This chapter addresses the information collection and basic analysis of the subject company. A firm understanding of the company, supported by documentation, is necessary in order to effectively make comparisons under both the income and market methods. What we are really assessing is, according to Eddie Davis: “people, processes, and profits.”
No matter how complex a company or situation may seem while working through a valuation, when complete, the valuation analyst should be able to provide a concise and clear analysis. If the analyst cannot do that, then more work is needed. Being able to simplify is a major indication that you are achieving the Art of Business Valuation. Companies are people, processes, and profits. This chapter is about understanding the company.
An engagement to estimate value results in either an opinion or conclusion, or a calculation. In all these cases, the estimate needs to be based on the combination of facts and the opinions of key people inside and outside the company, the assumptions provided to the valuator as well as the assumptions made, and estimates performed by the valuator. Here we are going to look at the documents, forms, and possible interviews used to build a foundation for the statement of value.
A detailed document request could be worded like this:
We have been engaged to prepare a valuation. Please provide all information requested below. If the information does not exist, please note on the form and return with the information. Thank you for your patience and assistance.
Subject company backbone documents are those documents that provide the framework of the business valuation. They are the starting point of the analysis. They provide documentation to build a historic financial model of the subject company. When collecting the documents and entering and reviewing them, remember the following:
Now a little more detail on key documents. Many of these documents are addressed in much more detail in Chapter 11, “Accounting Issues with Small and Very Small Businesses.”
These documents provide the information to determine cash flows and make adjustments so the comparables and the subject company are using comparable measures for cash flow. The data will also be valuable in assessing the quality of the company as it compares to the comparables under the market method. The income method uses the same processes to adjust cash flows.
Enterprise value is the value of the company itself. It is equal to the value of a 100% interest in the stock or assets of the company.
Lease terms need to be reviewed. In one mall lease, the business had agreed to give 10% of the sales price (not equity after debt) to the landlord. In another retail lease, rent went from $100,000 per year to $150,000 at the extension. Other landlords are known to not cooperate with assignments, no matter what the lease says. These are difficult matters that greatly impact business value for businesses with advantages due to location or rate.
Finally, is the company subject to percentage rent? These are common in malls and high end retail locations. In those cases, ask if the landlord has performed an audit or if the client prepared an excess revenue worksheet to calculate additional rent.
Most of the remainder of the documents on the list relate to valuing interests which constitute less than 100% interest in the company and will be discussed in Chapter 9, Valuing Partial Interests in a Business.
Creating an apples-to-apples cash flow is a major component of doing a business valuation. Here we will list a few documents that may be required to verify add-backs. In general, if the valuation is a calculation, for internal use, and is not for dispute purposes “taking the seller at his word” is often acceptable. Do properly document the level of documentation and examination you are performing in your engagement agreement letter and report. Make your level of examination clear in the report also, just in case the report is given to a third party. Clarity is a valuator's best defense.
This list is assuming there is not a situation requiring forensic accounting-type work which is not covered in this book. Do note that the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Standards for Forensic Services No. 1 becomes effective for engagements accepted on or after January 1, 2020. If an engagement is for litigation or investigation purposes, review and comply with the new standards.
TABLE 4.1 Sample Family Add-back Chart
Name | Relation | Title | Salary | Employer Payroll Tax | Auto | Health Ins | 401(K) | Other | Total Benefit | Estimated Labor Value | EBITDA Adjustment | SDE Adjustment |
Mary Smith | Owner | $100,000 | $8,000 | $10,000 | $20,000 | $5,000 | $10,000 | $153,000 | $150,000 | $3,000 | $153,000 | |
Sam Smith | Spouse | Bookkeeper | $50,000 | $4,000 | $10,000 | $2,500 | $5,000 | $71,500 | $20,000 | $51,500 | $51,500 | |
Tammy Smith | Daughter | Labor | $45,000 | $3,600 | $5,000 | $2,200 | $55,800 | $12,000 | $43,800 | $43,800 | ||
Theo Smith | Son | Driver | $65,000 | $5,200 | $3,000 | $73,200 | $50,000 | $23,200 | $23,200 | |||
Notes: EBITDA Add-Back | $121,500 | |||||||||||
SDE Add Back (Includes all of Mary's compensation unless already added back elsewhere) | $271,500 | |||||||||||
It was reported by Mary Smith that: | ||||||||||||
Sam Smith works on Saturday putting the books together. Payroll is done by an outside service. | ||||||||||||
Tammy Smith is at college four hours away and works about 3-4 months per year. | ||||||||||||
Theo Smith graduated college last year and does a variety of things. It is hoped he will stay. |
Notes:
This is viewing all benefits as part of compensation. Often each benefit will be added back and just salary adjusted.
