CHAPTER 11
Smart Strategies for Gifting Assets to Family Members

One of the most straightforward ways to reduce estate taxes is to give away your assets. However, many people are reluctant to do this, fearing that they might need those assets at some future date. The best way to overcome these fears is to understand how much in assets you'll need in the future. To do this, complete the analysis in Chapter 5. Knowing that you have substantially more assets than you need for your retirement years should make you more confident about giving away assets. In this chapter, we examine the most popular strategies for gifting assets to family members.

The Annual Gift Tax Exclusion

You may think that giving away your assets shouldn't include interference from the government. After all, it is your property, and you should be able to do with it as you please. There was a time in our history when this was the case. The result was deathbed gifts of all one's property in order to avoid estate taxes. After all, we as Americans are quite ingenious at learning how to avoid taxes. But newer laws have changed the nature of the game, and you must follow the new rules if you're going to successfully minimize your taxes. The rules for annual gifting are as follows:

  • In any calendar year you are allowed to give away up to $14,000 per person to as many people as you desire without triggering any gift taxes. The gifts can be in cash or property. This $14,000 annual exclusion is indexed annually for inflation.
  • If you are married, you may give away up to $28,000 per year to as many people as you desire. This assumes that your spouse consents to make the gifts with you. This is called a “split gift.” Again, this amount will be adjusted for inflation annually.
  • Your gift must be a gift of a present interest versus a gift of a future interest. For example, assume that you deeded your 25-year-old son a piece of land, but the deed said he would not receive title until his thirtieth birthday. This would be considered a gift of a future interest and would not be eligible for the annual gift tax exclusion.
  • Gifts to spouses who are U.S. citizens are unlimited.
  • If your gift results in a gift tax, you, not the receiver of the gift, are responsible for paying the tax. The gift tax return (Form 709) and the taxes on gifts in excess of the annual gift tax exclusion can be handled in one of two ways. You can pay the tax on the gift on or before the time your income tax return is due (April 15 of the following tax year or later if you file an extension), or you can use a portion of your applicable exclusion amount for any federal gift tax due. If you remember from previous discussions in this book, the federal tax law allows you to give to whomever you wish, either during your lifetime or at your death, an amount equal to the lifetime applicable exclusion amount free of federal estate or gift taxes. Notice how this exclusion amount has changed over the past few years (see Table 11.1).

TABLE 11.1 Applicable Exclusion Amount Increases (2005–2014)

Year Exclusion Amount (Death) Exclusion Amount (Gift)
2005 $1,500,000 $1,000,000
2006 $2,000,000 $1,000,000
2007 $2,000,000 $1,000,000
2008 $2,000,000 $1,000,000
2009 $3,500,000 $1,000,000
2010 $5,000,000 or $0 $1,000,000
2011 $5,000,000 $5,000,000
2012 $5,120,000 $5,120,000
2013 $5,250,000 $5,250,000
2014a $5,340,000 $5,340,000

a When Congress passed the Tax Relief Act of 2012, the exclusion amount became fixed at $5,000,000, indexed for inflation. Visit www.welchgroup.com to get the current year's exclusion amount.

Unintended Gifts

It is possible to make a gift to someone without realizing what you have done. The result can create unintended tax consequences. Some typical examples are as follows:

  • You add your child's name to your savings or checking account. This is considered a gift the moment your child makes a withdrawal. If the withdrawal exceeds the allowed annual gift tax exclusion, it will be considered a taxable gift.
  • You want to be certain that a particular person receives a specific piece of real estate at your death. Your solution is to add their name to the deed. When the deed is executed, you have just made a gift for gift tax purposes.
  • You decide to buy a security, such as a stock, bond, or limited partnership interest, in both your name and someone else's name. As soon as you designate the joint owner, a gift is deemed to have occurred.
  • Under each of the preceding examples in which you created a joint ownership arrangement, at your death the entire value of the property is included in your estate. This is because you provided all of the financial consideration. If this is not your intended result, you can attempt to resolve the problem by making qualified gifts and filing a gift tax return.
  • If you guarantee a loan for someone else, the guarantee could be deemed a gift for gift tax purposes. Assume that your child wants to start a business with start-up costs of $95,000. Your child has no money or collateral with which to obtain a loan from the bank. You agree to guarantee the loan at the bank. Based on the 1984 Supreme Court case Dickman v. United States, the Internal Revenue Service concluded that the act of guaranteeing a loan created a gift. The amount of the gift was to be based on the difference between the value of the loan the child could have received on his or her own versus the deal they received with your help. You can imagine the difficulty of arriving at an appropriate figure for gift tax purposes. Since this ruling, the Internal Revenue Service has indicated that no gift is imputed unless there is an actual default on the loan that requires you to satisfy the debt for the benefit of your child. If this occurs, you are deemed to have made a gift for the full unpaid balance of the loan less any repayments to you by your child.

Providing loan guarantees can also create negative estate tax results. When you die, your loan guarantee becomes an obligation of your estate. As such, it might not qualify for the marital deduction and could disqualify a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) election. The Internal Revenue Service has issued both favorable and unfavorable private letter rulings on this subject. If you're involved in this type of situation, proceed with caution and get assistance from a competent legal adviser.

Filing a Gift Tax Return

Gifts that you make for less than $14,000 do not require the filing of a federal gift tax return. If you and your spouse jointly make a gift, you are required to file a federal gift tax return (Form 709). This is true even if the combined gift is less than $28,000, and no gift tax is due. All gifts of a future interest, and gifts of a present interest greater than $14,000, require the filing of a federal gift tax return. If your state of residence has a gift tax, you may also have to file a state gift tax return.

The Lifetime Applicable Exclusion Amount

In addition to the annual exclusion, you are also allowed a lifetime applicable exclusion amount. This lifetime applicable exclusion amount represents the amount of money or property that you can give to someone other than your spouse free of gift or estate taxes. If these gifts are not made during your lifetime, they can be used at the time of your death.

Although most people wait to use their applicable exclusion amount at death, it can be advantageous to use it while you're alive. If you own an asset that you expect to appreciate rapidly, you can remove the asset plus the appreciation of that asset from your future estate by giving it away before your death. For example, suppose you own an interest in a business that is presently valued at $4 million. If the business is expected to rapidly appreciate, you should consider giving a portion of your interest in the business to your children, via a trust. If the business increases from $4 million to $15 million, the appreciation is removed from your estate.

Outright Gifts

Based on an evaluation of your estate, you determine that you have excess assets and can therefore afford to begin a gifting program for your children. Now that you have made this decision, what is the best way to maximize the power of your gifts? The answer is to evaluate the different assets that you own that are available to give away. The following sections present a review of the pros and cons of several different possibilities.

Outright Gifts of Cash

Perhaps the easiest gift to make is cash. You simply write a check to your child or other donee. The recipient receives the money and does with it as he or she pleases. The disadvantage is that your child may spend the money unwisely. We have seen many cases where children become dependent on annual gifts from their parents. Another disadvantage is that the money you give could become subject to either a divorce proceeding or a creditor's claim.

Outright Gifts of Appreciating Property

The value of giving away property that is expected to appreciate rapidly is that you are also giving away the future growth. Suppose you give your child $14,000 worth of stock in a start-up company that you expect to appreciate significantly. As it turns out, you were correct, and the stock appreciates on average 15 percent per year over the next 25 years. By making a gift of $14,000 in the present, you have removed an asset that would have grown (compounding appreciation) to $460,865 in the future.

Outright Gifts of Appreciated Property

Some people choose to give away assets that have already appreciated substantially. If you expect the asset to continue to appreciate rapidly in the future, then you will receive some of the same benefits mentioned previously. Gifting appreciated property can have its disadvantages. Some of your gifts of appreciated property are subject to divorce proceedings and creditor claims. Also, if you hold appreciated property until you die, your heirs receive a stepped-up basis. Your heirs could then sell the property and not incur income tax liability from the sale.

