Chapter 6. Polyesters

6.1. Background

Polyesters are formed by a condensation reaction that is very similar to the reaction used to make polyamide or nylons. A diacid and dialcohol are reacted to form the polyester with the elimination of water as shown in Figure 6.1.
B9780080964508000065/gr1.jpg is missing
Figure 6.1
Chemical structure of PC polyester.
While the actual commercial route to making the polyesters may be more involved, the end result is the same polymeric structure. The diacid is usually aromatic. Polyester resins can be formulated to be brittle and hard, tough and resilient, or soft and flexible. In combination with reinforcements such as glass fibers, they offer outstanding strength, a high strength-to-weight ratio, chemical resistance, and other excellent mechanical properties. The three dominant materials in this plastics family are polycarbonate (PC), PET, and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT). Thermoplastic polyesters are similar in properties to Nylon 6 and Nylon 66, but have lower water absorption and higher dimensional stability than the nylons.

6.1.1. Polycarbonate

Theoretically, PC is formed from the reaction of bis-phenol A and carbonic acid. The structures of these two monomers are given in Figure 6.2.
B9780080964508000065/gr2.jpg is missing
Figure 6.2
Chemical structures of monomers used to make PC polyester.
Commercially, different routes are used, but the PC polymer of the structure shown in Figure 6.3 is the result.
B9780080964508000065/gr3.jpg is missing
Figure 6.3
Chemical structure of PC polyester.
Polycarbonate performance properties include:
• Very impact resistant and is virtually unbreakable and remains tough at low temperatures
• “Clear as glass” clarity
• High heat resistance
• Dimensional stability
• Resistant to UV light, allowing exterior use
• Flame retardant properties
Applications include glazing, safety shields, lenses, casings and housings, light fittings, kitchenware (microwaveable), medical apparatus (sterilizable), and CDs (the discs).

6.1.2. Polybutylene Terephthalate

PBT is a semi-crystalline, white or off-white polyester similar in both composition and properties to PET. It has somewhat lower strength and stiffness than PET, is a little softer but has higher impact strength and similar chemical resistance. As it crystallizes more rapidly than PET, it tends to be preferred for industrial scale molding. Its structure is shown in Figure 6.4.
B9780080964508000065/gr4.jpg is missing
Figure 6.4
Chemical structure of PBT polyester.
PBT performance properties include:
• High mechanical properties
• High thermal properties
• Good electrical properties
• Dimensional stability
• Excellent chemical resistance
• Flame retardancy

6.1.3. Polyethylene Terephthalate

PET polyester is the most common thermoplastic polyester and is often called just “polyester”. This often causes confusion with the other polyesters in this chapter. PET exists both as an amorphous (transparent) and as a semi-crystalline (opaque and white) thermoplastic material. The semi-crystalline PET has good strength, ductility, stiffness, and hardness. The amorphous PET has better ductility but less stiffness and hardness.
It absorbs very little water. Its structure is shown in Figure 6.5.
B9780080964508000065/gr5.jpg is missing
Figure 6.5
Chemical structure of PET polyester.
PET has good barrier properties against oxygen and carbon dioxide. Therefore, it is utilized in bottles for mineral water. Other applications include food trays for oven use, roasting bags, audio/video tapes as well as mechanical components.

6.1.4. Liquid Crystalline Polymers

Liquid crystalline polymers (LCP) are a relatively unique class of partially crystalline aromatic polyesters based on 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and related monomers shown in Figure 6.6. Liquid crystal polymers are capable of forming regions of highly ordered structure while in the liquid phase. However, the degree of order is somewhat less than that of a regular solid crystal. Typically, LCPs have outstanding mechanical properties at high temperatures, excellent chemical resistance, inherent flame retardancy and good weatherability. Liquid crystal polymers come in a variety of forms from sinterable high temperature to injection moldable compounds.
B9780080964508000065/gr6a.jpg is missing
B9780080964508000065/gr6b.jpg is missing
B9780080964508000065/gr6c.jpg is missing
B9780080964508000065/gr6d.jpg is missing
B9780080964508000065/gr6e.jpg is missing
B9780080964508000065/gr6f.jpg is missing
B9780080964508000065/gr6g.jpg is missing
Figure 6.6
Chemical structures of monomers used to make LCP polyesters.
LCPs are exceptionally inert. They resist stress cracking in the presence of most chemicals at elevated temperatures, including aromatic or halogenated hydrocarbons, strong acids, bases, ketones, and other aggressive industrial substances. Hydrolytic stability in boiling water is excellent. Environments that deteriorate these polymers are high-temperature steam, concentrated sulfuric acid, and boiling caustic materials.
As an example, the structure of Ticona Vectra® A950 LCP is shown in Figure 6.7.
B9780080964508000065/gr7.jpg is missing
Figure 6.7
Chemical structure of Ticona Vectra® A950 LCP.

