After obtaining the mathematical model of the system, its performance is analysed based on the time response or frequency response. Time response of the system is defined as the response of the system when standard test signals such as impulse, step and so on are applied to it. Frequency response of the system is defined as the response of the system when standard sinusoidal signals are applied to it with constant amplitude over a range of frequencies. The frequency response indicates the steady-state response of a system to a sinusoidal input. The characteristics and performance of the industrial control system are analysed by using the frequency response techniques. Frequency response analysis is used in numerous systems and components such as audio and video amplifiers, speakers, sound cards and servomotors. The different techniques available for frequency response analysis lend themselves to a simplest procedure for experimental testing and analysis. In addition, the stability and relative stability of the system for the sinusoidal input can be analysed by using different frequency plots.
This chapter introduces the frequency response of the system and explains the procedure for construction of Bode plot to determine frequency domain specifications such as gain crossover frequency, phase crossover frequency, gain margin and phase margin.
The time response of the system can be obtained only if the transfer function of the system is known earlier, which is always not possible. But it is possible to obtain frequency response of the system even though the transfer function of the system is not known. The reasons for determining the frequency response of the system are:
The disadvantages of frequency response analysis are:
The comparison between the time response analysis and frequency response analysis is listed in Table 8.1.
Table 8.1 ∣ Comparison between the time response analysis and frequency response analysis
In frequency response analysis, the signal used as an input to the system is a sinusoidal wave because of the following reasons:
Consider a ramp signal as shown in Fig. 8.1(a) and constant sine and cosine waves of varying amplitude as shown in Fig. 8.1(b).
Fig. 8.1 ∣ (a) Ramp signal, (b) Fourier components and (c) original and sum of fourier components
If the sine wave and cosine wave as shown in Fig. 8.1(b) are added, the resultant will be a ramp signal indicated using a dotted line along with the original ramp signal shown as a continuous line depicted in Fig. 8.1(c). Since any signal can be represented by varying the frequency and amplitude of the sine and cosine waves, the sinusoidal wave is chosen for frequency domain analysis.
The steady-state output of the stable linear system is also a sine wave of same frequency when a sinusoidal input is applied to the system. The output and input of the system generally differs in both magnitude and phase. Generally, the frequency response of the system can be obtained by replacing the variable s in the transfer function with as given by
(8.1)
where is the magnitude or gain i.e., the sinusoidal amplitude ratio of output to input. In addition, is the angle by which the output leads the input. The parameters and are functions of the angular frequency . The Laplace variable s is a complex number that is represented as . If a linear time-invariant system is subjected to a pure sinusoidal input, , the output response of the system contains both the transient part and the steady-state part. But at , the transient part dies out because the roots have negative parts for a stable system and only the steady-state part of the output response exists. Therefore, as the frequency response of the system deals with steady-state analysis of the system, it is enough to substitute instead of .
Example 8.1 Consider a low-pass RC network with and as shown in Fig. E8.1 and is driven by the input voltage Determine the output voltage v0(t) across the capacitor, C.
Fig. E8.1
Solution: The transfer function of the low-pass RC network is
Substituting the values of and , we obtain
The Laplace transform of the input,
Hence, the output of the system,
Using partial fractions, we obtain
Taking inverse Laplace transform, we obtain
where is the transient part of the output and is the steady-state part of the output.
The frequency response analysis of both open-loop and closed-loop systems is discussed below.
Fig. 8.2 ∣ A simple open-loop system
Consider an open-loop linear time-invariant system as shown in Fig. 8.2. The input signal i.e., sinusoidal with amplitude and frequency is given by
The steady-state output of the system will also be a sinusoidal function with the same frequency but possibly with a different amplitude and phase, i.e.,
where is the amplitude of the output sinusoidal wave and is the phase shift in degrees or radians.
Let the transfer function of a linear single-input single-output (SISO) system be . Then, the relation between the Laplace transforms of the input and the output is
For sinusoidal steady-state analysis i.e., frequency response analysis, s is replaced with Then, the above equation becomes
(8.2)
Here, can be written in terms of magnitude and phase angle as
(8.3)
Similarly, Eqn. (8.2) can be re-written as
(8.4)
Hence, comparing Eqs. (8.3) and (8.4), we obtain
(8.5)
and the phase angle is
(8.6)
From the transfer function of a linear time-invariant system with sinusoidal input, the magnitude and phase angle of the output can be obtained using Eqs. (8.5) and (8.6) respectively.
Fig. 8.3 ∣ A simple closed-loop system
The closed-loop system is shown in Fig. 8.3.
The transfer function
For the frequency response analysis, substituting , we get
The transfer function can be expressed in terms of its magnitude and phase as
Therefore, the magnitude of is
(8.7)
The phase angle of is
(8.8)
Thus, by knowing the transfer function of a linear time-invariant system and the feedback transfer function the magnitude and phase angle of the output for the closed-loop system can be obtained using Eqs. (8.7) and (8.8) respectively, provided the input to the system is sinusoidal.
Consider a negative feedback closed-loop system as shown in Fig. 8.3 with the closed-loop transfer function as
(8.9)
where is the Laplace transform of the output and is the Laplace transform of the input.
For a closed-loop stable system,
(8.10)
where, and
where and are positive and distinct integers with .
Consider the input applied to the system as
Taking Laplace transform, we obtain
Hence, the Laplace transform of the output using Eqn. (8.9) is
Substituting Eqn. (8.10) in the above equation, we obtain
Using partial fractions for the above equation, we obtain
(8.11)
Here, , where
In addition,
As the constant K1 is a complex number, it is convenient to represent it in polar form as
where
Since we have assumed all the values of the steady-state response is
Thus, if a sinusoidal input is applied to a system that has negative real value of poles, the steady-state response is a scaled, phase-shifted version of the input. The scaling factor is and the phase shift is the phase of .
The frequency response analysis of a system is used to determine the system gain and phase angle of the system at different frequencies. Hence, the system gain and phase angle can be represented either in a tabular form or graphical form.
Tabular form: It is useful in representing the system gain and phase angle of a system at different frequencies only if the data set is relatively small. It is also useful in experimental measurement.
Graphical form: It provides a convenient way to view the frequency response data. There are many ways of representing the frequency response in the graphical form.
The frequency response analysis of a system can be determined using (i) experimental determination and (ii) mathematical determination.
