Chapter 16
IN THIS CHAPTER
Identifying independent and subordinate clauses
Untangling complicated sentences
Combining clauses to emphasize important ideas
Clauses are everywhere, and none of them wear red suits and travel with reindeer and a sled. A clause is a basic unit of expression, the fundamental structure that carries meaning in a sentence. Unless you rely on emoticons, you can’t write without clauses. This chapter deals with clauses and their effect on a sentence: what makes sense alone, what needs a little extra help to express meaning, and how various types of clauses and their placement affect the meaning you convey. By the time you’ve completed this chapter, you’ll be an expert in every type of clause.
Clauses are easy to find. Look for a matching subject-verb pair, and you have a clause. When I say “matching,” I mean that the pair makes sense together in Standard English. Bill is watching makes a pair (Bill = subject, is watching = verb). Bill watching isn’t a proper pair. Why? The verb is incomplete. To sum up: Where a matching subject-verb pair appears, so does a clause. Where one doesn’t appear, no clause exists. (For more on matching subject-verb pairs, turn to Chapter 3.)
Q. Oh boy. Ella agreed to attend her fifteenth high-school reunion! She resolved to get a promotion, a new wardrobe, and at least one new impressive hobby before the class dinner.
A. Ella agreed to attend her fifteenth high-school reunion! You've got a subject-verb pair here (Ella agreed), so this one is a clause. The first underlined section (Oh boy) has neither a subject nor a verb. To get a promotion has no subject, and strictly speaking, the infinitive to get isn't a verb in this sentence. Before the class dinner lacks a subject verb pair. Dinner is a noun, and class is a description of the noun (an adjective, to be precise).
1 Was the reunion scheduled for Labor Day weekend? Seriously? Meeting on a holiday!
2 Last week, Ella, who is very interested in gossip, decided to attend.
3 Coming from the other coast, Ella needs a hotel, preferably one with a pool.
4 If she were honest, Ella would admit that she's nervous.
5 To calm her nerves, Ella has begun yoga lessons.
6 Her downward-facing-reunion posture is her best move, which she practices for an hour a day.
7 Ella has also hired a dance instructor, who promises to make Ella look cool or, at a minimum, less nerdy.
8 Having studied ballet, Ella believes that today's dance moves will be easy to learn.
9 Wrong! Ella has two left feet, as her ballet teacher remarked.
10 To make a good impression on her former classmates, Ella will do almost anything, but she draws the line at dieting. More to love, she says.
You can sort clauses into two categories: independent (it can stand on its own, making sense and forming a complete sentence) and subordinate (a clause that must rely on an independent clause in order to form a complete thought). Subordinate clauses are sometimes referred to as dependent clauses. Either term is correct. Check out these examples:
Did you notice that the independent clause makes sense all by itself? It’s a sentence. The subordinate clause just hangs there. A subordinate clause may give you more information about a noun or a verb, acting as a description. A subordinate clause may also play the role of a noun in the sentence, acting as a subject or object. No matter what job they do, subordinate clauses never sound complete. Only when you put a subordinate clause with an independent clause do you have a complete sentence:
After she had read every tweet, Betsy checked her email.
Q. Betsy stares at her phone whenever she has a free moment.
A. Subordinate. The underlined words don't form a complete thought, so this clause is subordinate. In case you're wondering, clauses that give information about time are often subordinate. This one explain when Betsy stares.
