References

[1]Acciao, B., Penner, I. Dynamic risk measures. Forthcoming in: Advanced Mathematical Methods for Finance, Springer.

[2]Acerbi, C., Tasche, D. On the coherence of expected shortfall. Journal of Banking and Finance 26, (2002), 1487–1503.

[3]Aliprantis, C. D., Border, K. C. Infinite dimensional Analysis. A hitchhiker’s guide, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.

[4]Aliprantis, C., Brown, D., Burkinshaw, O. Existence and optimality of competitive equilibria. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989.

[5]Allais, M. Le comportement de l’homme rationell devant de risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine. Econometrica 21 (1953), 503–546 .

[6]Anscombe, F. J., Aumann, R. J. A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Statistics 34 (1963), 199–205.

[7]Ansel, J.-P., Stricker, C. Quelques remarques sur un théorème de Yan. Séminaire de probabilités XXIV, 1988/89 (J. Azéma, P. André and M. Yor, eds.), Lecture Notes in Math. 1426, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, 266–274.

[8]Ansel, J.-P., Stricker, C. Lois de martingale, densités et décomposition de Föllmer-Schweizer. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 28 (1992), 375–392.

[9]Ansel, J.-P., Stricker, C. Unicité et existence de la loi minimale. In: Séminaire de probabilités XXVII (J. Azéma et al., eds.). Lecture Notes in Math. 1557, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993, 22–29.

[10]Ansel, J.-P., Stricker, C. Couverture des actifs contingents et prix maximum. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 30 (1994), 303–315.

[11]Arrow, K., Hildebrandt, W., Intriligator, D., Sonnenschein, H. (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. I–IV, Elsevier Science Publishers (1991).

[12]Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D. Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9 (1999), 203–228.

[13]Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D., Ku, H. Coherent multiperiod risk adjusted values and Bellman’s priciple. Ann. Oper. Res. 152, 5–22 (2007).

[14]Bachelier, L. Théorie de la spéculation. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 17 (1900), 21–86.

[15]Bank, P., Riedel. F. Existence and Structure of Stochastic Equilibria with Intertemporal Substitution, Finance Stoch. 5 (2001), 487–509.

[16]Barbera, S., Hammond, P. J., Seidl, C. (eds.), Handbook of Utility Theory, Vol. 1: Principles, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.

[17]Barrieu, P., El Karoui, N. Inf-convolution of risk measures and optimal risk transfer, Finance and Stochastics 9(2), 269–298 (2005).

[18]Baudoin, F. Conditioned stochastic differential equations: theory, examples and application to finance. Stochastic Process. Appl. 100, (2002) 109–145.

[19]Bauer, H. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Grundzüge der Maßtheorie. Third edition. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin–New York, 1978.

[20]Bauer, H. Probability theory. De Gruyter Stud. Math. 23, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin–New York, 1996.

[21]Bauer, H. Measure and integration theory. De Gruyter Stud. Math. 26, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin–New York, 2001.

[22]Bellini, F., Klar, B., Müller, A., and Rosazza Gianin, E. Generalized quantiles as risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 54, 41–48 (2014).

[23]Bensoussan, A. On the theory of option pricing. Acta Appl. Math. 2 (1984), 139–158.

[24]Ben-Tal, A.; Teboulle, M. Penalty functions and duality in stochastic programming via ϕ-divergence functionals. Math. Oper. Research 12, 224–240 (1987).

[25]Ben-Tal, A.; Teboulle, M. An old-new concept of convex risk measures: the optimized certainty equivalent. Math. Finance 17, no. 3, 449–476 (2007).

[26]Bernoulli, D. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 5 (1738), 175–192. Translated by L. Sommer: Econometrica 22 (1954), 23–36.

[27]Bewley, T. Existence of equilibria in economies with infinitely many commodities. J. Econom. Theory 43 (1972), 514–540.

[28]Bick, A. Comments on the valuation of derivative assets. Journal of Financial Economics 10 (1982), 331–345.

[29]Bion-Nadal, J. Dynamic risk measures: time consistency and risk measures from BMO martingales. Finance Stoch. 12 (2008), 219–244.

[30]Bion-Nadal, J. Time consistent dynamic risk processes. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 119 (2008), 633–654.

