181drones in the City
Which makes it all the more important for the police to be as well-equipped
as possible. Does the force appreciate the importance of robotics suciently?
“ere’s always a certain degree of conict between innovative devel-
opments and the wish to get quick results. Unfortunately, the early
stage brings costs only, while results are some way o. You’re nding
out what works, you’re taking small steps in important developments.
ese investments are not without risk, and setbacks occur. Which is
why, to my mind, we should only spend resources on things of con-
siderable potential benet. e successful innovations have to make
up for the setbacks.
What may be harder here than elsewhere is to develop a long-term
vision. e police have a culture of action, but it’s reactive rather than
proactive. After all, our main job is to respond to a disruption of some
sort. But perhaps the problem is not specic to us after all. It’s prob-
ably just part of the human condition. e short term always trumps
the long term.”
References
Anderson, C. (2014). Agricultural drones. MIT Technology Review, 117(3),
58–61.
Barrientos, A., Colorado, J., del-Cerro, J., Martinez, A., Rossi, C., Sanz, D.,
& Valente, J. (2011). Aerial remote sensing in agriculture: A practical
approach to area coverage and path planning for eets of mini aerial
robots. Journal of Field Robotics, 28(5), 667–689.
Bennett, W. C. (2014). Civilian drones, privacy, and the federal-state balance.
Washington, DC: Brookings, Center for Technology Innovation.
Bramley, R. (2009). Lessons from nearly 20years of precision agriculture
research, development, and adoption as a guide to its appropriate appli-
cation. Crop and Pasture Science, 60(3), 197–217.
Calo, M. R. (2011). e drone as privacy catalyst. Stanford Law Review
Online, 64, 29–33.
Cavoukian, A. (2013). Surveillance, then and now: Securing privacy in public spaces.
Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Information and Privacy Commissioner.
http://www.ipc.on.ca/images/Resources/pbd-surveillance.pdf (accessed
May 24, 2014).
Clarke, R. (2014a). Understanding the drone epidemic. Computer Law &
Security Review, 30(3), 230–246.
Clarke, R. (2014b). What drones inherit from their ancestors. Computer Law
& Security Review, 30(3), 247–262.
Clarke, R. (2014c). e regulation of civilian drones’ impact on behavioural
privacy. Computer Law & Security Review, 30(3), 286–305.
182 Just ordinAry robots
Clarke, R., & Bennett Moses, L. (2014). e regulation of civilian drones’
impacts on public safety. Computer Law & Security Review, 30(3),
263–285.
De Jong, A., & Schuilenburg, M. (2007). Een cultuur van controle. Interview
met Eric Nordholt. Gonzo (circus), 79, 12–15.
Elias, B. (2012). Pilotless drones: Background and considerations for congress
regarding unmanned aircraft operations in the national airspace system (CRS
Report for Congress, R42718). http://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42718.pdf.
EPIC (2014). Drones: Eyes in the sky. https://www.epic.org/privacy/ surveillance/
spotlight/1014/drones.html (accessed January 23, 2015).
European Commission (2014). A new era for aviation. Opening the aviation
market to the civil use of remotely piloted aircraft systems in a safe and sustain-
able manner. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. http://eur-lex.
europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52014DC0207
(accessed September 4, 2014).
European RPAS Steering Group (2013). Roadmap for the integration of civil
remotely-piloted aircraft systems into the European aviation system. http://
ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/aerospace/uas/ (accessed September 4,
2014).
FAA (2013). Unmanned aircraft system test site program. Washington, DC:
Department of Transportation.
Farber, H. B. (2013). Eyes in the sky: Constitutional and regulatory approaches
to domestic drone deployment. Syracuse Law Review, 64(1), 1–48. http://
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2350421 (accessed October
14, 2014).
Gernsback, H. (1924). Radio police automaton. Science and Invention, May 14.
Hambling, D. (2010, February 10). Future police: Meet the UK’s armed robot
drones. Wired. www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-02/10/future-police-
meet-the-uk’s-armed-robot-drones#comments (accessed March 17, 2014).
Hayes, B., Jones, C., & Töpfer, E. (2014). Eurodrones Inc. London, UK:
Statewatch.
Huang, Y., omson, S. J., Homann, W. C., Lan, Y., & Fritz, B. K. (2013).
Development and prospect of unmanned aerial vehicle technologies for
agricultural production management. International Journal of Agricultural
and Biological Engineering, 6(3), 1–10. http://www.ijabe.org/index.php/
ijabe/article/view/900 (accessed October 5, 2014).
Jenkins, D., & Vasigh, B. (2013). e economic impact of unmanned aircraft
systems integration in the United States. Arlington, VA: Association for
Unmanned Vehicle Systems International.
Ladiges, R., & Van Stijl, M. C. (2009). OT&E scenario’s voor KLPD UAS
(NLR-CR-2009-598). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Nationaal Lucht-
en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium.
Mann, S., Nolan, J., &Wellman, B. (2003). Sousveillance: Inventing and
using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance
environments. Surveillance & Society, 1(3), 331–355.
183drones in the City
Magriña, E. (2014, June 27). e global race for drone regulation. Inline.
http://inlinepolicy.com/2014/the-global-race-for-drone-regulation/
(accessed August 25, 2014).
Molko, R. (2013). e drones are coming! Will the fourth amendment stop
their threat to our privacy? Brooklyn Law Review, 78(4), 1279–1333.
Phillips, D. J. (2004). Privacy policy and PETs: e inuence of policy
regimes on the development and social implications of privacy enhanc-
ing technologies. New Media & Society, 6(6), 691–706.
Rubin, R. (2014). Drones: Quickly navigating toward commercial application,
starting with e-commerce and retail. New York: BI Intelligence.
Sato, A. (2003). e RMAX helicopter UAV (Public report). Shizuoka, Japan:
Aeronautic Operations Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.
Schlag, C. (2013). e new privacy battle: How the expanding use of drones
continues to erode our concept of privacy and privacy rights. Pittsburgh
Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 13(2), 1–22. http://tlp.law.pitt.edu/
ojs/index.php/tlp/article/view/123 (accessed October 26, 2014).
Sharkey, N. (2008). 2084: Big robot is watching you. Report on the future for polic-
ing, surveillance and security. http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~noel/Future%20
robot%20policing%20report%20Final.doc (accessed November 16,
2014).
Solove, D. J. (2004). e digital person: Technology and privacy in the informa-
tion age. New York: New York University Press.
Syed, N., & Berry, M. (2014). Journo-drones: A ight over the legal land-
scape. Communications Lawyer, 30(3), 1–10. http://www.lskslaw.com/
documents/CL_Jun14_v30n4_SyedBerry.pdf (accessed October 26,
2014).
ompson II, R. M. (2013). Drones in domestic surveillance operations: Fourth
amendment implications and legislative responses. Washington, DC:
Congressional Research Service. http://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42701.
pdf (accessed October 26, 2014).
Volovelsky, U. (2014). Civilian uses of unmanned aerial vehicles and the
threat to the right to privacy—An Israeli case study. Computer Law &
Security Review, 30(3), 306–320.
Wright, D. (2014). Drones: Regulatory challenges to an incipient industry.
Computer Law & Security Review, 30(3), 226–229.
..................Content has been hidden....................
You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.