11 The pocket for Betsy's phone has never been used because Betsy never puts her phone away.
12 The last time that Betsy left the house without her phone was traumatic for her.
13 Sal, who is Betsy's best friend, told her that she must face her phone addiction.
14 Betsy strongly denies having phone problems, but Sal is not convinced.
15 While Betsy was looking at her phone, Sal removed Betsy's shoes.
16 When Betsy stood up, she finally noticed that her feet were bare.
17 Furious, Betsy grabbed Sal's phone, which he had left on the table.
18 Will Betsy and Sal's fight be resolved, or will the phone feud continue?
In grammar, the term subordinate or dependent doesn’t refer to the poor slob who has to make coffee for the boss. Instead, this type of clause is the part of the sentence that, while still containing a subject and a verb, occupies a position of lesser importance in relation to the rest of the sentence. Subordinate clauses may fall at the beginning, middle, or end of the sentence. Here are some examples, with the subordinate clause in italics:
As you see, a subordinate clause embeds one idea in another, making your writing less choppy by eliminating a series of short sentences.
I think everyone agrees that the conviction and punishment are more important than George’s laughter. In the first example sentence, those ideas appear in a subordinate clause. Furthermore, the subordinate clause is surrounded by commas — punctuation that implies the information isn’t necessary. (Chapter 11 explains this point.) The second example makes more sense because the crucial information appears in the independent clause. You can do without the giggling and still grasp the main idea.
Q. Nadia’s boss held a press conference. The boss issued a statement about “the incident.”
A. I, II. Both I and II contain all the information of the original. In option I, where he issued a statement about “the incident” is a subordinate clause. In option II, who held a press conference is a subordinate clause. Both choices work in different circumstances. Option I emphasizes the press conference. You’d write this way if the boss’s willingness to face the press is the main idea. Option II emphasizes the apology, not where it was issued. Option III doesn’t have a subordinate clause, just a rather clumsy prepositional phrase, with “the incident” being apologized for.
19 Joseph Schmo is a prize-winning reporter. He discovered the scheme to hack every social media account in the Midwest.
20 The boss asked Joe to sit down and be quiet. Joe refused. He was still looking for information about “the incident.”
21 The CIA became interested in the case. The agency sent several agents to investigate.
22 Nadia didn’t want to talk to the agents. Her boss said that her job was in jeopardy.
23 Nadia bought a bus ticket. She slipped out of the office.
24 The CIA may track her down. They will deal with her harshly.
25 Nadia is away. The boss is trying to manage the news media.
26 Nadia has offered her story to an independent film company. The film company is tentatively interested.
27 She wrote a complete account of “the incident.” Nadia put her manuscript in a box.
28 The box has been placed in a bank vault. The vault has a titanium door.
29 Nadia’s closest friends know the location of the box. Those people are in danger.
30 The film will come out next summer. Then the whole world will know about “the incident.”
Do clauses cause you problems? Check your answers to find out how well you understand clause-and-effect.
1 Was the reunion scheduled for Labor Day weekend? This is a clause because it has a matching subject-verb pair, reunion was scheduled.
2 who is very interested in gossip. The subject is who, which matches the verb is. Last week has neither a subject nor a verb. To attend is an infinitive, not a verb in the sentence, and has no subject.
3 Ella needs a hotel. The subject-verb pair is Ella needs. They match, so this is a clause. Did I catch you with Coming from the other coast? This one has no subject, either stated or implied, so it's not a clause.
4 If she were honest, that she's nervous. This sentence actually has three clauses, but Ella would admit isn't underlined. Are you wondering where the verb is in the second answer? She's is short for she is.
5 Ella has begun yoga lessons. The subject-verb pair is Ella has begun. The introductory statement in this sentence, to calm her nerves, isn't a clause because to calm is an infinitive, not a verb, and there's no subject.
6 which she practices for an hour a day. Yup, this one has the pair (she practices), so this one's the clause.
7 Ella has also hired a dance instructor. The pair here is Ella has hired. The second underlined potion lacks a subject-verb pair.
8 that today's dance moves will be easy to learn. Did you find the pair? It's moves (subject) and will be (verb). The other underlined words have no subject-verb pair.
9 Ella has two left feet, as her ballet teacher remarked. The pairs are Ella has and teacher remarked.
10 Ella will do almost anything, she draws the line at dieting, she says. Three subject-verb pairs (Ella will do, she draws, she says = three clauses). Did you select the first underlined portion? The infinitive doesn't function as a verb, and it has no subject. Hence, it's not a clause.