Roth IRAs

It may seem strange to discuss Roth individual retirement accounts (IRAs) in the section on giving assets to your children, but one of the true power plays is to give your children the money to make a Roth IRA contribution. Assume that your 19-year-old daughter works summers to earn extra spending money. Her total earnings are $6,500. You give her $5,500 so she can make a contribution to a Roth IRA. Her contribution to the Roth IRA is not deductible, but because of her low tax bracket this is unimportant. The true value of the Roth IRA is tax-free growth. The earnings will never be taxed if she adheres to the following rules:

A qualified distribution is one made:

  • After the five-year period beginning with the first taxable year for which a taxable contribution was made to a Roth IRA in your name; and
  • After she turns age 591/2; or
  • Because she is disabled; or
  • She used the money for a qualified purpose. A qualified purpose includes withdrawals of up to $10,000 in acquisition costs for her first home. Another qualified purpose is withdrawals for tuition payments of qualified higher education expenses for herself, her spouse, or her children.

Distributions of the amount she has invested (called basis) in her Roth IRA are never subject to taxes or penalties.

Although a $5,500 contribution may not seem significant, the results can be quite dramatic. Let's assume that your daughter invests in a stock mutual fund that earns on average 10.5 percent, and she does not touch it until she is age 75. Your small one-time gift of $5,500 has turned into $1,474,519! This is the type of gift you will want to make each year. As an added bonus, because it is a retirement account, she is less likely to squander the money.

When the Donee Is a Minor

If you have decided to begin making gifts to your children, but they are minors, you will need to make special preparations. Although the law allows minors to receive property in their name, no state allows them to sign legally binding contracts, so future dealings involving their property can be difficult. Practical ways to manage minor children's property include using custodial accounts or minor's trusts. In the following sections, we examine each approach.

Custodial Accounts

Most often, assets are transferred to minors under either the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (UGMA) or the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA), depending on which act your state has adopted. The forerunner of these was the UGMA, which allowed an adult (the custodian) to act on the behalf of a minor concerning the minor's property. Under this act, the custodian can invest the child's money in bank accounts, securities, annuities, and life insurance. The UTMA expanded the types of investments to include real estate and tangible personal property.

ADVANTAGES

  • Custodial accounts are easy to set up and make it easy to transfer property. To set up a custodial account all you need to do is open the account by listing the name of the child and custodian as follows: “Richard B. Franklin (the name of the custodian) as Custodian f/b/o (for the benefit of) Sara J. Franklin (the name of the child) under the (your state) Uniform Gifts (or Transfers) to Minors Act.” Transferring title to existing property is equally as easy.
  • To set up a custodial account, no additional documents or agreements are required, so the costs are minimal.
  • Custodians are not required to post any bonds and are not required to provide any reporting to the courts.
  • The custodian is allowed broad powers to transact business on behalf of the minor child.
  • The gifted assets and the future appreciation of the assets may be removed from your estate.
  • The assets can be used for the health, education, maintenance, and support of your child (with certain restrictions).
  • Transfers to custodial accounts are treated as gifts of present interests and therefore qualify for the annual gift tax exclusion.

DISADVANTAGES

  • The gifts are irrevocable. Once you have made a gift, you cannot change your mind later and take the property back.
  • Your child will get legal control of the property no later than his or her 21st birthday. The UGMA requires transfer of the property at the age of majority for your state of residence, usually age 18 or 19. Under the UTMA, some states allow the transferor to select when the child receives the property outright between the ages of 18 and 21. Other states set the age of legal transfer at age 21. If you have a choice in your state, we prefer the UTMA with age 21 as the legal age of transfer. The obvious concern is that children between ages 18 and 21 may not be mature enough to handle money without parental supervision.
  • The assets you have gifted your child may become part of your estate for estate tax purposes. Few states allow minors to draw a will. If a minor child dies, the laws of intestacy of your state of residence determine to whom the child's estate will go. In virtually every state, a minor child's property reverts to the parents. The only way to avoid this pitfall is to establish a trust. Also, if you act as both the transferor and custodian, and you die before your child reaches the age of majority (as defined under the UGMA or UTMA), the property you gave your child will be included in your estate for estate tax purposes. One solution to this problem is to have your spouse act as the custodian. However, this too can be an issue in some states if your spouse is legally obligated to support your minor child and state law does not preclude the use of custodial funds for this purpose. Consult competent legal advice before proceeding. A better strategy would be to choose another family member or friend to act as the custodian. By so doing, you have effectively resolved this problem.
  • Your child can sue the custodian. This may sound far-fetched, but it does happen. Once your child reaches the age of majority as defined under the UGMA or UTMA, he or she has the legal right to request an accounting of how his or her money has been handled. If it has been handled improperly in the eyes of the courts, the custodian could be held personally liable.
  • Income from the custodial account may be taxed to you or your child at your tax rate. This so-called “kiddie tax” is applied to the unearned income of your child in excess of $2,000 (2014) if your child is under age 19; or for children ages 19 through age 23 who are full-time students if you are paying for more than half of their support. That could be the difference between a 10 percent rate of tax (their bracket) and a 39.6 percent rate of tax (your bracket). If you find yourself in a situation that the kiddie tax may apply, a simple solution is to shift the child's investments toward assets that focus on appreciation rather than income.

If you prefer to exercise more control over your gifts to your children than allowed under custodial accounts, then you should consider either a 2503(b) trust or a 2503(c) trust. These are both minor's trusts and are named after the applicable Internal Revenue Code section.

2503(b) Trust

The primary advantage of this trust is that the trustee is never required to distribute principal to your child. The trustee must, however, distribute all the income on at least an annual basis. Gifts to the trust do qualify for the annual gift tax exclusion, but only as related to the present value of the future income stream. For example, you contribute $10,000 to a trust for your five-year-old daughter to last for 30 years. If the Internal Revenue Service interest rate assumption is 2.3 percent, considering these facts, the value of your gift was $5,091, which qualifies for the $14,000 annual gift tax exclusion. Therefore, $4,909 is considered a gift of a future interest, and you must either pay gift taxes on this amount or use part of your lifetime applicable exclusion amount. This trust can also be structured to allow the trustee to distribute principal under certain conditions. This type of trust requires the filing of an annual gift tax return in any year that a gift is made. The trustee must also apply for and receive a tax identification number. A separate trust must be set up for each beneficiary.

2503(c) Trust

We have found that because of greater flexibility and control, clients are more willing to consider the 2503(c) trust arrangement. This type of trust allows the trustee to either distribute or accumulate trust income. The trust document can also allow the trustee to make distributions of trust corpus for predetermined reasons or at the trustee's discretion. Any income not distributed will be taxed to the trust. Income distributed to your child will be taxed at your child's tax bracket if your child is age 19 or older. The kiddie tax rules apply for children under the age 18 or younger and dependent students under the age of 24.

The primary disadvantage of the 2503(c) trust is that your child has a legal right to all trust assets when he or she turns 21. To avoid this result, the best solution is to incorporate a “window” in your trust document. When your child reaches age 21, he or she has the right to terminate the trust and receive all assets. If he or she fails to exercise his or her right within a certain time period (usually 60 days), the child's right to take possession of the trust assets expires. The trust then continues to be managed for your child's benefit for life or until your child reaches a certain age that you choose. As with the custodial accounts and the 2503(b) trust, this trust is irrevocable. Once you have made the gifts, you cannot get your assets back. Gifts to the trust do qualify for the annual gift tax exclusion. By including a special provision in the trust, you as the grantor may be responsible to report and pay all income taxes (ordinary and capital gains). This can greatly benefit the child but is not considered a taxable gift. The provision may even be changed if paying the income taxes becomes a financial burden.