6.1.5. Polycyclohexylene-dimethylene Terephthalate

Polycyclohexylene-dimethylene terephthalate (PCT) is a high-temperature polyester that possesses the chemical resistance, processability, and dimensional stability of polyesters PET and PBT. However, the aliphatic cyclic ring shown in Figure 6.8 imparts added heat resistance. This puts it between the common polyesters and the LCP polyesters described in the previous section. At this time only DuPont makes this plastic under the trade name Thermx®.
B9780080964508000065/gr8.jpg is missing
Figure 6.8
Chemical structure of PCT polyester.
This material has found use in automotive, electrical, and housewares applications.

6.1.6. Polyphthalate Carbonate

Amorphous polyphthalate carbonate copolymer (PPC) is another high-temperature PC. It provides excellent impact resistance, optical clarity, and abrasion resistance. The plastic offers UV protection as well. It is lightweight, impact-resistant, and can be reused after multiple exposures to sterilization. Its structure is shown in Figure 6.9.
B9780080964508000065/gr9.jpg is missing
Figure 6.9
Chemical structure of PPC polyester.

6.1.7. Polytrimethylene Terephthalate

Polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT) is a semi-crystalline polyester polymer that has many of the same property advantages as PBT and PET. However, compared to PBT, compounds composed of PTT exhibit better tensile strengths, flexural strengths, and stiffness. They also have excellent flow and surface finish. PTT can also be more cost-effective than PBT. PTT may have more uniform shrinkage and better dimensional stability in some applications. PTT, like PBT, has excellent resistance to a broad range of chemicals at room temperature, including aliphatic hydrocarbons, gasoline, carbon tetrachloride, perchloroethylene, oils, fats, alcohols, glycols, esters, ethers, and dilute acids and bases. Strong bases may attack PTT and many polyester resins.
The two monomer units used in producing this polymer are 1,3-propanediol and terephthalic acid and its structure is shown in Figure 6.10.
B9780080964508000065/gr10.jpg is missing
Figure 6.10
Chemical structure of PTT polyester.

6.1.8. Polyester Blends and Alloys

There are numerous polyester blends and alloys. Often the different polyesters are blended.

6.2. Polycarbonate

6.2.1. Fatigue Data

B9780080964508000065/gr11.jpg is missing
Figure 6.11.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 101—unreinforced, high viscosity, general-purpose extrusion PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr12.jpg is missing
Figure 6.12.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 121—unreinforced, low viscosity, general-purpose PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr13.jpg is missing
Figure 6.13.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 141—unreinforced, low–medium viscosity, general-purpose PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr14.jpg is missing
Figure 6.14.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 143R—unreinforced, low–medium viscosity, UV stabilized general-purpose PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr15.jpg is missing
Figure 6.15.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 191—high impact PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr16.jpg is missing
Figure 6.16.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 500—10% glass fiber reinforced PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr17.jpg is missing
Figure 6.17.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 915R—unreinforced, flame retardant, easy release reinforced PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr18.jpg is missing
Figure 6.18.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 920—low viscosity, unreinforced, flame retardant PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr19.jpg is missing
Figure 6.19.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 925—low viscosity, unreinforced, flame retardant, ECO conforming label grade PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr20.jpg is missing
Figure 6.20.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 940—medium viscosity, unreinforced, flame retardant, ECO conforming label grade PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr21.jpg is missing
Figure 6.21.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 945—low–medium viscosity, unreinforced, flame retardant, ECO conforming label grade PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr22.jpg is missing
Figure 6.22.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 955—medium viscosity, unreinforced, flame retardant, ECO conforming label grade PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr23.jpg is missing
Figure 6.23.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® EM1210—automotive interiors, heat and impact-resistant PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr24.jpg is missing
Figure 6.24.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® EM2212—automotive interiors, 10% glass-reinforced PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr25.jpg is missing
Figure 6.25.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® EM3110—automotive interiors, optimized flow and processability for thinner wall uses PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr26.jpg is missing
Figure 6.26.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® HF1110—high flow, heat-resistant PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr27.jpg is missing
Figure 6.27.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® HF1130—high flow, UV stabilized, heat resistance PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr28.jpg is missing
Figure 6.28.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® HF1140—high flow, FDA food compliant for disposable end-uses PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr29.jpg is missing
Figure 6.29.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® LS1—automotive lens system, low-viscosity PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr30.jpg is missing
Figure 6.30.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® OQ1030—optical quality for CD/DVD PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr31.jpg is missing
Figure 6.31.
Fatigue crack propagation rate dependence on cyclic frequency and stress intensity factor range for generic PC.
B9780080964508000065/gr32.jpg is missing
Figure 6.32.
Fatigue crack propagation rate dependence on cyclic frequency and temperature for generic PC.