11 Independent. If you chop off the rest of the sentence, you still have a complete thought. The reason Betsy has an untouched pocket is interesting, but it doesn’t have to appear in that sentence in order for the underlined words to make sense.
12 Subordinate. When you start a clause with that, it’s often subordinate, which is the case here. Say the underlined words. They’re incomplete without the support of the rest of the sentence.
13 Subordinate. The underlined words would form an independent clause if they were asking a question, but they aren’t. They’re making a statement — an incomplete one. Therefore, you’re looking at a subordinate clause.
14 Independent. Read the underlined words aloud. Do you hear the complete thought? This is an independent clause.
15 Subordinate. You have a time statement beginning with while, but that statement, all by itself, leaves you wondering. No doubt about it: This is a subordinate clause.
16 Independent. The underlined words make sense, so you have an independent clause.
17 Subordinate. The word which, when it isn’t part of a question, generally signals a subordinate clause.
18 Independent. This one is a little tricky. You have only one question mark, but bring out your reading comprehension skills. Do you see that the sentence asks two separate questions? Question one is Will Betsy and Sal’s fight be resolved? Question two is will the phone feud continue? Both parts of the sentence are independent clauses.
19 I. The subordinate clause in option I lies between the commas. Unless you’re defending the integrity and competence of the reporter, this is where the information about prize-winning belongs. Option III has no subordinate clause.
20 III. This sentence relies on two subordinate clauses to convey information that’s less important than the main idea, which is that Joe refused. The clauses beginning with Although and as he was are subordinate.
21 II. The pronoun which stands in for the CIA and introduces relatively unimportant information.
22 II, III. Both II and III create a cause-and-effect sentence structure with the subordinate clause beginning with because. The location of the subordinate clause doesn’t matter, just the fact that it’s subordinate.
23 III. Your reading comprehension skills should tell you that option III makes sense, and options I and II don’t. Option I is also a grammatical felony — a run-on sentence.
24 I. Option I links the ideas in a logical way, beginning with the subordinate clause If the CIA tracks her down. Option II includes a subordinate clause, When the CIA will deal with her harshly, but the full statement doesn’t quite make sense. Option III contains two subordinate clauses but no independent clause. Penalty box!
25 II, III. The subordinate clause beginning with while makes more sense than although. Because placement at the beginning and the end of the sentence yields the same meaning, both II and III are fine.
26 I. Option I places the subordinate clause, which is tentatively interested, in the correct spot. Option II is awkward, changing the verb to was offered. Option III says that Nadia is tentatively interested — not the meaning you want.
27 I, II. The subordinate clause beginning with after works fine at the beginning or the end of the sentence. Did you notice that a comma appears in option I but not in II? Traditionally, an introductory subordinate clause is set off from the independent clause with a comma, unless the clause functions as the subject of the sentence. If the same clause shows up at the end of the sentence, it’s not usually separated with a comma. Option III, by the way, is a run-on sentence. (For more on run-ons, see Chapter 3.)
28 III. Read the three options aloud and you see that only III makes sense, is true to the original meaning, and flows smoothly.
29 I, II. Options I and II emphasize the danger, something I personally would want to know if I were one of Nadia’s closest friends. The third option emphasizes that these friends know the location of the box. It’s not wrong, precisely, but it shifts the emphasis to an odd place. Did I fool you with option II? This one uses a subordinate clause (That Nadia’s closest friends know the location of the box) as the subject of the verb puts. The whole sentence is an independent clause, with a subordinate clause as subject.
30 I. III. The first and third options set up a time situation as well as a cause/effect relationship: The film informs the world about “the incident.” These options both work. Option II deals only with cause and effect, making timing part of the cause. This option is less logical than the other two.
3.14.253.221