(i) Experimental determination of frequency response
This method is used only when the system transfer function is not known. This method is used for a plant testing and verification of the plant model. Determining the frequency response of a the small system experimentally in a laboratory environment is not very difficult. A typical set-up for the experimental determination of the frequency response is shown in Fig. 8.4.
Fig. 8.4 ∣ Experimental set-up for frequency response
The requirement for determining frequency response varies for different systems. The general requirements for determining the frequency response of systems are power supply, signal generator and a chart recorder or dual trace oscilloscope. The experimental set-up varies depending on the test systems.
The steps to be followed for determining the frequency response are:
Thus, the frequency response of the system whose transfer function is not known can be determined.
Mathematical evaluation of frequency response
This method is applicable to the system whose transfer function is known. In this method, by substituting , the transfer function is considered to be a function of frequency and it is treated as a complex variable. The system gain and phase angle at a particular frequency is same as the magnitude and phase angle of the complex number.
The mathematical procedure for determining the frequency response of simple and complex transfer functions are given below:
Simple transfer function
Complex transfer function
A complex transfer function can be separated in two simple transfer functions and each simple transfer function can be converted into the polar form. The complex number in polar form allows easier manipulation of magnitude and angle. The procedure is as follows:
Example 8.2 The transfer function of the system is given by . Determine the frequency response of the system over a frequency range of 0.1–10 rad/sec.
Solution:
Gain of the complex system = product of gains of simple systems
Phase angle of the complex system = addition of phase angles of simple systems
The given complex system can be divided into four simple functions as
Simple system 1:
Substituting , we obtain
Therefore, gain of the system M1 = 5 and phase angle of the system = 0°.
Simple system 2
Substituting , we obtain
Therefore, gain of the system M2 = and phase angle of the system
Simple system 3
Substituting , we obtain
Therefore, gain of the system, M3 =
and phase angle of the system
Simple system 4
Therefore,
Therefore, gain of the system
and phase angle of the system
The gain and the phase angle of various simple systems at different frequencies between 0.1 and 10 rad/sec are calculated and tabulated as given in Tables E8.3(a) and (b) respectively.
Table E8.3(a) ∣ Gain of the simple systems at different frequencies
Table E8.3(b) ∣ Phase angle of the system at different frequencies
Therefore, the overall gain and phase angle of the complex system is determined using the following expressions and are tabulated in Table E8.3(c).
Gain of the system,
Phase angle of the system, .
Table E8.3(c) ∣ Gain and phase angle of the complex system at different frequencies
Frequency domain specifications of a system are necessary to determine the quality of the system and to design the linear control systems using frequency domain analysis.
Consider a simple closed-loop system as shown in Fig. 8.3. Its transfer function is
The magnitude or gain of the above transfer function as a function of frequency is given by
The phase angle of the transfer function as a function of frequency is given by
The typical gain–phase characteristics of a feedback control system are shown in Figs. 8.5(a) and (b).
Fig. 8.5 ∣ Gain–phase characteristics
The different frequency domain specifications that are required for designing a control system and determining its performance are:
(i) Resonant peak Mr
The maximum value of gain as the frequency of the system is varied over a range is known as resonant peak . The relative stability of the system can be determined based on this value. There exists a direct relationship between the maximum overshoot in the time-domain analysis of the system and the resonant peak in the frequency domain analysis (i.e., a large value of indicates that the maximum overshoot of the system is also large). The resonant peak lies between 1.1 and 1.5.
(ii) Resonant frequency
The frequency of the system at which the resonant peak occurs is known as resonant frequency . The frequency of oscillations in the time domain is related to the resonant frequency . When resonant frequency is high, the time response or transient response of the system is fast.
(iii) Cut-off frequency
The frequency at which the gain of the system is 3 dB or 0.707 times the gain of the system at zero frequency is known as cut-off frequency .
(iv) Bandwidth
The range of frequencies that lie between zero and is known as bandwidth. It is also defined as the range of frequencies over which the magnitude response of the system is flat.
The value of bandwidth indicates the ability of the system to reproduce the input signal and it is a measure of the noise rejection characteristics. In time-domain analysis of the system for a given damping factor, bandwidth in the frequency domain indicates the rise time in the time domain. If the bandwidth of the system in the frequency domain is large, then the rise time of the system in time domain is small and the system will be faster.
(v) Cut-off rate
The slope of the magnitude curve obtained near the cut-off frequency is called cut-off rate. The cut-off rate indicates the ability of the system to distinguish the signal from noise.
(vi) Gain crossover frequency
The frequency at which the gain of the system is unity is called the gain crossover frequency .
If the gain of the system is expressed in dB, then the gain crossover frequency is defined as the frequency at which the gain of the system is 0 dB (since 20 log 1 = 0 dB).
(vii) Phase crossover frequency
The frequency at which the phase angle of the system is −180° is called phase crossover frequency.
(viii) Gain margin gm
In root locus technique, there exists a relationship between the gain and stability of the system. Similarly, in frequency response method, there exists a value of K, beyond which the system becomes unstable. Hence, the gain margin is defined as the factor by which the gain of the system can be increased before the system becomes unstable. Mathematically, it is defined as the reciprocal of the gain of the system at the phase crossover frequency .
The stability of the system is directly proportional to the gain margin of the system. In addition, the high gain margin results in an unacceptable response and the result becomes sluggish in nature.
(ix) Phase margin pm
In frequency response analysis, gain margin alone is not sufficient to comment on the relative stability of the system. The other factor that affects the relative stability of the system is phase margin . It is defined as the additional phase lag that makes the system marginally stable. In addition, it can be defined as the addition of phase angle of the system at gain crossover frequency and 180°.
As a thumb rule, for a good overall stability of the system, the gain margin of the system should be around 12 dB and the phase margin should be between 45° and 60°.
The interrelation between the time-domain analysis and frequency domain analysis of the system is explicit for the first order. In this section, the interrelation existing between the time domain and frequency domain for a second-order system is discussed. In addition, the frequency domain specifications for the second-order system are derived using the frequency response analysis.
Consider a second-order system as shown in Fig. 8.6 with the feed-forward transfer function as and with a unity feedback.
Fig. 8.6 ∣ A simple second order system
Hence, the transfer function of the second-order system is given by
(8.12)
where is the damping ratio of the system and is the undamped natural frequency of the system.
In addition,
The transfer function of the system in frequency domain is obtained by substituting in Eqn. (8.12) given by
(8.13)
Substituting in Eqn. (8.13), we obtain (8.14)
where is the normalized driving signal frequency.
