The gap between intention and execution needs to be short and shallow.
—Lee Caraher
As you provide context and color that explain why all work is meaningful work, you will also need to provide direction for the result you seek and explain how the employee or team should get there. You’ll also need to plan to give plenty of constructive and affirming feedback along the way. The result is the easiest piece of the puzzle: it’s the easiest to say and it’s also the easiest to assume that everyone understands. For that reason it’s often skipped over: “Of course everyone knows what we’re looking for in the finished product.” No statement is more false.
While it may seem counterintuitive, when we’re articulating what we want the result to be—a document, a presentation, a meeting, a campaign—we have the perfect opportunity to solicit input and ideas from the team. “The goal is _______. How can we: Make it great? Minimize risk? Streamline it? Put something new into the mix?” You get the idea.
If you have examples from the past that serve as standards you’d like to maintain, share them. “Here’s what we’re looking for. Are there ways to improve this?”
By starting with the end in mind1 and asking for input on how to maximize that end, we dramatically increase a person or a team’s investment and buy-in, and we improve the odds that we’ll get what we’re looking for.
The “how we get there” part of the equation is harder to manage than the articulation of the goal. You probably have a good idea of how you’d like the different parts of the project done. Resist the urge to prescribe exactly how you think things should be done before soliciting input from the people who need to do the work.
Maybe no one will say anything and you’ll get a blank stare when you ask, “How would you like to approach this?” Maybe you’ll get a long, complicated answer that you think will send the person down several rabbit holes. Maybe you’ll get exactly what you think should be done. Maybe you’ll get a better idea than you’ve ever thought of. The important thing is that you’ve asked the question. Be open to whatever you get back.
Our business lexicon is full of ambiguity we don’t recognize, maybe because older workers have a different understanding of the vocabulary.
While it might seem illogical setting deadlines is one of the most common places we find ambiguity in the workplace. Deadlines? Yes, deadlines. When is end of day? Or close of business? Or tomorrow? When is the end of the month? Later? Tuesday? Never. They are never. Whose day? Whose business? In what time zone? Until 11:59 p.m.? At 11:59 p.m. on the last day of the month, even if it’s a Sunday? Tuesday—which one? And later never gets here … ever. As my mother used to say, “I said March; I didn’t say which year.”
You may feel you’ve given very clear deadlines that can’t be misinterpreted, but unless you give a great deal of specificity, your team can disappoint you and be right … and nothing is more maddening.
In the end, the gap between intention and implementation needs to be short and shallow—and it’s your job to describe your intentions with so much clarity that other people can implement to your expectations … the first time.
One of the surprising elements I found in the interviews I conducted for this book concerned Millennials’ different sense of time. “They have no sense of time,” complained people under and over 34 years old.
Managers commented that Millennials “didn’t spend enough time to do the job well,” while Millennials consistently declared that they could “get the job done so much faster” than their managers. Here, dialogue and guidelines help everyone understand the changing work flows occurring today.
Managers, I encourage you to give estimated time required to finish the project well, and to add, “you may find a faster way to get this done. What I care about most is that the project is done well.” Give a clear time guideline while acknowledging that the other person may know shortcuts that won’t affect the quality of the work. Here’s a great opportunity for managers to learn from younger colleagues. Many times I’ve learned shortcuts that didn’t impact the quality of the work that my younger colleagues applied once they tackled the task.
The discussion about the time frame of the work also provides a forum for feedback if what comes back does not fit the bill. If that’s what happens, you can probe how the employee approached the work and pinpoint where shortcuts were taken without an appreciation for how they might impact the quality of the work. In the dialogue you have you’ll be able to reinforce the quality message and discuss what shortcuts or workarounds can be made that don’t impact the final product—you may even learn a new way to cut thirty minutes from your own work flow.
Millennials, I urge you to listen to the guidelines and follow them … at least the first time. Once you complete an assignment as it’s been outlined by your manager, you’ll be able to see the whole picture. Then you’ll be able to improve on it and get the same or a better result, and your way will have a better chance of being appreciated and adopted.
When giving deadlines, be specific: provide exact times on exact dates.
Examples:
This level of granularity can’t be misconstrued. If you provide this type of specificity and your employee or team misses deadlines, it’s not a matter of misunderstood expectations.
“I never would have dreamed of sending an unfinished product to my boss,” says Dan, forty-five. “And now all I ever get are half-assed efforts that I need to totally rewrite to get them done—it’d be faster and easier for me to do the work myself.”
