Chapter 7
In This Chapter
Identifying motives behind financial statement frauds
Realizing how such frauds are committed
Playing sleuth: Finding the fraud
Acompany records all its business transactions, culminating in the preparation of financial reports that provide information about the company's financial position and performance. Financial reports consist of the following: principal statements (the income statement, balance sheet, and statement of cash flows), notes to these statements, and management discussion and analysis (MD&A) of results. Financial statements provide a snapshot of the business at a given point in time: the results of its financial performance and its generation of cash flows during a given period.
Auditors conduct financial statement analysis, which involves evaluating a company's financial position and its ability to generate profits and cash flow both now and in the future. Such analysis may also include valuing the company itself. Financial statements provide the information to do so.
Financial statement fraud, commonly referred to as “cooking the books” or “fudging the numbers,” usually involves manipulating one or more elements of the financial statements. Assets, revenues, and profits could be overstated, and liabilities, expenses, and losses could be understated. This type of fraud involves the deliberate misrepresentation or manipulation of the financial condition of a business, and it's accomplished through the intentional misstatement or omission of amounts or disclosures in the financial statements to deceive the people who use those statements.
According to the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), losses due to issuing a fraudulent statement can total millions of dollars. When you take into account penalties and fines, legal costs, the loss of investor confidence, and reputational damage, the total costs of this type of fraud can be enormous.
The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission has studied financial statement fraud. Their studies indicate that senior management is often the most likely group to commit financial statement fraud. This section discusses incentives and opportunities to commit financial statement fraud.
Management has many incentives to perpetrate financial statement fraud. Managers trying to meet any number of legitimate corporate goals (such as sales targets, cost targets, analysts’ earnings expectations, and bonus plan targets) or who are trying to make critical investment and financing decisions to achieve these targets can find accounting rules and systems a hindrance. Therefore, they may be tempted to compromise the fundamental informational role of accounting to manage the company's earnings.
One of the main reasons to manage earnings is to keep Wall Street happy, at least in the short run. Information about a company's current status and prospects affect its share values. The company can get punished if it doesn't meet its earnings targets. Sometimes the drop in share value may be large.
Chapter 3 explains that the fraud triangle represents three conditions that are always present for fraud to occur: incentive, opportunity, and rationalization. This section examines the fraud triangle as it relates to financial statement fraud.
The following risk factors related to incentive or motivation can lead to financial statement fraud:
Here's how a company can create the opportunity for financial statement fraud:
Risk factors associated with the rationalization of financial statement fraud include the following:
An accountant's role in investigating financial fraud is to look for red flags or accounting warning signs. It's akin to a doctor who initially examines a patient by taking the patient's blood pressure, testing his reflexes, listening to his heart, and looking in his eyes, ears, and throat. Accounting red flags include:
This section explains four of the most common methods used to commit financial statement fraud: hidden liabilities, cookie jar reserves, off–balance sheet transactions, and notes that no one can comprehend.
In the accrual method of accounting (which is required for all public companies), expenses must be recorded in the period in which they're incurred, regardless of when they're paid. Capitalization refers to recording expenditures as assets rather than expenses because the expenditures add to the value of an asset, which provides benefits into the future. Improper capitalization occurs when companies capitalize current costs that don't benefit future periods. Improperly capitalizing or deferring expenses generally causes a company to understate reported expenses and overstate net income in the period of capitalization or deferral.
Take the case of WorldCom in the early 2000s. WorldCom was alleged to have overstated its cash flow by booking $3.8 billion of operating expenses as additions to capital. This transfer resulted in WorldCom materially understating expenses and overstating net income. It also enabled the company to report earnings that met analyst estimates. WorldCom's CEO was sentenced to 25 years in prison for orchestrating the fraud.
Reserves are provisions for liabilities that are set up for a wide variety of future expenditures, including restructuring charges, environmental cleanup costs, or expected litigation costs. Recording a reserve on a company's books generally involves recognizing an expense and a related liability. From a fraud perspective, this may be done in good years when the company makes profits so that it's able to incur larger expenses. These provisions are called cookie jar reserves because management can reach into the jar and reverse it in future years when the company deems it necessary to boost earnings.
Symbol Technologies is a case in point. From 1998 until early 2003, Symbol engaged in numerous fraudulent accounting practices and other misconduct that had a cumulative net impact of more than $230 million on Symbol's reported revenue and more than $530 million on its pretax earnings. Symbol created cookie jar reserves by fabricating restructuring and other charges to artificially reduce operating expenses in order to manage earnings.
Off–balance sheet arrangements are used to raise additional financing and liquidity. These arrangements may involve the use of complex structures, including special purpose entities (SPEs), to facilitate a company's transfer of, or access to, assets. In many cases, the transferor of assets has some liability or continuing involvement with the transferred assets.
