The understanding we have now acquired of p–n junction diodes allows us to explain and model the first commercialised transistors, the bipolar junction transistor ( BJT ) developed in the 1950s at Bell Labs and the junction field‐effect transistor ( JFET ) developed about 10 years later. Both of these p–n junction–based transistors are still in use today.
In Section 5.1, we explained the I–V curves for a p–n junction illuminated by a light source. Figure 5.2 as described by Eq. (5.7) shows how the reverse saturation current of a p–n junction is increased by the optical generation of minority carriers at or near the depletion region. Consider a reverse‐biased p–n junction with a power supply and a load resistor connected as shown in Figure 8.1.
If light shines on this junction, the reverse saturation current increases and the power flowing through the load increases. The magnitude of the reverse bias voltage across the diode is the supply voltage less the voltage across the resistor:
Figure 8.2 shows a load line based on resistor R. The voltage VR across the resistor can be varied by the intensity of the light and can range from almost zero if only the reverse saturation current flows through the diode (no illumination) to almost V S if illumination is strong enough. If we regard the resistor as a load, the photodiode becomes a way to control a voltage VR and a resulting current I = VR /R across the load.
A transistor is a device that controls a voltage and a resulting current across a load in response to an electrical input rather than by using light intensity as an input. In order to achieve this, we can consider how to vary minority carrier concentration in a reverse‐biased diode in response to an electrical input voltage or current.
We will now show that a controllable concentration of minority holes can be electrically produced in the n‐type material of the reverse‐biased p–n junction. Since only one minority carrier type is required for reverse diode current to flow, it is acceptable to only generate holes. Later we will also show that minority electrons could also be electrically generated in the p‐type material of a reverse‐biased p–n junction.
In Chapter 3, we concluded that the p–n junction in forward bias causes minority carriers to be injected into both the p‐side and the n‐side of the junction. If one side of the junction has much higher doping than the other side, then most of the minority carrier injection and hence most of the overall current flow are attributable to only one minority carrier type.
We will now consider a p + –n junction. Since the p‐side is heavily doped, the equilibrium minority electron concentration n p in the p‐side will be small compared to the equilibrium minority carrier concentration p n in the n‐side. From Section 3.5, we see that minority carriers exist as excess holes in the n‐side of a p–n junction and from Eq. (3.21b) we obtain
The excess hole concentration δp(x n) is exponentially related to applied voltage V, and therefore, only a small change of V in forward bias across this p–n junction can lead to orders of magnitude of change in δp(x n). If these minority holes could somehow be made available to the reverse‐biased p–n junction of Figure 8.1, then we would have the ability to control the current flow through the reverse‐biased p–n junction by varying the voltage V across a forward‐biased p–n junction.
Since the excess minority holes in the n‐side of a forward‐biased p–n junction drop off exponentially with distance away from the edge of the depletion region, we could position the reverse‐biased p–n junction as closely as possible to the forward‐biased junction and preferably well within a diffusion length of the forward biased junction. The resulting device is shown in Figure 8.3 with a forward bias connected to a first junction and a reverse bias connected to a second junction. This is the structure of a BJT.
Since we produce excess holes in the n‐type region due to the p+–n junction, this p+ region is called the emitter. Since we remove the minority holes from the reverse‐biased junction using the p‐type material on the right side, we call this the collector. The n‐type region is called the base for historical reasons since the first BJT was mechanically supported by this n‐type layer.
The most important region to understand is the base of the transistor because holes injected from the emitter–base junction diffuse through the base and then drift across the base–collector junction into the collector.
We can establish a coordinate system as shown in Figure 8.4. Here the excess minority electron concentration in the base δp n(x n) at the base–emitter depletion boundary is and in the base at the base–collector depletion boundary, it is .
We can now determine two boundary conditions relevant to the base region at x n = 0 and at x n = W b .
is obtained from the excess carrier concentration that exists on the p‐side of the base–emitter p–n junction for a given base–emitter bias voltage. Using Eq. (3.21b) we obtain
where V BE is the base–emitter voltage. If for a forward biased base–emitter junction, then we can write
We can also determine by considering the base–collector p–n junction:
where V CB is the collector–base voltage. If for a reverse‐biased base–collector junction, then we can write
Since p n is a very small number, we will approximate this to zero and hence,
The excess minority carrier concentration in the base can now be obtained by solving the diffusion Eq. (2.66a) to obtain the general solution
where C 1 and C 2 are constants. Since the base is finite in extent, we cannot argue the elimination of one term and both terms must be used. Applying our two boundary conditions to Eq. 8.2 we obtain
and
Solving for C 1 and C 2 we obtain
and
Substituting C 1 and C 2 into Eq. 8.2 we have
This can be plotted as shown in Figure 8.5.