Estimated Labor Value Calculations–pull data from Census or other source along with local knowledge
Mary Smith - This $3,000 adjustment would only be made for EBITDA. Using SDE, her entire compensation is an add-back.
Sam Smith - 8 hours a week times $40 per hour times 52 = $20,000.
Tammy Smith - 8 hours a day $16 per hour 90 days per year = $12,000
Theo Smith - Maybe the most difficult as it is unclear what his role really is. Likely to depend on starting pay scale in industry.
Questionnaires and management interviews are where the valuator really learns what is under the hood of the business. I refer to many of these factors as “soft” factors. Soft factors tie into motivations, culture, attitude and can be difficult to understand and quantify.
The financial information is a type of score. It indicates success or failure financially. The ability to quickly obtain clear financial information is also an indication of organization and effective business processes. Certainly, the old adage that “success breeds success” applies, yet the continuation of success into an uncertain future depends on many factors including soft factors. Those internal factors are learned by asking questions and listening to understand how the company really works.
Every valuator tends to use their own questionnaire. Several different forms and formats are provided on the website for this book. There is always a conflict between the amount of information the valuator would like to obtain and what the small business owner is willing and able to provide. In many cases, if you ask for too much, you end up getting nothing. Remember at all times, businesses are people, processes, and profits.
Does the business have a culture of: “forever and continuous improvement” or “resiliency in the face of problems”? These two factors often are the biggest indicators of future success or failure. They are also cultural matters that may be hard to quantify.
For small businesses, the following seem to be the major areas of emphasis:
In every instance, the history and policies of the company are important. But, the fact is, the most important thing is what the foreseeable future is going to look like. How are these policies, people, processes, and so on going to impact the company over the next few years?
These items need to be reviewed against the following screen:
Again, will the people, processes, and profits in place promote the growth or retraction of cash flows for the business in the foreseeable future?
Questions that may be helpful for major important areas in most companies include:
Product/service
History of the firm
Quality systems are when ordinary people get exceptional results––every time.
Richard V. Caruso
Businesses have many systems, most of which are rarely thought about but each of which is necessary for the company. In each case, how does the company document these systems (usually orally in small businesses) and train the people who run them? Understanding this is essential to understanding the resiliency of the company. Figure 4.1 is a list of systems that exist in a typical business.
Product and Service-Related | |||
Product development | |||
Cost estimating | |||
Bidding | |||
Purchasing / buying | |||
Contract negotiation / administration | |||
Testing | |||
Accounting | |||
General Ledger | |||
Accounts Payable | |||
Accounts Receivable | |||
Payroll | |||
Job cost / Product sales & gross margin | |||
Tax preparation | |||
Regulatory requirement data collection | |||
Sales and Marketing | |||
Advertising placement and evaluation | |||
Lead collection / CRM or other tracking | |||
Website | |||
Events, other marketing | |||
Sales | |||
Order taking | |||
Delivery | |||
Production | |||
Receipt / storage | |||
Production / processing | |||
Quality control | |||
Packaging | |||
Delivery | |||
Human Resources | |||
Hiring | |||
Compensation | |||
Review | |||
Promotion / Release |
FIGURE 4.1 Systems in a Typical Business
In small companies these are often combined. How are new customers attracted? Advertising, word of mouth, commission, independent contractor, salespeople? Some companies and industries are very sales-oriented, such as mortgages and specialty products. Others such as institutional food service and many distribution companies are very customer service-oriented.
How does the business retain and attract customers? Is the pipeline managed or is it more haphazard?
