Original Pronouncement | Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARSs) 4, 7, 9, 15, and 17. |
Effective Date | These statements currently are effective. |
Applicability | Compilation and review engagements when a successor accountant decides (not mandatory) to communicate with the predecessor accountant about acceptance of an engagement. The successor accountant must request the client to communicate with the predecessor when the successor believes that the financial statements reported on by the predecessor are materially misstated. |
Predecessor accountant. An accountant who has reported on the most recent financial statements or was engaged to do so but did not complete the engagement and has resigned, declined to stand for reappointment, or been terminated.
Successor accountant. An accountant who has been invited to propose on a new engagement and is considering accepting the engagement or who has accepted an engagement to compile or review financial statements.
This section discusses the circumstances when communications between predecessor and successor accountants may be desirable and the types of inquiries a successor may decide to make. The section was initially based on Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) 7, Communications between Predecessor and Successor Accountants (superseded by SAS 84; see Section 315, Communications between Predecessor and Successor Auditors). However, unlike the auditor-to-auditor communications in SAS 84, communications are not required in a compilation or review engagement (with the exception noted when the financial statements are believed to be materially misleading).
A successor accountant may decide to communicate with a predecessor accountant when:
The successor accountant should (1) obtain the client’s permission before communicating with the predecessor, and (2) ask the client to authorize the predecessor to respond fully to inquiries. The successor’s inquiries may be either oral or written.
Ordinarily, inquiries would include questions that might assist a successor in deciding whether to accept the engagement. Inquiries may cover:
The predecessor should respond promptly and completely to the inquiries noted above. If the predecessor limits his or her response because of unusual circumstances, such as litigation, that should be disclosed. The successor should evaluate the reasons and implications of a limited response in deciding whether to accept the engagement.
A successor may also wish, after the client obtains authorization from the predecessor, to review the predecessor’s working papers. The predecessor and successor should agree on those working papers that are available and those that may be copied. Valid business reasons (e.g., unpaid fees) may cause the predecessor not to allow access to working papers.
If during the engagement, the successor accountant becomes aware of information that causes him or her to believe that the financial statements reported on by the predecessor may need to be revised, the successor should ask the client to communicate the matter to the predecessor. If the client refuses to do so or if the predecessor’s response is inadequate, the successor should evaluate the implications for the engagement and consider whether to resign. The accountant may also wish to consult with legal counsel.
An accountant who has been asked to provide written or oral advice on the application of accounting principles to a client whose financial statements are compiled or reviewed by another accountant is obligated to follow SAS 50, Reports on the Application of Accounting Principles (see Section 625, Reports on the Application of Accounting Principles).
SAS 84 does not apply to engagements governed by SSARS 4. Furthermore, no standards apply to situations where the prior years’ financial statements were compiled or reviewed and the current year is to be audited, or vice versa. Footnote 3 of SAS 84 indicates that a successor auditor may find the guidance in Section 315 useful in communicating with the predecessor accountant who compiled or reviewed the prior financial statements. Similarly, a successor accountant may find the guidance in SSARS 4 useful in communicating with a predecessor auditor.
Before permitting access to the working papers, the predecessor accountant may wish to obtain a consent letter and an acknowledgement letter from the successor accountant. An example consent letter and an acknowledgement letter is presented in Illustrations.
Even with the client’s consent, access to the predecessor accountant’s documentation may still be limited. Experience has shown that the predecessor accountant may be willing to grant broader access if given additional assurance concerning the use of the documentation. Accordingly, the successor accountant might consider agreeing to the following limitations on the review of the predecessor accountant’s documentation in order to obtain broader access:
The following paragraph illustrates the above:
Because your review of our documentation is undertaken solely for the purpose described above and may not entail a review of all our documentation, you agree that (1) the information obtained from the review will not be used by you for any other purpose, (2) you will not comment, orally or in writing, to anyone as a result of that review about whether our engagement was performed in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services, (3) you will not provide expert testimony or litigation services or otherwise accept an engagement to comment on issues relating to the quality of our engagement.
18.116.35.5