Therefore, (8.15)
Using Eqs. (8.14) and (8.15), we obtain (8.16)
and (8.17)
The steady-state output of the system when the system is excited by the sinusoidal input with unit magnitude and variable frequency (i.e., ) is given by
Using Table 8.1, the magnitude and phase angle plots with respect to the normalized frequency u are shown in Figs. 8.7(a) and 8.7(b) respectively.
Table 8.2 ∣ Magnitude and phase values
Fig. 8.7 ∣ (a) Magnitude and (b) phase angle plots of second-order system
(i) Resonant frequency ωr
At resonant frequency , the first-order derivative of the magnitude of frequency domain analysis is zero.
i.e.,
Since the magnitude in Eqn. (8.16) depends on the normalized frequency , the above equation can be written as
where is the normalized resonant frequency.
Therefore,
Simplifying, we obtain
We know that, .
Therefore, the resonant frequency is given by (8.18)
(ii) Resonant peak Mr
The magnitude at resonant frequency , is known as the resonant peak .
i.e.,
Since the magnitude depends on the normalized frequency, the above equation can be written as
Substituting the in Eqs. (8.16) and (8.17), we obtain
(8.19)
(8.20)
But we know that in time domain analysis of a second-order system,
Peak overshoot, (8.21)
Damped natural frequency, (8.22)
From Eqs. (8.19) to (8.22), it is clear that there exists a relationship between the time-domain analysis and frequency domain analysis of a system.
Interesting facts about the interrelation between time-domain analysis and frequency domain analysis of a second-order system are given below.
Peak overshoot
Resonant peak
If is greater than 1.5 and the system is subjected to noise signals, then the system may face serious problems.
The resonant peak will also get vanished as the damping ratio increases. But the value of at which the resonant peak vanishes is derived as
Therefore,
Hence, at , the resonant peak and peak overshoot vanished.
This concept is shown in Figs. 8.8(a) and (b).
Fig. 8.8 ∣ Mp and Mr for different values of
The gets the maximum value i.e., . In addition, approaches infinity as decreases to zero. This concept is shown in Figs. 8.9(a) and (b) respectively.
Fig. 8.9 ∣ Mp and Mr for x = 0
The damping ratio should be chosen between 0.4 and 0.707 (i.e., 0.4 < < 0.707) to have a tolerable and . If the chosen is less than 0.4, both have larger values that are not desirable for the system.
When the value of is chosen between 0.4 and 0.707, the value of and are comparable to each other.
When , both the values of and approach .
When is small, then the values of and are:
Here, the value of indicates the speed of the response. The above concept is shown in Figs. 8.10(a) and (b).
Fig. 8.10 ∣ ωd and ωr for different values of ξ
(iii) Bandwidth
The range of frequencies between zero and cut-off frequency , is known as bandwidth and the cut-off frequency is defined as the frequency at which the magnitude of the system is 3 dB down the magnitude of the system at zero frequency. Hence, bandwidth is nothing but the cut-off frequency .
Assuming the magnitude of the system at zero frequency as 1, the cut-off frequency is derived as
= =
But from Eqn. (8.16), it is clear that the magnitude depends on the normalized frequency. Hence, the above equation can be written as
=
Comparing the above equation with the quadratic equation , we obtain
Hence, solving this quadratic equation, we obtain
Considering only the positive values, we obtain
Therefore, (8.23)
We know that,
Therefore, the cut-off frequency is given by (8.24)
The expression for bandwidth is also same as that of the cut-off frequency. From Eqn. (8.23), the normalized bandwidth is equal to 1. The graphical idea about the bandwidth with respect to the damping ratio is shown in Fig. 8.11.
Fig. 8.11 ∣ Magnitude versus frequency
The graphical idea between the normalized bandwidth and the damping ratio is shown in Fig. 8.12.
Fig. 8.12 ∣ ξ vs normalized bandwidth
Example 8.3 The open-loop or the feed-forward transfer function of a unity feedback system is given by . Determine the resonant frequency and resonant peak for the given system.
Solution: Given and .
Hence, the closed-loop transfer function of the system,
The characteristic equation of the given system is
Comparing the above equation with the standard second-order characteristic , we obtain
, i.e., rad/sec and , i.e.,
Hence,
Resonant peak,
Resonant frequency, rad/sec
Example 8.4 The closed-loop poles of a system are at . Determine (i) bandwidth, (ii) normalized peak driving signal frequency and (iii) resonant peak for such a system.
Solution: The closed-loop transfer function of any system is given by
and the characteristic equation of the system is given by
The closed-loop poles of a system are obtained by equating the characteristic equation to zero. Hence, the characteristic equation of the given system using the given closed-loop poles is obtained as
i.e.,
Comparing the above equation with the standard second-order characteristic equation, we obtain . Therefore, rad/sec
Therefore,
Using the damping ratio and natural frequency, the frequency domain specifications can be determined as given below:
= 4.350 rad/sec
= = 0.3846
Therefore, = = 1.083
Example 8.5 Consider a second-order system with a natural frequency of 4 rad/sec and damped natural frequency of 1.6 rad/sec. Determine (i) the percentage of peak overshoot when the system is subjected to a unit step input and (ii) the resonant peak value when the system is subjected to sinusoidal input.
Solution: Given = 4 rad/sec and = 1.6 rad/sec
We know that
Therefore,
Upon solving, we obtain
Example 8.6 Consider a second-order system with resonant peak 2 and resonant frequency of 6 rad/sec. Determine the transfer function of the given second-order system and hence determine (i) rise time tr , (ii) peak time tp , (iii) settling time ts and (iv) % peak overshoot Mp of the given system when the system is subjected to step input. In addition, determine the time of oscillation and number of oscillations before the response of the system gets settled.
Solution: Given and
We know that
i.e.,
i.e.,
Upon solving, we obtain
i.e., or 0.933
Therefore, or 0.966
The system with the damping ratio greater than 0.707 does not exhibit any peak in the frequency response of the system. Hence, the damping ratio of the given system is .
We know that,
Substituting the known values, we obtain
Upon solving, we obtain rad/sec
The standard second-order transfer function of the system is
Substituting the known values, we obtain
=
Here, rad
Therefore, rad
Also, rad/sec
Rise time, = 0.2957 sec
Peak time, = 0.5045 sec
Settling time for a system can be determined for 2% error tolerance and 5% error tolerance.