It’s not enough to say, “Please send me the report by Tuesday, September 3 at 10 a.m.”
In interview after interview, managers across the country in different industries described getting work product with loose outlines instead of fully formed ideas, reports, or recommendations ready for distribution. They also complained that they were submitted drafts that were full of inaccuracies, typos, or messy language.
“When I tell people that their work isn’t done I often get, ‘You didn’t say you wanted it to be final’ or ‘I thought you would just fix any problems.’ How is this even a possibility?” says Michelle, forty-three.
It may seem incredible, but in order to get what you want, you need to articulate exactly what you want in your instructions. Always. Do not assume that the other person knows what you mean or holds the same expectation of delivery that you do. Ambiguity is in the eye of the beholder. As long as someone else can say, “I thought you meant” or “I didn’t know that” and be right, you are rolling the dice on the work submitted to you.
Replace:
If you get work full of typos and loose language, send it back and tell the person it’s not ready to be reviewed.
Hi Tim,
You must have sent me the wrong version. Please take a look and make sure that the report [e-mail/memo] is typo free, is in the standard format, uses tight, active language, and is something that I can pass along to Sally. Please send this to me by tomorrow, Tuesday, at 10 a.m.
Thanks,
Peter
If this has happened before, respond with something like:
Hi Tim,
This version is not ready for me to review. Please take a look and make sure you’ve got all of the information you need and that the document is correctly formatted, free of typos, and uses active language and concise sentence structure. I expect this back to me by tomorrow, Tuesday, at 10 a.m.
Thanks,
Peter
And a third time (please, no):
Hi Tim,
This is not ready for me to review. Please take a look at my last e-mail and make sure you follow all of the direction there. Please see me by 5 p.m. today to check in on your status.
Thanks,
Peter
Or
Another common complaint about the way Millennials work concerns the quality of the thinking or work process. “They think the first answer they find with a simple Google search is the answer and sufficient to base a recommendation on,” says Nancy, fifty. Or, as Perry, fifty-two, adds, “They just want to get things off their list so they can move onto the next thing. They don’t seem to care whether it’s done right or well.”
First of all, we all know that less-than-quality work is not the hallmark of Millennials alone—it’s common to people from all generations who either (A) don’t know what quality is or (B) don’t care what quality is. Until you’ve proved that A is not true, don’t move onto B. Schooled to ace the test and not necessarily master the material, Millennials may never have been shown or taught how to vet sources and assemble an informed point of view from a variety of good sources.
While I love Googling as much as the next person, the phrase “Just Google it” is as grating as fingernails on a chalkboard to me. We can prove over and over again that where the first link takes us or what is on the first page of any search result is most likely not enough to create a well-informed understanding of a subject (unless, perhaps, the search is on Justin Bieber).
For anyone new to your organization or team, it’s important to set the tone and provide guidelines for the quality of work you expect before they start. Don’t waste time—yours or theirs—assuming they will know what you expect. Spend ten minutes before someone starts on a project to describe the quality of the work you expect if you want to raise your odds of receiving the quality of work you expect.
While it may seem obvious to you, one person’s full analysis is another person’s snapshot. Be as specific as possible.
For example:
Replace—“I need a full analysis of last quarter’s sales” with “I need a full analysis of last quarter’s sales by customer, salesperson, product, and price point. Please take a look at the last two quarters as a comparison and identify any trends. I’ll look forward to your assessment of any opportunities you think we have. I think this may take four hours.”
And once your employee gets it, you can say, “Great job last time, can you please do the same thing and bring any learnings forward this month?”
E-mail is hell. It’s a hell of redundant messages, most of which are required to get the point across because the originator did not provide enough context, specificity, or instructions in the first e-mail.
The point of communication is to deliver a concept that can be well understood by the recipient. We’ve all gotten lazy with e-mail. Based on e-mail patterns in my inbox, I believe we can reduce e-mail volume by more than 55 percent if we drive ambiguity out of e-mail.
To: Lee
From: Joe
Cc: Quail Team
RE: RE: Meeting on Caller Project Progress
Date: Monday, June 2, 2012 3:15 p.m.
Lee,
I’m available anytime on Wednesday or Thursday. Do you want everyone to report on his or her responsibilities or a topline? Do you want a PowerPoint? Who should drive that? What do you want to see before the meeting?
Thanks,
Joe
To: Lee
From: Liam
Cc: Quail Team
RE: RE: Meeting on Caller Project Progress
Date: Monday, June 2, 2012 3:16 p.m.
