2.21. THEORY OF THE FERROELECTRIC DIELECTRIC RESPONSE 61
e electric permittivity (") of the medium is equal to the derivative of polarization P
with respect to the electric field " D @P =@E; in other words, observing (2.41), for any value of
the electric field, permittivity is defined as the slope of the polarization curve.
" D "
0
"
r
D
@P
@E
D
1
˛ C 3ˇP
2
: (2.42)
Let ".0/ D 1=.˛"
0
/ or "
0
".0/ D 1=˛, where "
0
D 8:854 10
12
F/m is the permittivity
of free space. e dielectric constant can be written as:
"
r
D ".0/
1
1 C 3ˇ "
0
".0/ P
2
: (2.43)
From Eq. (2.43), it is obvious that ".0/ represents the relative permittivity in the absence of
a biasing electric field P D P
dc
D 0. According to the Ginzburg–Landau theory, the coefficient
˛ is regarded as a linear function of temperature and vanishes at the Curie–Weiss temperature
T
C
.
˛ D ˛
GL
D
1
"
0
T T
C
C
; (2.44)
where C is the Curie–Weiss constant, which, for displacive ferroelectrics, has a typical value of
C 10
5
K. is implies that the dielectric constant has high values even beyond the Curie–
Weiss temperature T
C
. According to [39], at T D T
C
C 200 K Eq. (2.43) gives
".0/ D
1
"
0
˛
D
C
T T
C
: (2.45)
erefore, ".0/ 500.
Equation (2.44) is considered to hold for jT T
C
j=T
C
1. However, for displacive fer-
roelectrics, it has been found that (2.44) is valid for temperatures up to the melting point of the
material with good accuracy. For incipient ferroelectrics like SrTiO
3
and KTa O
3
(those with
T
C
around zero K having Debye temperature ‚ 400 K), Eq. (2.44) has been found to apply
with reasonable accuracy from 50–80 K up to the melting point of the material.
Note that the terms “displacive ferroelectric” and “quantum paraelectric” are used alter-
natively to the term “incipient ferroelectric.” Both of them refer to ferroelectrites whose Curie–
Weiss temperature is around T
C
! 0 K. Indicative examples include SrTi O
3
and KTa O
3
. For
lower temperatures, far below the Debye temperature T ‚, Eq. (2.44) ceases to apply and
the quantum statistics of the lattice vibration must be taken into account. Among the several
models proposed [39], those of Vendik et al. [63], and Barrett [64] have reasonable accuracy.
e Vendik model reads as follows:
˛ D ˛
V
D
T
V
"
0
C
8
<
:
s
1
16
C
T
T
V
2
T
C
T
V
9
=
;
; (2.46)