CHAPTER FOUR

MAKING YOUR FIRST CONVERSATION COUNT

Successful guerrillas almost invariably attach extreme importance to training and preparation. . . the training consists not simply in studying guerrilla military tactics. . . but in the manipulation of the political and economic and social forces that bear upon the outcome.

CHARLES W. THAYER, GUERRILLA

Following the steps outlined in Chapters Two and Three allows you to select appropriate grantmakers and develop basic strategies for approaching them. These were general preparations; now you need to prepare specifically for your first encounter. As you know, first impressions are very powerful, and they set the tone for everything that follows. Remember, in the relationship model of grantseeking, you are not merely trying to get a grant but to lay the groundwork for a partnership that can generate support for years to come. The first conversation, then, will be a complex interaction. You will convey and decode subtle, implied messages, as well as explicit information.

If you are like most people, you may be somewhat anxious about this conversation, and anxiety can impede your performance. The best way to reduce anxiety is to prepare thoroughly. The better prepared you are, the better you will perform, and giving it your best shot is what this chapter is about. There are two possible scenarios for an initial conversation: the cold call, an exchange between people who have never spoken before and have no knowledge of one another, and the warm call, an exchange preceded by a third party who knows you both asking the grantmaker to talk with you. For the sake of this discussion, we will assume that you are making a cold call—the more difficult variety. To position yourself for success, plan the conversation with the following objectives in mind:

  • Convey an explicit message. When seeking a grant (Scenario A), you need to let the grantmaker know what your organization wants or needs. When responding to a grant opportunity (Scenario B), let the grantmaker know what your organization has to offer.
  • Convey an implicit message. Specifically, you want the grantmaker to infer that you are a person with whom she would like to establish a relationship. This impression can be created through the subtext of your conversation.
  • Elicit information about the grantmaker's situation. If you listen carefully, you can often gain valuable information about the grantmaker's program, priorities, and timetable.
  • Set up your first meeting, nailing down all the details.

Placing Your Call

Take into account that there will probably be one or more rounds of “telephone tag” before you and your prospective grantmaker connect. Be prepared to leave messages and to speak with the grantmaker at a later date.

If the grantmaker is not in when you call, you may speak first with the receptionist, then with the grantmaker's secretary or administrative assistant. Remember that each of these people can be helpful in developing your relationship with the grantmaker. Assistants process your paperwork, provide (or impede) access, and have an intimate knowledge of the grantmaking process. Receptionists often keep track of where program officers are and what they're doing. It is clearly in your best interest to be on good terms with people in these support positions. One successful grantseeker observes Secretary's Week by sending flowers to the assistants of all his grantmakers.

If the receptionist puts you into the grantmaker's voice mail system, the message you leave will create your first impression on the grantmaker. It should therefore be clear and brief, but include enough details to make it easy to return your call. Allow for the operation of Murphy's Law—by the time your call is returned you will probably have misplaced or filed the fact sheet you prepared to guide yourself through the conversation. Make up a miniature, fail-safe version of the fact sheet on one or more sticky notes and place them on any phone you might conceivably pick up when the call comes in.

Once you reach the grantmaker, remember that your main goal is to communicate effectively. Find out right away if you can have her undivided attention at this particular time, or if she would prefer to speak with you later. If her tone of voice indicates that she is rushed, or if background noise makes it difficult for her to hear, ask if you can reschedule the conversation. The grantmaker will appreciate your consideration, and you will ensure that your message is heard.

Conveying Explicit Messages

When you finally find a good time to speak and the grantmaker is on the line, use your fact sheet. Here are three examples of how successful grantseekers applied the principles outlined in Chapters Two and Three to introduce themselves effectively.

Example One

The president of a new organization calls a grantmaker he has never met to discuss an idea he has for a project.

