As discussed in Chapter 16, some organizations favor customization of the PM toolbox by project family. This is the case when the organizations have a stream of projects featuring both mature and novel technologies, and project size is not considered an issue. Also, when projects are dominated by a strong industry or professional culture, this customization is a valid option. Here, we offer examples of PM toolboxes for the following families:
Because these families have a strong technological emphasis, we added technical deliverables to the PM tools (managerial deliverables) to create the complete PM toolbox. In this way, you can readily use our examples of the PM toolbox as an adaptable blueprint to create the PM toolbox for the specific family in an organization as a proxy for standardized project management process.
In presenting the toolboxes, our goals are as follows:
The degree of technical novelty in projects is often used as a criterion for project classification. Applying this criterion, you can group the projects into classes of simple, medium, and complex. We used this simple framework to distinguish between managerial needs of these classes' project managers. Note, however, that since the technical novelty is the only criterion in building the toolboxes, our examples are not in any way related to the project size. Note also that we chose the generic labels of simple, medium, and complex to describe degrees of technical novelty. This is a sufficient reason for organizations that have their own definition of technical novelty to adapt our examples per such definition.
Here we again use the Kano methodology to divide each class's toolbox into must, optional, and delighter tools. These types of tools are defined in Appendix B.
Note: Shaded areas indicate technical deliverables
Note: Shaded areas indicate technical deliverables
Note: shaded areas indicate technical deliverables
Note: Shaded areas indicate technical deliverables.
Note: Shaded areas indicate technical deliverables
18.219.16.177