Hence, sec for 2% tolerance
sec for 5% tolerance
Period of oscillation, sec
Number of oscillations before the response of the system gets settled is given by
Peak overshoot of the system is = 0.4309
Example 8.7 The time response of a second-order system when the system is subjected to a unit step input is given below:
Determine the frequency response parameters of the system (i) peak resonance , (ii) resonant frequency and (iii) cut-off frequency of the system .
Solution:
From the given Table, the maximum value of the time response and the peak time of the system are 1.12 and 0.2 s, respectively.
Hence, there exists a peak overshoot of 0.12 at 0.2 sec.
Therefore,
Solving the above equation, we obtain
i.e.,
Therefore, rad/sec
rad/sec
Example 8.8 Consider a unity feedback system as shown in Fig. E8.9. Determine the K and a that satisfies the frequency domain specifications as Mr = 1.04 and ωr = 11.55 rad/sec. In addition, for the determined values of K and a, determine settling time and bandwidth of the system.
Fig. E8.9
Solution: Given and
Hence, the closed-loop transfer function of the system is
Comparing the above equation with the standard second-order transfer function, we obtain
i.e., (1)
i.e., (2)
Using the values of resonant peak and the resonant frequency, the values of K and a can be determined.
i.e.,
Upon solving, we obtain
i.e.,
Upon solving, we obtain rad/sec
Substituting the values of in Eqs. (1) and (2), we obtain
Example 8.9 The damping ratio and natural frequency of oscillation of a second-order system is 0.5 and 8 rad/sec respectively. Determine the resonant peak and resonant frequency.
Solution: Given and rad/sec
rad/sec
Example 8.10 The specification given on a certain second-order feedback control system is that the overshoot of the step response should not exceed 25 per cent. What are the corresponding limiting values of the damping ratio and peak resonance ?
Solution:
Given
i.e.,
Therefore,
i.e.,
or
i.e.,
Therefore, damping ratio,
Hence, resonant peak,
Example 8.11 Determine the frequency specifications of a second-order system when closed transfer function is given by
Solution: Comparing denominator of the transfer function with , we obtain
i.e., and i.e.,
and rad/sec
Consider a system with the open-loop transfer function . When a pole at is added to such a system, the open-loop transfer function of the system becomes . When a sinusoidal input is applied to such a system, the system becomes less stable compared to the stability of the previous system. In addition, the specifications of the frequency domain and time domain vary depending on the time constant .
For larger values of , we obtain
Consider a system with the open-loop transfer function . When a zero at is added, the open-loop transfer function of the system becomes . When a sinusoidal input is applied to the system, the following changes occur in the frequency domain specifications.
Determining the frequency response of a system, i.e., the magnitude and phase angle of a system for different frequencies from 0 to by using tabulation method becomes more complicated when more number of poles and zeros exist in the system. An alternative method that eliminates the difficulty of the tabulation method is the graphical representation of frequency response.
There are different graphical methods by which the frequency response can be represented. They are
The Bode plot of representing frequency response of a system is discussed in this chapter and the other plots will be discussed in the subsequent chapters.
Bode plot introduced by H.W. Bode was first used in the study of feedback amplifiers. It is one of the popular graphical methods used for determining the stability of the system when the system is subjected to sinusoidal input. The stability of the closed-loop system is determined based on the frequency response of the loop transfer function of the system, i.e., . The gain or magnitude and phase angle of the system can be easily represented as a function of frequency using Bode plot. It is also a very useful graphical tool in analysing and designing of linear control systems.
The Bode plot consists of two plots:
In Bode plot, both the magnitude and phase plots are plotted against the frequency in the logarithmic scale. In addition, the magnitude of the system is plotted in dBs (decibels). Hence, the Bode plot is also called logarithmic plot. Since the magnitude and phase plots of a system are sketched based on the asymptotic properties instead of detailed plotting, the Bode plot is also called asymptotic plots.
The reasons for plotting the magnitude and phase angle plots of the Bode plot in a logarithmic scale are:
It is noted that in Bode plot, the magnitude of the loop transfer function is taken in terms of decibels (complex logarithm) rather than the simple logarithm. The magnitude used to plot the magnitude plot in Bode plot is determined using
dB
Table 8.3 shows the importance of logarithmic scale rather than the ordinary scale. Any real value existing between and 100 can be plotted between −40 to 40 dB.
Table 8.3 ∣ The dB values for the original magnitude
Thus a wide range of magnitude can be plotted easily using logarithmic magnitude scale.
The advantages of using Bode plot in plotting the frequency response of a system are:
The disadvantages of using Bode plot in plotting the frequency response of a system are:
The different frequency domain specifications that can easily be determined using Bode plot are gain margin, phase margin, gain crossover frequency and phase crossover frequency. The plot shown in Fig. 8.13 indicates the determination of the above said frequency domain specifications.
Fig. 8.13 ∣ Frequency domain specifications
From the above plot, the formula for determining the frequency domain specifications can be obtained as follows:
Gain crossover frequency, = frequency at which = 0.
Phase crossover frequency, = frequency at which = −180°.
Gain margin, = 0 dB −.
Phase margin, = − (−180°) = 180°+ phase angle at .
The stability of the system is easier to determine using Bode plot once the frequency domain specifications are obtained. The stability of the system can be analysed on the basis of crossover frequencies ( and ) or gain and phase margins.
The system can either be a stable system, marginally stable system or unstable system. The stability of the system based on the relation between crossover frequencies is given in Table 8.4.
Table 8.4 ∣ Stability of the system based on crossover frequencies
The stability of the system based on the gain margin and phase margin is given in Table 8.5.
Table 8.5 ∣ Stability of the system based on gm and pm
The construction of Bode plot can be illustrated by considering the generalized form of loop transfer function is given by:
where are real constants,
Z is the number of zeros at the origin,
N is the number of poles at the origin or the TYPE of the system,
M is the number of simple poles existing in the system,
U is the number of simple zeros existing in the system,
V is the number of complex poles existing in the system
Q is the number of complex zeros existing in the system and
T is the time delay in seconds.
Substituting and simplifying, we obtain
Rearranging the above equation, we obtain
(8.25)
where , and
The magnitude of Eqn. (8.25) in dB is given by
The phase angle of Eqn. (8.25) is given by
where magnitude of the term is 1 and phase angle of the term is .
It is noted that phase angle of the term = 0°.