Background and Planning

In 1991, two years after the Ohio Aerospace Institute (OAI) was founded, its newly appointed president, Michael J. Salkind, decided he wanted to secure funding for meetings of interdisciplinary groups of scientists from government, industry, and academia who work on specific problems in aerospace-related technology. The purpose of getting them together in focus groups would be to promote communication that could lead to collaborative research, advancing American research agendas, and attracting large federal grants and contracts. Salkind believed these groups could help carry out OAI's mission of facilitating “collaboration among universities, industry and government to enhance the economic competitiveness of Ohio and the United States through research, education and technology adaptation.”

In considering potential sponsors, Salkind dissected the various elements of the project and the values it demonstrated. Conceptually, it would have been easiest to identify a grantmaker whose primary goal was to promote collaborative research, or collaboration in general. Unfortunately, there was no such funder. So, revisiting OAI's mission statement, he focused on enhancing Ohio's economic competitiveness and soon realized that he knew of only one organization whose mission was to enhance the economic competitiveness of Ohio: namely, the Ohio State Department of Development.

The department was encouraging and enthusiastic, but it had no funding available for such projects at the time and so suggested approaching The Cleveland Foundation, the local community foundation, to discuss the economic development potential of the project. Researching The Cleveland Foundation by reading its recent annual reports, Salkind confirmed that it was an appropriate funding source. Its mission was to “enhance the quality of life for all residents of Greater Cleveland” and to “address the community's needs and opportunities.” He also learned that the foundation had identified economic development as a key community need and was actively making grants in that area.

Salkind realized how the ends he had in mind intersected with the ends of The Cleveland Foundation: the focus groups could be presented as enhancing the economic development of Cleveland, the home community of OAI.1 So he made contact, and this conversation ensued (note that in this and the following examples the questioner's words have been truncated to the basic questions of the model in Chapter Three).

The Conversation

[Q: Who are you?]

A: This is Michael Salkind, president of Ohio Aerospace Institute.

[Q: What's your story?]

A: OAI is a state-funded consortium of government, industry, and academia, established two years ago to promote collaborative research and encourage economic development in our area. I'm new in town. I'd like to get acquainted with you, and perhaps run by you an idea for a project I have been thinking about.

[Q: What's your track record?]

A: Before I took this job in Cleveland, I headed up R&D [research and development] for the Air Force, and I found in my twelve years there that collaboration is definitely a body-contact sport. By bringing people together—in person and by various electronic means—we found that we initiated more than double the usual number of new projects each year. And we saw this each of the last five years I was with the agency.

[As Salkind's purpose is to get acquainted, he doesn't specify the scope of the project he has in mind. Instead, he makes an appointment to meet with the grantmaker.]

Example Two

The CEO of a planning agency calls a grantmaker at a newly established foundation to discuss a new idea.

Background and Planning

Many buildings owned by the Catholic Diocese of Cleveland became underutilized or vacant as the number of children in Catholic schools dwindled and the number of priests and nuns declined. At the same time, the number of elderly persons was growing dramatically, and residential facilities that offered assisted living or nursing care were inadequate to meet the growing demand.

The diocesan organization that deals with social service needs is the Federation for Catholic Community Services, an umbrella organization overseeing the activities of thirty-seven social service agencies in its eight-county area of responsibility. At the recommendation of its strategic planning committee, the federation decided to look into converting some of the vacant or underutilized buildings into housing for elderly persons. Rev. Walter H. Jenne, then executive director of the federation, was assigned the task of raising the money needed to convert the first of these buildings, which would serve as a model for creating further such cost-effective facilities. Rev. Jenne knew that Joseph Bruening, a deeply religious Catholic who had recently died, had been committed to helping elderly people in Greater Cleveland. Bruening had left his fortune to establish a private foundation, and part of its mission was to carry on the founder's work on behalf of elderly people. So Rev. Jenne called the newly appointed executive secretary of the Bruening Foundation.

The Conversation

[Q: Who are you?]

A: This is Father Walt Jenne. I'm the executive director of the Federation for Catholic Community Services.

[Q: What's your story?]

