Case: Is This Worth Starting?

There are many ways that projects get started, and most of them have some explicit step where a decision is made on some quantifiable criteria. Sure, there are times where the decision is made implicitly, based on some hunch or on the relative power of the person who wants the project. Usually organizations at least want to justify such decisions with some more defensible rationale. And it’s in those explicit decision steps where estimates play a part.

Let’s look at some of the criteria for these decisions.

Return on Investment

A fundamental question for investment is “Will this provide more value than it costs?” If so, it’s quickly followed by “How much more?” and we weigh the benefits and costs. Not all benefits are measured in money. We may need to weigh some intangibles. What is the value of happiness or health? Some benefits, such as brand goodwill, are hard to quantify in dollars. We often think in terms of products, where the value is mostly equated to the revenue it brings in. For IT systems, we might judge the value by the labor saved or the increased volume of work we can handle. In some cases, the value is in new capabilities that the organization didn’t have before. These are generally estimated based on assumptions we make about what will change when we have this new system. Sometimes market research or tests with prototypes inform these estimates.

In addition to estimating the return from having the system, we estimate the cost of acquiring it. How many people will have to work for how long in order to build it? How much will that cost us? What equipment will we need to develop it and to run it in production?

Return on Investment at Empire Enterprises

Casey looked at the proposal for a magnet clearinghouse. "How am I to estimate this? It’s way too vague." Fortunately, the proposal included the source of the idea, so Casey set up a meeting with Frankie and Ellis to go over the details.

Frankie and Ellis were happy to describe their vision to Casey. They went on and on about all the features they envisioned while Casey took notes. Then Casey went off and estimated the work to produce such a system.

Casey gave the estimate to the Project Manager, who forwarded it to the VP, who reported it to the IT PMO, who gave the report to the CEO. At a regular C-level planning meeting, the senior leadership compared this cost estimate with the benefit estimates. The CFO noted that, if the estimates were accurate, it would take at least 8 years to recover the cost with internal savings. On the other hand, with the projected revenue of offering an external service, it would only take about a year to reach break-even.

"Not so fast," the Product Director interjected. "How can we be sure that this business will be a success? How do you propose to test the interest of potential customers, many of whom are competitors?"

The CEO looked thoughtful. "What are the assumptions about how quickly this business will ramp up when it’s launched? And what’s the synergy with our existing business lines?" Ultimately, they decided that it wasn’t a good strategic decision for Empire Enterprises to enter the magnetics brokerage business.

When Frankie brought the news, Ellis was crushed. It seemed like such a good plan. Frankie thought a minute. "Let’s go back and talk to Casey. We got carried away describing the Cadillac of systems. Perhaps we can find a cheaper one that will help you do your job."

And so they did. This smaller system didn’t have any of the bells and whistles needed for a commercial offering, but it would still make Ellis’ job easier. This time, the analysis showed the internal-only system would pay for its development in one to three years, depending on the volatility of market conditions. The project was given the green light.

In this instance, we see the flip side of separating the estimation of value and the estimation of cost from what we worried about in Empire Enterprises: The Birth of a Project. The cost estimate included a lot of extra work that wasn’t aligned with the value that made strategic sense for the company. That extra cost torpedoed the project. It was only by reestimating with reduced scope that the project made sense.

Capacity

Before you start something new, you may need to consider if you have the capacity to undertake the endeavor and make everyone reasonably happy. Even when you’re not facing a firm deadline, you can’t take on an unlimited amount of work. I would expect that your answer might generally be one of “no problem,” “no way,” or “it’s hard to tell.” The first two answers give clear signals. The third will require more precise analysis, and takes on more risk if it’s wrong.

Riffle & Sort Get an Inquiry from a New Customer

"Let me run some numbers and I’ll get right back to you."

Kai hung up the phone and went down the hall to talk with Jesse.

"Jesse, I just got a call from a potential customer. They want what sounds like a fairly simple online presence, but they want it by the end of March. Given that it’s mid-October and holiday season is approaching, I thought I’d better check with you about our capacity to take on the job."

"We’ve got one development team that’s currently working on maintenance and improvement items, but the rest of the teams are dedicated to significant projects. The team that has some development bandwidth is intentionally being held in reserve for high-priority work that might come up during tax season, from January 1 to April 15. It’s crucial for us to be able to respond immediately to any legal discrepancies or operational problems that show up during that time."

"I guess that effectively gives us about a month to a month and a half of team time before the end of the year. That’s not enough to build the site they want."

"Historically, the tax season on-call development team has at least 50% unused capacity during the season."

"That would be enough capacity, I’m pretty sure."

"The worst case I’ve ever seen was the year they were 80-85% busy with emergency work. I hope we never have that crisis again!"

"Let me call the client back and see how flexible they are. I suspect we could do this job using a third of their capacity from January through March, but that’s too close to guarantee. Perhaps we can identify a subset that’s valuable, but small enough to guarantee before April, with the rest following on a time-available basis. We should still be able to complete it by the end of May, even with the worst-case tax season. If they’ve got some flexibility, then I’ll do some more rigorous estimates."

These are some of the questions you might consider when doing capacity estimates:

  • What are the needed people doing now, and when will they be done with that?
  • If you lose some people, how much longer will it take?
  • If you do this, what else will you have to give up or defer?
  • How long might it delay other desired development?
  • When can you move on to the next thing?
  • How long will these people, currently allocated elsewhere, be tied up with this project?