6.2.2. Tribology Data

B9780080964508000065/gr33.jpg is missing
Figure 6.33.
Coefficient of friction vs. temperature for SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 101R—unreinforced, high viscosity, release agent, general-purpose extrusion PC (against 100Cr6 stainless steel, Ra = 0.1μm, sliding speed = 0.1m/s, pressure = 1.5MPa).
Table 6.1. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 300 TFE 5 (PC with 5% PTFE) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
700.451.0056280.29
701.800.2513730.33
1752.250.509390.42
3509.000.253860.26
Table 6.2. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 300 TFE 5 (PC with 5% PTFE) vs. RTP 300 TFE 5 (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
17.50.900.15260.17
350.900.256390.24
701.800.253200.24
700.900.501520.18
Table 6.3. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 300 TFE 10 (PC with 10% PTFE) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
700.451.0013730.16
701.800.256550.24
1752.250.508300.22
3509.000.252530.13
Table 6.4. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 300 TFE 10 (PC with 10% PTFE) vs. RTP 300 TFE 10 (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
17.50.900.15210.19
350.900.25720.17
701.800.252910.18
700.900.501870.11
Table 6.5. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 300 TFE 15 (PC with 15% PTFE) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
700.451.007780.56
701.800.252630.33
1752.250.501900.27
3509.000.25690.21
Table 6.6. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 300 TFE 15 (PC with 15% PTFE) vs. RTP 300 TFE 10 (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
17.50.900.13160.30
350.900.25490.19
701.800.251670.12
700.900.501290.16
Table 6.7. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 300 TFE 20 (PC with 20% PTFE) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
700.451.005550.33
701.800.253540.31
1752.250.502530.24
3509.000.251160.18
Table 6.8. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 300 TFE 10 SI 2 (PC with 10% PTFE and 2% Silicone) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
700.451.0012840.31
701.800.259950.35
1752.250.503260.26
3509.000.251170.18
Table 6.9. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 300 AR 10 (PC with 10% Aramid Fiber) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
700.451.00580.22
701.800.259850.38
1752.250.50121000.29
3509.000.25147330.31
Table 6.10. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 300 AR 10 TFE 10 (PC with 10% Aramid Fiber and 10% PTFE) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
700.451.006630.03
701.800.251130.10
1752.250.501770.14
3509.000.252770.14
Table 6.11. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 302 TFE 15 (PC with 15% Glass Fiber and 15% PTFE) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
700.451.00940.22
701.800.251110.35
1752.250.5019380.34
3509.000.256350.34
Table 6.12. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 305 TFE 15 (PC with 30% Glass Fiber and 15% PTFE) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
700.451.001980.31
701.800.251760.35
1752.250.50930.53
3509.000.2510070.27
Table 6.13. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 382 TFE 15 (PC with 15% Carbon Fiber and 15% PTFE) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
701.800.25720.57
1752.250.50450.54
Table 6.14. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 382 TFE 15 (PC with 15% Carbon Fiber and 15% PTFE) vs. RTP 382 TFE 15 (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
17.50.900.151960.31
350.900.251690.22
701.800.25910.12
700.900.501120.13
Table 6.15. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 385 TFE 15 (PC with 30% Carbon Fiber and 15% PTFE) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPam/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/Nm)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
700.451.00400.24
701.800.252850.30
1752.250.502050.39
3509.000.25720.36
Table 6.16. Taber Abrasion Performance of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® (Data obtained per ASTM D 1044, CS-17 wheels, 1kg load)

