If you are a business owner, health care practitioner, or farmer, you'll have to contend with special challenges as you work to preserve your assets for your heirs. To simplify our discussion, we will refer to anyone who falls into any of these three categories as a business owner. As a business owner, you're probably so involved in the day-to-day demands of running your business that you haven't really thought about succession planning. Unfortunately, too many people don't plan properly, and as a result, the value of their business is seriously diminished. A couple of typical cases show how important advance planning can be.
Case Study 1
Bill Johnson Sr., a divorcee, owned a small precision manufacturing company that had an estimated value of $6 million. He had spent his entire career building this successful company, which represented the bulk of his net worth. He was grooming his son Billy to take over the company when he retired. Bill Sr. also had two daughters who were not involved in the business. Unfortunately, he died suddenly, leaving his estate to the three children equally. Billy Jr. was now in business with his two sisters, and he was a minority stockholder. Although Billy's sisters had little interest in the business, they felt they deserved an income from it because, after all, Billy received a nice salary. Together, the two sisters owned a majority of the voting stock, and they were able to successfully demand the income they felt they deserved. Because they did not work in the business, these income payments were not deductible by the business. This story does not have a happy ending: the infighting and cash-flow problems eventually caused the company to fail. The sisters blamed Billy. After all, he was running the company.
A number of steps could have alleviated the problems in this case. One strategy would have been to have the daughters receive their share of the estate of Bill Sr. from assets other than the business. To accomplish this, Bill Sr. would have had to buy life insurance owned by a trust for the daughters' benefit or have arranged for the daughters to own the policies individually. If insurance was not a possibility, he could have considered two classes of stock—voting and nonvoting. In this way, he could have given the daughters nonvoting stock while giving Billy voting stock. All of the children would have had equal ownership in the company, but Billy would have had voting control. Another option would have been for Bill Sr. to sell the company to Billy Jr. for an installment note. At Bill's death, the children would have had an equal interest in the note.
Case Study 2
Dr. Steve Stein's dental practice has provided him and his family a good income for 35 years. Now, at age 64, he has noticed that his patient load is declining significantly each month. That is likely to continue because his current patients are all in their mid to late 60s. Also, an increasing number of his current patients are moving to retirement communities out of town, while others are dying. He seems to be surrounded by younger dentists who have thriving practices while his profits are dropping month by month. He is ready to retire but cannot afford to because there is little value left in his practice. He has no choice but to continue to run an increasingly deteriorating practice. Finally, at age 75, he shuts his doors and sells his equipment for pennies on the dollar.
We have had an opportunity to work with numerous health care professionals over the years and one of our primary objectives is to make sure that we built value in their practices. Dr. Stein should have brought in a younger dentist to the practice. Not only would the younger dentist have provided valuable new blood, but he or she would have been the perfect buyer.
Case Study 3
Horace and Martha James owned a working farm that had been in the family for two generations, and it was their desire that the farm remain in the family. Although the farm income had allowed them to raise and educate their two children, they always had to pay attention to their cash flow. Consequently, they didn't expect the farm to be worth very much and have not concerned themselves with any estate planning. However, when the Jameses both passed away, their children were in for a rude awakening. The farm was rich in timber, and the IRS valued the land at four times the Jameses' estimate. This resulted in substantial estate taxes even though the children didn't have the cash to pay the taxes. Despite the special tax provisions for farmers, the children were unable to pay the taxes, and the farm had to be sold to raise cash.
Business owners, particularly farmers, tend to underestimate the value of their businesses. This is a big mistake. For better or worse, the IRS seems particularly inclined to challenge the business values of deceased business owners. There is a lot of money at stake, and the IRS wins more than its share of these cases. The Jameses' best defense would have been a good offense. First, they could have reduced the value of the farm by using discounting strategies such as the family limited partnership (FLP) or the limited liability company (LLC). Next, they should have considered using their annual gift tax exclusion to begin transferring undivided interests in the farm to their children at that time. Finally, they needed to monitor the value of the land and then develop a game plan that provided the liquidity to meet any potential estate tax obligation. To do this, they would have had to get aid from a qualified appraiser. This is another instance where planning ahead could have achieved the desired objective.
