What’s the point in doing things the same way time after time? Variety is not only the spice of life but trying different ways to solve the same problem eventually leads you to better solutions.
Ideas are the fuel for organisations. What you do with those ideas, and how you convert them into action and improvements, is what then makes the organisation grow and prosper. Space for improvement can be readily found in all areas, especially in technique, systems, presentation, recruitment and performance. All retailers can benefit from a culture of everyday performance improvement but few try to. Don Taylor and Jeanne Smalling Archer, authors of the very helpful Up Against the Wal-Marts call this “kaizen”, as does Julian Richer in his awesome book The Richer Way. Others use different names for the same thing. Kaizen is Japanese for “continuous improvement involving everyone” and is a pretty good summation of the challenge.
Improvement in this sense isn’t necessarily about massive earth-shattering changes. What we are looking for are those everyday improvements: improvements in the ways in which we look after each other, our relationships with customers and the quality and relevance of our processes. A typical example might be the discovery that one piece of paperwork can be integrated with some other process rather than dealt with separately. Combining the two will save money and time – so that’s an improvement. It could be the realisation that the rules of a promotion we’ve created can be simplified to the benefit of the customer, and that is an improvement too.
You will need to have two things in place:
If you were to look at just 1 task or process in each daily team meeting, you will have 7 improvements each week, 30 for the month and 365 over a year. That’s awesome. Okay, so maybe you won’t get into this every day but you will still generate a significant store of improvement ideas every month. Working in this way is easy. You are not attempting to change the world in a day, you are just looking to change one little thing at a time.
Do you currently change anything each month? Does change only ever happen dramatically once a year? Doing it a little better every time puts you in the driving seat of change. Your team becomes a valuable engine of change.
Plenty of otherwise sensible people believe that you cannot improve that which you cannot measure. That’s dangerous, wrong even, and here’s why: some of the most effective customer satisfaction-improving tools are unmeasurable in a conventional sense. Smiling at a customer turns out to be one of the most effective ways to make them feel better about you and your company. How do you measure the number of smiles your team gives out?
Here’s something to think about. A number of aspects of sexual performance can be measured. Factors such as duration, the dimensions of various body parts, room temperature, heart beats per minute can all be easily recorded and measured (you might need somebody with a clipboard to come in and write this stuff down for you, though). But do any of these factors automatically add up to guaranteed great sex? Of course not, as there is a deeper set of emotional, compatibility elements, a sprinkle of chemistry and magic even.
Measuring the wrong things is a real trap. This is a grim example but it’s worth telling. A US Army general noticed that the daily success of the Vietnam War was being measured by relative casualty rates. A measure as crude and unpleasant as “if we kill more of them than they do of us, then we must be winning”. Convinced this measure did not convey a useful picture, this general, instead, created a set of metrics that, also took into account territory, specific objectives, political and economic cost.
It is what the general said about his reasons for doing this that is absolutely relevant to retailing. He said: “We are only making important that which we can easily measure when instead we should be measuring only that which is important.” Just because you can measure unit sales easily, for example, does not make that the most important part of your business to concentrate your improvement efforts in. Customer satisfaction is harder to measure but far more important because it relates to unit sales made today, tomorrow and next year.
In the early 1980s, the Coca-Cola Company had become incredibly twitchy about the strengthening performance of Pepsi, its nearest rival. Pepsi had made big strides into Coke’s market and one stat, in particular, had the execs at Coke sweating. In 1972, 18% of drinkers said they drank Coke exclusively against just 4% choosing Pepsi. By the start of the 1980s, this ratio had moved to 12% favouring Coke exclusively and 11% Pepsi.
And that’s when Pepsi pulled its genius move and unleashed “The Pepsi Challenge”. Pepsi targeted committed Coke drinkers and presented them with two small cups of cola, one marked “Q” and one marked “M”. Almost without fail, drinkers would take a sip and choose “M”, which would, of course, then be revealed as Pepsi.
Initially, the team at Coke attempted to claim that Pepsi’s campaign was fixed. But when they then ran similar experiments themselves, they discovered a 53% to 47% split in favour of Pepsi. For the market leader, this was a bombshell – the impact of a six percentage point spread could be measured in millions of dollars in potential lost revenue.
The team were horrified and commissioned a slew of additional market research projects. Each came back with similar results and attempts to qualify the choice for Pepsi began to suggest that Americans had fallen out of love with Coke’s distinct “bite”. What was once described as “refreshing” became “harsh”. The same tasters began to associate words like “smooth” and “rounded” with Pepsi and went on to suggest they preferred these attributes.
Roy Stout was the head of Coke’s consumer marketing research team and is the man who made the connection between losing market share and product taste. He reasoned: “If we have twice as many vending machines, have more shelf space, spend more on advertising, and are competitively priced, why are we losing [market share]? You look at the Pepsi Challenge and you have to begin asking about taste.”
This bombshell drove the board at Coke to make an extraordinary decision. It would change the hitherto sacred and world-famous secret Coke recipe to take account of the perceived change in America’s cola preferences. And thus was born “New Coke”, which had a lighter and sweeter taste, a taste more like Pepsi, in fact.
Early test results were good. New Coke pulled level with Pepsi on blind tasting preferences. A little more tinkering followed and New Coke began to pull out a persistent 6 to 8% lead. The board then took the decision to take it to market and launched a massive campaign behind the new formula.
All the research said New Coke would be a winner.
