Chapter 2
In This Chapter
Taking on the job of educating clients
Showing the value of an outside perspective
Establishing a strong return on investment (ROI)
Making the most of the client’s budget
Considering the value of in-house coaching
Business coaching is above all about change and growth, whether for the individual or the organisation, a process that takes people on a journey from where they are now to where they want to go. The value in coaching lies in the degree of change that you, as a coach, help clients make. The more you can identify the difference before and after an intervention, the more a client sees the value and wants to work with you.
All the client really wants to know is ‘What’s in it for me?’ In this chapter, we help you answer that question, forming such a compelling proposition that the client just has to say, ‘Yes, I want your coaching programme’.
Business coaching and mentoring is no longer regarded as just a new fashionable trend, nor as simply a feel-good substitute for good management. Business people increasingly see it as a valid methodology for assessing and re-evaluating goals and processes and for creating and delivering effective solutions to business needs.
Many companies are increasingly recognising that during and after coaching programmes, things are different. A company will, however, only make so much of an investment in coaching based solely on the idea that coaching will help. Successful companies won’t throw endless amounts of money at programmes that don’t have a positive impact on their bottom line – or, at least, they won’t do so for long.
Coaches therefore need to educate potential clients in the benefits of coaching. Clients need to know how coaching translates into improved results, whether that be
Here’s a popular idiom: ‘We’re too close to the woods to see the trees’. What this saying means is that you can’t see the whole situation clearly because you’re looking too closely at small details or you’re too closely involved to see what a third party might see.
A coach, however, can see each tree. She’s unhindered by history, politics and habits, un-blinkered to all the possibilities. She can bring a fresh, new, valuable perspective to the business. That’s what you need to get across when making the case for a coaching programme.
Most people already have an idea of the value of perspective. You hear people say ‘I need to get some distance from this situation’ or ‘I have to rise above the problem’. Intuitively, they know that distance and perspective help them see solutions.
As coaches we don’t claim to have a god-like, all-seeing, all-knowing perspective of the business. We’re not the subject matter experts, nor do we claim to have all the answers. What we do claim is that we know the value of a third-party perspective and we purposefully bring that approach to work with us, cultivating and demonstrating an attitude of curiosity that challenges and provokes new ways of seeing the business.
A term often used in Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) is ‘looking for the elusive obvious’ – finding subtle, small changes that can make big differences to results. Coaches do that. And beyond the subtle stuff, coaches also spot the self-evident or, as we like to call it, ‘the bloody obvious’! Distance and objectivity enable us to see solutions, options and choices and then offer the appropriate interventions.
An individual or business that needs coaching needs change – something isn’t working or stands to be improved. The third-party perspective enables the coach to highlight where the change can take place. In an organisation, for example, areas identified for change may include
Construal level theory explores the psychology of ‘can’t see the woods for the trees’. In simple terms, the theory is based on the idea that people think in more abstract ways about problems they have some distance from or about problems relating to distant people. Thinking at a more abstract level means it’s possible to be disconnected from the problem, to not be personally affected or associated to it. This detached perspective enables more creative solutions to be considered.
Two levels exist:
Scott was the marketing manager for a software provider. Steve was coaching him in the subject of persuasion and influence, with the view to examine the company’s email marketing campaigns. The brief was to give the campaigns a persuasion and influence makeover to improve client enquiries and increase sales.
Scott’s primary strategy had been to send emails to selected target audiences, and automated replies were triggered by the email recipients’ actions. Scott called this strategy the ‘drip campaign’. The recipients’ actions determined which automated emails were triggered (or dripped out). The automated messages varied depending on whether the recipients opened the email, what landing pages they visited on the company’s website, what they viewed and what links they followed.
Scott announced he didn’t believe the drip campaign strategy was as effective as creating ad-hoc emails. He supported his assumption with statistics he had gathered that clearly showed that when he wrote and sent an independent one-off email, more people read it and took action. Scott was convinced that the drip campaign was a waste of time and ineffective.
Scott had also concluded that the drip campaign simply annoyed people, but he had no evidence to support this point of view. Steve challenged Scott’s point of view by asking him, ‘How do you know this to be true?’ Scott was unable to answer this other than by saying he had a hunch.
Steve asked to see examples of the email messages. What Scott wasn’t able to see because of his involvement over the course of a year was that his ability to write compelling and persuasive copy had improved over time. The earlier communications used in the drip campaigns were less compelling and persuasive than the ad-hoc emails sent out later. It was suspected that the quality of the copy – not the change in strategy – accounted for the improved results.