A: Mr. Bruening was on our board, and I remember his commitment to helping his elderly neighbors. I wanted to let you know that we are thinking about an initiative along the lines that would have been of great interest to Joe. For the past six months, we've been involved in a strategic planning process, looking at community needs. It has highlighted our concern about the inadequacy of appropriate, affordable housing for elderly people, who are the fastest-growing segment of our population. Seven of our agencies provide services to elderly people, and they all report a growing but unmet need for assisted living and nursing care. We have extensive holdings of buildings and land, and would like to explore the possibility of using some of these resources to meet this need.

[Q: What's your track record?]

A: As you may be aware, Jennings Hall, our residential facility for elderly persons, has won several national and regional awards for innovative and responsive programming. We believe that by combining our expertise in program development with our existing facilities, we can make a major contribution to the community.

[Q: What is the scope of the project?]

A: We understand that there is HUD [the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development] and other government money for which we can apply, but we need to do a pilot project to establish our reputation in assisted living services, which is new for us. For $300,000 to $400,000, we believe we can rehab a vacant convent and convert it into assisted living units.

Example Three

The executive director of a social service organization calls a grantmaker to discuss the possibility of responding to an RFP [request for proposals] issued by a national foundation.

Background and Planning

Alice Kethley is executive director of the Benjamin Rose Institute (BRI), an organization that provides residential care and outreach services for elderly people and conducts gerontological research. She serves on several national committees and task forces concerned with various aspects of aging. When the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation issued an RFP related to new concepts in outreach, Kethley thought of a BRI project that might qualify.

The Conversation

[Q: Who are you?]

A: This is Alice Kethley in Cleveland. I believe we met at the President's Task Force on Aging in Washington last spring. I just received a copy of your “Partners in Caregiving” RFP, and I'm thinking about responding to it.

[Q: What's your story?]

A: My agency, the Benjamin Rose Institute, has just begun a planning process to develop a financially self-sufficient day care program for people with dementia. We have some ideas that will enable us to provide these much-needed services in a way that will help people with dementia stay independent longer.

[Q: What's your track record?]

A: Since 1928, BRI has been offering residential and community-based services for the elderly and conducting pioneering research in gerontology. For the last five years, our research department has been working with Dr. Peter Whitehouse, director of the Alzheimer's Center at University Hospitals of Cleveland. It's one of the four Centers of Excellence funded by the National Institutes on Aging. We are developing programs that will use behavioral strategies to retard the progress of Alzheimer's disease.

[Q: What is the scope of the project?]

A: We believe that an investment of $400,000 to $500,000 will enable us to get our program off the ground, and to serve as many as ninety individuals within twelve months. We've run the numbers, and we believe we'll break even within eighteen months.

Conveying Implicit Messages

In addition to conveying explicit information during your first phone call with a grantmaker, you will need to communicate certain implicit messages as well. Here are the most important ones.

I understand the system.

Though grantmakers are accustomed to dealing with grantseeking novices, obviously it's tedious for them to explain over and over again how their grantmaking processes work. If you show that you understand the basic steps involved in making grants, your dialogue will rise to a higher plane more quickly, and you will be able to engage in conversations about your work, the project you wish to undertake, or other topics of far greater interest to your grantmaker. Meaningful dialogue is at the heart and soul of good relationships, so you should try to get to it as soon as possible. The experience and knowledge you have gained through other relationships can be applied to a new one; for instance, in initial encounters, both parties decide whether they wish to establish a relationship. You certainly want to, and you can probably get that implicit message across fairly readily. Making the grantmaker want to have a relationship with you, however, is another matter; it requires relaying another quite critical implicit message.

I am a credible person,
worthy of a relationship with you
.

You want to make yourself appear attractive enough to interest the other person in getting to know you. The most basic requirement in any business relationship is trust, which is based on credibility; so you want to imply in every possible way that you are who you say you are, and that you will do what you say.

It takes time to convince a person that you are honest and trustworthy. Ultimately your credibility depends on your ability to deliver as promised, but a few simple strategies can help jump-start a grantmaker's initial impression of you as a credible person.

