The family limited partnership (FLP) and the limited liability company (LLC) have become common estate-planning techniques, not unlike the irrevocable life insurance trust. Properly structured, they can be a part of your wealth preservation strategy. The FLP and LLC should be considered tools in your defense against estate taxes.
With an FLP, you establish a limited partnership agreement and then transfer title to certain property from your individual name to the name of the partnership. This transfer is a nontaxable event if the original property owners are the same as the original partners in the same proportion that they formerly owned the property outright. Typically, you (and your spouse) are the general partner(s), and your children and/or grandchildren are limited partners. As with any partnership, only the general partners have the right to make decisions and vote; the limited partner's role is very restricted. If, as the general partner, you decide to make a partnership distribution, all partners including the limited partners must receive a pro-rata distribution. Initially, when you transfer your property to the partnership, you will retain both the general partner interest and all limited partnership interests.
Assets transferred to the FLP must be valued at the time of the transfer. As the general partner, you may then begin to transfer limited partnership interests (called units in the case of an LLC) to other family members through a gifting program using your annual or lifetime exclusion. Because the interests that you are transferring are limited partnership interests, a business appraiser may discount the value of the gift. For example, say you transfer farm property worth $1 million to your FLP with you and your spouse as the general partners. You then want to use your combined annual gift tax exclusion ($28,000) to gift limited partnership units to your five children. You calculate that $28,000 times five equals $140,000. However, this is not correct! Because what your children will receive is a limited partnership interest in the farmland rather than the land itself, it is worth less than full value. This is because as limited partners, their rights to sell and use the property are only those granted them by the general partner and the partnership agreement. In other words, the value of a 10 percent limited partnership interest in the land is worth less than 10 percent of the whole value of the property. The result is a discounting of the value of limited partnership interests, which allows you to leverage your wealth transfers. If the land being transferred into your partnership received a 30 percent discount, this would mean that your $140,000 gifts of partnership units to your children would actually transfer $200,000 of prediscounted land value. Now that is what we call leverage! Remember, you can make gifts every year.
Now that we have made a persuasive case for using an FLP as part of your estate plan, let's look at some of the disadvantages.
To be recognized as a partnership for income tax purposes, you must follow certain rules and procedures. Failure to do so may result in adverse tax consequences. Specifically, to qualify as an FLP, you must meet the following tests:
With the help of a qualified appraiser, two types of discounts are potentially available under the FLP.
A limited partnership interest in an FLP will normally include restrictions as to transferability, usually including a first right of refusal to the remaining partners. These restrictions as to marketability cause a limited partnership interest to be less valuable than an outright interest in an asset. For example, think of how you would determine the value of a particular piece of property you know to have a fair market value of $100,000. You have the choice of buying the entire property outright, or you can buy a 10 percent interest in the property as a limited partner, which would mean you have no vote or input regarding any partnership decisions. You may not even know the other partners. Would you be willing to pay $10,000 for this 10 percent interest? In most cases, your answer would be no. You would want to discount the purchase price, perhaps substantially, to be enticed to buy. Fortunately, our courts take this same view. In cases where transferability is restricted, a valuation discount is usually warranted.
As a limited partner, you have no right to set investment policy, compel distributions, or impact any decisions regarding the partnership. The courts have typically supported the premise that this lack of control results in your interest being less valuable and have therefore granted valuation discounts for holders of limited partnership interests. This is because the law looks at the value of the interest by itself rather than as a part of the whole. This is also true of minority interests in a partnership or corporation. Of particular importance in a partnership is the fact that taxes are passed through to the partners whether or not distributions are made to those partners. You can imagine how unhappy a partner would be if he or she received a tax bill for undistributed income, which is often the case.
Calculating the various discounts is a job that should be performed by knowledgeable and qualified appraisers. Discounts for lack of control or marketability are not mutually exclusive. They can be aggregated. These discounts can apply to the general partners as well as the limited partners, but typically in lesser amounts. The fact that you transfer property from your name outright to an FLP possibly creates a discount for you even if you retain the bulk of both the general and limited partnership interests. However, most valuation experts have become more conservative in this area. Typically, if a person creates an FLP and retains the bulk of both the general and limited partner interests, the appraiser is less likely to apply a significant discount. The theory being that the original property owner has maintained too much control over the property. If the original property owner retains only some control over the property (by retaining some general partnership interests), then an appraiser may apply a modest discount to the general partnership interests. This discount is typically less than the discount applied to the limited partnership interests. Some appraisers will take an even more conservative view and reduce the discount applied to the limited partnership interests if the appraiser determines that the limited partnership interest owner retains control over the entity by virtue of the fact he or she also owns some or all of the general partnership interests. We have seen examples of discounts of as much as 40 percent to 50 percent being applied. However, discounts that high can be a red flag. In most cases, discounts can range from 20 percent to 35 percent. The amount of the discount will depend on the underlying assets owned by the entity and the degree of control given to the general partnership interest or limited partnership interest (depending on which interest is being valued). One of the most important elements in setting up your FLP is getting an appropriate discount valuation. You will want to choose someone who specializes in this field and has experience in defending his or her work. The stakes are very high if an inappropriate discount is applied and the IRS attacks the entity or the discount. A successful attack by the IRS can result in additional estate or gift taxes due (as a result of undervaluing property) or in the inclusion of previously transferred property back in the donor's estate (because he or she retained too much control). Therefore, your goal should be an appropriate discount based on defendable evidence and facts which apply to your particular FLP.