529 Plans

The average costs to pay for one year at a private college exceeds $40,000; for a public college the average annual costs exceeds $18,000. From our perspective, there is no greater gift that you can give a person than the best education that they can qualify for and allow that person to avoid crippling student loans. The single best strategy for funding college is the 529 Plan.

WHAT IS A 529 PLAN?

Created in 1996 under Internal Revenue Code Section 529, these plans receive special tax treatment and are run by each state or by an educational institution. They are specifically for the sole purpose of funding qualified higher education expenses of the designated beneficiary of the account. There are two types of 529 plans: prepaid tuition plans and savings plans. You may open a 529 plan to benefit anyone including relatives, friends, even yourself.

PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS

A 529 plan may accept contributions only in the form of cash and not property. Contributions cannot exceed the amount necessary to fund the qualified education expenses of the beneficiary. Currently, the limitation ranges from about $300,000 to $400,000 but is expected to increase as college expenses continue to rise.

TAX-FREE GROWTH

While you don't receive an income tax deduction for contributions, earnings in a 529 plan grow tax deferred until distributions are made, at which time the distributions are tax free if used to pay qualified education expenses. For example, suppose you and your spouse contributed $100,000 to a 529 plan on behalf of a one-year-old grandchild. This $100,000 would grow tax free until such time as it is withdrawn for higher education expenses. If your 529 plan investments averaged 9 percent, the account value would exceed $400,000 by the time you are ready to begin drawing funds for your grandchild's college. When the funds are then used to pay for qualified education expenses, there will be no income taxes due on those distributions. Qualified higher education expenses include tuition, books, supplies, computer technology or equipment, fees, expenses for special needs services, and room and board (within certain limits).

PENALTIES ON NONQUALIFIED DISTRIBUTIONS

If distributions from a 529 plan are not used for qualified education expenses, a 10 percent penalty is imposed on the recipient of the funds. In addition, the earnings portion of the distribution is subject to ordinary income taxes. Usually, the tax will be triggered when distributions exceed the educational expenses of the designated beneficiary. According to some states' plans, any funds not distributed prior to the beneficiary attaining the age of 30 will be deemed a non-qualifying distribution (some exceptions apply for a special needs beneficiary). Exceptions to this penalty apply for payments made due to the beneficiary's death, disability, or receipt of a scholarship.

OTHER TAX BENEFITS

As an incentive to get you to invest in their 529 plans, many states offer tax incentives to their residents. For example, the State of Alabama provides an income tax deduction to Alabama residents for contributions of up to $5,000 ($10,000 for couples filing jointly).

IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AID

Any 529 plan assets owned by the dependent student or parents of a dependent student (i.e., claimed as a dependent by the parents for income tax purposes) are includable in the calculations for federal need-based aid (called Free Application for Free Student Aid or FAFSA) and will reduce need-based aid by a maximum of 5.64 percent of the assets value. However, funds withdrawn to pay for college expenses are not included in the need-based aid calculations.

Any 529 plan assets owned by the grandparents (or other third party) are not included in FAFSA, but distributions are treated as untaxed income to the student beneficiary. This untaxed income can reduce student aid by (approximately) 50 percent of the student aid amount.

Any 529 plan assets owed by an independent student will reduce eligibility by 20 percent of the asset value.

As you can see, if you are planning to use student aid in order to fund a portion of a child's college expenses, careful planning is necessary in order to maximize financial aid benefits.

INVESTMENT OPTIONS

  • Prepaid tuition plans. One potential downside of Section 529 prepaid tuition plans is that you are unable to direct the investments of the plan. The investment accounts are operated as blind pools where you have no input over specific investment decisions. Most plan sponsors do, however, indicate the general investment approach they use.
  • College savings plans. Most college savings plans offer a variety of mutual funds from which to choose, including money market funds, bond funds, balanced funds (stocks and bonds), stock funds, and age-weighted or target-date funds.

PORTABILITY AND CONTROL

Once every 12 months, you are allowed to transfer your 529 college savings plan to another sponsor. This provides you with the flexibility to switch plans should another become more competitive or should you move to another state.

Whether you are a parent or grandparent, as owner, you remain in control of the account. You get to decide when, how much, and if any money is distributed.

You can also change the beneficiary of the plan assets. This is important because one child may choose not to attend college or may attend a relatively inexpensive college while another child may attend a very expensive college. A 529 plan allows you to move your funds around as needed. The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) included cousins in the definition of family member. However, be sure to check the applicable plan's rules and restrictions for changing beneficiaries.

Finally, you even retain the right to withdraw the money yourself. If you do, you'll owe a 10 percent federal penalty plus you'll have to report the investment gains as ordinary income in the year withdrawn. However, decades of tax-deferred growth could well overcome these penalties and taxes.

GIFT TAX CONSEQUENCES

A contribution to a Section 529 plan is considered a completed gift from the account owner to the designated beneficiary at the time of the contribution and is thus eligible for the annual gift tax exclusion (for 2014: $14,000 or $28,000 in the case of a joint gift by spouses, adjusted annually for inflation). If the contribution exceeds the annual gift tax exclusion, the amount not exceeding five times the current annual exclusion may be applied pro rata to annual exclusions over five years.

For example, you could make an initial contribution of $70,000 for each designated beneficiary without incurring gift tax liability for the contribution. The $70,000 contribution would be treated as if you made a $14,000 contribution in each of the next five years. Note that this presumes that no other gifts are made to the beneficiary during this five-year period. Any additional gifts would be subject to gift taxes. However, because the annual exclusion amount is indexed for inflation, this amount could increase in future years. Married couples can join together in making gifts, thus increasing the potential one-time contribution to $140,000 without incurring gift taxes.

ESTATE TAX CONSEQUENCES

Even though the donor retains the right to change the designated beneficiary (to another member of the donor's family) and to receive distributions from the account if no other person is designated, funds invested in the 529 plan are not included in the donor's gross estate unless the funds are in fact returned to the donor. Thus, once you contribute an amount to a 529 plan, that amount is out of your estate(s), as is the future appreciation on that amount. However, if a contribution exceeding the annual exclusion is applied pro rata to the annual exclusion over five years but the donor dies before the fifth year, that portion of the contribution that has not yet been applied to the annual exclusion for the years following the donor's death will be included in the donor's estate.

For example, suppose Mr. Leonard contributes $70,000 to a 529 plan and elects to have this applied pro rata over the next five years to the annual exclusion. Furthermore, assume Mr. Leonard passes away in the fourth year following the contribution. The amount of the annual exclusion to be applied in the fifth year ($14,000) would be brought back into Mr. Leonard's estate.

For more information on 529 plans visit the Resource Center at www.welchgroup.com; click on “Links,” then “College Funding—529 Plans.”

Other Tax-Free Gifts

In addition to your annual and lifetime gift tax exclusions, you receive an unlimited exclusion for the payment of a donee's medical expenses or tuition, as long as the payment is made directly to the education or medical provider. We have found this to be particularly useful where a grandparent is already making maximum annual gifts to grandchildren. They can then pay the grandchild's tuition or medical costs without incurring gift taxes. For these payments to qualify for the unlimited exclusion, they must be made directly to the qualifying educational institution or medical provider. These payments are not tax deductible unless the donee is your dependent.

If the gift you wish to make is for the specific purpose of funding education expenses, then you need to consider the Section 529 plans.

One gift that qualifies for the annual exclusion but is still included in your estate is a gift of life insurance within three years of your death. In this case, all of the life insurance proceeds are included in your estate for estate tax purposes. For example, you decide that you want to remove your $5 million term life insurance policy from your estate by transferring the ownership to your adult son. You do so but die within three years of the gift. The result is that the $5 million of life insurance proceeds are included as part of your estate for the purpose of calculating your estate tax liability.

