Chapter 5. Polyether Plastics

5.1. Background

This chapter covers polymers in which the most important linking group is the ether moiety, which is –O–.

5.1.1. Polyoxymethylene (or Acetal Homopolymer)

Acetal polymers, also known as polyoxymethylene (POM) or polyacetal, are formaldehyde-based thermoplastics that have been commercially available since the 1960s. Polyformaldehyde is thermally unstable. It decomposes on heating to yield formaldehyde gas. Two methods of stabilizing polyformaldehyde for use as an engineering polymer were developed and introduced by DuPont in 1959 and Celanese in 1962 (now Ticona).
DuPont’s method for making polyacetal yields a homopolymer through the condensation reaction of polyformaldehyde and acetic acid (or acetic anhydride). The acetic acid puts acetate groups (CH3COO–) on the ends of the polymer as shown in Figure 5.1, which provide thermal protection against decomposition to formaldehyde.
B9780080964508000053/gr1.jpg is missing
Figure 5.1
Chemical structure of acetal homopolymer.
Further stabilization of acetal polymers also includes the addition of antioxidants and acid scavengers. Polyacetals are subject to oxidative and acidic degradation, which leads to molecular weight decline. Once the chain of the homopolymer is ruptured by such an attack, the exposed polyformaldehyde ends may decompose to formaldehyde and acetic acid.

5.1.2. Polyoxymethylene Copolymer (POM-Co or Acetal Copolymer)

The Celanese route for the production of polyacetal yields a more stable copolymer product via the reaction of trioxane, a cyclic trimer of formaldehyde, and a cyclic ether, such as ethylene oxide or 1,3-dioxolane. The structures of these monomers are shown in Figure 5.2. The polymer structure is given in Figure 5.3.
B9780080964508000053/gr2.jpg is missing
Figure 5.2
Chemical structure of POM-Co monomers.
B9780080964508000053/gr3.jpg is missing
Figure 5.3
Chemical structure of acetal copolymer.
The improved thermal and chemical stability of the copolymer versus the homopolymer is a result of randomly distributed oxyethylene groups, which is circled in Figure 5.5. All polyacetals are subject to oxidative and acidic degradation, which leads to molecular weight reduction. Degradation of the copolymer ceases, however, when one of the randomly distributed oxyethylene linkages is reached. These groups offer stability to oxidative, thermal, acidic and alkaline attack. The raw copolymer is hydrolyzed to an oxyethylene end cap to provide thermally stable polyacetal copolymer.
The copolymer is also more stable than the homopolymer in an alkaline environment. Its oxyethylene end cap is stable in the presence of strong bases. The acetate end cap of the homopolymer, however, is readily hydrolyzed in the presence of alkalis, causing significant polymer degradation.
The homopolymer is more crystalline than the copolymer. The homopolymer provides better mechanical properties, except for elongation. The oxyethylene groups of the copolymer provide improved long-term chemical and environmental stability. The copolymer’s chemical stability results in better retention of mechanical properties over an extended product life.
Acetal polymers have been particularly successful in replacing cast and stamped metal parts due to their toughness, abrasion resistance and ability to withstand prolonged stresses with minimal creep. Polyacetals are inherently self-lubricating. Their lubricity allows the incorporation of polyacetal in a variety of metal-to-polymer and polymer-to-polymer interface applications such as bearings, gears and switch plungers. These properties have permitted the material to meet a wide range of market requirements.
The properties of polyacetals can be summarized as follows:
• Excellent wear resistance
• Very good strength and stiffness
• Good heat resistance
• Excellent chemical resistance
• Opaque
• Moderate to high price
• Somewhat restricted processing