It failed and failed dramatically. Tens of thousands of Coke drinkers rose up in protest, sales of the new drink faltered and, cutting a long story short, the company was forced into a humiliating climbdown and reintroduced the original formula as Classic Coke. Very shortly afterwards, sales of New Coke all but evaporated.
Why? The flaw was, in hindsight, a very simple one. Coke has a predominantly citrusy-burst flavour whereas Pepsi has a more raisiny-vanilla taste. Take one or two sips of Coke and the experience is quite sharp, the bite is very strong. Do the same with a can of Pepsi and the first gulps are much smoother, sweeter and gentler on the palate.
But drink a whole can of either cola and the experience changes completely. And this is the flaw – Coke drinkers like the way a can of coke tastes but they don’t entirely like the first few sips. Coke drinkers who prefer the first sips of Pepsi when tested blind often complain of a cloying sweetness when they then go on to drink the whole can.
New Coke is a fantastic example of an entire company both putting too much emphasis on the research and ignoring instinct and emotion. So what were the real reasons for Coke’s slipping market share?
Consensus of opinion is that Coke had allowed its marketing spend to mature along with the product. It had failed to sell to the younger, hipper cola drinkers Pepsi had become so adept at communicating with. Coke’s customers were leaching away to a preference for coffee and later bottled waters whereas Pepsi’s were still enjoying rotting their teeth on “The Choice of a New Generation”.
I’m not entirely discrediting management by numbers but stories like this one go a long way to proving that without the emotional context you don’t have the full story.
Some specific statistics and background information here are sourced from the version of this case study related in Blink by Malcolm Gladwell.
Use your gut feel and allow yourself to apply improvements, even to those processes, tasks and interactions to which you are unable to attach numbers. I’d like to ask you to consider valuing the power of your gut feel more highly. Gut feel isn’t random. It’s a guide, an instinct that tells you a certain path may be the right one to take. It is also that good sense that tells you not to do something. But it needs tuning. Books like this one exist to help you separate out correct gut feel judgements from other emotional factors such as fear or laziness.
Behavioural science is now beginning to come round to seeing gut feel as something real and valuable. There is a lot of credible recent research that suggests decisions made on gut feel are more often than not the carefully calculated result of our experience and knowledge and that instinctive gut feel decisions get better as we add new experiences and knowledge to our memories. Think of your gut feel as a potent business weapon, a weapon that is unique to you.
Again, it’s worth reading Daniel Kahneman’s Thinking Fast and Slow for more insight into this process.
Let’s do it a little better every time. As well as running through ways to apply this idea at team meetings, you will need to create an environment in which the team feels comfortable to try things and suggest things. If you are the kind of person who greets every new idea with “I’d love to change that but…” or “I can’t see that working”, then soon people will stop trying and suggesting. Equally, if members of the team feel that you are likely to discipline them for making mistakes, then no one is going to want to try anything new for fear of punishment.
Get the culture of improvement established. Allow your people to question how they do things and you will benefit enormously. Make that an everyday occurrence: little steps but lots of them, and you and your customers will feel those improvements take hold.
The best retailers do not stand still when successful. They strive to keep the momentum, keep growing and keep moving forward. That growth and movement is inspired by tiny little everyday improvements just as much as it is by sweeping change.
Here are some of the categories in which you will always be able to find lots of opportunities to improve things. The thoughts listed here are a deliberate mix of actual ideas and of pointers to get you looking in the right places for ideas of your own.
You might like to pick out a single line during daily team meetings and have the team come up with some thoughts and ideas on that theme.
We are still in the early Wild West days of selling online. Nobody really knows all of the rules. Not even Amazon would make that claim. More than that, Amazon is never satisfied that it has all the answers, that it is the only one doing everything right – quite the opposite, in fact. Amazon makes extensive use of a technique called A/B testing and you should too.
At its simplest, A/B testing is a method for testing a variation on a current webpage, so customer X might see the usual A version but customer Y might see the B version. More dynamic versions of the tool may constantly offer even the same customer subtly different versions of the page as well as doing so across customers, types, territories and whatever other grouping metrics are useful. In both cases, you can quickly see if changing elements of the page change customer behaviours.
Things to test can be as small as the size of a specific button, to as big as a full redesign and all points in between. If yours is a large business, then your IT team will, almost certainly, be on top of this tool but, even if you are smaller, or even a one-off, then A/B testing is still available cost-effectively for you too. There are loads of third-party consultants and some platforms even build it in. Explore your options and get testing.
Even in physical stores, you can operate a version of A/B testing and this isn’t done often enough. Take an area such as the entranceway and play with versions of it across small numbers of stores. Test variation A across three stores versus three similar B control stores. Then swap back to the original in the test stores and put variation A into the three control stores. Measure footfall, conversion and ATV. You should be testing small variations such as these pretty much all the time and then rolling the learning into the wider estate. To make this easier, make sure your shopfitters and retail designers have considered modular fixtures in their format development. Modular means you can play with combinations at low cost and low risk.
There is one golden rule, and it should be obvious: A/B testing only works if you test just one change at a time. If your variation includes more than one difference, how will you know which one of those worked? Or worse, one might have worked but the others failed but you would only see the failure. So one change in colour on a page, one variation of a click box, one change of message. Online you can simultaneously test lots of those separately of course: 10,000 visitors, 2,000 see the original, 2,000 see variation one, 2,000 see variation two, etc.
Interpreting what constitutes one change in a physical environment can be trickier. Is one bit of POS enough of a change to test? Does it mean a whole display? I tend to believe in physical spaces; one family change counts as one thing: swapping all of one type of POS to a different colour or changing one display unit.
18.191.166.122