Lee,
I can meet on Thursday. Do you want the whole team there? I’m not sure everyone is here next week. What format? Any key metrics you’re looking for? What’s the outcome you’re looking for?
Thanks,
Liam
And so on.
It’s enough to send you into a fetal position under your desk once your hand’s been wrapped in a cast for carpal tunnel syndrome due to so much unnecessary typing.
To avoid unnecessary back-and-forth, drive as much clarity as possible into the first e-mail. Provide context, name exactly who is responsible for what, give deadlines, and provide opportunity for the team to bring to your attention items you haven’t considered or heard about. If you’re using a global e-mail list, call out specific people who have action items—don’t assume people will know they’re supposed to do anything.
To: Joe; Sally
Cc: Quail Team
From: Lee
Re: Meeting on Caller Project Progress
Date: Monday, June 2, 2012 3:14 p.m.
Quail team,
I’d like to meet for a progress check-in on the Caller Project next week either Wednesday at 2 or Thursday at 10—Jane will confirm with you.
Joe and Sally, please take the lead on this with input from the rest of the team. I’d like to see overall status of the project elements with special attention to the Community Plan and Packaging. If there are any other elements that are in yellow or red, please bring those forward as well. Anything on schedule without issues need not be discussed during the meeting. PowerPoint will be best. I’d like to see the report by 6 p.m. the night before—Jane will confirm deadline with you.
Thanks,
Lee
While e-mail is great for keeping track of (sometimes inane) conversations, we get lazy quickly in our effort to plow through it all. And in that laziness we increase the chance of details being lost—important details such as deadlines, formats, or other requirements.
Drive ambiguity out of your e-mail strings by striking the following from your e-mail vocabulary: Start reading at the bottom. Never start an e-mail with “Read from the bottom”—you are just inviting confusion. Bring all of the key facts forward in your reply so that in one screen everyone can see the scope, deadlines, context, and responsibilities.
E-Mail Dos and Don’ts:
Whoever said assumptions make an “ass out of U and me” was a genius. A true genius. For management and Millennials alike, assumptions about an event, project, or rule often mean that the two groups end up on polar ends of the spectrum of understanding.
Management: “I assumed they knew what I was talking about.”
Millennial: “I assume they will help me do the job”
Management: “I assume they know what is expected.”
Millennial: “I assume they will tell me what they want and will give me the tools to do it.”
Management: “I assume everyone just needs to do their job.”
Millennials: “I assume you’ll tell me how my job fits in with the rest of the teams’.”
Lots of assumptions. And too often we learn that our assumptions diverged before the project even started, though we didn’t realize that until after we’d executed a plan to less than satisfactory results.
Why does this happen? Because we don’t voice our assumptions. We all need to get better at thinking about and articulating our assumptions before we start our work. In chapter 4 I talked about how important context is for Millennials—and the rest of us—to effectively engage in the work at hand. A big part of context are assumptions—those factors we take for granted as fact or commonly held (yet unarticulated) beliefs. Beyond the purpose of the project and individual roles in it, take the time to articulate your assumptions and solicit your team members’ assumptions as well.
For example:
And so on.
What does your team expect? Ask them!
And so on.
What happens when things go awry? Too often if we actually take the time to review a project—what went well and what did not, we ignore assumptions that each team member carried into the assignment. And by ignoring them you’re stacking the deck against making the kind of exponential difference you want to make the next time you try.
A good step to take when examining a work plan’s results or process breakdown is to examine the results you got, examine how closely you adhered to the plan (what got in the way or changed) then adjust the plan based only on what happened. If your team does this single-loop process Plan-Do-Adjust, you will be ahead of most teams, but chances are high that you will only be incrementalizing your way forward.
With Single-Loop learning,2 there’s a real danger of repeating ourselves without getting to the root of why we’re disappointed with the results or the process. A better, no great, step to actually fundamentally improving outcomes and processes is to incorporate Double-Loop learning when examining project results. Double-Loop learning puts into the process the step that allows us to align on the assumptions we held going into the project: assumptions about the market and the competition, as well as the assumptions about who’s going to do what, deadlines and dependencies.
By articulating assumptions at the beginning, you will drive ambiguity out at the start of a project. By looping back to the assumptions, not just adjusting the plan, after completing a project, you will be able to plan better for ongoing work.
This is how teams get better together, become more efficient, and get better results: by aligning their assumptions, driving out ambiguity, and continually revisiting the assumptions to ensure that everyone’s pulling the oars in the same direction. And when your team includes people from different generations, double-loop learning gets everyone on the same page quickly and without ambiguity.