5.1.3. Modified Polyphenylene Ether/Polyphenylene Oxides

Polyphenylene ether (PPE) plastics are also referred to as polyphenylene oxide (PPO). The structure of the polymer is shown in Figure 5.4.
B9780080964508000053/gr4.jpg is missing
Figure 5.4
Chemical structure of PPE or PPO.
The PPE materials are always blended or alloyed with other plastics, so they are called modified PPE or PPO. PPE is compatible with polystyrene (PS) and is usually blended with high-impact PS over a wide range of ratios. Because both PPE and PS plastics are hydrophobic, the alloys have very low water absorption rates and high dimensional stability. They exhibit excellent dielectric properties over a wide range of frequencies and temperatures. PPE/PS alloys are supplied in flame-retardant, filled and reinforced, and structural foam molding grades. PPE can also be alloyed with polyamide (nylon) plastics to provide increased resistance to organic chemicals and better high-temperature performance.
End uses include automotive electrical applications, water pump impellers, HVAC equipment, solar heating systems, packaging and circuit breakers.
Graphs of the creep properties of the polyether-based plastics are in the following sections.

5.2. Acetals–POM Homopolymer

5.2.1. Fatigue Data

B9780080964508000053/gr5.jpg is missing
Figure 5.5
Stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at various temperatures for DuPont Engineering Polymers Delrin® 500—unfilled medium viscosity POM.
B9780080964508000053/gr6.jpg is missing
Figure 5.6.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at various temperatures for DuPont Engineering Polymers Delrin® 100, 500 and 900—unfilled POM.
B9780080964508000053/gr7.jpg is missing
Figure 5.7.
Fatigue crack propagation vs. stress intensity factor of various molecular weights of generic unfilled POM.

5.2.2. Tribology Data

B9780080964508000053/gr8.jpg is missing
Figure 5.8.
Wear against mild steel in a thrust washer test for DuPont Engineering Polymers Delrin® 500 and 500 CL (internally lubricated) medium viscosity POM resins (nonlubricated, P = 0.04MPa, V = 0.95m/s).
B9780080964508000053/gr9.jpg is missing
Figure 5.9.
Wear against various materials of DuPont Engineering Polymers Delrin® 100, 500 and 900—unfilled POM.
B9780080964508000053/gr10.jpg is missing
Figure 5.10.
The effect of Teflon® PTFE levels in DuPont Engineering Polymers Delrin® on wear rate and dynamic coefficient of friction.
Table 5.1. Wear Properties of RTP Company RTP 800 TFE 20 DEL—POM Homopolymer with PTFE 20% vs. 1018 C Steel

PV (KPa m/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/N m)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
701.800.253210.30
1752.250.504400.40
3502.251.006090.57
Table 5.2. Coefficient of Friction of Several DuPont Engineering Polymers Delrin® POM Plastics (Thrust Washer Test, Nonlubricated, 23°C; P = 2.1MPa; V = 3m/min)

Material/Counter MaterialStatic Coefficient of FrictionDynamic Coefficient of Friction
Delrin 100, 500, 900 on Steel0.200.35
Delrin 500CL on Steel0.100.20
Delrin AF on Steel0.080.14
Delrin 500 on Delrin 5000.300.40
Delrin 500 on Zytel 1010.100.20
Table 5.3. Characteristics, Specific Wear Rate and Dynamic Coefficient of Friction of Various Grades of DELRIN® Designed for Friction and Wear Applications

Delrin GradeSpecific Wear Rate 10−6mm3/N·mDynamic Coefficient of Friction
Against ItselfAgainst 100 Cr6 SteelAgainst ItselfAgainst 100 Cr6 Steel
100P1150120.380.27
500P1500120.350.33
500CL120040.360.27
500AF4020.220.20
500AL2260.160.18
520MP530.190.18
900P1400120.330.33
900SP200.10
1. Surface and countersurface are consisting of the same grade of DELRIN®. The specific wear rate was measured at low speed (0.084m/s) with a pressure of 0.624MPa in a reciprocating motion (total sliding distance: 1.52km), and the coefficient of friction was measured at a similar speed (0.08m/s) with a pressure of 0.196MPa, also in reciprocating motion.
2. Surface roughness Ra (μm): 0.10; hardness HRB: 93. The specific wear rate was measured at low speed (0.084m/s) with a pressure of 0.624MPa in a reciprocating motion (total sliding distance: 4.25km); the coefficient of friction was measured at a high speed (0.5m/s) with a load of 10N in a sliding motion (Block-on-Ring).