In order to calculate the current flow through the base, we consider minority hole diffusion current density (Eq. (2.65)) and we assume a BJT junction area A to obtain
Substituting δp(x n) from Eq. 8.2 and evaluating I p(x n) at x n = 0 we obtain
and evaluating I p(x n) at x n = W b we obtain
Using Eqs. 8.3 and 8.4 we can write I p(0) and I p(W b) as
and
Note that I p(0) and I p(x n) are determined by the slopes of the curve in Figure 8.5 at x n = 0 and at x n = W b, respectively. We require that and only a small fraction of the holes entering the base from the emitter junction recombine before they reach the base–collector junction. This therefore implies that the two slopes are similar. As a BJT becomes more close to ideal in performance, the shape of the curve approaches a straight line shown as a dotted line in Figure 8.5.
The holes that do recombine in the base cause a base current to flow. This is because for every hole that recombines in the base, an electron must be supplied to the base to maintain base change neutrality. These electrons are supplied to the base from the external circuit resulting in base current flowing out of the base. Another contribution to base current exists due to electrons being injected from the base into the emitter. Since we have intentionally specified base doping much lower than emitter doping in the p+–n emitter–base junction, this electron injection current will be small. See Example 3.4 in which holes injected from a heavily doped p‐side into a lightly doped n‐side dominate current flow. The goal in BJT transistor design is to minimise total base current.
We will define the total base current as i B = I B + I n where I B represents electrons required for hole recombination in the base and I n represents electrons injected from the base to the emitter. We can quantify I B as the difference between the hole current entering the base and the hole current leaving the base and therefore
Using Eqs. 8.5 and 8.6, we obtain
Since , a Taylor series expansion may be used for the exponential functions. To the second order,
Upon substitution we obtain the approximation
This can be rewritten in terms of minority hole lifetime using L p 2 = D p τ p to yield
As expected, if the minority hole lifetime increases, less recombination will occur and base current decreases.
There is another way to approximate the base current. Using Figure 8.5 we can obtain the total charge in the base due to minority holes using the area under the curve. To simplify this, we will assume that the dotted line forming a triangular region allows us to use the area of a triangle to obtain
Since this charge recombines on average in time τ p, the recombination current or base current becomes
which is identical to Eq. 8.8.
We can now obtain a more complete view of the BJT and its performance and express this using a few key parameters.
The base transport factor B is the fraction of holes injected by the base–emitter junction that make it across the base to the base–collector junction and we therefore define B as
Typical values of base transport factor in a good BJT transistor approach unity. The value is maximised by minimising the base width and by doping the base lightly since increased doping causes undesirable carrier scattering and lowers minority carrier lifetimes and diffusion lengths in semiconductors. Note also that we can express I B in terms of B from Eq. 8.7 as
Since not all the current flowing through the base–emitter junction is hole current, we define the emitter injection efficiency γ as
where I n is due to electron injection into the emitter from the emitter–base junction. The value of emitter injection efficiency also approaches unity and is maximised by having a high emitter doping level and a low base doping level.
The ratio between collector current and emitter current is called the current transfer ratio α and is given by
which also approaches unity for a good BJT transistor. The terminal currents flowing in or out of the BJT terminals are labelled using lower case symbols as shown in Figure 8.3.
The total base current i B is now attributable to both minority hole recombination in the base and electron injection from base to emitter. Hence,
An important parameter that determines the current amplification available in a transistor is the collector current amplification factor β defined as
Dividing both numerator and denominator on the right‐hand side by I p(0) + I n we obtain
Since α is almost unity, typical values of β are large and can be on the order of 100. In this case a base current of 1 mA for a BJT would result in a collector current of 100 mA.
The resulting electrical behaviour of a PNP transistor may now be presented by a family of characteristic curves shown in Figure 8.6. Each curve shows the collector current for a given value of base current.
Although we have presented a PNP transistor, the converse transistor type, the NPN transistor, operates in a completely analogous manner. In the NPN transistor, the minority carriers crossing the p‐type base are electrons rather than holes. Since electrons have higher diffusion lengths than holes in silicon, NPN transistors generally outperform PNP transistors, although both transistor types are used.
The JFET is also built on the basis of the p–n junction, but its operating principle is quite different from that of a BJT. Instead of using minority carriers, it relies on current flow due to majority carriers. Control of current flow is provided by changing the cross‐sectional area of a channel through which majority carriers flow. By reducing the channel width to virtually zero, the flow of current can be minimised and by maximising the channel width, a maximum current can flow.
In Chapter 3, we saw that the depletion width of a p–n junction depends on a reverse bias. If reverse‐biased junctions are arranged on either side of a channel, the effective width of the channel can be controlled by means of the reverse bias voltage applied to the p–n junctions.
Figure 8.7 shows an n‐type channel of width h located between two p+ regions. The equilibrium depletion regions of width W for the two resulting p+n junctions are shown using dashed lines. They extend further into the n‐type region than into the p+ regions as expected. See Example 3.2.
The n‐type material has ohmic contacts at the beginning and end of the channel. These are labelled source (S) and drain (D), and the channel carries the load current. The two p‐type regions are connected together, and they are connected to a gate (G) electrode using two ohmic contacts.
The resulting JFET characteristic curves are shown in Figure 8.8.
