Project management cannot succeed unless the project manager is willing to employ the systems approach to project management by analyzing those variables that lead to success and failure. This chapter briefly discusses the dos and don'ts of project management and provides a “skeleton” checklist of the key success variables. The following four topics are included:
One of the most difficult tasks is predicting whether the project will be successful. Most goal-oriented managers look only at the time, cost, and performance parameters. If an out-of-tolerance condition exists, then additional analysis is required to identify the cause of the problem. Looking only at time, cost, and performance might identify immediate contributions to profits, but will not identify whether the project itself was managed correctly. This takes on paramount importance if the survival of the organization is based on a steady stream of successfully managed projects. Once or twice a program manager might be able to force a project to success by continually swinging a large baseball bat. After a while, however, either the effect of the big bat will become tolerable, or people will avoid working on his projects.
Project success is often measured by the “actions” of three groups: the project manager and team, the parent organization, and the customer's organization. There are certain actions that the project manager and team can take in order to stimulate project success. These actions include:
In Chapter 4 we stated that a project cannot be successful unless it is recognized asa project and has the support of top-level management. Top-level management must be willing to commit company resources and provide the necessary administrative support so that the project easily adapts to the company's day-to-day routine of doing business. Furthermore, the parent organization must develop an atmosphere conducive to good working relationships between the project manager, parent organization, and client organization.
With regard to the parent organization, there exist a number of variables that can be used to evaluate parent organization support. These variables include:
The mere identification and existence of these variables do not guarantee project success in dealing with the parent organization. Instead, they imply that there exists a good foundation with which to work so that if the project manager and team, and the parent organization, take the appropriate actions, project success is likely. The following actions must be taken:
Both the parent organization and the project team must employ proper managerial techniques to ensure that judicious and adequate, but not excessive, use of planning, controlling, and communications systems can be made. These proper management techniques must also include preconditioning, such as:
The client organization can have a great deal of influence on project success by minimizing team meetings, making rapid responses to requests for information, and simply letting the contractor “do his thing” without any interference. The variables that exist for the client organization include:
With these variables as the basic foundation, it should be possible to:
By combining the relevant actions of the project team, parent organization, and client organization, we can identify the fundamental lessons for management. These include:
The last lesson, project termination, has been the downfall for many good project managers. As projects near completion, there is a natural tendency to minimize costs by transferring people as soon as possible and by closing out work orders. This often leaves the project manager with the responsibility for writing the final report and transferring raw materials to other programs. Many projects require one or two months after work completion simply for administrative reporting and final cost summary.
Having defined project success, we can now identify some of the major causes for the failure of project management:
PMBOK® Guide, 4th Edition
Chapter 4 Intergration Management
Chapter 9 Human Resources Management
Chapter 10 Communications Management
Project managers interact continually with upper-level management, perhaps more so than with functional managers. Not only the success of the project, but even the career path of the project manager can depend on the working relationships and expectations established with upper-level management. There are four key variables in measuring the effectiveness of dealing with upper-level management. These variables are credibility, priority, accessibility, and visibility:
PMBOK® Guide, 4th Edition
Chapter 9 Human Resources Management
Chapter 10 Commnunications Management
In the project management environment, the project managers, team members, and upper-level managers each have expectations of what their relationships should be with the other parties. To illustrate this, top management expects project managers to:
At first glance, it may appear that these qualities are expected of all managers, not necessarily project managers. But this is not true. The first four items are different. The line managers are not accountable for total project success, just for that portion performed by their line organization. Line managers can be promoted on their technical ability, not necessarily on their ability to write effective reports. Line managers cannot disrupt an entire organization, but the project manager can. Line managers do not necessarily have to make decisions, just provide alternatives and recommendations.
Just as top management has expectations of project managers, project managers have certain expectations of top management. Project management expects top management to:
The project team also has expectations of their leader, the project manager. The project team expects the project manager to:
In order to provide high task efficiency and productivity, a project team should have certain traits and characteristics. A project manager expects the project team to:
Team members want, in general, to fill certain primary needs. The project manager should understand these needs before demanding that the team live up to his expectations. Members of the project team need:
Project managers must remember that team members may not always be able to verbalize these needs, but they exist nevertheless.