[31]Black, F., Scholes, M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Polit. Econom. 81 (1973), 637–654.

[32]Blackwell, D., Dubins, L. A Converse to the dominated convergence theorem. Illinois J. Math. 7 (1963), 508–514.

[33]Borch, K. Equilibrium in a reinsurance market. Econometrica 30 (1962), 424–444.

[34]Bourbaki, N. Intégration. Hermann, Paris, 1969.

[35]Breeden, D., Litzenberger, R. Prices of state-contingent claims implicit in option prices. J. Business 51 (1978), 621–651.

[36]Brown, H., Hobson, D., Rogers, L. C. G. Robust hedging of barrier options. Math. Finance 11 (2001), 285–314.

[37]Browne, S. The risks and rewards of minimizing shortfall probability. J. Portfolio Management 25 (1999), 76–85.

[38]Bühlmann, H. The general economic premium priciple. Astin Bulletin 14 (1984), 13–21.

[39]Bühlmann, H., Jewell, S. Optimal risk exchanges. Astin Bulletin 10 (1979), 243–262.

[40]Burgert, C. Darstellungssätze für statische und dynamische Risikomaße mit Anwendungen. Dissertation, Universität Freiburg, 2005.

[41]Carassus, L., Pham, H., Touzi, N. No-arbitrage in discrete-time under portfolio constraints. Math. Finance 11 (2001), 315–329.

[42]Carlier, G., Dana, R.-A. Law invariant concave utility functions and optimization problems with monotonicity and comonotonicity constraints. Statist. Decisions 24 (2006), no. 1, 127–152.

[43]Carlier, G.; Dana, R.-A. Rearrangement inequalities in non-convex insurance models. J. Math. Econom. 41 (2005), no. 4–5, 483–503.

[44]Carlier, G., Dana, R. A. Two-persons efficient risk-sharing and equilibria for concave law-invariant utilities. Econom. Theory 36 (2008), no. 2, 189–223.

[45]Carlier, G., Dana, R.-A. Core of convex distortions of a probability. J. Econom. Theory 113 (2003), no. 2, 199–222.

[46]Carlier, G., Dana, R.-A. Insurance contracts with deductibles and upper limits. Preprint, Ceremade, Université Paris Dauphine (2002).

[47]Carr, P., Geman, H., Madan, D. Pricing and hedging in incomplete markets. J. Financial Econom. 62 (2001), 131–167.

[48]Cheridito, P., Delbaen, F., Kupper, M. Coherent and convex monetary risk measures for bounded càdlàg processes. Stochastic Process. Appl. 112 (2004), no. 1, 1–22.

[49]Cheridito, P., Delbaen, F., Kupper, M. Coherent and convex monetary risk measures for unbounded càdlàg processes. Finance Stoch. 9, (2005) 1713–1732.

[50]Cheridito, P., Delbaen, F., Kupper, M. Dynamic monetary risk measures for bounded discrete-time processes. Electronic J. Probab. 11, (2006) 57–106.

[51]Cheridito, P., Kupper, M. Recursiveness of indifference prices and translation-invariant preferences. Math. Financ. Econ. 2 (2009), no. 3, 173–188.

[52]Cheridito, P., Li, T. Risk measures on Orlicz hearts. Math. Finance 19 (2009), no. 2, 189–214.

[53]Cherny, A. S. Weighted V@R and its properties. Finance Stoch. 10 (2006), no. 3, 367–393.

[54]Cherny, A., Madan, D. New Measures for Performance Evaluation. Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 2571–2606.

[55]Chong, K. M., Rice, N. M. Equimeasurable rearrangements of functions. Queen’s Papers in Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 28. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont., 1971.

[56]Choquet, G. Theory of capacities. Ann. Inst. Fourier 5, 131–295 (1953/54).

[57]Chow, Y. S., Teicher, H. Probability Theory: Independence, interchangeability, martingales. Springer-Verlag, New York–Heidelberg–Berlin, 1978.

[58]Chung, K.-L. A course in probability theory. 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York–London, 1974.

[59]Cont, R. Model uncertainty and its impact on the pricing of derivative instruments. Math. Finance 16, (2006) 519–542.

[60]Cootner, P. H. (ed.), The random character of stock market prices. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1964.