Lexan® productTaber abrasion mg/1000 cycles
101—Unreinforced, high viscosity, general purpose10
121—Unreinforced, low viscosity, general purpose10
141—Unreinforced, low–medium viscosity, general purpose10
143R—Unreinforced, low–medium viscosity, UV stabilized general purpose10
191—High impact20
500—10% Glass fiber reinforced11
920—Low viscosity, unreinforced, flame retardant10
940—Medium viscosity, unreinforced, flame retardant, ECO conforming label grade10

6.3. Polybutylene Terephthalate

6.3.1. Fatigue Data

B9780080964508000065/gr34.jpg is missing
Figure 6.34.
Stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 20°C and 50% relative humidity of DSM Arnite®—unreinforced PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr35.jpg is missing
Figure 6.35.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of Ticona Celanex® 2300 GV/30—general-purpose, 30% glass fiber reinforced PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr36.jpg is missing
Figure 6.36.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of several Ticona Celanex® PBT plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr37.jpg is missing
Figure 6.37.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of several DuPont Engineering Polymers Crastin® PBT plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr38.jpg is missing
Figure 6.38.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of several other DuPont Engineering Polymers Crastin® PBT plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr39.jpg is missing
Figure 6.39.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of DuPont Engineering Polymers Crastin® SK645FR—30% glass fiber reinforced, UL94 V-0 flame retardant PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr40.jpg is missing
Figure 6.40.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics LNP Stat-Kon® WC-4036—30% glass fiber reinforced PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr41.jpg is missing
Figure 6.41.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of two SABIC Innovative Plastics LNP Thermocomp® fiber reinforced PBT plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr42.jpg is missing
Figure 6.42.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 310—unreinforced, general-purpose PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr43.jpg is missing
Figure 6.43.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 337—unfilled, impact modified grade for low-temperature PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr44.jpg is missing
Figure 6.44.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 412E—20% glass fiber reinforced PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr45.jpg is missing
Figure 6.45.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 420—30% glass fiber reinforced, high heat PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr46.jpg is missing
Figure 6.46.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 430—33% glass fiber reinforced, impact modified PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr47.jpg is missing
Figure 6.47.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 732E—30% glass/mineral filled, thermal stabilized, low warpage, enhanced flow PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr48.jpg is missing
Figure 6.48.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 736—45% glass/mineral PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr49.jpg is missing
Figure 6.49.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 325—unreinforced, improved processing PBT.
B9780080964508000065/gr50.jpg is missing
Figure 6.50.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® HV7075 PBT.

6.3.2. Tribology Data

B9780080964508000065/gr51.jpg is missing
Figure 6.51.
Dynamic coefficient of friction vs. pressure loading of Ticona Celanex® 2500—general purpose, nucleated, easy flow PBT (v = 10m/min, against steel with Rz = 2μm).
B9780080964508000065/gr52.jpg is missing
Figure 6.52.
Dynamic coefficient of friction vs. sliding speed of Ticona Celanex® 2500—general purpose, nucleated, easy flow PBT (p = 1.25N/mm2, against steel with Rz = 2μm).
B9780080964508000065/gr53.jpg is missing
Figure 6.53.
Range of sliding coefficient of friction vs. pressure of Evonik Industries Vestodur® 2000—unreinforced, medium viscosity PBT (v = 0.5m/s).
Table 6.17. Taber Abrasion and Coefficient of Friction of Ticona Celanex® PBT Plastics

PropertyTaber Abrasion (mg/1000 cycles)Coefficient of Friction DynamicCoefficient of Friction Static
Celanex® 2000—Unfilled130.130.13
Celanex® 2002—General purpose, unreinforced140.130.13
Celanex® 2012—Flame retardant, unreinforced0.10–0.130.10–0.13
Celanex® 3200—General purpose, 15% glass fiber reinforced240.10–0.210.15–0.19
Celanex® 3210—18% Glass fiber reinforced, flame retardant140.10–0.13
Celanex® 3211—18% Glass fiber reinforced, flame retardant0.12–0.160.18–0.23
Celanex® 3300—General purpose, 30% glass fiber reinforced400.120.16–0.34
Celanex® 3310—30% Glass fiber reinforced, flame retardant33100.10–0.13
Celanex® 3311—30% Glass fiber reinforced, flame retardant33110.12–0.160.17–0.26
Celanex® 3400—General purpose, 40% glass fiber reinforced34000.12–0.160.17–0.19
Celanex® 4300—Improved impact, 30% glass fiber reinforced43000.13–0.150.17–0.18
Celanex® 5300—Improved surface smoothness, 30% glass fiber reinforced170.13
Celanex® 6400—Warp resistant, 40% glass fiber/mineral reinforced, good surface smoothness250.13–0.150.17–0.23
Celanex® 7700—Warp resistant, 40% glass fiber/mineral reinforced, flame retardant0.01–0.200.14–0.24