Depending on the nature of the obligations and the related accounting treatment, the company's financial statements may not fully reflect the company's obligations with respect to the SPE or its arrangements. Transactions with SPEs commonly are structured so that the company that establishes or sponsors the SPE and engages in transactions with it isn't required to consolidate the SPE into its financial statements.
Enron provides a great example of the improper use of off–balance sheet transactions for fraudulent purposes. The company's former CFO and another high-ranking Enron official were convicted of engaging in a complex scheme to create an appearance that certain entities they funded and controlled were independent of the company. This allowed Enron to incorrectly move its interest in these companies off its balance sheet. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleged that these entities were designed to improve the company's financial results and to misappropriate millions of dollars representing undisclosed fees and other illegal profits.
Companies can also commit financial statement fraud by misrepresenting their financial condition through misstatements and omissions of facts and circumstances in their public filings, such as the management and discussion analysis, nonfinancial sections of annual reports, or footnotes to the financial statements. In this situation, management doesn't provide sufficient information to the users of financial statements. As a result, the users can't make informed decisions about the financial condition of the company.
Companies must disclose related party transactions in accordance with securities laws and accounting rules. Moreover, transactions with board members, certain officers, relatives, or beneficial owners holding 5 percent or more of a company's voting securities that exceed $60,000 must be disclosed in the management section of the annual report. Failure to disclose related party transactions hides material information from shareholders and may be an indicator of fraudulent financial reporting.
In 2002, the SEC alleged that Adelphia engaged in numerous undisclosed related party transactions with board members, executive officers, and entities it controlled. One of these transactions involved the construction of a golf course on land owned or controlled by senior management. The SEC alleged that Adelphia failed to disclose the existence of these transactions or misrepresented their terms in its financial statements. More than $300 million of company funds were diverted to senior management without adequate disclosure to investors.
The SEC alleged that three top executives — the CEO, CFO, and Chief Legal Officer — failed to disclose to shareholders the multimillion dollar loans from the company they used for personal business ventures and investments, and to purchase yachts, fine art, estate jewelry, luxury apartments, and vacation estates. These senior officials also allegedly failed to disclose benefits such as a rent-free $31 million Fifth Avenue apartment in New York City, the personal use of corporate jets, and charitable contributions made in their names.
Financial analysis techniques can help accountants and investigators discover and examine unexpected relationships in financial information. These analytical procedures are based on the premise that relatively stable relationships exist among financial accounts. If the relationships among those accounts become unstable, especially in a public company, the financial statements should offer full disclosure of the facts to explain what happened.
As an accountant, you could use the following techniques to identify the relationships among any financial data that present red flags:
Ratio analysis is a comparative technique that you can use to study data on a time series basis (meaning year over year or over a period of time) so that different trends can be identified. You should perform these analyses at the company level and at the business-unit levels (meaning within each department or unit of the company). See Book V, Chapter 3, to get up to speed on using ratios to assess the financial health of a company. The following list looks at some of these ratios from a forensic perspective to help you understand how financial fraud can be detected from this analysis.
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
Debt to equity ratio = Total liabilities ÷ Total equity
Profit margin ratio = Net income ÷ Net sales
Asset turnover ratio = Net sales ÷ Average assets
The Beneish model is a mathematical model used to predict the likelihood of a company cooking its books. To use this model, you calculate indexes based on changes in account balances between the current and prior year. Professor Messod Beneish developed the model after finding that on average, companies that manipulate their financial statements have significantly larger increases in days sales in receivables, greater deterioration of gross margins and asset quality, higher sales growth, and larger accruals than companies that don't manipulate their financial statements.
Here are several important indexes used in the Beneish model:
By calculating these ratios, you create a score that you can compare with the scores of other companies. The following table shows the average scores for each index for nonmanipulators (companies that don't mess around with their financial statements) and manipulators (companies that do). If your calculations show that a company's scores are close to those of a manipulator, you have reason to keep investigating.
Index Type |
Nonmanipulators |
Manipulators |
Days sales in receivables index |
1.031 |
1.465 |
Gross margin index |
1.014 |
1.193 |
Asset quality index |
1.039 |
1.254 |
Sales growth index |
1.134 |
1.607 |
Total accruals to total assets |
0.018 |
0.031 |
Whereas all the analytical methods introduced so far in this chapter involve analyzing aggregated financial statements, data mining uses queries or searches within financial accounts to identify anomalies — large and unusual items that call for further review. For instance, a query can be performed on payment amounts to identify double payments. Other examples of data mining techniques include:
3.135.246.193