From Eqn. (8.25), it is clear that the open-loop transfer function may contain the combination of any of the following five factors:
Hence, it is necessary to have a complete study (magnitude and phase plots) of these factors that can be utilized in constructing the plot (magnitude and phase plots) of a composite loop transfer function . The composite plot for the loop transfer function is constructed by adding the plots of individual factors present in the function. Thus Bode plot is an approximate asymptotic plot of individual factors.
Factor 1: Constant K
The magnitude and phase angle of the constant K which are to be plotted in a semi log graph sheet are:
Magnitude in dB = .
Phase angle = 0°.
The magnitude and phase plots corresponding to the values obtained using the above equation are shown in Figs. 8.14(a) and (b) respectively.
Fig. 8.14 ∣ Bode plot for factor K
Note:
Similarly,
i.e.,
Factor 2: Zeros at the origin or poles at the origin
In Bode plots, the frequency ratios are expressed in terms of octaves or decades. When the frequency band is from to , it is called decade.
The details for plotting the magnitude and phase plots when only one pole or zero exists at the origin are given in Table 8.6.
Table 8.6 ∣ Magnitude and phase plots for and
The magnitude in dB will be equal to zero at the frequency value of .
If multiple poles or zeros exist at the origin, the corresponding changes in the magnitude and phase plots are given in Table 8.7. Let the number of zeros at the origin existing in the system be Z and the number of poles at the origin be N.
Table 8.7 ∣ Magnitude and phase plots for and
Factor 3: Simple pole or simple zero
The details for plotting the magnitude and phase plots when only one simple pole or simple zero exists are given in Table 8.8.
Table 8.8 ∣ Magnitude and phase angle for simple pole and simple zero
It is known that the magnitude of a number is same as the magnitude of the reciprocal of a number with the opposite sign. Hence, in this case the step-by-step procedure for plotting the magnitude and phase plots for a simple pole are discussed.
For simple pole
Case 1: For low frequencies
Magnitude =
Slope =
Case 2: For high frequencies
Magnitude =
The slope of the line is determined as follows:
At , magnitude = 0 dB
At , magnitude = −20 dB
Hence, the slope of the line is
The approximate magnitude plot of the simple pole is shown in Fig. 8.15(a).
Fig. 8.15 (a) ∣ Approximate magnitude plot for
The frequency at which two asymptotes meet is called corner frequency or break frequency. In this case, the corner frequency is at . The corner frequency divides the frequency response curve of the system as low-frequency region and high-frequency region.
The magnitude plot obtained using the above three steps is an approximated magnitude curve. The actual magnitude curve can be obtained by substituting different values of in magnitude equation of simple pole as given in Table 8.9.
Table 8.9 ∣ Actual magnitude curve
Hence, an error exists in the magnitude plot. The error in the magnitude plot is maximum at the corner frequency and the value of the error is obtained by
Error =
The values of error at different frequencies are given in Table 8.10.
Table 8.10 ∣ Error versus Frequency
The magnitude plot with the approximate curve and actual curve is shown in Fig. 8.15(b).
Fig. 8.15 (b) ∣ Magnitude plot for (1 + jωT)−1
At , phase angle = 0°
At , phase angle = −45°
At , phase angle = −90°
Hence, the phase plot of a simple pole is shown in Fig. 8.15(c).
Fig. 8.15 (c) ∣ Approximate phase plot for (1 + jωT)−1
The phase plot of a simple pole is skew symmetric about the inflection point at phase angle = −45°.
Some errors exist in the phase plot when the actual value is approximated and the approximate phase angle value and actual phase angle at different frequencies are given in Table 8.11.
Table 8.11 ∣ Exact and approximate phase values for simple zero
The phase plot with the approximate curve and actual curve are shown in Fig. 8.15(d).
Fig. 8.15 (d) ∣ Phase plot for a simple pole
The reciprocal of a simple pole is a simple zero. Hence, the magnitude and phase plots of a simple zero are just the mirror image of the plots of simple pole. The magnitude and phase plots of a simple zero with the actual curve and approximated curve are shown in Figs. 8.15(e) and (f) respectively.
Fig. 8.15 ∣ Bode plot for simple zero (1 + jωT)−1
If the number of simple poles and simple zeros of same value existing on the system is , then the magnitude and phase plots are obtained as
The details for plotting the magnitude and phase plots of complex pole and complex zero is given in Table 8.12.
Table 8.12 ∣ Magnitude and phase angle for complex zero and complex pole
In Table 8.12, is the damping ratio and .
It is known that the magnitude of a number is same as the magnitude of the reciprocal of that number with opposite sign. The magnitude and phase plots of the quadratic factor depend on the corner frequency and the damping factor. Hence, in this case, the step-by-step procedure for plotting the magnitude and phase plots for simple poles has been discussed.
When the damping ratio is greater than 1, i.e., , the quadratic factor can be written as the product of two first-order factors with real poles. When the damping ratio is within a range, i.e., , the quadratic factor can be written as the product of two complex conjugate factors. The asymptotic approximation of the plots is not accurate for this factor with lower values of .
The step-by-step procedure for plotting the magnitude and phase plots for a complex pole is discussed below.
Magnitude plot:
(8.26)
Case 1: For lower frequencies ,
Magnitude =
Slope =
Case 2: For higher frequencies ,
Magnitude =
The slope of the line is determined as
At , magnitude = 0 dB
At , magnitude = −40 dB
Hence, the slope of the line is .
The approximate magnitude plot of the complex pole is shown in Fig. 8.16(a).
Fig. 8.16 (a) ∣ Approximate magnitude plot for
At the corner frequency i.e., , the resonant peak occurs and its magnitude depends on . Also, error exists in the approximation of two asymptotes and the magnitude of the error depends inversely on damping ratio .
The actual magnitude curve can be obtained by substituting different values of in Eqn. (8.26) as given in Table 8.13.
Table 8.13 ∣ Actual magnitude curve
Hence, error always exists in the magnitude plot of the system. The error at is calculated as given below:
Error = actual value − approximate value
= dB
The error for different values of at is given in Table 8.14. Similarly, error will vary depending on and .
Table 8.14 ∣ Error versus damping ratio at
The magnitude plot with the actual and asymptotic value is shown in Fig. 8.16(b).
Fig. 8.16 (b) ∣ Magnitude plot for
At , phase angle = 0°
At , phase angle = −90°
At , phase angle = −180°
Hence, the phase plot of a complex pole is shown in Fig. 8.16(c).