5.3. Acetals–POM-Co

5.3.1. Fatigue Data

B9780080964508000053/gr11.jpg is missing
Figure 5.11.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure for Ticona Celcon® POM-Co plastics.
B9780080964508000053/gr12.jpg is missing
Figure 5.12.
Fluctuating stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C and 10Hz for Ticona Hostaform® C 9021—Standard Injection Molding Grade POM-Co.
B9780080964508000053/gr13.jpg is missing
Figure 5.13.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C and 10Hz for Ticona Hostaform® C 9021—Standard Injection Molding Grade POM-Co.
B9780080964508000053/gr14.jpg is missing
Figure 5.14.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C and 10Hz for several Ticona Hostaform® POM-Co plastics.
B9780080964508000053/gr15.jpg is missing
Figure 5.15.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C and 10Hz for two Ticona Hostaform® C 9021 POM-Co plastics.
B9780080964508000053/gr16.jpg is missing
Figure 5.16.
Torsional stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C and 10Hz for Ticona Hostaform® C 9021—Standard Injection Molding Grade POM-Co.
B9780080964508000053/gr17.jpg is missing
Figure 5.17.
Torsional stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C and 10Hz for Ticona Hostaform® C 9021—Standard Injection Molding Grade POM-Co.
B9780080964508000053/gr18.jpg is missing
Figure 5.18.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C and 10Hz for two BASF Ultraform® POM-Co plastics.

5.3.2. Tribology Data

B9780080964508000053/gr19.jpg is missing
Figure 5.19.
Radial wear vs. load on unlubricated journal bearing of Ticona Celcon® POM-Co at various running speeds at 23°C.
B9780080964508000053/gr20.jpg is missing
Figure 5.20.
Dynamic coefficient of friction vs. bearing pressure on unlubricated hardened and polished steel shaft of Ticona Celcon® POM-Co at a running speed of 10m/min.
B9780080964508000053/gr21.jpg is missing
Figure 5.21.
Dynamic coefficient of friction vs. bearing speed on unlubricated hardened and polished steel shaft of Ticona Celcon® POM-Co at a bearing pressure of 0.26Mpa.
B9780080964508000053/gr22.jpg is missing
Figure 5.22.
Limiting PV curve for unlubricated Ticona Celcon® POM-Co.
B9780080964508000053/gr23.jpg is missing
Figure 5.23.
Coefficient of sliding friction vs. roughness of a sliding steel disk (HRC = 54–56 at 40°C, P = 1MPa, V = 0.5m/s) for two BASF Ultraform® POM-Co plastics.
B9780080964508000053/gr24.jpg is missing
Figure 5.24.
Wear rate vs. roughness of a sliding steel disk (HRC = 54–56 at 40°C, P = 1MPa, V = 0.5m/s) for two BASF Ultraform® POM-Co plastics.
Table 5.4. Tribological Properties of RTP Company ESD 800 Static Dissipative (Base Polymer POM-Co Ticona Celcon® M90) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data Obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPa m/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/N m)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
701.800.25870.60
1752.250.50390.57
3502.251.0060.44
Table 5.5. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 800 Base Resin (Base Polymer POM-Co Ticona Celcon® M90) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data Obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPa m/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/N m)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
701.800.251870.40
1752.250.502060.42
3502.251.003020.44
Table 5.6. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 800 SI 2 (Base Polymer POM-Co Ticona Celcon® M90 with Silicone 2%) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data Obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPa m/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/N m)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
701.800.25850.43
700.451.003130.39
1752.250.50920.41
3508.990.251210.51
3502.251.001510.51
Table 5.7. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 800 TFE 5 (Base Polymer POM-Co Ticona Celcon® M90 with PTFE 5%) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data Obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPa m/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/N m)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
701.800.25360.37
1752.250.50850.35
3502.251.00320.30
Table 5.8. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 800 TFE 10 (Base Polymer POM-Co Ticona Celcon® M90 with PTFE 10%) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data Obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPa m/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/N m)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
701.800.251700.68
700.451.003800.92
1752.250.50260.29
3508.990.25140.18
3502.251.0012450.10
Table 5.9. Tribological Properties of RTP Company RTP 800 TFE 10 SI 2 (Base Polymer POM-Co Ticona Celcon® M90 with PTFE 10% Silicone 2%) vs. 1018 C Steel (Data Obtained per ASTM 3702)