Family Gifts Utilizing Trusts

Thus far, we have primarily discussed outright gifts to family members. There can also be significant advantages to making gifts to family members through the use of trusts. Two primary benefits include control issues and the possibility of receiving substantial valuation discounts for such gifts. Some of the more often used trusts include the grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT), the grantor retained unitrust (GRUT), and the qualified personal residence trust (QPRT).

Even without a GRAT, GRUT, or QPRT, gifts to irrevocable trusts can create additional income tax benefits for the grantor and gift tax benefits for the trust beneficiaries. On July 6, 2004, the IRS released Revenue Ruling 2004-64. The IRS acquiesced to the idea that the payment of income taxes by the grantor on behalf of his or her grantor trust will not result in an additional taxable gift to the grantor if certain trust requirements are met. This allows the grantor to shift greater wealth to future generations tax free. If the gift trust is drafted as a so-called “grantor trust,” this technique is available.

Grantor Retained Annuity Trust

A GRAT allows you to make a substantial gift to a child (or anyone) at a significant reduction of gift taxes (or none at all!) while you retain an income interest for a stated period of time. Because your beneficiary is only receiving the “remainder” at the end of the trust term, his or her interest is considered a future interest and not a present interest. Here's how this works:

  • You, the grantor, establish an irrevocable trust in which you retain a fixed-income interest. This fixed income can either be based on a fixed dollar amount or a fixed percentage based on the initial asset value transferred.
  • You determine the number of years the trust will last. The trust period can be any period of time. The longer the period of time, the smaller the amount of the gift to your beneficiaries is in the eyes of the Internal Revenue Service.
  • You determine who the remainder beneficiaries will be (typically your children).
  • You transfer assets into your GRAT.
  • You receive the designated income stream for the designated term of the trust.
  • At the end of the trust term, the remaining assets revert to your beneficiaries. This reversion can either be outright or in trust.

When you transfer assets into your trust, you have made a gift for gift tax purposes. To determine the value of your gift, you subtract the present value of your future stream of income from the value of your original contribution to your GRAT.

Advantages

  • The primary advantage of a GRAT is that it allows you to give away a large asset while paying little or no gift taxes.
  • The gift, although a gift of a future interest, represents the immediate transfer of an asset. As a result, any appreciation of that asset accrues to the benefit of your beneficiaries and is not included in your estate.
  • As grantor, you retain the income from the trust during the term of the trust.
  • You can act as the trustee of your GRAT if the trust is properly drafted.

Disadvantages

  • One of the primary disadvantages of the GRAT is that if you die during the term of the trust the assets revert back to your estate for estate tax purposes. For planning purposes, you will want to choose a trust term that you are likely to survive.
  • The GRAT is an irrevocable trust, and, therefore, you have permanently given up the right to your principal.
  • The GRAT is a grantor trust, and as such, all income is taxed to the grantor (you) whether or not it is paid to the grantor.
  • Your beneficiaries' interest in the trust is a future interest and therefore does not qualify for the annual gift tax exclusion. Your only alternatives are to pay the gift taxes associated with the gift or use a portion of your lifetime applicable exclusion amount. Typically, the GRAT is structured in a way that the amount of the gift is either zero or very small.
  • The income that you receive is a fixed income and therefore may not adequately offset the future ravages of inflation.

Grantor Retained Unitrust

The GRUT, although very similar to the GRAT, has several significant differences. The key distinction has to do with how your income is determined. As discussed previously, with a GRAT you receive a fixed income. Under a GRUT, the income you receive is variable. Suppose you (at age 50) place $500,000 into a GRUT and elect a 7 percent income. The first year your income would be $35,000. If the next year the account grew to $550,000, your income would be 7 percent of the new balance, or $38,500. If, however, the account decreased to $450,000, your income would be only $31,500. If the assets that you are transferring to your trust are likely to appreciate at a greater rate than your withdrawal rate, and if you want an increasing income, then you should consider a GRUT.

Table 11.2 shows an example of how the mathematics can work for a GRAT versus a GRUT. In structuring a GRAT or GRUT, the best assets to contribute are ones that stand to appreciate rapidly.

TABLE 11.2 Benefits Comparison of GRAT versus GRUTa

Year Annual Distribution to Donor Value of Remainder Interest Year Annual Distribution to Donor Value of Remainder Interest
1 $35,000 $0 1 $38,150 $0
2 $35,000 $0 2 $38,673 $0
3 $35,000 $0 3 $39,202 $0
4 $35,000 $0 4 $39,740 $0
5 $35,000 $0 5 $40,284 $0
6 $35,000 $0 6 $40,836 $0
7 $35,000 $0 7 $41,395 $0
8 $35,000 $0 8 $41,962 $0
9 $35,000 $0 9 $42,537 $0
10 $35,000 $0 10 $43,120 $0
11 $35,000 $0 11 $43,711 $0
12 $35,000 $0 12 $44,310 $0
13 $35,000 $0 13 $44,917 $0
14 $35,000 $0 14 $45,532 $0
15 $35,000 $0 15 $46,156 $0
16 $35,000 $0 16 $46,788 $0
17 $35,000 $0 17 $47,429 $0
18 $35,000 $0 18 $48,079 $0
19 $35,000 $0 19 $48,738 $0
20 $35,000 $0 20 $49,405 $0
21 $0 $1,011,601 21 $0 $656,385
Totals $700,000 $1,011,601 $870,964 $656,385

a Assumptions: $500,000 contribution, 20-year term, 7% withdrawal rate, 9% income return on investments, 5% IRS Section 7520 rate.

GRAT: $63,823 present value of gift.

GRUT: $195,450 present value of gift.

Calculations courtesy of Comdel, Inc., Crescendo Planned Gifts Marketing Software, A. Charles Schultz, President/Author, 1-800-858-9154.

Qualified Personal Residence Trust

When trying to reduce the size of one's estate in order to reduce taxes, the notion of giving away one's residence rarely comes to mind. If done properly, the gifting of a residence can have significant tax benefits without limiting one's use of the residence. One of the best ways to do this is through a QPRT. This is one of those rare instances where you can have your cake and eat it, too.

In working with clients who have taxable estates, we have often found that they are much more willing to give away their residence if they have the right to continue to live in the residence. A gift of a residence under these circumstances is preferable rather than giving away their investments, which often represent their security against unknown financial circumstances such as an illness. In other cases, the residence may be one of the only available assets to give.

How to Set Up a Qualified Personal Residence Trust

Under a QPRT, an individual known as a grantor irrevocably transfers his or her primary or secondary residence to a trust for a fixed period of time such as 10 to 15 years. During the term of the trust, the grantor retains the right to use and occupy the personal residence on an unrestricted basis. At the end of the term, the residence then passes to the designated beneficiaries known as remaindermen (usually the grantor's children). At the end of the term, the grantor then leases the residence back from the remaindermen. These lease payments do not interfere with his or her ability to make annual gifts each year.

Tax Treatment

Because the remaindermen will not receive the gift for 10 to 15 years, the grantor is allowed a discount based on the present value of the future gift. The amount of the discount is determined by Internal Revenue Service tables. This allows the grantor to significantly discount the value of the gift.

