then the second company might be for you. Again, the entry process sets a clear tone—intense challenge, high visibility, and a chance to show what you can do.
If clearly specified tasks are important to you, and if you want a well-defined path to succeed at work, then the third company probably sounds like a dream come true. Clearly the management has thought about how to do well and is prepared to invest significant time and resources in helping you learn the ropes.
Getting it right—finding a work environment that matches your personality and preferences—is key to your ultimate enjoyment of your work. In the end, the role you will be asked to play and the characteristics of the workplace need to be in line with the role you’re prepared to play and the environment you enjoy. By choosing the company that is best suited to your needs and preferences, you increase the chances you will find yourself in a place that matches your passions, one in which you will be highly engaged in your work.
Let’s take the second step in finding work you will love and that will work for you. Keeping in mind the situations you identified in chapter 4, those in which you felt highly engaged or passionate, the next step is to identify the practical characteristics of your ideal relationship with work and the pragmatic clues that will help you find it. Our research has shown that there is a high correlation between certain types of passion—certain life lures—and specific, identifiable elements of the work environment. For example, someone with a passion for creating unique items with lasting value—let’s say by designing buildings or writing books—is much more likely to prefer flexible schedules and independence than someone whose passion is leading teams successfully into competition.
My colleagues’ and my research has identified six archetypes of work-related passions and preferred relationships with work.1 They describe the six roles that work plays in our lives and represent six life lures.
Take the ten-question assessment in table 5-1. Which of the statements in each row of the assessment do you identify with most closely? Once you’ve completed the assessment, turn to table 5-2 at the end of the chapter to see which lure is most important to you.
Once you have your results, the following descriptions of each lure will help you identify the observable criteria you should use as you evaluate your work options.
Note that some of the criteria apply to the nature of the tasks you would perform, and others apply to the work environment—the type of organization you would be a part of, the management style of the boss, and so on. You’ll find that organizations differ widely in important components of the work experience, often even within an industry. For example, some companies have risk-based compensation (options, bonuses), whereas others have predictable cost-of-living-based salary structures. Some organizations set up highly flexible, self-scheduling work groups; others take an intense “all hands on deck” approach most of the time. Some reflect an underlying philosophy of paternalism; others operate with a virtually contractor-like, hands-off attitude. Your criteria should encompass the nature of both the work and the workplace.
Individuals who identify closely with this archetype tend to have the following characteristics:
If you share the values of this archetype, use the following criteria to judge your future work possibilities. Consider each of your options in terms of the degree to which it offers the following:
Examples of the type of work that is often engaging for individuals in this archetype include architecture (creating something of lasting value), construction (individual latitude), professional services (stimulating work), and a wide variety of the arts. Attractive work environments include self-employment and entrepreneurial start-ups.
Companies that want to attract and retain people who place a high priority on the nature of the work itself—on creating something of lasting value—often do things that strongly reflect the company’s heritage, values, and ambitions in unique and memorable ways. Bright Horizons, a provider of employersponsored child care, uses a high-touch recruiting process that emphasizes the lasting impact an early childhood educator can have on young lives. A walk through Xilinx’s hall of patents or past the mural depicting the founders’ early vision for programmable logic devices leaves any visitor with a sense of the firm’s grand ambition. Look for these kinds of signals if expressive legacy describes you.
Individuals in this archetype have the following characteristics:
If you share the values of this archetype, look for opportunities that offer the following:
Examples of careers that are often engaging for individuals in this archetype include those in education, health care, government, manufacturing, and transportation. Look in particular for firms that can offer a predictable, upward path to success and economic security (and note that many simply can’t make this promise). Be alert to evidence that the company is committed to employees’ long-term security; for example, ExxonMobil made the decision to stick with defined benefit pension plans several years ago, recognizing the importance of security in the firm’s employee experience. The Container Store’s investment in training—more than five times the industry average—and clearly articulated progressions emphasize its strong commitment to structured career development.
Individuals in this archetype have the following characteristics:
If you share the values of this archetype, look for opportunities that offer the following:
The particular industry is less important to individuals in this archetype than is finding a team-based work environment. Many seek managerial roles.
If you want to work in a team-based environment, look for specific practices within the firm that require or support team-based behavior. The Royal Bank of Scotland is well known for its every-morning management meetings, in which goals for the day are set collaboratively by the top executives. Whole Foods’ hiring and compensation processes are team-based; candidates are on probation until the team votes that they may be hired full-time.
Individuals in this archetype have the following characteristics:
If you share the values of this archetype, look for opportunities that offer the following:
Examples of work environments that can be engaging for individuals who fit the risk with reward archetype include those in information technology, investment banking, and professional services. Many of these individuals are frequently happiest working for smaller organizations or being self-employed.
Look for firms that clearly signal a commitment to challenge, change, learning, and the possibility of wealth, at every turn. Trilogy, a software firm, uses a highly challenging orientation process to create this culture from the start.
Individuals in this archetype have the following characteristics:
If you share the values of this archetype, look for opportunities that offer the following:
Examples of work environments that are often engaging for individuals in this archetype include backroom work in financial services and leisure and hospitality, because both often offer the scheduling options this group desires. Look for human resource practices that emphasize an organization’s flexibility and empathy. JetBlue’s system for its reservation agents allows them to work at home and self-schedule within their work group, an example of competing for talent on the basis of maximum flexibility.
Individuals who fit the limited obligations profile have the following characteristics (and given these characteristics, chances are they’re probably not reading this book!):
If you share the values of this archetype, look for opportunities that offer the following:
Examples of work environments that might be best suited to individuals in this archetype, largely because the positions have low barriers to entry, include retail, wholesale, and transportation.
. . . . .
The criteria associated with your life lure should be part of your reflections as you evaluate work opportunities. They will help you increase the odds of finding a career where you can really plug in.
In summary, these criteria ask you to consider four different aspects of each opportunity—what I call the “four C’s”:
As you think about what you want to do next, it’s important to think about these preferences. If you don’t get this right, no matter how much you intellectually like the idea of the work, you almost certainly won’t be engaged. If you took the selfassessment in table 5-1, check out table 5-2, which identifies your life lures based on the answers you gave.
In the next chapter, I talk about some of the places where you might be most likely to find your ideal work and work environment—and how those places are changing.
Your life lures | |
---|---|
Column A | Expressive legacy: Work is about creating something of lasting value. |
Column B | Secure progress: Work is about upward mobility, a predictable, upward path to success. |
Column C | Individual expertise and team victory: Work is an opportunity to be a contributing member of a winning team. |
Column D | Risk with reward: Work is an opportunity for challenge, change, learning, and, maybe, wealth. |
Column E | Flexible support: Work generates a livelihood but not currently a life priority. |
Column F | Limited obligations: Work’s value is largely its near-term economic gain. |
AQ:
Source?
3.145.107.94