PMBOK® Guide, 4th Edition
Professional Responsibility Task #2—Contribute to the PM Knowledge Base
Lessons can be learned from each and every project, even if the project is a failure. But many companies do not document lessons learned because employees are reluctant to sign their names to documents that indicate they made mistakes. Thus employees end up repeating the mistakes that others have made.
Today, there is increasing emphasis on documenting lessons learned. Boeing maintains diaries of lessons learned on each airplane project. Another company conducts a postimplementation meeting where the team is required to prepare a three- to five-page case study documenting the successes and failures on the project. The case studies are then used by the training department in preparing individuals to become future project managers. Some companies even mandate that project managers keep project notebooks documenting all decisions as well as a project file with all project correspondence. On large projects, this may be impractical.
Most companies seem to prefer postimplementation meetings and case study documentation. The problem is when to hold the postimplementation meeting. One company uses project management for new product development and production. When the first production run is complete, the company holds a postimplementation meeting to discuss what was learned. Approximately six months later, the company conducts a second postimplementation meeting to discuss customer reaction to the product. There have been situations where the reaction of the customer indicated that what the company thought they did right turned out to be a wrong decision. A follow-up case study is now prepared during the second meeting.
PMBOK® Guide, 4th Edition
Professional Responsibility Task #2—Contribute to the PM Knowledge Base
One of the benefits of understanding the variable of success is that it provides you with a means for capturing and retaining best practices. Unfortunately this is easier said than done. There are multiple definitions of a best practice, such as:
In the author's opinion, best practices are those actions or activities undertaken by the company or individuals that lead to a sustained competitive advantage in project management.
It has only been in recent years that the importance of best practices has been recognized. In the early years of project management, there were misconceptions concerning project management. Some of the misconceptions included:
As project management evolved, best practices became important. Best practices can be learned from both successes and failures. In the early years of project management, private industry focused on learning best practices from successes. The government, however, focused on learning about best practices from failures. When the government finally focused on learning from successes, the knowledge on best practices came from their relationships with both their prime contractors and the subcontractors. Some of the best practices that came out of the government included:
What to Do with a Best Practice?
With the definition that a best practice leads to a sustained competitive advantage, it is no wonder that some companies were reluctant to make their best practices known to the general public. Therefore, what should a company do with its best practices if not publicize them? The most common options available include:
Even though companies collect best practices, not all best practices are shared outside of the company, even during benchmarking studies where all parties are expected to share information. Students often ask why textbooks do not include more information on detailed best practices such as forms and templates. One company commented to the author:
We must have spent at least $1 million over the last several years developing an extensive template on how to evaluate the risks associated with transitioning a project from engineering to manufacturing. Our company would not be happy giving this template to everyone who wants to purchase a book for $80. Some best practices templates are common knowledge and we would certainly share this information. But we view the transitioning template as proprietary knowledge not to be shared.
Critical Questions
There are several questions that must be addressed before an activity is recognized as a best practice. Three frequently asked questions are:
Some organizations have committees that have as their primary function the evaluation of potential best practices. Other organizations use the PMO to perform this work. These committees most often report to senior levels of management.
There is a difference between lessons learned and best practices. Lessons learned can be favorable or unfavorable, whereas best practices are usually favorable outcomes.
Evaluating whether or not something is a best practice is not time-consuming, but it is complex. Simply believing that an action is a best practice does not mean that it is a best practice. PMOs are currently developing templates and criteria for determining whether an activity may qualify as a best practice. Some items that may be included in the template are:
One company had two unique characteristics in its best practices template:
Executives must realize that these best practices are, in fact, intellectual property to benefit the entire organization. If the best practice can be quantified, then it is usually easier to convince senior management.