We talked earlier about using academic or religious titles when you introduce yourself. If used appropriately they can certainly add to your credibility; earning a terminal degree, for example, does not guarantee that you are honest or trustworthy but it does say something about your perseverance. If you are an officer in the military, you did what it took to achieve this distinction, and you should let your grantmaker know that you made a substantial contribution to your country's well-being. If you are a nun or a priest, you have made a commitment to the spiritual life, and your title can encourage the grantmaker to see you as a credible person and to take you seriously. At the very least, a title can set you apart from other grantseekers. That is highly desirable, as the average program officer must deal with a large number of applicants.

Another way to promote your credibility is to refer to a distinguished pedigree, if you have one. You might say, for example, “I began working on this problem when I was a graduate student at MIT” or “This project relates to the work I did to prepare for a congressional hearing.”

You can also share with grantmakers your background of successful experience. For example, you might say something like this: “In my last position, I was responsible for turning around an organization with a large operating deficit and a high staff turnover rate. Within three years, we eliminated the accumulated deficit by tripling annual giving, and we reduced staff turnover to less than 5 percent. I believe that similar improvements are possible in my current situation.”

I want to understand you better.

Next to credibility, the quality that most promotes sound relationship-building is a genuine interest in the other person. Show that you are interested in the grantmaker and her priorities. You might express yourself along these lines: “I'd be especially interested in learning more about the most effective economic development programs you are funding. I'd also like to know more about your foundation's priorities in terms of job creation and retention, and your view of the foundation's role in helping high-tech industry grow.”

Some grantmakers are very forthcoming about their current interests and challenges, and that makes it easy for grantseekers to learn about the organization. Others may be less enthusiastic about sharing inside information. If this is the case, you can still imply your interest by indicating that you have done research on their past grantmaking activities. You can then begin building these relationships later, when they become comfortable enough to be more open with you.

In any case, your purpose is to determine whether your two organizations share core values that make it possible for you to work together. If these values drive you toward common goals, there is a rich potential for fruitful collaboration. To find out whether this potential exists, you will need to clearly articulate the ends your organization is pursuing, and how today's specific project provides a means to those ends. You will also need to ascertain what ends the grantmaker is seeking, and think about how your project may provide a means to achieving those as well.

Fruitful relationships between grantseekers and grantmakers develop when the interests of both coincide. Once the relationship is established, you can concentrate on weaving its fabric through hundreds of interactions over many years.

Setting Up a Meeting

If your telephone conversation has uncovered enough common ground, the grantmaker may suggest a meeting. If not, ask for one yourself.

No matter how well you have prepared for your conversation, and no matter how persuasive you have been, some grantmakers insist on seeing something in writing before they will agree to meet. This can present a major hurdle in developing a relationship, but when you encounter this demand you must comply. In the next chapter, we will discuss the best way to respond.

For now, let's assume that a meeting is in order. In making the arrangements, keep in mind that the grantmaker is the customer; though you should have a plan for how to proceed, remain flexible enough to accommodate your customer's preferences. Basically, however, planning the meeting requires asking the same questions as any good journalist: who, when, and where. Also ask how long the meeting will be and what will be on the agenda. Let's address each of these in order.

Who? As will be detailed in Chapter Six, your first meeting should include the president or CEO of your organization, a representative of your board, and a fund development staff person. For reasons of strategy as well as courtesy, it is important to let the grantmaker know in advance who will be representing your organization. For example, though you may be meeting with someone at the staff level, your board representative may know someone higher up in the grantmaker's organization; if you mention this to the staff person, she may invite the higher executive or trustee to stop by and say hello. Mentioning the participation of an important person raises your stock, so to speak, by showing the grantmaker that you can secure the involvement of powerful people.

When? Because the grantmaker is the customer, the meeting will be scheduled at her convenience. But as at least three people will be representing your organization, you will need to do some advance planning before you make your call to identify a date that will work for everyone. Check the calendars of all those who will represent your organization, and select at least three dates when they are all available. At least one of these will usually work for the grantmaker as well.