PV (KPa m/s)Load (N)Speed (m/s)Wear Factor × 10−8 (mm3/N m)Dynamic Coefficient of Friction
701.800.25190.29
700.451.001140.63
1752.250.50120.24
3508.990.25180.14
3502.251.002190.27
Table 5.10. Wear and Dynamic Coefficient of Friction of Various Ticona Hostform® Grades in Dry Sliding Contact with a Rotating Polished Steel Shaft (Wear Conditions: Roughness Height 0.8μm, Peripheral Speed of Shaft v = 136m/min, Load = 3.1N)

GradeWear Volume (mm2)Dynamic COFa
C 9021 AW0.62
C 9021 K0.730.39
C 9021 TF + 3% Si oil1.230.27
C 9021 G1.960.29
C 9021 TF3.640.23
C 9021 + 3% Si oil6.560.39
C 90217.960.34
aSpeed = 20m/min, pressure = 1.25N/mm2, test duration 30min.

5.4. Modified Polyphenylene Ether/Polyphenylene Oxide

5.4.1. Fatigue Data

B9780080964508000053/gr25.jpg is missing
Figure 5.25.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® GTX954—unfilled impact modified PPE/PS/PA plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr26.jpg is missing
Figure 5.26.
Flexural stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Thermocomp® ZF-1006—30% glass fiber PPO.
B9780080964508000053/gr27.jpg is missing
Figure 5.27.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® PPX615—15% glass fiber reinforced, impact modified PPE/PP plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr28.jpg is missing
Figure 5.28.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® PPX630—30% glass fiber reinforced PPE/PP plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr29.jpg is missing
Figure 5.29.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® PPX640—40% glass fiber reinforced PPE/PP plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr30.jpg is missing
Figure 5.30.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® PPX7110—high-impact, good heat resistant PPE/PP plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr31.jpg is missing
Figure 5.31.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® PPX7112—paintable, exterior automotive PPE/PP plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr32.jpg is missing
Figure 5.32.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® PPX7115—high-modulus/impact/heat PPE/PP plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr33.jpg is missing
Figure 5.33.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® 731 general-purpose, UL94 HB rated PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr34.jpg is missing
Figure 5.34.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® HH195—PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr35.jpg is missing
Figure 5.35.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® EM6100F—automotive interiors. 240°F HDT, high-impact, PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr36.jpg is missing
Figure 5.36.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® EM6101—automotive interiors, improved flow and processing 250°F DTUL PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr37.jpg is missing
Figure 5.37.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® EM7100—automotive interiors. 200F DTUL. Excellent processability/economy. PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr38.jpg is missing
Figure 5.38.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® EM7304F—15% glass fiber reinforced, high flow, for automotive instrument panel retainers PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr39.jpg is missing
Figure 5.39.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® FN150X—improved productivity, thin wall capable, UL94 V-0/5VA rated PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr40.jpg is missing
Figure 5.40.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® FN215X—structural foam PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr41.jpg is missing
Figure 5.41.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® GFN1—10% glass fiber reinforced, UL94 HB rated PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr42.jpg is missing
Figure 5.42.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® GFN2—20% glass fiber reinforced, UL94 HB rated PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr43.jpg is missing
Figure 5.43.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® GFN3—30% glass fiber reinforced, UL94 HB rated PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr44.jpg is missing
Figure 5.44.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® HS1000X—13% mineral reinforced. Nonbrominated, nonchlorinated fire resistant, UL94 V0 and 5VA listed PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr45.jpg is missing
Figure 5.45.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at 23°C of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® HS2000X—17% mineral reinforced, nonbrominated, nonchlorinated fire resistant, UL94 V0 and 5VA listed PPE/PS plastic.
B9780080964508000053/gr46.jpg is missing
Figure 5.46.
Tensile stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure at various temperatures of SABIC Innovative Plastics Noryl® IGN320—PPE/PS plastic.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.222.116.233