To understand and model this graph, we will start by confining our analysis to the behaviour closer to the origin. Consider the case in which V S = 0 and V D is small. As the gate voltage is made negative relative to the source region and the drain region, the two p–n junctions become reverse‐biased and the depletion regions of the two p–n junctions increase in width. See Figure 3.19. This decreases the effective channel width h. As gate voltage continues to become more negative, h will reach zero and the channel width reaches zero.
An expanded version of Figure 8.8 is shown in Figure 8.9 in which V DS = V D − V S is small. In this regime, we can consider the width h of the channel to be constant along the channel. For convenience, we shall again set V S = 0 and therefore we can state that V D ≅ V S = 0. The width W of a depletion region with bias was derived in Chapter 3 and using Eq. (3.26) we obtain
If the doping in the p+ regions is much higher than the doping in the n‐type channel, we can assume that the depletion regions exist almost entirely within the n‐type region. Hence, from Figure 8.7, we can express channel width h as
Note that the channel width h reaches zero when H = 2W . We define this condition as pinch‐off which is achieved if H − 2W = 0. Solving for the corresponding gate voltage we obtain
where pinch‐off voltage V p is defined as the magnitude of gate voltage at pinch‐off.
The electrical resistance R between source and drain of a channel of length L is therefore
where A is the cross‐sectional area of the channel and Z is the channel depth. For the JFET of Figure 8.9 the curve having the smallest slope is for the case of a channel very close to the pinch‐off condition and hence V p ≅ 4 V for this JFET. Since the slope of each line in Figure 8.9 is equal to 1/R , we can express it as
Equation 8.9 and corresponding Figure 8.9 represent widely applicable voltage‐controlled resistor behaviour. Depending on gate voltage, the resistance between drain and source varies. If the FET is connected such that drain current I D flows through a load, then the FET can control load current. A particular advantage of a JFET is that gate current is negligible since the p+n junctions are never forward‐biased during normal operation.
We can also consider larger values of V DS which are included in Figure 8.8. Modelling a JFET over a wide range of voltages is more complicated since the channel width is no longer uniform from source to drain. As the drain voltage shown in Figure 8.7 becomes more positive, it adds a further reverse bias to the p+n junctions near the drain contact thereby narrowing the channel width at the drain end of the JFET. Figure 8.10 shows the tapered shape of a channel with V G = 0 under these circumstances that reaches pinch‐off at the drain. Further increasing V DS will no longer substantially increase drain current and the JFET is said to be in saturation. Figure 8.11 shows the point on each characteristic curve of the JFET at the onset of saturation.
More complete JFET modelling requires two‐dimensional treatment of the tapered channel to obtain the conductivity of the channel of varying cross‐sectional area. It is made still more complex due to carrier velocity effects since at pinch‐off, drain current I D is crowded into a very narrow channel. Electric fields in this portion of the channel can be sufficiently high that carrier velocity saturation occurs, especially in short channel JFETs. See Figure 2.24.
The converse JFET device has a p‐type channel between two n+p junctions, and its modes of operation are completely analogous to the n‐channel JFET. Both n‐channel and p‐channel JFETs are in use. Variations on the JFET design we have described also exist. For example, JFETs may be fabricated in which the channel is formed between only one p–n junction and an insulating layer on the opposing side of the channel. The same operating principle still applies.
Figure 8.12 shows both PNP and NPN BJT transistor symbols as well as n‐channel and p‐channel JFET symbols.
Today's electronics industry is dominated by digital electronics and the MOSFET (metal oxide field‐effect transistor) serves almost all of this market. The MOSFET is a variation of the JFET and is covered in detail in semiconductor device books. See Further Reading.
There are, however, many other more specialised applications of transistors in linear amplifiers, temperature sensors, low‐noise amplifiers, analogue switches, and power electronics for which BJTs and JFETs can outperform MOSFETs. The p–n junctions common to both the BJT and the JFET are very robust, and these devices are more rugged and less prone to damage than are MOSFETs. JFETs have inherently lower noise operation than MOSFETs. The BJT is widely used in discrete applications due to the very broad selection of individually packaged BJT types available covering a wide spectrum of applications from small signal amplifiers to power electronics. The BJT is also used in very high frequency applications, such as radio frequency circuits for wireless communications systems. As a temperature sensor, the BJT, due to its well understood temperature dependence, is widely used.
Carrier lifetimes of 0.1 μs
Emitter doping 1019 cm−3
Collector doping 1017 cm−3
Base doping 1017 cm−3
Metallurgical base width (junction to junction based on a step doping profile): 4 μm
Cross‐sectional area 10−3 cm2
Configuration | Collector | Base | Emitter |
1 | ground | No connection | +V |
2 | ground | ground | +V |
3 | +V | ground | No connection |
4 | +V | ground | +V |
Semiconductor is silicon at room temperature
p+ doping: 5 × 1018 cm−3
n doping: 2 × 1016 cm−3
L = 100 μm
The JFET is biased such that V S = V D = 0
3.145.2.184