The value of most businesses goes home every night. Even most commodity businesses require service. Service requires people. Many small and very small businesses are labor suppliers for larger businesses.
How does the business attract, obtain, retain, train people? What do the results look like? Some industries and businesses have constant turn-over. Others are quite stable. How does the company compare to the industry?
Is there a culture of forever and continuous improvement?
This really gets down to the culture. Is the culture open, caring, can-do? How does this tie into results and how will it facilitate or hobble the future plans for the business? Employee energy along with a can-do attitude has gotten many companies through tough times and eventually into high profits. This can be a key factor.
Key management team. All employees are important in small and very small businesses. As the businesses grow, the management team becomes more important. Often in small businesses, the “management team” will be an administrator who handles purchases, a bookkeeper accounts receivable/accounts payable (A/R A/P) clerk and a salesperson or two.
It is important to know the age, health, and likely retirement of the management team. Often management teams are about the same age as the owner. If they are all retiring when the owner does, this can be a problem. For instance, a family business consisting of three brothers, one wife, and son, who are the management team of a small mechanical contractor, will have a problem as four of the five managers intend to retire within a year or two of each other.
Is there an up-and-coming “star” in the management team? Sometimes small companies sell for a premium because they have extremely talented sales or technical talent that is staying.
The likelihood of the management team staying with a successful business at a sale is a major factor in the value. Marketability even of a 100% interest is greatly reduced if there is no transition team staying with the company.
Facilities and equipment generally form a straightforward category. It is the stuff used by the people and systems to produce or distribute the goods and services. Important factors to consider are:
As an example, if the company has five trucks and they are varied in age and mileage, that should not cause an adjustment. If the company has five brand new trucks that could cause a small upward drift in value but probably not nearly enough to pay off the loans if the trucks were financed. If the company trucks all need replacement, that will lower value.
Facilities, particularly real estate, can affect a company in several ways and need to be investigated. Some companies have very favorable locations. Convenience stores, gas stations, and the like require long-term leases or owning the real estate to maintain value. They are clearly location-dependent. Others, while less clear, gain significant advantage by facilities location, such as some construction companies with yards close to major cities cutting transportation costs and driver labor, and companies with under market lease rates locked in. Some companies have an unusual build-out that would be costly to reproduce, such as bowling centers.
At the other extreme are companies that have long-term leases that a buyer would want to extinguish. Industrial, distribution, and service operations often consolidate locations to reduce overhead.
These changes may or may not be synergistic. Use of these facts will depend on the overall fact pattern, standard of value, and purpose.
Technology is affecting every business differently but it is affecting every business. A few pointers on different things seen in different businesses:
Concentrations kill. Concentrations are the main reason why small businesses are so much riskier than larger businesses. A large customer or supplier or other concentration can cause major disruption and bankruptcy when relationships end. Small and very small businesses have all sorts of concentrations. Some almost by definition, others by choice. Many concentrations are unavoidable at least for periods of time.
Site visits are an underutilized tool. Site visits are expensive and sometimes just not feasible. But a site visit can tell the valuator a great deal about the company. Particularly when the company is in full operation, the look and feel of the company can provide a greater sense of underlying company behavior than many days of financial analysis.
Preparing for the Site Visit. Often site visits are broken down into three parts. Meet and greet, the tour, and technical questions. Prior to the site visit, whenever possible, all financials should have been reviewed. The company information should be compiled and reviewed. Often a first draft work product may have been developed. From this work, general and specific questions can be developed for the visit.
Things to look for:
One sign of organization is if companies can get backup and detail in a reasonable timeframe. If every request requires building a spreadsheet from scratch, the company probably does not have proper organization in place (or you are asking for unimportant information).
Take notes through the interview. Remember nonverbal cues and look and feel and energy in a room often can say more about a company than questions and answers.
Skipping the Site Visit. Many businesses do not require a site visit to value them fairly. When performing a conclusion of value, if this step is not taken, it must be noted in the report. Small engineering firms, accounting firms, other firms located in offices may not require a visit. A franchise that must follow standards may not require a visit.