ADVANTAGES

There are many advantages to setting up a QPRT, including the following:

  • In many cases, it is more palatable to give away your residence rather than cash or securities to reduce estate taxes. By holding on to your stocks, bonds, and cash, you can feel more secure about handling a significant financial emergency should one occur. However, by giving away the house while retaining the right to live in it, you do not change your lifestyle even though you make a significant move toward reducing the value of your current and future estate.
  • You effectively remove a large asset from your estate at a significant discount from its current value. The Franklins were able to give away an asset worth $450,000 for $181,566.
  • You remove the growth of your residence from your estate. If the Franklins' home continued to appreciate over the next 15 years at 5 percent, it would be worth $935,000. By giving their home away, they saved the taxes on the additional $485,000 of appreciation.
  • You entirely avoid probate on your residence because it is passing to your heirs through the trust instead of under your will.
  • At the end of the trust term, you are allowed to increase your annual gifting by paying rent to your heirs. These payments will not be included as part of your allowable annual gift tax exclusion.

DISADVANTAGES

There are also several disadvantages to a QPRT.

  • If you die during the term of the trust, the value of the personal residence is included in your estate for estate tax purposes. Although this result may not be what you hoped for, it is not as bad as it seems. The property receives a stepped-up cost basis and any applicable credit amount that has been used is retrieved. In other words, for federal estate tax purposes, it is as if the transaction never occurred. You have, however, gone to the trouble and expense of setting up the trust and received no benefit.
  • When you transfer the residence, the beneficiaries will receive the same tax basis as you had on the date of transfer. However, if you had held the residence until your death, they would have received a stepped-up cost basis based on the value at the date of your death. In that case, they could have then sold the home without owing tax on net capital gains.
  • At the end of the term, the residence may not be available for your use. Technically, the home is now the property of the remaindermen (the second trust) rather than your property.
  • If the residence is sold, the $250,000 ($500,000 for married couples) exclusion for gain on sale of residence is not available because it is no longer your residence.
  • If there is a mortgage on the property, any payments on that mortgage are considered a gift to the remaindermen.

Note that QPRTs work best in higher-interest-rate environments because of the lower gift valuation attributable to the remainder interest.

Death during the Term of the Trust

As the grantor, you can receive a larger discount by creating a contingent reversionary interest. With a contingent reversionary interest, you state in the trust agreement that if you die before the trust term expires, your last will and testament will determine who receives the trust property.

If the grantor dies during the term of the trust, the property is included in the grantor's estate and, at that time, receives a stepped-up cost basis based on the fair market value at the date of death. Also, any applicable exclusion amount that was used to transfer the property to the trust will be revived to the benefit of the grantor. In other words, it is as if this transaction had never taken place.

Taking Advantage of Generation-Skipping Transfers

Prior to 1987, there were no laws that prevented you from leaving large amounts of assets in trust for multiple generations of family members. For example, you could place millions of dollars in a trust that provided for a lifetime of income for your children and grandchildren. As long as your children did not have a general power of appointment, the assets would not be included in their estates for estate tax purposes. Passage of the generation-skipping transfer tax in 1987 significantly reduced one's ability to pass money to multiple generations without a transfer tax. Although transfer opportunities have been reduced, they have not been eliminated. Therein lies the opportunity.

In the following list, we examine the rules surrounding generation-skipping transfers (GSTs):

  • A skip generation refers to family members one generation removed as would be the case of a gift from a grandparent to a grandchild. If the gift is to a non–family member, a person is considered a skip person if they are at least 371/2 years younger than the transferor.
  • The generation-skipping transfer tax that is imposed is based on the highest marginal estate and gift tax rate (currently 40 percent; see Table 1.2 in Chapter 1).
  • There are three categories of transfers that can occur. The first is called a direct skip. Direct skips occur when you gift assets directly to a generation skip person. For example, a direct skip would occur if you gave $100,000 directly to a grandchild or if you gave $100,000 to a trust in which your grandchild was the sole beneficiary. Any GST tax due must be paid at the time of the transfer. The transferor can elect to pay the tax himself/herself, or he/she can elect to have the taxes paid out of the gifted proceeds. The next category of GST occurs where there is a taxable termination. A taxable termination occurs when assets have been placed into a trust for multiple generations of family members and the last nonskip family member ceases to be a beneficiary of the trust. For example, you place $500,000 in a trust that will provide a lifetime income for your child. At your child's death, the trust will continue to provide a lifetime income for your grandchild. When your child dies, a taxable termination has occurred, and at that time, your trustee would be required to pay any GST tax due out of trust assets. The final category of skip transfers relates to taxable distributions. A taxable distribution occurs at the time your trustee makes a distribution to a skip person. For example, you place $500,000 into a trust for the benefit of your children and grandchildren. If your trustee makes a distribution to a grandchild (a skip person), a taxable distribution has occurred, and any taxes due must be paid out of that distribution.

So far, the GST rules do not sound very appealing. The opportunity lies in the following three exceptions to the GST tax rules:

  1. Deceased child exception. This exception provides that if a child has predeceased you and has left children of his or her own, your gifts to that grandchild are not subject to the GST tax.
  2. $14,000 annual GST exclusion. Similar to your annual gift tax exclusion, the GST exclusion provides that no GST tax is due for the first $14,000 per year of gifts that are direct skips. However, if the gift is made in trust, only transfers to trusts that meet certain requirements will qualify for the GST annual exclusion. This $14,000 per year will increase in future years due to special inflation indexing.
  3. $5,340,000 GST exemption. This important exception provides that bequests of up to $5,340,000 can be made to skip persons free of the GST tax. This exemption is automatically applied to direct skips. It is sometimes automatically applied to nondirect skips depending on elections made by the grantor, and therefore care should be taken when drafting trusts that are likely to result in nondirect skips. Note that the $5,340,000 GST exemption is available to all individuals; therefore, parents' combined exemption for bequests equals $10,680,000 in 2014. Gift exemptions are also $5,340,000 per donor or $10,680,000 for a donor couple for 2014. This GST exemption amount is indexed annually for inflation.

Case Study 1

Jeannie and Raymond Davidson would like to make a large gift to their son and possibly their grandchildren. In our discussions, we discover that their son is likely to accumulate a large estate on his own. We explain that if the Davidsons make gifts to their son either directly or in trust, substantial estate taxes will likely be due when he dies. As an alternative, we recommend that they consider a GST trust. They will use part of their (combined) lifetime applicable exclusion amount to make a tax-free gift of $1 million to a trust that will provide income to their son for his lifetime. At his death the assets will remain in trust for the benefit of the grandchildren. By electing the GST exemption, there will be no estate taxes due at the son's death. Using this strategy, the parents have removed the growth on the $1 million from their estate and have avoided future estate taxes at their son's death, thus preserving a much larger benefit for their grandchildren. Because each parent has a $5,340,000 GST exemption in 2014, we structured their wills so as to take advantage of their remaining GST exemption at their death.

Case Study 2

Jeff and Cynthia Cooper have expressed a desire to establish a gifting program to benefit their children and grandchildren. Although their investments produce a large income for them, they are not comfortable making large lump-sum gifts. They are also concerned that gifts might spoil their children. We recommend that they consider using their $14,000 annual exclusion to purchase a $1.5 million survivorship life insurance policy. A GST trust would be the owner and beneficiary. As a result, after the second person has died, the GST trust would be funded with $1.5 million that would benefit both their children and their grandchildren. Trust provisions would allow the trustee to make distributions to either the children or the grandchildren. In cases where life insurance is being used to leverage GSTs, it is important to file a gift tax return requesting that the GST exemption be applied to the gifts.

Sales to Family Members

There are many estate-planning advantages to loaning family members money as well as sales of assets to family members. Particularly effective are installment sales and the private annuity.

Installment Sales to Family Members

Installment sales between family members are set up like any other installment sale. You determine a fair market price and then arrange repayment terms based on a market interest rate. If the sale was to include a below-market price or below-market interest rate, the Internal Revenue Service considers that you have made a gift for gift tax purposes. Advantages and disadvantages of asset sales to family members are presented in the following sections.