The larger your estate, the more important it will be to properly execute discount planning in the form of FLP planning. This can be accomplished through several well-thought-out strategies:
Care must be taken in structuring your FLP so that an appropriate balance is struck between giving the general partner the desired control over decisions and restricting those powers sufficiently so as to not disqualify the partnership for tax purposes. This is of particular importance where the general partner is the donee rather than the donor. Say you form an FLP, fund it with your assets, and make your son and daughter co–general partners at a 2 percent interest each. You retain a 96 percent limited partnership interest. However, you continue to make all the decisions regarding partnership business while your children act as rubber stamps for those decisions. As far as the public is concerned, you are still the one in control—the partnership contact person. This is exactly how the IRS will view the arrangement, and your partnership will likely be attacked by the IRS if audited.
Recognition of partnership income must be allocated in an appropriate manner. Each partner must receive their pro-rata share, net of partnership expenses. For income tax reasons, you may want to shift a larger portion to your children who are in a lower tax bracket than are you. Some advisers will draft the partnership agreement to allow this. However, doing so means you're subject to scrutiny and possible disqualification by the IRS. At the same time, the general partners must be compensated fairly for their management services. Often, the general partner will work for free to make additional income available to the limited partners. At the opposite end of the spectrum is the general partner who desires a disproportionately higher income from the partnership and therefore pays him- or herself more compensation than the services are worth. Either extreme is subject to challenge by the IRS. It should be noted that what is considered fair compensation to the general partner can be a wide-ranging dollar amount. You should consider not only what the actual services are worth but other compelling issues as well. For instance, as a general partner, you are exposed to unlimited liability. As a result, a corporation or LLC is often used as the general partner.
Limited partners should receive copies of partnership tax returns, and if the partnership agreement gives them any voice in management decisions, those rights should be respected. The donor should also not retain powers to unreasonably restrict a donee's right to dispose of his or her partnership interest. This is typically handled through a first right of refusal by the general partner and/or limited partners. Your agreement should not contain a set price for which the donor can buy back a donee's partnership interest. To do so might constitute a detrimental interest on the part of the donee, which is restricted in the regulations.
Minors (as well as legally incompetent persons) are allowed to own interests in an FLP. A minor's interests can be held by a custodian under a Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (UGMA) or a Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA) or by a trustee under a trust account. Note that not all states have adopted the UTMA regulations, and some states may not allow a minor's account to hold a partnership interest. Extra care should be taken where the donor will also act as the custodian or sole trustee. To do so could cause the minor's interest to be includable in the donor's estate. Also, the IRS will closely scrutinize these situations to be certain that the donor is acting solely in the interest of the minor. One excellent attribute of using FLP interests for gifts to custodial accounts is that it solves the problem of transfer of control when the minor reaches legal adulthood. If you transferred securities to a custodial account, your child would legally take control of the securities based on state law (usually age 18 to 21). At that point, the child could do whatever he or she pleased with the funds. However, if the asset is a limited partnership interest, their rights and control are significantly limited.
Some individuals may benefit from establishing more than one FLP. One primary advantage of doing so is to enhance asset protection by separating safe assets from risky assets. Safe assets would include assets such as marketable securities, notes receivable, or idle cash; risky assets include real estate, closely held business interests, or general partnership interests. By separating these asset groups, you insulate your safe assets from liability attributable to the risky assets. If you own real estate that later becomes subject to a legal award for environmental damages, your personal securities and cash would not be exposed to this suit or claim. Separating assets also allows you to fine-tune your gifting program by allowing you to maintain 100 percent ownership of the safe asset FLP while gifting limited partner units of the risky FLP. It may also be appropriate to separate risky assets into multiple FLPs for the reasons just stated. The downside to having multiple FLPs are costs in setup and ongoing administration. In addition, although we're suggesting that you consider placing your marketable securities and cash in a separate FLP, we caution you that special rules are applicable in this situation. You must avoid having your asset treated as an investment company, so you should consult with a professional adviser experienced in this important area.
A limited liability company (LLC) provides many of the same features as the FLP, with a few notable distinctions. One of the primary advantages is that all members of an LLC have limited liability for the debts and obligations of the company. As you remember, with the FLP, only the limited partners enjoy this protection. The general partner has unlimited liability. In most other respects, the LLC enjoys many of the same benefits as the FLP, including asset protection, valuation discounts, continuity and consolidation of management, income tax shifting, and probate avoidance (for the underlying asset not the LLC interest).
There are some disadvantages to the LLC compared with the FLP. First, the laws governing LLCs vary from state to state. You and your professional adviser will need to review your own state laws carefully. Second, in most states, a member has the right to withdraw from the company and receive the fair market value of his or her interest. This freedom of transferability can affect the size of discounts available in the LLC. Also, the complete withdrawal or death of a member can result in the dissolution of the company. In some states, it is possible to include language in the company's operating agreement that satisfactorily deals with each of these problems.
The FLP can be an ideal tool for owners of closely held business interests or family farms. Often, these individuals want to have family members succeed them in the family business. Therefore, succession planning is essential in these situations. If you own your own business, Chapter 14 will provide you a thorough review of succession strategies for you to consider.
18.222.111.134