[61]Cox, J., Ross, S., Rubinstein, M. Option pricing: a simplified approach. J. Financial Econom. 7 (1979), 229–263.

[62]Csisźar, I. I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems. Ann. Probab. 3 (1975), 146–158.

[63]Csiszár, I. Sanov property, generalized I-projection and a conditional limit theorem. Ann. Probab. 12 (1984), 768–793.

[64]Cvitanic, J. Minimizing expected loss of hedging in incomplete and constrained markets. SIAM J. Control Optim. 38 (2000), 1050–1066.

[65]Cvitanic, J., Karatzas, I. Convex duality in constrained portfolio optimization. Ann. Appl. Probab. 2 (1992), 767–818.

[66]Cvitanic, J., Karatzas, I. Hedging contingent claims with constrained portfolios. Ann. Appl. Probab. 3 (1993), 652–681.

[67]Cvitanic, J., Karatzas, I. On dynamic measures of risk. Finance Stoch. 3 (1999), 451–482.

[68]Cvitanic, J., Karatzas, I. Generalized Neyman-Pearson lemma via convex duality. Bernoulli 7 (2001), 79–97.

[69]Cvitanic, J., Spivak, G. Maximizing the probability of perfect hedge. Ann. Appl. Probab. 9 (1999), 1303–1328.

[70]Dalang, R., Morton, A., Willinger, W. Equivalent martingale measures and no-arbitrage in stochastic securities market models. Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 29 (1990), 185–201.

[71]Dana, R.-A. Existence and uniqueness of equilibria when preferences are additively separable and gross substitute. Econometrica 61 (1993), 953–957.

[72]Dana, R.-A. Market behavior when preferences are generated by second-order stochastic dominance. J. Math. Econom. 40 (2004), no. 6, 619–639.

[73]Dana, R.-A. Ambiguity, uncertainty aversion and equilibrium welfare. Econom. Theory 23 (2004), no. 3, 569–587.

[74]Dana, R.-A. Stochastic dominance, individual decision making, and equilibrium asset pricing. Preprint, Ceremade, Université Paris Dauphine (2002).

[75]Dana, R.-A. A representation result for concave Schur concave functions. Math. Finance 15, (2005) 613–634.

[76]Dana, R.-A., Jeanblanc, M. Financial markets in continuous time. Translated from the 1998 French original by Anna Kennedy. Springer Finance. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.

[77]Dana, R.-A., Scarsini, M. Optimal risk sharing with background risk. J. Econom. Theory 133 (2007), no. 1, 152–176.

[78]Davis, Mark H. A. Option pricing in incomplete markets. In: Mathematics of derivative securities (Dempster, M. A. H. and Pliska, S. R., eds.), Publ. Newton Inst., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, 216–226.

[79]Debreu, G. Theory of value: an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University, Monograph 17, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York; Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London, 1959.

[80]Debreu, G. Continuity properties of Paretian utility. International Econ. Rev. 5 (1964), 285–293.

[81]Delbaen, F. Coherent measures of risk on general probability spaces. In: Advances in Finance and Stochastics. Essays in Honour of Dieter Sondermann, Springer-Verlag, 2002, 1–37.

[82]Delbaen, F. Coherent risk measures. Cattedra Galileiana. Scuola Normale Superiore, Classe di Scienze, Pisa, 2000.

[83]Delbaen, F. The structure of m-stable sets and in particular of the set of risk neutral measures. In memoriam Paul-André Meyer: Séminaire de Probabilités XXXIX, Lecture Notes in Math., 1874, Springer, Berlin (2006), 215–258.

[84]Delbaen, F. Risk measures for non-integrable random variables. Math. Finance 19 (2009), 329–333.

[85]Delbaen, F., Grandits, P., Rheinländer, T., Samperi, D., Schweizer, M. and Stricker, C. Exponential Hedging and Entropic Penalties. Math. Finance 12 (2002), 99–123.

[86]Delbaen, F., Schachermayer, W. A general version of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing. Math. Ann. 300 (1994), 463–520.

[87]Delbaen, F., Schachermayer, W. The fundamental theorem of asset pricing for unbounded stochastic processes. Math. Ann. 312 (1998), 215–250.

[88]Delbaen, F., Schachermayer, W. The mathematics of arbitrage. Springer Finance. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006.