In the modern world many elements of a site visit can be duplicated. Google maps can show the location and street views for most businesses. Many retail businesses have pictures of inside the shop and many reviews. Menus, price lists, and other information can be listed on the website. Yelp, Facebook, and Google will often have rankings and references. These certainly tell you something.
Questions and answers can be handled over the phone or using a video service like Zoom. The main thing that is missing is being able to gauge the energy of the firm. Happy people and good energy somehow solve many problems that come up in business. Combine that with earnings and you have a powerful combination.
It is important to take the time to review the critical strengths and weaknesses of the business. Some businesses and certain industries are driven by different skill sets than others. Does this business have those skill sets? That would be a clear strength. A second way of looking at it is: What are the one or two critical factors that allow this company to compete? For example:
Weaknesses come from concentrations and limitations of all sorts:
Of note: What are the strengths?
Typical strengths and weaknesses are shown in Figure 4.2.
Possible Strengths | Possible Weaknesses |
High revenues | Low revenues |
Gross profit margin | Low gross margin |
Profit margin | Low profit margin |
Low cost suppliers | High costs |
Market leader products | Generic products |
Supply contracts | Unstable supply |
Franchise name & relationship | No name |
Relationships with …. | No relationships / unproven |
Customer agreements | |
Technology | Industry technology threats |
Equipment | Worn equipment |
Patents, licenses, etc. | |
Limited competition | Easy entry / lots of competition |
Trained workforce | No available talent |
Managers, others with upside / long careers | Old management close to retirement |
Sales system | Owner salesperson or sales in spite of self |
Manufacturing system | Too much personal goodwill |
Location | Concentrations of any type |
Non-solicits, non-competes | Problems with staff / contractors |
Positive enthusiasm, energy | Lawsuits |
Barriers to entry |
FIGURE 4.2 Possible Strengths and Weaknesses
In most instances the analyst will select two to five strengths and the same range of weaknesses. These should be weighted heavily later in the process when selecting the multiplier or capitalization rate. The analyst can also provide strengths and weaknesses in each section of the business description.
Another way of presenting company strengths and weaknesses is shown in Figure 4.3 which is at the top of the next page.
The name is a bit of cliché but the following are items that can quickly reduce value and need to be investigated. Often they only last a year or two and in many cases they are eventually resolved. Yet, during the time they exist, they may cast a blight over the company and significantly reduce value.
Strengths / Weakness Factors | Comments | Increase or Decrease |
Profitability | ||
History of Growth / Stability | ||
Concentrations | ||
Owner Transition | ||
Systems | ||
Key People | ||
Workforce | ||
Location | ||
Equipment | ||
Goodwill / Customer Relationships | ||
Goodwill / Supplier Relationships | ||
Other Risks / Opportunities |
FIGURE 4.3 Company Strengths and Weaknesses
The company operates in an environment with many factors beyond its control that are going to influence results in the foreseeable future. In this section we will review a few of those factors.
Key important factors to focus on from the economic and industry data are: does the background that the business operates in support growth or will it create challenges to growth? If the external future appears to create challenges, is it reasonable to believe this company will survive and at some point prosper?
In addition, consider how these external factors affect your subject company in ways that may vary from the comparison company set. This could be comparables for market methods or buildup data used for income methods.
For small and very small businesses the impact of the economy on cyclical industries is underestimated in the short run. Many industries are tied into the economic cycle. All types of engineering firms, contractors, home-builders, appliance shops, moving companies, furniture stores, and the list goes on. A few small firms are well diversified and perhaps have a large component of service work but many will have two or three breakeven/hopefully small loss years and then five to seven good years as part of the economic cycle. Very small companies in cyclical industries that carry a lot of debt often do not survive the downturn. Figure 4.4 provides the number of electrical contractor transactions shown in DealStats between 1998 and 2019. While certainly not conclusive, it appears that there are significantly less transactions in the years following the start of a recession (year 2001 had a recession and between the end of 2007 through early 2009 was a recession). This is very difficult to factor into a company value properly.