6.4. Polyethylene Terephthalate

6.4.1. Fatigue Data

B9780080964508000065/gr54.jpg is missing
Figure 6.54.
Stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 20°C and 50% relative humidity of DSM Arnite®—35% glass fiber reinforced PET.
B9780080964508000065/gr55.jpg is missing
Figure 6.55.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of two BASF Petra®—glass fiber reinforced PET plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr56.jpg is missing
Figure 6.56.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of two DuPont Engineering Polymers Rynite® PET plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr57.jpg is missing
Figure 6.57.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of several DuPont Engineering Polymers Rynite® 500 Series—general purpose, glass fiber reinforced PET plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr58.jpg is missing
Figure 6.58.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of two DuPont Engineering Polymers Rynite® 900 Series—low warp, mica/glass fiber reinforced PET plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr59.jpg is missing
Figure 6.59.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of DuPont Engineering Polymers Rynite® SST35—super tough, 35% glass fiber reinforced PET.
B9780080964508000065/gr60.jpg is missing
Figure 6.60.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of several DuPont Engineering Polymers Rynite® FR400 Series—flame retardant reinforced PET plastics.

6.4.2. Tribology Data

Table 6.18. Coefficient of Friction and Taber Abrasion of DuPont Engineering Polymers Rynite® PET Plastics

PropertyCoefficient of Friction (Against Self)Coefficient of Friction (Against Steel)Taber Abrasion (CS-17 Wheel, 1000g)
Test MethodASTM D1894ASTM D1894
Unitsmg/1000 cycles
Rynite® 530—General purpose, 30% glass fiber reinforced0.180.1730
Rynite® 545—General purpose, 45% glass fiber reinforced0.170.2044
Rynite® 555—General purpose, 55% glass fiber reinforced0.270.18
Rynite® 935—Low warp, 35% mica/ glass fiber reinforced0.210.19
Rynite® 940—Low warp, 40% mica/ glass fiber reinforced81
Rynite® 415HP—Toughened, 15% glass fiber reinforced0.420.2735
Rynite® SST 35 Super Tough, 35% glass fiber reinforced82
Rynite® FR330—Flame retardant, 30% glass fiber reinforced0.240.1888
Rynite® FR515—Flame retardant, 15% glass fiber reinforced, higher heat0.210.1888
Rynite® FR530—Flame retardant, 30% glass fiber reinforced, higher heat0.180.1938
Rynite® FR543—Flame retardant, 43% glass fiber reinforced, higher heat0.180.1669
Rynite® FR943—Flame retardant, 43% mica/glass fiber reinforced, higher heat, low warp0.290.1882
Rynite® FR945—Flame retardant, 45% mica/glass fiber reinforced, higher heat, low warp0.200.2081
Rynite® FR946—Flame retardant, 46% mica/glass fiber reinforced, higher heat, low warp0.270.1874

6.5. Liquid Crystal Polymer

6.5.1. Fatigue Data

B9780080964508000065/gr61.jpg is missing
Figure 6.61.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of two Ticona Vectra®—fiber reinforced LCP plastics (10Hz).
B9780080964508000065/gr62.jpg is missing
Figure 6.62.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of DuPont Engineering Polymers Zenite® 6130 BK010—30% glass fiber reinforced LCP.

6.5.2. Tribology Data

Ticona Vectra® A130—30% Glass fiber reinforced, standard grade LCP
Ticona Vectra® A230—30% Carbon fiber reinforced, high-stiffness LCP
Ticona Vectra® A530—30% Mineral-filled LCP
Ticona Vectra® A430—PTFE modified, standard grade LCP
Ticona Vectra® A435—Glass/PTFE-filled LCP
Ticona Vectra® A625—25% Graphite-filled LCP
Ticona Vectra® B130—30% Glass fiber reinforced, high-stiffness LCP
Ticona Vectra® B230—30% Carbon fiber reinforced, high-stiffness LCP
Ticona Vectra® C130—30% Glass fiber reinforced, heat resistant LCP
Ticona Vectra® L130—30% Glass fiber reinforced, high flow LCP
B9780080964508000065/gr63.jpg is missing
Figure 6.63.
Dynamic coefficient of friction for various Ticona Vectra® LCP resins (P = 6N, v = 60cm/min).
B9780080964508000065/gr64.jpg is missing
Figure 6.64.
Wear volumes after 60 hours of testing for various Ticona Vectra® LCP resins (P = 3N, v = 136m/min).
Table 6.19. Coefficients of Friction for Various Vectra® LCP Grades