ADVANTAGES

  • A sale of an asset to a family member removes the appreciation of the asset from your estate. Henry owns stock in his closely held business. At some point in the future, he plans to take his company public, at which point he expects the value to appreciate dramatically. Henry's son, Jake, also works in the business but owns no stock. By selling Jake stock now, Henry is able to transfer the future growth out of his estate.
  • An installment sale to a family member keeps the asset in the family. Edith Thompson inherited the family farm from her parents and has a strong desire to keep the farm in the family. She sells the farm to her two children on an installment sale basis. The payments to her total $2,000 per month. Edith uses $12,000 of her $14,000 annual gift tax exclusion to give each child $12,000 toward payment of their share of the note.
  • An installment sale prevents a family member from receiving wealth too quickly. Dave Adams sells his children an apartment building that he owns. The apartment building currently produces $40,000 per year of net income. The installment note requires payments of $3,000 per month for 240 months. The children have purchased a valuable asset that will increase their net worth as it appreciates but will receive little in the way of cash benefits for many years. Their incentive to fend for themselves is unhampered.
  • An installment sale provides you with a continuing income stream. Not everyone can afford to give away their assets. You may not need the asset, but you may need the income it produces. An installment sale to a family member may provide the ideal solution. You remove the appreciating asset from your estate while retaining the income for an extended period of time.
  • The buyer's cost basis in the property is based on the price they paid, which is presumably the fair market value. If they had received the property as a gift, their basis would be the same as the donor's basis. Buying the property will likely result in less tax upon a subsequent sale.

DISADVANTAGES

  • You have not entirely removed the asset from your estate. The value of the note receivable will be included in your estate.
  • You have given up control of the property.
  • You have accepted a fixed payment that will not be adjusted for inflation.
  • You must recognize the gain on the sale for income tax purposes. Because it is an installment sale, taxes are due only as you receive your note payments.
  • If the property is resold within two years, you may incur an acceleration of income taxes. This creates the possibility of owing income taxes without having cash to pay them.

SETTING YOUR INTEREST RATE

When you are deciding what interest rate to charge your family member, you must choose a rate that is considered a fair market rate. If you choose a below-market rate, the difference between the fair market rate and the rate you charged will be imputed to you for income tax purposes. Likewise, this difference in rate can be imputed as an interest deduction for the buyer.

How do you determine what a fair interest rate is? Fortunately, the Internal Revenue Service provides you with the answer under Code Section 1272 entitled “Applicable Federal Rates.” These rates change from month to month but are often less than a buyer could receive if he or she sought traditional financing. For the current applicable federal rates, visit the Resource Center at www.welchgroup.com; click on “Links,” then “Applicable Federal Rates.”

An installment sale can be combined with annual gifts to family members to magnify the power of the transaction. You sell property “A” to your son in return for a note with a market rate of interest. The note payments equal $9,500 each year for 12 years. In January of each year, you give your son $14,000 as a tax-free gift. He then uses the gift to make the note payment. You can manipulate the term of the note to make certain that the payments fall within the allowed annual gift tax exclusion. For example, if the property was valued at $150,000, and the federal interest rate was 4 percent, a 10-year term would result in payments of $18,493.64. By increasing the term to 15 years, you would cut the annual payments to under $14,000.

Remember that whether you give your child the money to make the note payments or simply forgive the note, you are still responsible for reporting and paying the income tax on the note interest. Although you have not received the interest, it has been imputed to you.

The Private Annuity

A private annuity is the sale of property by one family member (the annuitant) to another family member (the obligor) in exchange for an unsecured promise by the obligor to make payments to the annuitant for the rest of the annuitant's life.

ADVANTAGES

  • The property and its future appreciation are removed from your estate; thus, you avoid all estate taxes.
  • Because this is a fair market value sale, there are no gift taxes to pay.
  • You receive a lifetime income.
  • The capital gains on the sale are spread over your life expectancy.
  • The property is maintained within the family. This can be particularly important with a closely held business interest or family land.
  • If you die prematurely (before your life expectancy), the annuity payments end immediately, and there is no remaining value in the annuity. This is unlike the installment sale, in which case the note payments would continue and the present value of those payments would be included in your estate.

DISADVANTAGES

  • The note payments cannot be secured by the trust property or any other asset.
  • Your children (the obligors) bear the risk that you will outlive the actuarial tables.

Loans to Family Members

Unlike installment sales to family members, loans to family members offer little in the way of estate planning benefits. If you charge a below-market interest rate, you will have income imputed to you, and you will have been deemed to have made a gift based on the value of the “bargain” amount. A related technique is to make a loan to a child and then use their annual gift tax exclusion to forgive all or a portion of the note payments each year. Note that this does not relieve you of your income tax liability. One possible estate tax advantage occurs if your child is able to earn a higher rate of return on your loan than you are currently earning.

Case Study

David has $200,000 in certificates of deposits earning 3 percent. David's son, James, wants to start a business that requires $100,000 of capital, but James lacks the ability to borrow the money. David loans him the money, charging him 3 percent (or the applicable federal rate, whichever is greater). His business is successful and earns on average 15 percent per year. David has effectively helped leverage his son's net worth while earning at least as high an interest rate as he was earning before.

Sales to Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts

A sale of assets to an intentionally defective grantor trust (IDGT) can be an effective way to transfer the future income or appreciation from an appreciating asset with little or no gift or estate tax cost. A grantor trust is established, and the grantor must report, on the grantor's individual income tax return, all of the income, deductions, and credits of the trust. The grantor then sells assets to the trust in exchange for a promissory note. The IRS has ruled that a sale or other transaction between a grantor trust and the grantor does not result in any capital gain or loss or any other tax consequence. The trust is ignored for federal income tax purposes. However, the assets owned by the trust are not included in the grantor's estate for estate tax purposes. Assuming the value of the assets sold to the trust appreciate higher than the value of the assets upon the sale, the appreciation escapes transfer tax. The sale of assets to such a trust is a highly complex estate-planning technique. A summary of the key points is as follows:

  • Such a trust is respected for gift and estate taxes but ignored for income taxes, therefore no taxable gain upon sale.
  • The trust should be seeded with at least 10 percent of the fair market value of the assets to be sold.
  • The trust generally benefits children and grandchildren.
  • Only seed money would be a gift. Normally, a future interest gift could be structured as preset interests (Crummey).
  • Assets are often placed in a limited liability company. The assets then qualify for discount for lack of marketability and control. This impacts the fair market value of asset.
  • If the trust is not given for all or part of the purchase price, it is best to pay off the balance before the death of donor-grantor.

The Legacy Trust

In thousands of discussions with clients over the past 30-plus years, it has become evident that many of them have a strong desire to make certain that the assets that they worked so hard to accumulate are not wasted or lost by their children. While this desire is intuitive, the solution often is not. One solution that has received universal appeal is the legacy trust.

Let's begin by setting the context by way of an actual client meeting. During a recent estate-planning review with a client, we asked the following question: “What is the divorce rate in America?” The client quickly answered, “About 50 percent.” The next question was a little tougher. “Since you have three children whom we'll assume will all marry, what are the odds (statistically speaking) that at least one of them will have a marriage that ends in divorce?” Now the client is less certain. The answer? 87.5 percent! To this statistic, add the fact that America is the most litigious society in the world. Today, the common phrase is, “Sue them all, then we'll sort it out in court!” It's true that not all of these lawsuits will result in a judgment or that a judgment will be for a large amount of money, but the risks are clear. Returning to our client meeting, it appears that when you combine the risks of a divorce plus the risks of a judgment from a lawsuit, the odds are pretty high that at least one of the clients' children will face a significant event that will place their finances in jeopardy. If part of their finances includes an inheritance from you, your assets are simply added to the pot of money, which makes the child a bigger target and increases the chances that your hard-earned assets end up in someone else's bank account. Not a pleasant thought!