To test Steve’s theory, new email copy was written using persuasion and influence language. The email was sent to the same database of prospective clients who had previously received emails in the drip campaign. The results were measured, and the new persuasive drip campaign clearly outperformed both the original drip campaign and the ad-hoc campaign, leading to a 130 per cent increase in company sales. An annual £30,000 ($45,000) email marketing campaign generated leads that converted to sales figures in excess of £2.3 million ($3.5 million) compared to £1million ($1.5 million) previously. (See Chapter 15 on how to engage, inform and influence.)
Steve started by asking a few questions to get more specific information about what Alex meant by important and difficult. From the replies, Steve understood that Alex needed to get a bit of distance from the decision and a new perspective. He’d come up with two possible decisions and was in a dilemma over which to choose because the difference between each wasn’t distinct.
Steve led Alex through a ten-minute coaching intervention where Alex visualised the choices and rose above the imagined future, looking off in time to see the futures unfolding to their inevitable outcomes. This intervention enabled him to see the choices over time and then review them with hindsight. Hindsight ahead of time is useful!
At no point did Steve need to know what the subject matter was. All he needed to do was guide Alex in exploring different perspectives.
This simple coaching exercise enabled Alex to experience high-level construal thinking in relation to time and space. As a result, Alex reached a point where the light bulb went on. From the new perspective, he had seen a new choice and another possible outcome. He then tested the choice in his mind, using the same visualisation technique, and was able to see that it was the best decision he could make at that moment in time with the information available to him.
Steve asked Alex the value to the business of this new choice. It turned out that the idea could save the bank £100 million ($150 million) over the next two years. ‘Great’, Steve said, ‘that makes my fee seem very reasonable by comparison’.
Not every new perspective you offer will work or resonate with clients, but many will, and a coach’s responsibility is to help clients see the alternatives and then work through the choices.
‘So what’s the cost?’ or ‘What do I have to invest?’ are questions all clients ask, even if not quite so directly. In business speak, what they want to know is ‘What’s my return on investment?’ and in plain speak, they’re asking ‘So what do I get in return for my money?’
Return on investment (ROI) isn’t always easy to quantify and demonstrate, and existing quality data is often difficult to come by. A rigorous study needs to confirm to the rules of randomised double-blind controlled trials and requires
Some coaching projects require this degree of commitment and professional enquiry, undertaken, usually, by analytics specialists. However, many clients aren’t looking for a detailed report and want to hear from you how coaching equates to the bottom line. So in this section we offer a simple approach to demonstrating ROI to clients.
In business, everyone is a salesperson. All people have to sell something, whether selling a CV so they get a job, selling themselves for a promotion or selling a creative idea to a team. Whether you like it or not, business people are part of one of the oldest professions on earth. Professional coaches who embrace this idea and become experts in selling the idea of their coaching have full diaries and can choose whom they coach.
Sales people commonly recognise that customers and clients buy the benefits and not the features of a product or service. Yet many ineffective sales people still talk about what their product or service looks or sounds like, and not what it’s going to do for the customer, or give her or get her. Customers are only interested in what’s in it for them. The case is the same for many coaches when it comes to explaining what they do and making a compelling business case for coaching.
Consider a networking event. Over the course of the event, people come over to meet you, and one of their first questions is, ‘So what do you do?’ If you answer ‘I’m a business coach’, you may well see people’s eyes glaze over as they back away and head towards the nearest exit. You may as well say, ‘I’m a lice infestation consultant’ if you want to end the conversation quickly. If you’re lucky enough to be given a second chance and the networker (who may be a prospective client) asks, ‘So what exactly does that entail?’, you now have an opportunity to redeem yourself.
You have two options:
The difference is clear. The first set of responses is uninspiring. The second set sells the benefits of coaching.
You can come at ROI from the angle of assessing:
Make a cost-benefits chart.
Take a piece of paper and draw a straight vertical line down the middle. Head up one side ‘Costs of not coaching and staying the same’ and the other, ‘Benefits and value of coaching’.
Investigate the costs of staying the same (not coaching).
Ask good questions that root out hidden costs that may not be obvious to the client. For example:
Examine the benefits of coaching.
Here are a few questions you can include:
In the cost-benefits analysis described in the preceding section, you can see an emphasis on measuring and monetising. Facts and figures are what matter most to clients.
