Dogs like to eat and will take an opportunity to eat people food. At least in my house, feeding the dog people food is (in a sense) illegal. 

An example of enticement is that you've cooked the food, walked over to the table, and left the food in plain view of the dog. Although the dog knows that eating people food is illegal, it has a choice of either eating it or not eating it. We will know whether or not the dog eats the food because it will either be consumed or left alone. 

An example of entrapment is that you've cooked the food, walked over to the table, and left the food in plain view of the dog. Although the dog knows that eating people food is illegal, it has a choice of either eating it or not eating it. However, you pick up the piece of food, tell the dog that they shouldn't eat it, then you feed the dog the food that it shouldn't have eaten in the first place, and then discipline the dog.

Which of these scenarios sounds morally and ethically correct? 

Now let's replace a few things and say the same story.