Fig. 8.16 (c) ∣ Phase plot for
The phase plot of a simple pole is skew symmetric about the inflection point at phase angle = −90°.
Plots for a quadratic zero are mirror images of those for a pole. The magnitude and phase plots for a complex zero are shown in Figs. 8.16(d) and (e) respectively.
Fig. 8.16 ∣ Bode plot for complex zero
It is noted that in the quadratic zero when the damping ratio is less than 0.7 (i.e., ), a dip has to be drawn at frequency with the amplitude of .
Similarly, for quadratic pole when the damping ratio is less than 0.7 (i.e., ), a peak has to be drawn at frequency with the amplitude of .
Factor 5: Transportation lag,
Consider a system with loop transfer function as
In frequency domain, the loop transfer function is given by
where T is the time delay in seconds.
Therefore,
Hence, the magnitude and phase angle of the factor is given by
and
Since the phase angle obtained is in the unit of radians, the phase angle can be calculated in degrees as
Table 8.15 shows the phase angle for different values of .
Table 8.15 ∣ Phase angle versus frequency
It is clear that for the transportation lag factor, the magnitude plot is zero for all the values of frequency and the phase plot is varying linearly with the frequency .
Table 8.16 shows the different factors with its corner frequency, slope of the magnitude curve, values of the magnitude in dB and phase angle in degrees.
Table 8.16 ∣ Possible factors present in a given system
Consider the loop transfer function as
Substituting , we obtain
Now, the corner frequencies of the given system are
The phase plot is independent of the corner frequency. Since the magnitude of each term present in the transfer function is calculated in the increasing order of corner frequency, the magnitude plot depends on the corner frequency.
Hence, the relation between the corner frequencies is considered as .
For each term present in the loop transfer function, the slope of the magnitude curve varies. To combine the slope of the different terms present in the given system, the following steps are followed:
Table 8.17 ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Gain at
where
The gain at different frequencies are tabulated as given in Table 8.18.
Table 8.18 ∣ Gain at different frequencies
The construction of phase plot is much simpler when compared to construction of magnitude plot.
The phase angle of the given system as a function of frequency has to be determined as
for
and for
The values of at different frequencies are calculated including the frequencies mentioned in Table 8.18 and tabulated.
The flow chart for plotting the Bode plot (both magnitude and phase angle plot) for a given system is shown in Fig. 8.17.
Fig. 8.17 ∣ Flow chart for plotting the Bode plot for a system
The flow chart for determining the gain K for the desired is given in Fig. 8.18(a).
Fig. 8.18 (a) ∣ Determination of K for the desired ωgc
The flow chart for determining the gain K for the desired is given in Fig. 8.18(b).
Fig. 8.18 (b) ∣ Determination of K for the desired gm
The flow chart for determining the gain for the desired is shown in Fig. 8.18(c).
Fig. 8.18 (c) ∣ Determination of K for the desired pm
The gain has an effect only on the magnitude plot of a loop transfer function of a system. The magnitude plot of a loop transfer function can be shifted vertically upwards or vertically downwards depending on the gain . If there is an increase in gain value from the original value, then the magnitude plot gets shifted vertically upward and if there is a decrease in gain from the original value, then the magnitude plot gets shifted vertically downward. The gain value cannot be increased or decreased infinitely. There exists some limits in doing so. The gain can be increased or decreased till the magnitude reaches dB at phase crossover frequency. The new gain can be determined as
where is the value by which the magnitude plot has been raised or lowered to reach dB at .
The step-by-step procedure for determining the transfer function of a system from its magnitude plot are:
Step 1: Determine the number of corner frequencies existing in the system (the point at which the slope of the system changes). If there exist different slopes for the given system, then there exist different corner frequencies.
Step 2: Determine the initial slope and final slope of the system.
Step 3: Construct a table for the given system in the format given below to determine the different factors present in the system.
Step 4:Determine the gain , corner frequencies, unknown frequencies and unknown magnitude values using the equation of a straight line, , where is the magnitude in dB, is the slope of the line in dB/dec, is the logarithmic value of frequency , i.e., in rad/sec and is the constant.
Consider the loop transfer function of a minimum phase transfer function as
(8.27)
and the loop transfer function of a non-minimum phase system as
(8.28)
where
The pole-zero plots of the minimum and non-minimum systems are shown in Fig. 8.19.
Fig. 8.19 ∣ Pole-zero plots of (a) minimum and (b) non-minimum phase systems
The magnitude and phase angle of the transfer function can be obtained by substituting in Eqs. (8.27) and (8.28) as
and (8.29)
(8.30)
From Eqs. (8.29) and (8.30), it is clear that the magnitudes of minimum phase system and non-minimum phase system are same, whereas the phase angles of minimum phase system and non-minimum phase system are different. The magnitude and phase plots of minimum and non-minimum phase systems are shown in Fig. 8.20.
Fig. 8.20 ∣ Phase plot of minimum and non-minimum phase systems
Example 8.12 The loop transfer function of a system is given by . Sketch the Bode plot and determine the following frequency domain specifications (i) gain margin , (ii) phase margin , (iii) gain crossover frequency and (iv) phase crossover frequency . Also, comment on the stability of the system.
Solution:
rad/sec and rad/sec.
To sketch the magnitude plot
Table E8.12(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.12(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
To sketch the phase plot
Table E8.12(c) ∣ Phase angle of the system for different frequencies
Hence, the magnitude and phase plots for the loop transfer function of the system are shown in Fig. E8.12.
Fig. E8.12
From the definition of gain crossover frequency, phase crossover frequency, gain margin, phase margin and from the graph shown in Fig. E8.12, the frequency domain specifications values are obtained as
Gain crossover frequency, rad/sec
Phase crossover frequency, rad/sec
Gain margin, dB
Phase margin,
Based on frequency:
Since , the system is stable.
Based on frequency domain specifications:
Since the gain margin and phase margin are greater than zero and , the system is stable.
Example 8.13 The loop transfer of a given system is given by . Sketch the Bode plot for given system. In addition, (i) determine the gain K and the phase margin so that gain margin is +30 dB and (ii) determine the gain K and the gain margin so that phase margin is .
Solution:
rad/sec and rad/sec.