The most difficult part of evaluating the economy is that most people are pretty optimistic, particularly when things are going well. Obviously economic cycles are such that the best economic times come before the downturn. When times are really, really good, we “should” be downgrading our valuations because bad times are around the corner. For some reason as humans, we have a hard time doing that. It is always safer to look to the last few years rather than really honestly look at the future. Plus, how do we really know? By the way, it's not just valuation specialists, it's also the economists we need to rely on for this information.7
Having spent most of my life on the East Coast in Maryland, it was hard to understand just how much the local economy can impact a business. In Maryland, the local economy is really the regional economy, including much of the Federal government, and it is huge.
Recently having spent time in a ski resort town of 20,000 people in Colorado, which is 45 minutes from the next town (which has 2,000 people) and over 3 hours away from a major city, Denver, it has become clear in some instances how the local economy can be quite different from the regional one. In these cases, when that local economy is really the entire market, best efforts should be made to understand the primary drivers of the really local, local economy and evaluate them too.
Economic data can come from many sources and levels. International, national, regional, and, in some areas, local can all have an impact. There are many economic reporting bodies. A major one is the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve Market Committee regularly provides updates on the international and national economic outlook. The Beige Books provide an anecdotal-type analysis of the Federal Reserve districts. The Federal Reserve of Philadelphia publishes the Livingston Survey in June and December. Therein they provide their estimate of the maximum, mean (average), and minimum forecast of the growth of the economy for the next ten years. Finally, FRED, Economic Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis has an amazing assortment of information, data, and even a downloadable mobile app because we all need instant economic data.
Economic data from international, to national, to regional and even local can be purchased from many sources, including BVR and ValuSource among others.
Industry information is available from a number of sources, including IBIS World, First Research, Hoover's Online, Value Line, and Current Industrial Reports from the U.S. Census, trade associations, and industry groups.
Industry information is the best source of data concerning the future of the industry. Is the industry growing or contracting related to the economy as a whole? Is the industry consolidated or fractured? What are expected changes in the industry? If major changes are expected, does it appear that the company being valued is in a position to benefit or lose out from the changes? Often suggested interview questions and areas of focus are provided.
Many major trade associations report economic data and indicators for their industry. Much of this must be purchased but often some indicators are available on the websites and blog posts and the like. Examples are the National Association of Realtors Economists' Outlook. One of the indices is Pending Home Sales Index.8 Many people believe four months of downward pending home sales is a signal of a recession in twelve to eighteen months. At the time of writing the book, it fell from June of 2018 until December of 2018. It then recovered through July of 2019. We will see if it indicates the next recession.
Another example is the National Restaurant Association data. This information can be quite useful when valuing restaurants or restaurant-related suppliers and service companies.9
Sometimes local associations and boards may have indicative data. For example, real estate listings and sales data are available for many markets and are a leading indicator for many housing-related cyclical businesses.
The Amazon effect is a term for the relentless rate of change primarily due to technology. How is the service and supply chain changing? If change is occurring in the company's industry, how will the company withstand and gain from it––or perhaps it will not.
Remember Moto Photos. If you are under 40, you probably do not. Amazing little businesses that printed pictures in kiosks located in shopping center parking lots with 35% profit (that is not a misprint) margins. Digital photos and phones quickly ended that business.
Industry data and parties to the business valuation are most likely to provide information on technology change. Careful questioning is the best way to reveal these issues.
The Amazon effect has had devastating consequences for many retailers. Yet large well-located convenience stores with gas have thrived. Small wholesalers have been decimated yet ones that provide repair and consulting services can carve out a niche and prosper. Be sure to understand how the company being valued is dealing with technological change.
Financial analysis is important for determining how the business being valued ranks compared to businesses in general and more particularly comparable businesses. For small and very small businesses, which are the focus of this book, financial analysis may be of limited usefulness due to poor or incomplete bookkeeping of the subject company. However, it should be looked at for what it is worth.
One of the most important features of financial analysis is the trends. While attempts to compare a company to comparables is useful, paying attention to clear trends is essential. If clear trends exist, they will indicate if the company is improving or heading for trouble. Remember, the past is evaluated to form an opinion about the foreseeable future.
