181drones in the City
Which makes it all the more important for the police to be as well-equipped
as possible. Does the force appreciate the importance of robotics suciently?
ere’s always a certain degree of conict between innovative devel-
opments and the wish to get quick results. Unfortunately, the early
stage brings costs only, while results are some way o. Youre nding
out what works, youre taking small steps in important developments.
ese investments are not without risk, and setbacks occur. Which is
why, to my mind, we should only spend resources on things of con-
siderable potential benet. e successful innovations have to make
up for the setbacks.
What may be harder here than elsewhere is to develop a long-term
vision. e police have a culture of action, but its reactive rather than
proactive. After all, our main job is to respond to a disruption of some
sort. But perhaps the problem is not specic to us after all. Its prob-
ably just part of the human condition. e short term always trumps
the long term.”
References
Anderson, C. (2014). Agricultural drones. MIT Technology Review, 117(3),
5861.
Barrientos, A., Colorado, J., del-Cerro, J., Martinez, A., Rossi, C., Sanz, D.,
& Valente, J. (2011). Aerial remote sensing in agriculture: A practical
approach to area coverage and path planning for eets of mini aerial
robots. Journal of Field Robotics, 28(5), 667–689.
Bennett, W. C. (2014). Civilian drones, privacy, and the federal-state balance.
Washington, DC: Brookings, Center for Technology Innovation.
Bramley, R. (2009). Lessons from nearly 20years of precision agriculture
research, development, and adoption as a guide to its appropriate appli-
cation. Crop and Pasture Science, 60(3), 197–217.
Calo, M. R. (2011). e drone as privacy catalyst. Stanford Law Review
Online, 64, 29–33.
Cavoukian, A. (2013). Surveillance, then and now: Securing privacy in public spaces.
Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Information and Privacy Commissioner.
http://www.ipc.on.ca/images/Resources/pbd-surveillance.pdf (accessed
May 24, 2014).
Clarke, R. (2014a). Understanding the drone epidemic. Computer Law &
Security Review, 30(3), 230246.
Clarke, R. (2014b). What drones inherit from their ancestors. Computer Law
& Security Review, 30(3), 247–262.
Clarke, R. (2014c). e regulation of civilian drones’ impact on behavioural
privacy. Computer Law & Security Review, 30(3), 286–305.
182 Just ordinAry robots
Clarke, R., & Bennett Moses, L. (2014). e regulation of civilian drones’
impacts on public safety. Computer Law & Security Review, 30(3),
263–285.
De Jong, A., & Schuilenburg, M. (2007). Een cultuur van controle. Interview
met Eric Nordholt. Gonzo (circus), 79, 12–15.
Elias, B. (2012). Pilotless drones: Background and considerations for congress
regarding unmanned aircraft operations in the national airspace system (CRS
Report for Congress, R42718). http://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42718.pdf.
EPIC (2014). Drones: Eyes in the sky. https://www.epic.org/privacy/ surveillance/
spotlight/1014/drones.html (accessed January 23, 2015).
European Commission (2014). A new era for aviation. Opening the aviation
market to the civil use of remotely piloted aircraft systems in a safe and sustain-
able manner. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. http://eur-lex.
europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52014DC0207
(accessed September 4, 2014).
European RPAS Steering Group (2013). Roadmap for the integration of civil
remotely-piloted aircraft systems into the European aviation system. http://
ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/aerospace/uas/ (accessed September 4,
2014).
FAA (2013). Unmanned aircraft system test site program. Washington, DC:
Department of Transportation.
Farber, H. B. (2013). Eyes in the sky: Constitutional and regulatory approaches
to domestic drone deployment. Syracuse Law Review, 64(1), 148. http://
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2350421 (accessed October
14, 2014).
Gernsback, H. (1924). Radio police automaton. Science and Invention, May 14.
Hambling, D. (2010, February 10). Future police: Meet the UK’s armed robot
drones. Wired. www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-02/10/future-police-
meet-the-uks-armed-robot-drones#comments (accessed March 17, 2014).
Hayes, B., Jones, C., & Töpfer, E. (2014). Eurodrones Inc. London, UK:
Statewatch.
Huang, Y., omson, S. J., Homann, W. C., Lan, Y., & Fritz, B. K. (2013).
Development and prospect of unmanned aerial vehicle technologies for
agricultural production management. International Journal of Agricultural
and Biological Engineering, 6(3), 1–10. http://www.ijabe.org/index.php/
ijabe/article/view/900 (accessed October 5, 2014).
Jenkins, D., & Vasigh, B. (2013). e economic impact of unmanned aircraft
systems integration in the United States. Arlington, VA: Association for
Unmanned Vehicle Systems International.
Ladiges, R., & Van Stijl, M. C. (2009). OT&E scenario’s voor KLPD UAS
(NLR-CR-2009-598). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Nationaal Lucht-
en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium.
Mann, S., Nolan, J., &Wellman, B. (2003). Sousveillance: Inventing and
using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance
environments. Surveillance & Society, 1(3), 331–355.
183drones in the City
Magriña, E. (2014, June 27). e global race for drone regulation. Inline.
http://inlinepolicy.com/2014/the-global-race-for-drone-regulation/
(accessed August 25, 2014).
Molko, R. (2013). e drones are coming! Will the fourth amendment stop
their threat to our privacy? Brooklyn Law Review, 78(4), 12791333.
Phillips, D. J. (2004). Privacy policy and PETs: e inuence of policy
regimes on the development and social implications of privacy enhanc-
ing technologies. New Media & Society, 6(6), 691–706.
Rubin, R. (2014). Drones: Quickly navigating toward commercial application,
starting with e-commerce and retail. New York: BI Intelligence.
Sato, A. (2003). e RMAX helicopter UAV (Public report). Shizuoka, Japan:
Aeronautic Operations Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.
Schlag, C. (2013). e new privacy battle: How the expanding use of drones
continues to erode our concept of privacy and privacy rights. Pittsburgh
Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 13(2), 1–22. http://tlp.law.pitt.edu/
ojs/index.php/tlp/article/view/123 (accessed October 26, 2014).
Sharkey, N. (2008). 2084: Big robot is watching you. Report on the future for polic-
ing, surveillance and security. http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~noel/Future%20
robot%20policing%20report%20Final.doc (accessed November 16,
2014).
Solove, D. J. (2004). e digital person: Technology and privacy in the informa-
tion age. New York: New York University Press.
Syed, N., & Berry, M. (2014). Journo-drones: A ight over the legal land-
scape. Communications Lawyer, 30(3), 1–10. http://www.lskslaw.com/
documents/CL_Jun14_v30n4_SyedBerry.pdf (accessed October 26,
2014).
ompson II, R. M. (2013). Drones in domestic surveillance operations: Fourth
amendment implications and legislative responses. Washington, DC:
Congressional Research Service. http://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42701.
pdf (accessed October 26, 2014).
Volovelsky, U. (2014). Civilian uses of unmanned aerial vehicles and the
threat to the right to privacy—An Israeli case study. Computer Law &
Security Review, 30(3), 306320.
Wright, D. (2014). Drones: Regulatory challenges to an incipient industry.
Computer Law & Security Review, 30(3), 226229.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
3.138.204.195