One major problem shared by farmers and small business owners is that the farm or business typically represents the majority of the value in their estate. Under normal circumstances, estate taxes are due within nine months after the date of death. Because businesses and farms are by their nature highly illiquid enterprises, there is rarely cash to pay these estate taxes. Fortunately, Congress has provided a variety of special tax provisions to make it easier for the small business owner and farmer to meet their tax obligation and thus pass the assets to family members. These special provisions include the following:
Estate taxes are generally due within nine months of the date of death. If the value of your closely held business or farm exceeds 35 percent of your adjusted gross estate, your executor can elect to pay your estate taxes in installments. A 100 percent deferral of taxes is allowed for the first four years based on interest-only payments. The “clock” doesn't start running until the due date of the estate tax return, which is nine months after the decedent's death (so a total of 69 months). The taxes are then paid in equal installments over 2 to 10 years (with a maximum installment payment period of 177 months). For 2014, a reduced interest rate of 2 percent is charged on the first $1,450,000 (as indexed for inflation) of taxable value and a rate 45 percent of the underpayment rate in Section 6601( j )(1) is charged on the balance.
Imagine that you own a working farm in an outlying area of a fast-growing community. The farm has been in your family for two generations, and you want it to remain in the family. Upon your death, the IRS values it not under its current use but at its highest and best use, which is for commercial development. If it were valued as farm property, it would be worth $6 million, but as commercial property it is worth $15 million. This is not an unusual circumstance. To address this problem, current law provides special-use valuations that allow your executor to elect to value the property at its current use rather than its fair market value. To qualify for this election certain criteria must be met:
For 2014 this reduction in value for tax purposes is limited to $1,090,000 and is adjusted for inflation annually. Special-use valuation is a complex area of the law, so you'll need to consult your financial adviser early in the planning process.
Most business and farm owners have a poor sense of the value of their business. This may be because as a profession, farming can yield small profits for a lot of work. However, the IRS doesn't consider work when it puts a value on your property; you should note what the IRS thinks is very important. Upon your death, it is the IRS that may challenge the values your executor places on the farm. In many instances, the IRS will assume that you are going to try to undervalue the business or farm. To counteract this assumption, you will need to have qualified appraisers establish the fair market value and be prepared to defend their results. You should get a ballpark estimate now so that you can do your advance planning. Figure a worst-case valuation and then develop a plan that addresses the estate tax and succession issues. In previous chapters, we discussed many ways to create discounts for valuation purposes. Other chapters outline strategies that you can use to begin transferring portions of the business or farm each year. The important thing is to develop a plan early. You don't want to die and then have your heirs in a crisis-management mode that often results in higher taxes and a greater burden on your loved ones.
Two potentially distinct issues must be considered when thinking about the family business, the first of which has to do with keeping it in the family. If there are family members who are both interested and capable of carrying on the business, you will want to make sure that you design a transfer that gives that person or persons appropriate control of the business. You will also want to ensure that he or she receives the business in a sound financial condition.
If you don't intend to pass the business to family members upon your death or retirement, you should structure the business in such a way as to receive its maximum value. Your decisions here will help determine the strategy that is best for you and your family.
Take a long look at your business. Are there family members who are able and interested in continuing it? If you have a child or children who are interested in the business and others who are not, do you have a way of dividing your estate so that all are treated fairly? You definitely want to avoid engineering a successful transfer of the family business only to have it divide the family. Let's assume that you want your business to be under your children's control. Some of the planning issues to consider are as follows:
If you do not plan to leave your business to a family member, you will want to take steps to maximize its value upon your death or retirement. If you're assuming someone else will be willing to pay top dollar for your business, you have to do a lot of planning. Here are some of the issues you should consider:
Once you have found the right buyer for your business, you will need to structure a formal agreement that outlines all the terms. Whether your buyer is a family member or not, buy-sell agreements offer several advantages:
Buy-sell agreements are typically classified as either entity purchase agreements (sometimes referred to as redemption agreements), cross-purchase agreements, or hybrid agreements.
With an entity purchase agreement, the company agrees to purchase your shares of stock at the occurrence of some predetermined event such as your retirement, disability, or death. This type of buy-sell agreement has several disadvantages. First, it only makes sense where there are other co-owners. Second, if life insurance is used as the funding vehicle, your company may be subject to some rather unpleasant tax consequences (for C corporations)—the alternative minimum tax (AMT). If you may be subject to the AMT, you may want to consider electing S corporation status. Also, unless the agreement is carefully structured, the proceeds could be subject to ordinary income taxes. Finally, the remaining owners are deprived of a stepped-up cost basis, which they would have received if they had purchased your shares directly. In most cases, a cross-purchase agreement is preferred.
In a business where there are multiple owners, a cross-purchase agreement is often used in which each owner agrees to buy a portion of the interest of the departing owner's shares at retirement, disability, or death. The company itself is not a party to these transactions. This arrangement has the advantage of providing the buyer with a stepped-up cost basis in the business interest that he or she purchased. The primary disadvantage is the increased paperwork involved, especially if there are several owners or life insurance is being used to fund the purchases.