A concern about all small business comparable data is that business brokers believe that only the top 50% of most small businesses are saleable. Therefore, how does data from a broad cross-section of companies get compared to market data which is compiled from saleable companies? Even more perplexing is how this fact compares when using the income method, which cannot really be tied into any referenceable small business data. When using the income method, we are comparing the subject company data to public companies. Quite a stretch for most small companies.
Comparable data has not had any adjusting entries made. Therefore, when comparing comparable data to adjusted data, remember that the adjusted data results are not as highly ranked as may appear. (A result that appears to be equal to a 70% or better comparable may be more of a 50% comparable, but it is impossible to know the exact ranking.)
Newer versions of market data comparable sale information usually contain data on some key ratios. This allows comparison of the company being valued to “typical companies” in RMA (Risk Management Associates) or other sources and to the actual comparables. But, caution must be taken when assuming correlations between key ratios and multipliers. This will be reviewed further in the Market Data sections.
Common size financial statements convert financial statements to ratios as opposed to dollars. For instance, if revenues are $100 and the cost of goods sold is $65, then the common size cost of goods sold is 65% (65/100). This ratio and other ratios calculated using this methodology can facilitate easy comparisons across companies.
Common size income statements are quite useful for comparing profitability and, depending on the level of data, for comparing the cost of goods sold and sometimes major expenses, such as rent. Major cost and profitability trends indicate if the business is becoming more efficient, more profitable, or if results are creeping away. Often with small and very small businesses the common size ratios change over time and a review of the trends will be more useful than the comparison to commensurate data.
While common size comparisons are important, the analyst must also evaluate the dollars on the statements independently. Both ratios and raw numbers can raise questions and provide reason for further query. An example of a common size balance sheet is shown in Figure 4.5 and a common size income statement is shown in Figure 4.6.
Balance sheet common size statements are harder to compare. Many small companies do not properly maintain their balance sheets. This is most pronounced in restaurants and cash-based retail and other smaller operations. In many cases even if the statement is accurate, the owner moves money interchangeably between personal and business accounts and does not expect the business to be self-supporting without an occasional infusion. In fact, due to the taxation of undistributed income for pass-through entities, some owners distribute all profits every year and then re-invest if they must. Therefore, cash accounts may be artificially low on year-end balance sheets which are usually used for comparison. There can be similar issues with the recognition of receipt of receivables and overpayment of payables for cash basis businesses at year-end. If the company being valued “manages” earnings for tax purposes, request a balance sheet and the related payables and receivable aging for another more typical month just to see what “typical” balances look like.
Adjusted | Historic | Historic | Historic | Historic | ||
RMA | 2018 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
Cash & Equivalents | 12.30 | 1.69 | 44.65 | 28.36 | 44.59 | 64.66 |
Accounts Receivable | 31.90 | 29.45 | 12.38 | 64.38 | 49.36 | 28.71 |
Inventory | 2.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Other Current Assets | 5.20 | 0.00 | 11.65 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 0.00 |
Total Current Assets | 51.60 | 31.14 | 68.68 | 92.73 | 94.34 | 93.37 |
Fixed Assets Net | 39.60 | 68.86 | 28.95 | 6.31 | 5.57 | 6.21 |
Intangibles Net | 3.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Other Non-Current Assets | 5.70 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 0.96 | 0.09 | 0.42 |
Total Assets | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Accounts Payable | 12.30 | 0.00 | 0.65 | 11.14 | 6.43 | 24.26 |
Short-Term Notes Payable | 6.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.17 | 5.39 |
Current Maturity LT Debt | 6.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Other Current Liabilities | 8.30 | 0.00 | 3.74 | 1.63 | 3.02 | 3.12 |
Total Current Liabilities | 33.60 | 0.00 | 4.40 | 12.77 | 13.62 | 32.77 |
Long-Term Debt | 20.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.52 | 9.53 |
Other Non-Current Liabilities | 3.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 81.54 | 53.32 | 33.88 |
Total Liabilities | 57.70 | 0.00 | 4.40 | 94.30 | 70.46 | 76.19 |
Total Equity | 42.40 | 100.00 | 95.60 | 5.70 | 29.54 | 23.81 |
Total Liabilities & Equity | 100.10 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
FIGURE 4.5 Sample Common Size Historic Balance Sheet
Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | ||
RMA | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
Revenue | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Cost of Goods | 69.00 | 72.51 | 78.24 | 64.32 | 72.37 |
Gross Profit | 31.00 | 27.49 | 21.76 | 35.68 | 27.63 |
Operating Expenses | 24.30 | 17.53 | 17.26 | 13.99 | 12.77 |
Operating Profit | 6.70 | 9.96 | 4.51 | 21.69 | 14.85 |
Other Income/(Expense) Net | –0.50 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.00 |
Pre-Tax Profit | 6.20 | 10.66 | 4.51 | 21.93 | 14.85 |
Notes: ANNUAL STATEMENT STUDIES, (TM) RMA THE RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, (TM) and the RMA Logo are trademarks of the Risk Management Association. RMA owns the copyright in the ANNUAL STATEMENT STUDIES(TM) data. The data is used under license from RMA.