[89]Dellacherie, C. Quelques commentaires sur les prolongements de capacités. Séminaire Probabilités V, Strasbourg, Lecture Notes in Math. vol 191, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1970).

[90]Dellacherie, C., Meyer, P.-A. Probabilités et potentiel. Chapitres IX à XI. Théorie discrète du potential. Revised edition. Publications de l’Institut de Mathématiques de l’Université de Strasbourg, XVIII. Actualités Sci. Indust. 1410, Hermann, Paris, 1983.

[91]Dembo, A., Zeitouni, O. Large deviations techniques and applications. Second edition. Appl. Math. 38. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.

[92]Denis, L., Martini, C. A theoretical framework for the pricing of contingent claims in the presence of model uncertainty. Ann. Appl. Probab. 16, no. 2, (2006) 827–852.

[93]Denneberg, D. Distorted probabilities and insurance premium. Methods Operations Research 52, 21–42 (1990).

[94]Denneberg, D. Non-additive measure and integral. Theory Decis. Lib. Ser. B Math. Statist. Meth. 27, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994.

[95]Deprez, O., Gerber, H. U. On convex principles of premium calculation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 4 (1985) 179–189.

[96]Detlefsen, K., Scandolo, G. Conditional and dynamic convex risk measures. Finance Stoch. 9, no. 4, (2005) 539–561.

[97]Deuschel, J.-D., Stroock, D. Large deviations. Pure Appl. Math. 137, Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1989.

[98]Doob, J. Generalized sweeping-out and probability. J. Funct. Anal. (1968), 207–225.

[99]Dubins, L., Gilat, D. On the distribution of maxima of martingales. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1978), 337–338.

[100]Dudley, R. Real analysis and probability. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 1989.

[101]Duffie, D. Security markets. Econom. Theory Econometrics Math. Econom. Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1988.

[102]Duffie, D. Dynamic asset pricing theory. 2nd ed. Princeton University Press, 1996.

[103]Duffie, D., Richardson, H. R. Mean-variance hedging in continuous time. Ann. Appl. Probab. 1 (1991), 1–15.

[104]Dunford, N., Schwartz, J. Linear Operators. Part I: General Theory. Interscience Publishers, New York, 1958.

[105]Dybvig, P. Distributional analysis of portfolio choice. J. Business 61 (1988), 369–393.

[106]Eilenberg, S. Ordered topological spaces. Amer. J. Math. LXIII (1941), 39–45.

[107]Ekeland, I., Temam, R. Convex analysis and variational problems. Stud. Math. Appl. 1, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam–Oxford; American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1976.

[108]El Karoui, N., Quenez, M.-C. Dynamic programming and pricing of contingent claims in an incomplete market. SIAM J. Control Optim. 33 (1995), 29–66.

[109]El Karoui, N., Ravanelli, C. Cash subadditive risk measures and interest rate ambiguity. Mathematical Finance 19 (2009), 561–590.

[110]Elliott, R., Föllmer, H. Orthogonal martingale representation. In: Stochastic analysis. Liber amicorum for Moshe Zakai, Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1991, 139–152.

[111]Elliott, R., Kopp, P. Mathematics of financial markets. Springer Finance, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999.

[112]Ellsberg, D. Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 75 (1961), 643–669.

[113]Embrechts, P. Klüppelberg, C., Mikosch, T. Modelling Extremal Events. Springer, Berlin, 1997.

[114]Feller, W. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1968.

[115]Ferguson, T. S. Mathematical Statistics: A Decision Theoretic Approach. Probability and Mathematical Statistics, vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, 1967.

[116]Filipović, D., Kupper, M. Monotone and cash-invariant convex functions and hulls. Insurance Math. Econom. 41 (2007), no. 1, 1–16.

[117]Filipović, D., Svindland, G. The canonical model space for law-invariant convex risk measures is L1. Math. Finance 22, no. 3, (2012) 585–589.

[118]de Finetti, B. Sul concetto di media. Giornale dell’Instituto Italiano degli Attuari 2 (1931), 369–396.

[119]Fishburn, P. Utility theory for decision making. Publ. Operations Res. 18, John Wiley, New York, 1970.

[120]Fishburn, P. Nonlinear preference and utility theory. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1988.

