You Manage It! 4: Discussion The Enduring Wage Gap by Gender

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 made it illegal for firms to pay differential wages to women and men who perform equal jobs in the same company, yet more than fifty years later, women still earn 77 percent of what men earn, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Compared to fifty-plus years ago, when most women stayed at home, the proportion of men and women in the workforce was almost equal in 2015, and the educational achievement of women as a whole now exceeds that of men. According to June E. O’Neill, a professor at Baruch College, the main reason for the persistent gender wage gap is that women assume greater responsibility for child-rearing than men. Because women look for jobs that are compatible with meeting the demands of family responsibilities, this generally implies accepting lower wages. In her recent book, Reshaping the Work Family Debate, Joan C. Williams, a law professor at the University of California, summarizes research that suggests that women are still expected to take primary responsibility for child care and that men are stigmatized at work for taking on a share of that responsibility. She argues that, surprisingly, because this goes against their expected roles in corporate America, men report higher levels of work–family conflict than women do. The fact that it is “politically incorrect” for men to admit this publicly, according to her, makes this all the more stressful for men. Consistent with Williams’s findings, a recent poll by the Pew Research Center uncovered that even though the so-called women’s liberation movement is over 50 years old, 67 percent of respondents expect men to be primarily responsible to support a family financially. Writing in 2014, Molly Edmonds, a consultant on women’s workplace and family issues, discusses the “mommy wars,” referring to stay-at-home moms who often accuse working moms of irreparably harming their children, implying that women more than men face a difficult choice between earning more money and properly attending to their children’s needs.

Critical Thinking Questions

  1. 1-30. Why do you think the pay gap between men and women has been so persistent? Do you agree or disagree with the explanations offered by the women who are cited in the case? Explain.

  2. 1-31. What personal qualities do you think are necessary for a couple with children to have successful careers? How would you select for those qualities? Explain.

  3. 1-32. What role, if any, should the HR department play in reducing the pay gap between men and women? Explain.

Team Exercise

  1. 1-33. The class is divided into groups of five. Team members are asked to make a list of reasons that explain the persistent pay gap between men and women. The team will then determine if the pay gap by gender and “equal pay for equal work” are different concepts. Assuming that the entire team works in an HR department, how would you research these issues in the organization?

Experiential Exercise: Team

  1. 1-34. Five students will take the side of the two women professors mentioned in the case and five students will take the opposite side. The two teams will debate in front of the entire class for about 15 minutes. The debate may be followed by open class discussion moderated by the instructor.

Experiential Exercise: Individual

  1. 1-35. Under the existing Equal Pay Act, an employer can avoid penalties by showing that pay differences by gender are based on nondiscriminatory factors such as work experience and education. At the time of this writing, the Senate may soon pass a bill—already passed in the House—that limits the use of these bona fide factors to justify pay differentials by gender by requiring that employers demonstrate that they are job-related necessities (a harder burden of proof). If you were asked for your informed opinion, would you support this change in the law? Carefully justify your answer.

Sources:Based on www.wsgr.com . (2014), Targeting employers for gender based pay and promotion; O’Neill, J. E. (2010, Nov. 10). Washington’s equal pay obsession. Wall Street Journal, C-1; Luscombe, B. (2010, Oct. 18). Week on, week off parenting. Time. 67–68; Luscombe, B. (2010, Nov. 19). Marriage, What’s it good for? Time, 48–53; Edmonds, M. (2014). Are men and women’s roles in society changing? [no longer online] http://people.howstuffworks.com .
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.119.103.204