Levels of Best Practices
Best practices can be discovered anywhere within or outside an organization. Figure 9-1 shows various levels of best practices. The bottom level is the professional standards level, which would include professional standards as defined by PMI®. The professional standards level contains the greatest number of best practices, but they are general rather than specific and have a low level of complexity.
The industry standards level identifies best practices related to performance within the industry. For example, the automotive industry has established standards and best practices specific to the auto industry.
As we progress to the individual best practices in Figure 9-1, the complexity of the best practices goes from general to very specific applications and, as expected, the quantity of best practices is less. An example of a best practice at each level might be (from general to specific):
Best practices can be extremely useful during strategic planning activities. As shown in Figure 9-2, the bottom two levels may be more useful for project strategy formulation whereas the top three levels are more appropriate for the execution of a strategy.
Common Beliefs
There are several common beliefs concerning best practices. A partial list includes:
Care must be taken that the implementation of a best practice does not lead to detrimental results. One company decided that the organization must recognize project management as a profession in order to maximize performance and retain qualified people. A project management career path was created and integrated into the corporate reward system.
Unfortunately the company made a severe mistake. Project managers were given significantly larger salary increases than line managers and workers. People became jealous of the project managers and applied for transfer into project management thinking that the “grass was greener.” The company's technical prowess diminished and some people resigned when not given the opportunity to become project managers.
Companies can have the greatest intentions when implementing best practices and yet detrimental results can occur. Table 9-1 identifies some possible expectations and the detrimental results that can occur. The poor results could have been the result of poor expectations or not fully understanding the possible ramifications after implementation.
There are other reasons why best practices can fail or provide unsatisfactory results. These include:
Best Practices Library
With the premise that project management knowledge and best practices are intellectual property, how does a company retain this information? The solution is usually the creation of a best practices library. Figure 9-3 shows the three levels of best practices that seem most appropriate for storage in a best practices library.
Figure 9-4 shows the process of creating a best practices library. The bottom level is the discovery and understanding of what is or is not a “potential” best practice. The sources for potential best practices can originate anywhere within the organization.
The next level is the evaluation level to confirm that it is a best practice. The evaluation process can be done by the PMO or a committee but should have involvement by the senior levels of management. The evaluation process is very difficult because a one-time positive occurrence may not reflect a best practice. There must exist established criteria for the evaluation of a best practice.
Once it is agreed upon that a best practice exists, it must be classified and stored in some retrieval system such as a company intranet best practices library.
Figure 9-1 shows the levels of best practices, but the classification system for storage purposes can be significantly different. Figure 9-5 shows a typical classification system for a best practices library.
The purpose for creating a best practices library is to transfer knowledge to employees. The knowledge can be transferred through the company intranet, seminars on best practices, and case studies. Some companies require that the project team prepare case studies on lessons learned and best practices before the team is disbanded. These companies then use the case studies in company-sponsored seminars. Best practices and lessons learned must be communicated to the entire organization. The problem is determining how to do it effectively.
Another critical problem is best practices overload. One company started up a best practices library and, after a few years, had amassed hundreds of what were considered to be best practices. Nobody bothered to reevaluate whether or not all of these were still best practices. After reevaluation had taken place, it was determined that less than one-third of these were still regarded as best practices. Some were no longer best practices, others needed to be updated, and others had to be replaced with newer best practices.
This section is applicable as a review of the principles to support the knowledge areas and domain groups in the PMBOK® Guide. This chapter addresses:
Understanding the following principles is beneficial if the reader is using this text to study for the PMP® Certification Exam:
The following multiple-choice questions will be helpful in reviewing the principles of this chapter:
9–1 What is an effective working relationship between project managers themselves?
9–2 Must everyone in the organization understand the “rules of the game” for project management to be effective?
9–3 Defend the statement that the first step in making project management work must be a complete definition of the boundaries across which the project manager must interact.
1. This section and Section 9.3 are adapted from Seminar in Project Management Workbook, copyright 1977 by Hans J. Thamhain. Reproduced by permission of Dr. Hans J. Thamhain.
3.147.65.247