Where? Hold the meeting where it is convenient for the grantmaker—her office unless she specifies otherwise. If you are planning to meet with a grantmaker whose offices are out of town, schedule the meeting just as you would if the grantmaker were based in your own community.

People who are new to grantseeking sometimes feel uneasy about admitting that they're planning a trip for the sole purpose of meeting with a grantmaker, but it is best to be honest. As a program officer from the Kellogg Foundation pointed out at a recent meeting of grantmakers and grantseekers, “No one just ‘happens to be passing through’ Battle Creek, Michigan.” If you aren't completely honest as you begin your relationship, you will jeopardize your credibility and undermine the basis of a sound relationship.

How Long? It is important to know in advance how much time you will have with the grantmaker. Strategically, the script you prepare for your meeting must fit the time available. In terms of courtesy, it is important not to overstay the time allotted for your visit unless the grantmaker suggests it. If the conversation is progressing well, and she becomes so engaged that she wants to prolong the visit, your schedule should be flexible enough to accommodate this.

When planning a series of meetings with grantmakers in another city, it is probably impractical to plan more than four or five meetings in a day. First, there are the logistic challenges of getting from one place to another in a timely fashion. Second, if you have already made the same “pitch” three times, it may be difficult to remember if you have mentioned a critical point in this meeting yet—or in the meeting you just left.

What's the Agenda? As detailed in Chapter Six, there are two kinds of initial meetings between grantseekers and grantmakers: the get-acquainted meeting and the get-down-to-business meeting. In your telephone conversation, you will need to determine which kind of meeting this one will be.

The Get-Acquainted Meeting. Ideally, you will have an opportunity to get acquainted with your prospective grantmaker, using the initial meeting to learn more about the individual, the interests of the organization, the immediate challenges it is facing, and any upcoming opportunities for grants that have not been publicized yet. This information will enable you to identify activities that your grantmaker is most likely to support. At the same time, you will be able to share your own interests and areas of expertise, giving the grantmaker some sense of the ways in which you might become helpful to her.

Like a blind date, the get-acquainted meeting provides an opportunity to find out if you have mutual interests and wish to pursue a relationship.

The Get-Down-to-Business Meeting. This type of meeting focuses on the project you are seeking to fund. As it is also your first meeting with the grantmaker, you still need to provide some background on your organization. In essence, you will combine everything you would present in a get-acquainted meeting with a discussion of a specific project.

Even for a get-acquainted meeting, you should have one or two projects in mind and be ready to describe them; you never know when a get-acquainted meeting will suddenly turn into a get-down-to-business meeting. On hearing of a grant opportunity, for example, you may think of a project you are planning or already conducting that fits in, and it may be entirely appropriate to begin a dialogue about submitting a proposal.

Getting the Hang of It

Your first conversation with a grantmaker requires a greater investment of time and energy than subsequent encounters will. Grantseeking is like any other complex skill. Do you remember the first time you sat behind the wheel of a car, and how you felt as you listened to your driving instructor? At sixteen, you needed to think about every decision involved in driving: How far back do I need to brake to come to a full stop at the stop sign? Where's that little stick that makes the turn signal come on? But with experience, driving becomes automatic, and the same is true of grantseeking. Niccolò Machiavelli, the master strategist, may have said it best when he observed that “he who does not lay his foundations beforehand may by great abilities do so afterwards, although with great trouble to the architect and danger to the building.”2

You are the architect of the grantseeker-grantmaker relationship. If you take care in laying the foundations, the structure will be sound and it will endure.

The essential elements of guerrilla tactics must always be kept in mind. These are: perfect knowledge of the ground; surveillance and foresight. . . vigilance over all the secondary roads that can bring support. . . intimacy with people in the zone so as to have sure help from them . . . total mobility; and the possibility of counting on reserves.

CHE GUEVARA, GUERRILLA WARFARE

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
3.137.198.96