FIGURE 4.6 Sample Common Size Historic Income Statement
Source: Risk Management Association, Philadelphia, PA 2018
Common size balance sheets should be compared if the statements are reasonable and include accruals but in many instances little or no weight will be applied as the trends may not be reliable.
Most ratios are a comparison of a balance sheet account to an income statement account. Therefore, most ratios will be of little value or impossible to calculate if the balance sheet is not reasonably accurate. When accurate statements are available, ratio analysis can be quite indicative of strengths and weaknesses.
Huge numbers of ratios exist. Some industries rely on certain ratios. Common ratios that are useful for business valuation are shown below. This is by no means all ratios but they are highly indicative and use high-level data that may be available even with small businesses. The following are the most common important ratios:
Current assets are cash, accounts receivable, inventory, other current assets. Current liabilities are accounts payable and other current liabilities.
The higher the ratio, the more cash available (and presumably the higher the level of liquidity) for payment of current liabilities. A higher figure is good, yet at some point cash should be put to other uses.
Quick assets are cash and accounts receivable. Current liabilities are accounts payable and other current liabilities.
The higher the ratio, the more cash available for payment of current liabilities. Again, a higher figure is good yet at some point cash should be put to other uses.
Days receivables outstanding or days sales outstanding is a measure of the rate of collection of accounts receivable. The formula is:
In general, a smaller number of days outstanding shows good accounts receivable management. But, at some point perhaps the extension of more credit would result in more sales.
In general, higher inventory turn shows efficient inventory management. This can be offset if there are inventory shortages that reduce sales.
Note: suppose the debt = $40,000 and the equity = $60,000. The debt/equity ratio is 66.667%. Now divide this ratio into the number 1 and this results in a 1.5 relationship. Therefore, $40,000 times 1.5 = $60,000. This is very helpful when the relationship is provided and not the ratio.
In general, the lower the debt to equity ratio, the less debt and the safer the company is.
Again, investors clearly prefer higher returns on equity.
More common financial ratios are shown in Figure 4.7.
Liquidity Ratios | |
Current Ratio | Current assets/current liabilities |
Quick Ratio | Quick Assets / current liablities |
Quick assets are cash and accounts receivable | |
Accounts Receivable Turnover | Revenue / Accounts Receivable; Note this assumes all sales are on credit. For some companies Sales on Credit would be substituted for Revenue. |
Average Collection Period | 365 / Average Receivable Turnover |
Inventory Turnover | Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventory for the Year |
Days Sales Inventory | 365/ Inventory Turnover |
Leverage Ratio | |
Debt to Equity | Total liabilities / Total Stockholders Equity |
Coverage Ratios | |
Times Interest Earned | Earnings Before Interest and Taxes / Interest Expense |
Operating Ratio | |
Return on Equity | Net Income after Taxes / Average Shareholders Equity |
Expense to Revenue Ratios | |
Gross Margin | Gross Profit / Net Sales |
% Depreciation, Amortization / Revenue | |
% Officers Comp / Revenues | |
Profit Margin | Profit / Net Sales |
FIGURE 4.7 Common Financial Ratios
Always ask your client if they have access to an industry periodical or association that tracks financial data and ratios. Often these have a cost associated with them. These are often the most useful when available at a reasonable price.
3.17.68.14