Vectra® LCP GradeCoefficient of Friction—Flow Direction
StaticDynamic
A115—15% Glass fiber reinforced, standard grade0.110.11
A130—30% Glass fiber reinforced, standard grade0.140.14
A150—50% Glass fiber reinforced, standard grade0.160.19
A230—30% Carbon fiber reinforced, high stiffness0.190.12
A410—10% Mineral/glass fiber filled0.210.21
A430—PTFE modified, standard grade0.110.11
A435—Glass/PTFE filled0.160.18
A515—15% Mineral filled0.200.19
A625—Graphite reinforced0.210.15
B230—30% Carbon fiber reinforced, high stiffness0.140.14
L130—30% Glass fiber reinforced, high flow0.150.16

6.6. Polyphthalate Carbonate

6.6.1. Fatigue Data

B9780080964508000065/gr65.jpg is missing
Figure 6.65.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 4501—high heat-resistant PPC.
B9780080964508000065/gr66.jpg is missing
Figure 6.66.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Lexan® 4701R—high heat-resistant PPC.

6.7. Polycyclohexylene-Dimethylene Terephthalate

6.7.1. Fatigue Data

B9780080964508000065/gr67.jpg is missing
Figure 6.67.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of several SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox®—fire retardant PCT plastics.

6.8. Polyester Blends and Alloys

6.8.1. Fatigue Data

B9780080964508000065/gr68.jpg is missing
Figure 6.68.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of several DuPont Engineering Polymers Crastin®—injection molding PBT/ASA Alloy plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr69.jpg is missing
Figure 6.69.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® CL101—automotive exterior PC/PBT Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr70.jpg is missing
Figure 6.70.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 368—flame retardant, impact modified, mold release PBT/PC Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr71.jpg is missing
Figure 6.71.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 508—30% glass fiber reinforced PBT/PC Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr72.jpg is missing
Figure 6.72.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 82°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 508—30% glass fiber reinforced PBT/PC Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr73.jpg is missing
Figure 6.73.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® 3706—impact modified PBT/PC Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr74.jpg is missing
Figure 6.74.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® K4630—17% glass fiber reinforced PC/PBT Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr75.jpg is missing
Figure 6.75.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® 1102—unreinforced PBT/PC Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr76.jpg is missing
Figure 6.76.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® 1103—unreinforced, impact modified PBT/PC Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr77.jpg is missing
Figure 6.77.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® 1402B—blowmoldable, unreinforced PBT/PC Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr78.jpg is missing
Figure 6.78.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® 1403B—PBT/PC Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr79.jpg is missing
Figure 6.79.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of two SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy®—PBT/PC Alloys.
B9780080964508000065/gr80.jpg is missing
Figure 6.80.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® 1760E—high flow, 11% glass-filled PBT/PC Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr81.jpg is missing
Figure 6.81.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of two SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® 52xx series PBT/PC Alloys.
B9780080964508000065/gr82.jpg is missing
Figure 6.82.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at two temperatures of SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® 5770—20% glass fiber/mineral filled, impact modified PBT/PC Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr83.jpg is missing
Figure 6.83.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of two SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® 5xxx series PBT/PC Alloys.
B9780080964508000065/gr84.jpg is missing
Figure 6.84.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of two other SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® 5xxx series PBT/PC Alloys.
B9780080964508000065/gr85.jpg is missing
Figure 6.85.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at two temperatures of SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® X5300WX—unreinforced, chemically resistant, UV stabilized PBT/PC Alloy.
B9780080964508000065/gr86.jpg is missing
Figure 6.86.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of several SABIC Innovative Plastics Enduran® PET/PBT Alloy plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr87.jpg is missing
Figure 6.87.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of two SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® PET/PBT Alloy plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr88.jpg is missing
Figure 6.88.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of two glass fiber reinforced SABIC Innovative Plastics Valox® PET/PBT Alloy plastics.
B9780080964508000065/gr89.jpg is missing
Figure 6.89.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of several SABIC Innovative Plastics Xenoy® PET/PC Alloy plastics.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.119.113.208