What if you could do something to use your assets to benefit your children while at the same time protecting those assets from creditors, lawsuits, or a divorce? Enter the legacy trust. With a legacy trust, instead of leaving your estate outright to your children, you place it in a trust that has specific language that provides financial support for your children while also including language that allows the trustee a defense mechanism in the event the child is threatened with a lawsuit or divorce.

Case Study

John and Kate Nelson are in their mid-50s and have an estate worth $9 million. Because of the 2012 Tax Relief Act provision allowing portability of the lifetime exemption amount, no matter how their assets are divided, there will not be any estate taxes due at their deaths. They have three children in their early 20s to mid-30s, all of whom are married. Two of their children have one child each, and they anticipate their other child will also have children. One child is a physician, one is on track to become a PhD professor teaching at the college level, and one is a business owner. Two of the children's marriages appear very stable, while one is more volatile. The Nelsons have a strong desire to ensure that their children, as well as their grandchildren, benefit from their estate assets. Of significant importance is making sure that the grandchildren can each afford the very best education they are capable of achieving. They also want to protect their assets from potential future legal claims against their children. We presented the concept of the legacy trust, and while they loved the idea, they had a number of questions.

How Long Does a Legacy Trust Last?

The short answer is that you get to decide how long it will last. In most cases the legacy trust is designed to last for at least the lifetime of each child. The reason is that this is the best way to get the full benefit of the asset protection attributes of the legacy trust. If you said that the trust would end when the child is age 60, then those assets would forever in the future be subject to litigation risks. In fact, in the typical case, we recommend leaving the assets in trust for as long as the law allows. How long the law allows is determined by each state. Some states allow the trust to last virtually forever—what we call a  Rockefeller trust, named after industrialist and oil magnate John D. Rockefeller, who became one of the wealthiest men in the world in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and went on to create a perpetual trust that continues to benefit his heirs to this day. Other states have a “law against perpetuities,” which essentially says that the trust can last for as long as the “lives in being plus twenty-one years.” Sound confusing? In our case study about the Nelsons, this means that the trust, once established at the death of the last parent, would last as long as any of the then-living potential beneficiaries, including any children, grandchildren, or great grandchildren who are alive, plus 21 years for beneficiaries who were not alive at the time the legacy trust first came into being. We like to refer to this as a 75-year trust, because it will often last 75 years or more, but not indefinitely. A number of states that had a law against perpetuities have statutorily set longer time frames, such as 300 years.

The Nelsons decided that while they wanted a legacy trust for their children's lifetime, they wanted the children to decide where their share of the trust would go at their death. We suggested that we give the children a testamentary general power of appointment. This would allow each child, through his or her own will, to terminate the trust in favor of his or her chosen heirs. We further suggested that if the child failed to exercise the general power of appointment that the money would remain in the legacy trust for that child's children and grandchildren. This general power of appointment creates great flexibility, but it causes the trust assets to be included in the child's estate for estate tax purposes (see the discussion on generation-skipping transfers later in this section). This can be avoided by granting the child a limited power of appointment, which limits the potential appointees of the assets to someone or something other than the child's estate or creditors of the child's estate.

How Do the Children Get Money from a Legacy Trust?

You get to decide how the trust benefits your heirs. Typically, we provide that, under normal circumstances, the trust will either distribute all of the income (interest and dividends) or we'll use a set withdrawal rate such as 3 or 4 percent based on the principal balance as of January 1 of each year. In addition, we will often make allowances for distributions of principal under certain circumstances. The variations here are limitless and bound only by the imagination of the clients or their advisers. We often say to the client, “If you can figure out what you want, we can figure out how to provide for it in the trust agreement.” We'll discuss some of the more esoteric ideas later in this section.

Who Would Be the Trustee?

Again, the trustee of your legacy trust can be whomever you wish. In some cases, the child will be a cotrustee of their legacy trust, which gives the child a sense of having some “ownership” of the money and of the trust's operation. If you want to preserve the asset protection attributes of the trust, the law in some states will not allow a child to be the “sole” trustee of his or her own trust and still receive the benefits of asset protection. This is because the trust document will give the trustee a wide range of powers that allow the trustee to decide “when and if” to make distributions. If the child were his or her own and sole trustee and there were a legal judgment against the child personally, the courts could compel the child, as the sole trustee, to make distributions to himself or herself, therefore making those funds available to the creditor, soon-to-be ex-spouse, or plaintiff in a lawsuit. This will not be the case when there is a separate trustee. So in the cases where the child will serve as a trustee, you may need a cotrustee depending on the law in your state. This can be an individual or an institution such as a trust company or a bank, which has trust services or another professional such as an attorney, accountant, or financial adviser. What is most important to remember is that the legacy trust will likely last a very long time, and therefore most of the “people-trustees” will not outlive the trust, so you'll want to take care in choosing a succession of people-trustees as well as an “institutional” trustee as your backup. Having an institutional trustee in place ensures that you don't run out of trustees, which would then require the retention of an attorney to go to court and have a trustee appointed, a proposition that could be expensive and produce less-than-optimal results.

In some states, the law governing trusts will permit the child or other beneficiary to be the sole trustee and protect the assets from potential creditors, as long as the distributions are subject to an ascertainable standard. Thus, creditors cannot compel a distribution by the trustee-beneficiary if the trust document limits the circumstances in which a distribution may be made—for instance, for health, education, maintenance, and support.

What if the Children Don't Like the Trustee?

When you begin discussing an institutional trustee or any trustee other than the child, there's invariably the question, “What happens if the child and the trustee don't get along?” One trust provision we recommend is giving someone, typically the trust beneficiary (or majority of beneficiaries) the power to replace the institutional or professional trustee with another institutional or professional trustee. What's important here is to make certain that the new trustee is also an institutional or professional trustee. A real case example will illustrate the reason why: One trust beneficiary became unhappy with the trustee because the trustee would not release funds when she wanted. The trust agreement allowed her to remove the trustee in favor of another trustee but was silent as to the required qualifications of the new trustee. She thought she could solve her problem of getting money out of the trust more quickly by appointing her good friend as the trustee. As the situation began to unfold, and more and more trust withdrawals were requested, we informed the new trustee of her fiduciary responsibility regarding the trust. If she failed to follow the instructions and guidelines outlined in the trust, she could become personally liable for her actions. For example, if the trust were depleted, she could actually be sued by her good friend, the beneficiary! This is something that all institutional and professional trustees understand. Having the trust agreement require successor institutional or professional trustees will often solve the problem of beneficiaries changing trustees with the expectation of having unreasonable demands met by the new trustee.

What About Having a Sibling as the Trustee?

Another idea clients will have is to make the siblings “cross-trustees.” This means, for example, designating the brother the trustee of his sister's trust and the sister the trustee of her brother's trust, thereby creating very “friendly” trustees. The problem with this strategy is what attorneys call substance over form. This means that the courts could view this as each sibling having, in effect, full power over their own trust, and they could lose the asset protection attributes intended for the trust. We also run into a lot of cases where one child is highly responsible and another highly irresponsible. The client may suggest having the responsible child act as trustee over the irresponsible child's trust. In our experience, this sets up a form of sibling resentment that most often leads to conflict and a deterioration of relationships.

What About the Different Needs of the Children?

In our case study, the Nelsons pointed out that each of the children would likely have very different needs. The child who intended to become a college professor would likely need income from the trust to supplement her salary, while the physician child would likely want his trust invested predominantly for growth since he'd have no immediate income needs from the trust. The business owner child might need loans for business expansion. How would the legacy trust meet the diverse needs of these very different financial situations? Typically, this is addressed by splitting the estate assets into separate trusts for each of the children. Trust language is drawn so that it is broad enough to meet a wide range of needs, or it can be tailored specifically for each child's trust.