You may have plenty of capacity, but also plenty of potential projects. Where should you spend your capacity? What projects should you do? This requires an estimate of the potential projects, of course. A moderate return at low cost may be just the low-hanging fruit you need right now. Or a more expensive project may justify the cost by having a huge potential for return. You must weigh the plusses and minuses and risks and make a decision.

  • If you add some people to work on it, will it take less time?
  • Either way, will it cost more or less? How much?
  • Can you afford the cost of devoting your manpower to this project, or the cost of increasing staffing for it?

If you don’t want to redirect your current capacity, how many people should you hire to staff it? Similarly, when you want to provide contracted development for someone else, what will be the demand and how many people will be needed to meet that demand? This requires a much more precise estimate.

It’s not easy to ramp up capacity. Finding people who are available and competent and interested in doing this work takes time. Forming them into effective teams takes time. And while things are getting organized, we’re spending for potential capacity that isn’t yet producing. This is one way that projects start out behind schedule from the very beginning, if the schedule assumes steady-state productivity right from the start.

Cashflow and Break-Even

Cost precedes value; investment precedes return. How far does it precede and at what rate? When will the break-even point be? How soon can we start earning value?

It’s popular these days to think that the earlier we deliver a system, the better. Is that always true, though? Certainly, there are times when the value of a new product is greatly enhanced by delaying for a splashy rollout. The iPhone didn’t debut with a Minimally Viable Product and incremental improvements. The old advertising saw, “Sell the sizzle, not the steak,” still holds true.

On the other hand, trying to achieve feature parity with an old version or a competitor’s offering may delay the new system to its detriment. Keep an eye on the market desires.

There are so many variables to consider even if we knew the cost precisely. Yet we can hardly begin to analyze the risks and trade-offs without any cost information. And so we look to estimates. We don’t need precision at this point, but we need something reasonably accurate for making decisions.

Funding the TinyToyCo Mobile App

Recall that TinyToyCo founders, Chris and Pat, created an online game in their spare time, and then were able to create a stream of income from advertising in that game. They had a hunch that if they created a mobile app version, they’d do even better.

They felt they were beyond the point of nights and weekends, though. They had been doing that too long. As the web game had increased in popularity, the demands on their time had grown. There were inquiries from users, relationships with advertisers, maintenance of the application, and scaling to meet demand. These things were taking up the time they would otherwise spend in development.

Was it time to quit the day jobs and go full time? Was it time to hire someone? If so, should they hire a developer with more mobile development experience than they had, or hire an administrator to free up more of their time? The next step felt like a big one.

Both Pat and Chris had been good about saving money, and they each had about six months of living expenses in the bank. If they hired someone, that buffer would be cut in about half, as both of them were depending on frugality to stretch their savings to six months. Hiring someone would require paying industry standard wages, or close to it, plus payroll taxes.

There’s nothing like being broke to focus your attention on income. Pat and Chris weren’t broke, yet, and they didn’t intend to be. They were willing to come close if it would catapult TinyToyCo to success. They decided to focus on three specific income milestones and weigh the intangibles and probabilities from that.

Financial Milestones

Out of all the questions popping up in their brains, three rose to the top.

  1. How long would it take to start generating net income with a mobile app?
  2. How long would it take until the income matched their living expenses?
  3. How long would it take to reach the break-even point, where the income had repaid the costs?

The first milestone would be the point where the drain on their savings would start to diminish. That would extend the time they could stay afloat without other jobs. The second milestone would be the point where they quit draining their savings. Once they reached that, they could breathe easier. They’d be able to continue indefinitely, as long as no unexpected expense came up. The third milestone was the turnaround point. At that point, their six months of living expenses would be back in the bank. After that, their work would start returning a profit. That’s when they could declare success. But when would that be, and could they make it that far?

It didn’t take a detailed estimate to decide that hiring someone was more than they could afford. That seemed entirely too risky given they were starting on a shoestring. Shortening the first milestone seemed like a prudent way to go. As long as they didn’t do something that would limit them in the future, the earlier they started earning money, the better.

There’s nothing like being broke to focus your attention on expenses, too. Pat and Chris didn’t want to be broke. They also didn’t want to shift their attention to the legalities of hiring and payroll. And they didn’t want to commit to “go for broke” or to have to let someone go in a short time if the finances looked bad. If it was just them working on the project, they could mothball it at any time that seemed prudent, without having to officially cancel it.

Industry Data is Better Than None

Pat called up some friends who had successfully developed mobile apps to ask for advice and information. How long had it taken them to field a working app, and then to monetize it? Chris started searching for publicly available information from strangers to answer the same questions. Together, they started envisioning a few minimal starting points they could build to test customer interest. They estimated how long it would take for each of these. The easiest one seemed as likely a starting point as the others. If it flopped, they could transform some of the same code into other attempts. As a rough guess, they could probably try four or five attempts until they were broke.

As soon as they found a starting point that connected with customers, then they could monetize it with advertising and a paid version without advertising. That would be the first milestone.

They did some calculations based on their research to estimate the second and third milestones based on the experience of others. Of course, these were the survivors. There were many other startups who didn’t get that far, and left no data behind. They recalculated at half the growth rate, and at one quarter. The slowest growth rate gave them some pretty grim predictions, but if their first, or maybe second, version resonated with people, then it might be enough.

And they really, really wanted to try this. With that burning desire, and estimates that gave them some hope, they decided to go for it. They would go with their eyes wide open, though, and re-evaluate frequently.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.119.248.149