Checking back in with the team on process and improvements is not a sign of weakness or pandering. It is the hallmark of good leadership. By consistently driving double-loop learning into the project management, to continually reaffirm or challenge the assumptions everyone is working from, everyone can learn how to drive efficiency into group dynamics.
By being as clear as possible in your direction, you are setting an example for how thoroughly you want your team to work and how the team members can support one other in their interdependent work.
I work in San Francisco, a city that attracts people from all over the world. We come together, with our different cultures and different upbringings, and bring our different perspectives together. No wonder we have issues “standardizing” expectations of behavior. And this is true throughout the country—people I talked with in the Northeast, Northwest, Midwest, South, and Southwest all talked about the same phenomenon.
So how can we get everyone on the same page without feeling like micromanagers? Start early, repeat often, and find fun ways to reinforce standards.
Onboarding is the first in-depth opportunity you have to convey your expectations. During the onboarding process, it’s critical that new employees understand their own role, their team’s purpose, and how they and the team fit into the company’s vision and mission, but it’s also crucial that they understand the cultural and practical expectations of how a team or company works.
Some of the key questions/topics you should start clarifying from day one are outlined here. As you will see there are many different ways to answer these standard questions – the more clarity you can drive into the answers, the better off you will be setting clear expectations for everyone from the beginning.
What are your expectations for office hours? Choose what makes sense for you.
How do you approach conference calls and meetings?
What are office norms?
Is there a dress code?
The company dress code should not be a surprise to a new employee. This should be covered in the recruiting process.
What are the expectations for dinner with the big cheese, a client, or another external partner?
What is the office e-mail etiquette?
At my company, we found that everyone had a different definition of business casual and a different understanding of dining etiquette, as well as varying expectations about other conduct. We began covering these topics in the onboarding process, but found that people benefited from being reminded from time to time.
To reinforce expectations, consider putting the company’s expectations about conduct into a game show format à la Jeopardy or Family Feud.
Etiquette Jeopardy. Fill a wall with your team’s etiquette guidelines, grouping them under different categories. Divide the group into teams; use an Eggspert buzzer to let people buzz in to answer questions.
Player: “I’ll take Conference Calls for two hundred.”
Moderator: “The answer is five minutes.”
First player to buzz: “What is ‘How many minutes early should we dial into a conference call’?”
Etiquette Family Feud. Divide the team into two sides. Rank the guidelines by priority of importance, and assign numerical value so that total number of priority points is one hundred (for example: “Call in five minutes early” is twenty-four points, “Always have an agenda” is twenty, “Turn off cell phones” is nineteen, etc.) Use an Eggspert buzzer to let people buzz in.
Moderator: Name something that is important for conference calls.
First player to buzz: Always have an agenda
Moderator says: Let’s see “Have an agenda!” Survey says, twenty!
The winning team gets lunch or drinks or some other fun reward. It’s dorky, but fun, and it gets everyone involved. Everyone gets some reinforcement out of this kind of game, and you’ve had some fun to boot.
While I think it’s true that everyone could benefit from a quarterly browse through Emily Post’s The Etiquette Advantage in Business,3 that three-inch-thick hardback book is cumbersome and expensive to put on everyone’s desk—and it’s bound to get put out of sight, never to see the light of day. If you happen to have a copy, browse it every once in a while. (Tip: It’s a great gift for college students. They may look at you askance, but it’ll be well worth the rolled eyes.)
Once every two months or so, choose one business etiquette topic and review the guidelines for that topic at your staff meeting. It’ll take five minutes and serve as a good reminder for everyone.
Every two months or so, send an e-mail reviewing the guidelines or clarifying any misapprehensions that may have arisen.
1. EverythingSpeaks Desktop Guide. To make it easier to keep manners top of mind after orientation, I created EverythingSpeaks, a desktop guide to manners. It’s a Lucite box of colorful cards that sits on people’s desks. Each card has a different piece of office protocol, written with humor (I hope) and featuring an illustration that helps make the point. Categories include: first impressions, conference calls, dining out, and so on. This way we can just pull a card for a category we want to reinforce and use them as reminders without being intimidating or preachy.
It’s a lot to cover, but all guidelines for expected conduct need to be described, and in some detail. Don’t let people’s inappropriate behavior make you crazy and build bad impressions of themselves or your company when they probably just don’t know better—really, they probably don’t know better.
18.191.44.23