The Umbrella Trust

We recently ran into an exception to the separate trusts strategy. In this case, the client has three children, all of whom are adults. Two of the children have good jobs and stable marriages, while the third child has a history of health problems that have prevented him from maintaining steady employment. His health could change in his favor and he could have steady employment, or his current situation could persist. The client's estate totaled about $2 million. If they divided the estate equally, we were concerned that $700,000 may not be sufficient to fully take care of the potentially disabled child. The solution was to create an umbrella trust. Instead of creating three separate trusts, we held all of the funds in one trust with language that suggested that the trustee treat all of the children equally unless there was a compelling reason (health, for example) to treat them unequally. This gave the trustee the flexibility to focus on the individual needs of each child and allowed, if necessary, the trustee to use the full power of the trust to take care of the disabled child should that become necessary. We understand that some people may view this as unfair, and our response is what's “fair” may not always be what's “appropriate.”

Can the Legacy Trust Be Used to Fund the Education of Our Grandchildren?

Our clients, the Nelsons, placed a very high value on a good education. It was their advanced education that allowed them to accumulate their own estate and they could see how being educated benefited their children. They loved the possibility of using part of their estate to fund the education of their grandchildren. Would that be possible? This is a very typical request from grandparents, and the answer is, “Yes.” We often insert language in the trust document that provides for the use of trust funds for the educational expenses of grandchildren. We agree that one of the greatest gifts you can give anyone is the gift of the best education for which they can qualify. Another possibility within this planning point is to provide specific language allowing the trustee to transfer funds into a 529 plan, Coverdell education savings plan, or other similar plan. This would allow those funds to grow tax deferred and then make tax-free distributions for qualified education expenses.

What Are the Disadvantages of a Legacy Trust?

As opposed to leaving your heirs their inheritance outright, one obvious downside is the costs involved in setting up and maintaining a legacy trust, or any type of trust for that matter. Depending on the complexity of the trust design, attorney's fees can run into the thousands or tens of thousands of dollars. Once the trust becomes effective (in the case of the legacy trust, this would typically be at the death of the last remaining parent), there will often be trust management fees, investment management fees, and fees associated with the filing of the trust tax return. In addition to the costs associated with the trusts, we find that children are not always fond of the idea of having their inheritance placed in a trust over which they have limited control. It's human nature to want to be in control and this is especially true when it comes to what children view as “their” money. If you decide to use a legacy trust, we highly recommend that you have a formal conversation with each of your children to explain the reasons you made this decision. If you're going to have a mutiny on your hands, it's usually better to find out while you're alive and can do something about it. Our experience is that a well-planned conversation tends to be received well by mature adult children. The children who react negatively often do so out of immaturity, which serves to emphasize just why the legacy trust is appropriate.

The Family Council

We have developed a concept called The Family Council, where we will meet with the parents and children to discuss money responsibility in light of potential future inheritance. This is the perfect setting to discuss all of the benefits of the legacy trust. The Family Council is discussed in more detail in the epilogue.

Think about it logically. If a child were to receive his inheritance outright, he only has two basic choices: he can spend it (or give it away) or he can invest it. If he spends it, there are only two results: he can spend it in a way that would meet your approval or in a way that would not. If he invests it, there are only two results: he can invest it well or he can invest it poorly. In most cases, our clients are not opposed to the child's spending some of the money on certain types of things like the down payment on a home or a child's education, and the trust allows for this. If the child chooses to invest the money, does it really matter that the investments are being done through a trust, and one that protects the child from creditors? We would argue that the legacy trust can provide a lifetime financial safety net for your children without unduly burdening them. If fact, it can free them up to focus on things that have more meaning to them like raising their children or pursuing their careers.

Can a Legacy Trust Spoil the Children?

This is a valid concern. In too many cases, we see trust fund babies never having the hunger or drive to work hard and create their own success. Think about it. When most kids graduate from college, the entry-level job opportunities might offer a starting salary of $30,000 to $50,000 per year. If that person is currently receiving $150,000 per year from their $3 million trust, what's the incentive to work? In many cases, the answer is “none.” If this is a concern for you, you might consider including an incentive provision in your legacy trust. There are many variations of this idea, but most go something like this: for every dollar of earned income, the trustee will give the beneficiary a “matching dollar.” Under this provision, if our college graduate gets that entry-level job earning $35,000, he'll also receive $35,000 from his trust. And he has every incentive to work hard and move up in the organization because future raises will also be matched!

INCENTIVE PROVISION USING A ROTH IRA

A subset of this strategy is to include an incentive provision for younger beneficiaries such as grandchildren. Consider allowing the trustee to “match” any earned income by making contributions into a Roth IRA. The rules for a Roth IRA allow a dollar-for-dollar contribution of up to 100 percent of earned income up to $5,500 each year (indexed annually for inflation). As you may remember, you don't get a deduction for contributions to a Roth IRA, but earnings grow tax deferred and distributions at retirement (age 591/2) are tax free. The Roth owner always has access to his/her contributions tax free. There are also provisions for tax-free qualified distributions (maximum of $10,000 in a lifetime) for first-time homebuyers provided that the Roth IRA has been in existence for a minimum of five years. Let's look at the power of this simple strategy: Assume your legacy trust provides a $5,500 per year matching contribution for your grandchild from ages 16 through 22 and the money remains invested until he is age 60. Assuming an 8 percent annualized return, his account value would be $846,329! And all of this was accomplished on a total investment of $38,500. Now there's a lesson in the power of saving early!

Are There Provisions that Must Be Included in the Legacy Trust?

If one of your goals is for the trust to serve as an asset protection trust, you'll need to include language giving the trustee the discretion to both make and withhold distributions of income and principal. The typical trust agreement provides that all of the income must be paid out to the beneficiary at least quarterly. Typical trust agreements also often mandate distributions of principal at certain ages. Here's a typical example in layman's terms: “The trustee is instructed to distribute all of the trust income at least quarterly. Distributions of principal will occur as follows: one-third at age 25; one-half at age 30; the balance at age 35.” This arrangement provides little, if any, asset protection for the beneficiary. For example, in the event of a divorce or other legal judgment, the trust income could effectively be “garnished.” Large-dollar judgments could be “settled” on the future event of the mandatory distribution of principal. Giving the independent trustee the discretion of withholding income or principal allows trust assets to be shielded from would-be legal predators.

Generation-Skipping Transfers

While you're creating your legacy trust, you should consider including a provision allocating the maximum allowable transfer to a GST trust. Currently, this is $5,340,000 total for you and, if you are married, $5,340,000 for your spouse as well. Money transferred into a GST trust will not be included in your heir's estates upon their death. Let's look at an example of how this might work: John and May Moneybags die in 2014 leaving a total estate of $20 million to their two children. Assume that John and May each owned $10 million of assets. Their will directs that the maximum amount go to a GST legacy trust for each child. As a result, each child receives $5,340,000 in their GST legacy trust, with the balance, after paying estate taxes, going to a traditional legacy trust; which means each child has two trusts. At any child's subsequent death, any money in the GST legacy trust will not be includable in that child's estate and therefore will not be subject to estate taxes. The assets in the traditional (non-GST) legacy trust are includable in the child's estate and may be subject to estate taxes. If the GST planning is desired, the power of appointment options must be carefully examined.

In this section, we've discussed the concept of the legacy trust and the importance of using this strategy to protect your assets from possible legal attacks against your children after your death. We should note that no trust is perfectly “bulletproof.” It will be important to include language giving the trustee instructions to do everything legally possible to protect trust assets from legal challenges.

Just as gifts to family members can be a powerful tool for tax-efficient transfers of wealth, gifts to charities can provide tax benefits as well as satisfy your desire to help the broader community. Gifts to charities are covered in our next chapter.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
3.14.144.229