In the earlier section ‘Selling the benefits’, we present two approaches to explaining what coaching is all about to a prospective client. But a third, even better approach exists: highlight the benefits and give examples of measurables. For example:
You can gain real value in being able to help a client see the often hidden benefits of coaching in these areas:
While doing the costs-benefits analysis (see the earlier section ‘Doing a costs-benefits analysis’), you notice the client start to talk about these areas. Monetisation isn’t always possible or easy, and yet you can get real value in measuring to help the client see the value of coaching not just at the consultation stage but throughout the coaching process.
You need to define and agree with the client:
Calculate the inputs: the resources needed to implement a coaching programme.
They’re measured as a cost. For example, the fees for running the programme include venue and equipment costs and staffing costs for the time spent. Assess the costs realistically because they give an accurate measure of investment.
Estimate the outputs: the direct result of the programme’s goal.
So, for example, if five members of staff are coached on improving customer service communication skills, how many customer service issues are you aiming to get resolved in one call compared to multiple calls? The outputs can be best estimates or a pilot study, or the results of the coaching programme can provide the feedback for future programmes and more accurate output assessments. If previous coaching programmes have been run with similar outputs, you can use the results to set the output goals.
Measure the outcomes: the changes that have occurred over the longer term.
So, for example, the five members of staff resolved 10 per cent more issues in one call than before the coaching programme.
Effective coaching brings about change. Sometimes the change isn’t apparent or evident while the coaching is happening. For example, the process of learning a new skill and then practising it until it becomes behavioural takes time. Insights and creative ideas sometimes appear after coaching sessions in moments of quiet reflection. Many developments from coaching take time to settle and create results.
Giving a client this explanation is an effective way of influencing them to notice and associate future positive changes with the work they did with you.
‘You probably won’t remember, but we met at a seminar about six years ago and you did a self-confidence exercise with me. I felt amazing, and you told me to imagine what other amazing things would change in my life. You said that I may look back and remember that moment as being the catalyst. Well, I imagined my business being successful and being able to travel the world. And I just realised in the middle of this exercise that here I am! It’s all come about because of working with you all those years ago’.
Marie’s reply was as follows:
‘That’s amazing! I’m pleased you remembered that moment and experienced your success, which came about because of the actions you took. Now imagine what else can improve and change in your future. Perhaps one day you’ll look back again and acknowledge the work we did here today’.
Don’t employ false humility to disregard this phenomena and not associate with your coaching work. However, you need to strike a balance between bragging and making sure the client associates the positive changes with your work. This example shows how to make the association conversationally. Of course Paul did all the work; Marie had nothing to do with that. However, if a change happens for a client in a coaching conversation or afterwards, don’t be shy about claiming it. Paul became a coaching client after the seminar – a deposit in the karmic bank paying dividends.
Often the first thing a business cuts back on during any downturn is the budget for training – and that includes coaching and mentoring. Even without a downturn, savvy HR departments look for ways to stretch their training budgets to get more ‘bang for their buck’.
Your job, then, as a coach convincing a client to hire you, is to demonstrate value for money by offering a blended mix of coaching that suits the budget of the client and still delivers results.
A benefit of coaching is its flexibility – you can effectively coach in many different ways:
All methods of coaching can be delivered in isolation or in combinations. They can be used for one-off sessions or over spaced intervals, depending on which best suit the coach and the client. Each method of delivery has pros and cons that affect the ROI, especially the costs involved in delivery.
As more companies recognise the value of coaching, they’re looking for ways to get the best value for money from coaching. As a result, coaches are finding increasing demand for them to work alongside existing teams of coaches or to work with the company to develop its own in-house coaching talent and in-house coaching programmes. The company’s logic is that the in-house team knows the business better than people brought in from the outside, and that in-house coaching is more cost-effective than bringing in an external coach. This logic is often based upon a hunch, because as yet little research has been done into the return on investment for in-house coaching.
You can also talk through the upsides and downsides of training in-house staff to be coaches, in case the client decides an external coach would be better. On the positive side:
The following potential drawbacks are worth exploring with the client:
You can make a valid business case for the experienced coach working alongside the organisation to train coaches or to support in-house coaches. No fixed formula exists that has been tested or proven to be best practice – see it as fertile ground for coach and client to explore in search of which options provide the best value. In Chapter 3, we explore how to coach and support the in-house coaches and mentors.
3.12.136.186