Hybrid agreements involve both the shareholders and the company in the buy-sell agreement. Typically they provide that upon your death, disability, or retirement, the shareholders have the first right of refusal to buy your shares. If they don't, then the company redeems your shares. In other cases, just the opposite occurs. The company has the first right of refusal to buy your shares, and if the company fails to do so, then the surviving shareholders have the right to buy them. If the shareholders refuse, the company then becomes obligated to buy your shares. This is sometimes referred to as a wait-and-see agreement because the buyers wait until the triggering event happens before deciding how your shares will be purchased. This allows for some last-minute tax planning to take place.
Having a buy-sell agreement is important, but your family or employees may not have the funds to buy your business interest. In a family-owned business, rarely do the shareholders or key employees have the cash to buy out the interest of a major owner. This problem is most often solved with life insurance. Premiums for permanent or cash-value life insurance can be expensive, but this is often a better solution than term life insurance, which is inexpensive initially but can become prohibitively expensive as you get older. If there are several owners who need to be insured, you may want to consider establishing a partnership to be the owner and beneficiary of the life policies. Without a partnership (or corporation), a company with four owners would need 16 separate life policies to fund a cross-purchase agreement.
Life insurance will not solve all your funding problems. For example, if the triggering event is your disability, life insurance may be of little initial value as a funding vehicle. Any cash values are likely to be inadequate to fund a buyout caused by the disability of the owner. One solution to this problem is to purchase disability buyout insurance. This is a special type of disability policy that provides a lump-sum payment to buy the stock of a permanently disabled business owner. The exact definition of incapacity of a business owner is a complicated issue that needs to be addressed with your professional adviser.
Certain other tax and cash-flow issues are critical to the ongoing financial health of your company. For example, if you were to become disabled and your company continued to pay your salary, those payments might not be deductible by your company, which would create an added drain on its resources. One solution would be to implement a qualified sick pay plan that establishes a company policy for providing income to disabled employees. Another problem caused by a key person's disability is that someone will likely need to be hired to complete his or her duties. This obviously creates further cash drain where the company is paying one person who is not working and another person who is.
Life insurance may also be of little value if you are selling because of your retirement. One possible solution here would be to establish a sinking fund whereby your company sets aside money monthly or yearly for this purpose. In the corporate world this is known as accumulated earnings and can create tax problems for C corporations. Accumulating corporate earnings for the purpose of buying out a majority owner's stock can cause the imposition of the accumulated earnings surtax, which is based on the maximum tax bracket of the individual.
Often, the best solutions are to purchase insurance where you can afford it and then plan to use financing arrangements to fund the balance. For example, your agreement may indicate that insurance will be used up to a certain dollar amount (the face of the policy) and that the balance will be paid over 5 to 10 years in monthly installments at a competitive interest rate. One danger with using installment payments is that they are made with after-tax dollars. The source of these payments is typically company salaries, bonuses, or dividends from the pockets of those people purchasing your stock. If the corporation increases salaries to cover the installment payments, the IRS may declare that the owner/stockholders are receiving what it considers unreasonable compensation, and the portion that is considered unreasonable is then reclassified as dividends for income tax purposes. Dividends are not deductible by the corporation, which results in double taxation. Successfully structuring the sale of a substantial business interest can be a very complicated matter that will require thoughtful effort on your part as well as on the part of experienced professional advisers.
Another viable alternative for selling your stock is to establish an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP). An ESOP is similar to a qualified profit-sharing plan except that the company contributes company stock instead of cash. Some crucial details about ESOPs include the following:
One of the primary advantages to the ESOP is that it can provide you with a ready market for your stock. If the company is a C corporation, the tax on capital gains from the sale may be avoided by reinvestment in marketable securities (stocks and bonds) within 12 months. This advantage is not currently available to owners of S corporation stock. An ESOP owning shares (even 100 percent) of an S corporation will pay no income taxes on corporate profits.
Also, under an ESOP, if the company lacks the cash flow to make a contribution, there is no requirement to do so. Because the employees ultimately will end up owning the company, the ESOP may provide additional employee motivation. Finally, using borrowed money to make stock contributions can be an effective way of raising capital for a company. One added advantage is that the stock may be sold over a number of years or in a lump sum.
Owning and running a business can be a time-consuming and demanding proposition. You put years of your life into making your business a success. To maximize the return on your efforts, you will need to develop a plan to reap the full value of your business at your death or retirement.
One common concern that we all have is protecting our assets from legal judgments. A corporation, FLP, or LLC can provide you with a certain level of protection from would be creditors. For a full discussion of asset protection, read Chapter 15, “Asset Protection Strategies.”
18.218.114.244