To sketch the magnitude plot
Table E8.13(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.13(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
To sketch the phase plot
Table E8.13(c) ∣ Phase angle of the system for different frequencies
Fig. E8.13 (a)
From the definitions of gain crossover frequency, phase crossover frequency, gain margin, phase margin and the graph shown in Fig. E8.13(a), the frequency domain specifications values are obtained as
Gain crossover frequency, rad/sec
Phase crossover frequency, rad/sec
Gain margin, dB
Phase margin,
(i) To determine the gain value and gain margin corresponding to desired phase margin:
The required phase margin for the system is .
But it is known that, phase margin .
Therefore, .
Hence, from Fig. E8.13(a), the new gain crossover frequency for a phase angle of is rad/sec.
It is proven that at the gain crossover frequency, the magnitude must be 0 dB. But from Fig. E8.13(a), the magnitude at dB. Hence, the magnitude plot shown in Fig. E8.13(a) is raised by 5dB.
The modified Bode plot is shown in Fig. E8.13(b).
From Fig. E8.13(b), the new frequency domain specifications are
New phase margin,
New gain margin, =16 dB
New gain crossover frequency, 1.3 rad/sec
The value of for the newly obtained Bode plot is determined as
where is the value in dB by which the original magnitude plot has been raised or lowered. In this case, the value of is 5 dB.
Hence,
Therefore, the value of is .
Fig. E8.13 (b)
(ii) To determine the gain and phase margin corresponding to the gain margin
The required gain margin dB.
We know that, the gain margin is obtained using the formula,
Therefore, required is dB.
But for the given system from the Bode plot shown in Fig. E8.13(a), the gain at is dB. Hence, it is clear that every point in the magnitude plot shown in Fig. E8.13(a), has to be reduced by dB. The modified Bode plot is shown in Fig. E8.13(c).
From the Bode plot shown in Fig. E8.13(c), the obtained frequency domain specifications are:
New phase margin,
New gain margin, = 30 dB
The value of for the newly obtained Bode plot is determined as
, where is the value in dB by which the original magnitude plot has been raised or lowered. In this case, the value of is −10.
Hence,
Therefore, the value of is .
Fig. E8.13 (c)
Example 8.14 The loop transfer function of a system is given by . Sketch the Bode plot for the given system. Also, determine the gain value K for the gain crossover frequency 5 rad/sec.
Solution:
rad/sec and rad/sec.
Table E8.14(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.14(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
To sketch the phase plot
Table E8.14(c) ∣ Phase angle of the system for different frequencies
Fig. E8.14 (a)
Gain crossover frequency, (ωgc) = 1 rad/sec.
Phase crossover frequency, ( ωpc) = 0 rad/sec.
Gain margin, (gm) = ∞ dB.
Phase margin, (pm) = −50°.
It is given that the required gain crossover frequency of the system is rad/sec, i.e., rad/sec. Hence, it is necessary that the magnitude of the system at must be 0 dB. But from the Bode plot of the system shown in Fig. E8.14(a), the magnitude of the system is 28 dB.
Therefore, each and every point present in the magnitude plot must be added by dB. Hence, the modified Bode plot with rad/sec is shown in Fig. E8.14(b).
Fig. E8.14 (b)
The value of for the new Bode plot is determined as follows:
where is the value by which the magnitude plot has been raised or lowered. In this case, dB.
Hence,
Therefore, the = .
Example 8.15 The loop transfer function of the system is given by . Sketch the Bode plot for the system. Also, determine the frequency domain specifications and hence determine the stability of the system.
Solution:
rad/sec, rad/sec and rad/sec.
To sketch the magnitude plot
Table E8.15(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.15(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
To sketch the phase plot
Table E8.15(c) ∣ Phase angle of the system for different frequencies
Fig. E8.15
Gain crossover frequency, rad/sec
Phase margin,
From Table E8.15(c), it is clear that the phase angle of the system becomes only when the frequency of the system is ∞ rad/sec. Hence, phase crossover frequency of the system is ∞ rad/sec. Therefore, the gain margin of the system is also ∞ dB.
Based on frequency: Since , the system is stable.
Based on frequency domain specifications: Since the gain margin and phase margin are greater than zero and , the system is stable.
Example 8.16 The loop transfer function of a system is given by . Sketch the Bode plot for the given system and determine the frequency domain specifications.
Solution:
rad/sec, rad/sec and the third corner frequency is obtained as follows.
Comparing the standard second-order characteristic equation with the given quadratic factor, we obtain
rad/sec and
Hence, the third corner frequency existing in the system is rad/sec.
To sketch the magnitude plot
Table E8.16(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.16(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
To sketch the phase plot
Table E8.16(c) ∣ Phase angle of the system for different frequencies
Fig. E8.16
Gain crossover frequency, 2.8 rad/sec
Phase crossover frequency, rad/sec
Gain margin, dB
Phase margin,
Example 8.17 The loop transfer function of a system is given by . Sketch the Bode plot for the given system and determine the frequency domain specifications.
Solution:
rad/sec and rad/sec.
To sketch the magnitude plot
Table E8.17(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.17(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
To sketch the phase plot
.
Table E8.17(c) ∣ Phase angle of the system for different frequencies
Fig. E8.17
Gain crossover frequency, rad/sec
Phase crossover frequency, rad/sec
Gain margin, dB
Phase margin,
Example 8.18 The loop transfer function of a given system is . Sketch the Bode plot for the given system.
Solution:
Hence, the magnitude and phase plots for the given system depends on .
Example 8.19 The frequency response of a unity feedback system is given in Table E8.19.
Table E8.19 ∣ Frequency response of a system
Determine (a) gain margin and phase margin of the system and (b) change in gain so that the gain margin of the system is dB.
Solution:
Gain crossover frequency, rad/sec
Phase crossover frequency, rad/sec
Gain margin, dB
Phase margin,
Hence,
i.e., .
Therefore, change in gain required to have the gain margin of the system as dB is .
Example 8.20 The loop transfer function of a system is given by . Sketch the Bode plot for the given system and determine the frequency domain specifications.
Solution:
Comparing the standard second-order characteristic equation with the given quadratic factor, we obtain
rad/sec and
Hence, the third corner frequency existing in the system is rad/sec.
To sketch the magnitude plot
Table E8.20(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.20(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
To sketch the phase plot
Table E8.20(c) ∣ Phase angle of the system for different frequencies
Fig. E8.20
Gain crossover frequency, rad/sec
Phase crossover frequency, rad/sec
Gain margin, dB
Phase margin,
Example 8.21 The loop transfer function of a system is given by . Sketch the Bode plot for the given system and determine the frequency domain specifications.
Solution:
To sketch the magnitude plot
Table E8.21(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.21(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
To sketch the phase plot
=
Table E8.21(c) ∣ Phase angle of the system for different frequencies
Fig. E8.21
Gain crossover frequency, rad/sec
Phase crossover frequency, rad/sec
Gain margin, dB
Phase margin,
Example 8.22 The loop transfer function of a system is given by . Sketch the Bode plot for the given system. Determine the frequency domain specifications.
Solution:
=
rad/sec, rad/sec, rad/sec and
rad/sec.
To sketch the magnitude plot
Table E8.22(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.22(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
Fig. E8.22
To sketch the phase plot
Table E8.22(c) ∣ Phase angle of the system for different frequencies
Gain crossover frequency, rad/sec
Phase crossover frequency, rad/sec
Gain margin, dB
Phase margin,
Example 8.23 The loop transfer function of a system is given by . Sketch the Bode plot for the given system and determine the frequency domain specifications.
Solution:
where .
rad/sec and rad/sec.
To sketch the magnitude plot
Table E8.23(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.23(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
To sketch the phase plot
=
Table E8.23(c) ∣ Phase angle of the system for different frequencies
Fig. E8.23
Gain crossover frequency, rad/sec
Phase crossover frequency, rad/sec
Gain margin, dB
Phase margin,
Example 8.24 The block diagram of a system with and is shown in Fig. E8.24(a). Determine the loop transfer function and sketch the Bode plot for the same. Also, determine the maximum gain before the system becomes unstable.
Fig. E8.24(a)
Solution:
rad/sec, rad/sec and rad/sec.
To sketch the magnitude plot
Table E8.24(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.24(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
Fig. E8.24(b)
To sketch the phase plot
Table E8.24(c) ∣ Phase angle of the system for different frequencies
Gain crossover frequency, rad/sec
Phase crossover frequency, rad/sec
Gain margin, dB
Phase margin,
To determine the maximum gain
Example 8.25 The loop transfer function of a system is given by . Determine the maximum value of time delay , for the closed-loop system to be stable.
Solution:
rad/sec and .
To sketch the magnitude plot
Table E8.25(a) ∣ Determination of change in slope at different corner frequencies
Table E8.25(b) ∣ Gain at different frequencies
(1)
The phase margin for the system to be stable is . Therefore,
Substituting Eqn. (1) in the above equation, we obtain
Substituting = 10 rad/sec, we obtain
i.e., T = 0.068 sec.
Therefore, maximum time delay, , for the closed-loop system to be stable is sec.
Example 8.26 The magnitude plot of a system is shown in Fig. E8.26(a). Determine the transfer function of the system.
Fig. E8.26 (a)
Solution:
From Fig. E8.26(a), we can obtain the following information:
The change in slope from initial to final slope occurs in three steps and the factor that could be present in the transfer function for that change in slope to occur is given in Table E8.26.
Table E8.26 ∣ Factor for the change in slope
Therefore, from the above table, we can determine the loop transfer function of the system as a function of gain value as
The values of time constants and can be determined from their respective corner frequencies as
, and .
Hence, the loop transfer function of the system as a function of is
To determine the gain K
The gain can be determined using the general equation of straight line, i.e., where is the magnitude of in dB, is the slope of the line, is the logarithmic frequency in and is the constant.
The given magnitude plot of a system is redrawn as shown in Fig. E8.26(b).
Fig. E8.26(b)
For the line segment , we have
Slope of the line, .
Therefore,
At dB.
Therefore, i.e., c =32.
The magnitude at is
Solving the above equation, we obtain dB.
At rad/sec, only the gain and poles at the origin exist in the system, i.e., .
Therefore,
Therefore, .
Hence, the transfer function for the given magnitude plot of a system is
Example 8.27 The magnitude plot of a particular system is shown in Fig. E8.27(a). Determine the transfer function of the system.
Fig. E8.27 (a)
Solution:
From Fig. E8.27(a), we can obtain the following information:
The change in slope from initial to final slope occurs in three steps and the factor that could be present in the transfer function for that change in slope to occur is given in Table E8.27.
Table E8.27 ∣ Factor for the change in slope
Therefore, from Table E8.27, we can determine the loop transfer function of the system as a function of gain value as
To determine the gain K and corner frequencies:
Therefore,
The gain can be determined using the general equation of straight line, i.e., where is the magnitude of in dB, is the slope of the line, is the logarithmic frequency in and is the constant.
The magnitude plot given in Fig. E8.27(a) can be redrawn as shown in Fig. E8.27(b).
Fig. E8.27 (b)
For the line segment , we have
Therefore,
At , dB.
Therefore,
Solving the above equation, we obtain
Also, at , dB
Therefore,
Solving the above equation, we obtain s.
Similarly, for line segment , we have
Therefore,
At , dB.
Therefore,
Solving the above equation, we obtain
Also, at , dB
Therefore,
Solving the above equation, we obtain s.
Similarly, for line segment , we have
Therefore,
At , dB.
Therefore,
Solving the above equation, we obtain
Also, at , dB
Therefore,
Solving the above equation, we obtain s.
Therefore, the required transfer function will be
Calculate (i) the peak response and resonant frequency of the system and (ii) damping ratio and natural frequency of oscillation of the equivalent second-order system.
Fig. Q8.34
Determine (i) the values of and so that and rad/sec and (ii) corresponding bandwidth.
Fig. Q8.36
Table Q8.56
Fig. Q8.59
.
Show that the gain margin of the system is
Fig. Q8.64
Use frequency response technique to determine (a) , zero dB frequency 180° frequency, (b) closed-loop bandwidth, percentage overshoot, settling time and peak time and also comment on the stability of the system.
.
Derive an expression for gain K in terms of and specified gain margin .
(i) (ii) and (iii)
(i) and (ii)
Fig. Q8.75
Using Bode plot, determine (a) is the system stable for a gain K = 1 and (b) what is the maximum value of K before the system becomes unstable.
Fig. Q8.76
Fig. Q8.80
Determine (a) phase margin for the time delay of 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 1 s (b) gain margin for the time delay mentioned in (a), (c), for what time delay mentioned in (a), the system is stable and (d) for each time delay that makes the system unstable, how much reduction in gain is required for the system to be stable?
Fig. Q8.85
Fig. Q8.86
.
Determine the range of K for closed-loop stability.
18.220.18.186