[121]Föllmer, H. Calcul d’Ito sans probabilités. Seminaire de probabilites XV, Univ. Strasbourg 1979/80, Lect. Notes Math. 850 (1981), 143–150.

[122]Föllmer, H. Probabilistic Aspects of Financial Risk. Plenary Lecture at the Third European Congress of Mathematics. Proceedings of the European Congress of Mathematics, Barcelona 2000, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2001.

[123]Föllmer, H., Gundel, A. Robust projections in the class of martingale measures, Illinois Journal of Mathematics 50(2), (2006) 439–472.

[124]Föllmer, H., Kabanov, Yu. M. Optional decomposition and Lagrange multipliers. Finance Stoch. 2 (1998), 69–81.

[125]Föllmer, H., Kramkov, D. Optional decompositions under constraints. Probab. Theory Related Fields 109 (1997), 1–25.

[126]Föllmer, H., Leukert, P. Quantile hedging. Finance Stoch. 3 (1999), 251–273.

[127]Föllmer, H., Leukert, P. Efficient hedging: cost versus shortfall risk. Finance Stoch. 4 (2000), 117–146.

[128]Föllmer, H., Penner, I. Convex risk measures and the dynamics of their penalty functions. Stat. Decisions 24(1), (2006) 61–96.

[129]Föllmer, H., Schied, A. Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stoch. 6 (4) (2002), 429–447.

[130]Föllmer, H., Schied, A. Robust representation of convex measures of risk. In: Advances in Finance and Stochastics. Essays in Honour of Dieter Sondermann, Springer-Verlag, 2002, 39–56.

[131]Föllmer, H., Schied, A., Weber, S. Robust preferences and robust portfolio choice. In: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Methods in Finance (Ed. P. Ciarlet, A. Bensoussan, Q. Zhang), Handbook of Numerical Analysis 15, 29–88 (2009).

[132]Föllmer, H., Schweizer, M. Hedging by sequential regression: An introduction to the mathematics of option trading. Astin Bulletin 18 (1989), 147–160.

[133]Föllmer, H., Schweizer, M. Hedging of contingent claims under incomplete information. Applied stochastic analysis, London, Stochastic Monogr. 5 (1990), 389–414.

[134]Föllmer, H., Sondermann, D. Hedging of non-redundant contingent claims. Contributions to mathematical economics, Hon. G. Debreu, 206–223 (1986).

[135]Fouque, J.-P., Papanicolaou, G., Sircar, R. Derivatives in Financial Markets with Stochastic Volatilities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.

[136]Frittelli, M. Introduction to a theory of value coherent with the no arbitrage principle, Finance and Stochastics, 4, no. 3, (2000), 275–297.

[137]Frittelli, M. The minimal entropy martingale measure and the valuation problem in incomplete markets, Mathematical Finance, Vol. 10 (2000), 39–52.

[138]Frittelli, M., Rosazza Gianin, E. Putting order in risk measures. J. Banking & Finance 26 (2002), 1473–1486.

[139]Frittelli, M., Rosazza Gianin, E. Dynamic convex risk measures. In: New Risk Measures in Investment and Regulation, G. Szegö ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2003.

[140]Frittelli, M., Rosazza Gianin, E. Law-invariant convex risk measures. Advances in Mathematical Economics 7, (2005) 33–46.

[141]Frittelli, M., Scandolo, G. Risk measures and capital requirements for processes. Math. Finance 16 (2006), 589–612.

[142]Gilboa, I. Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. J. Math. Econom. 16 (1987), 65–88.

[143]Gilboa, I. Theory of decision under uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[144]Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D. Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18 (1989), 141–153.

[145]Goovaerts, M. J., De Vylder, F., Haezendonck, J. Insurance premiums. Theory and applications. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1984).

[146]Gundel, A. Robust utility maximization in complete and incomplete market models, Finance Stoch. 9, no. 2, (2005) 151–176.

[147]Halmos, P., Savage, L. Application of the Radon-Nikodym theorem to the theory of sufficient statistics. Ann. Math. Stat. 20 (1949), 225–241.

[148]Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E., Pólya, G. Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1934.

[149]Harrison, J., Kreps, D. Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. J. Econom. Theory 20 (1979), 381–408.

[150]Harrison, J., Pliska, S. Martingales and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading. Stochastic Process. Appl. 11 (1981), 215–260.

[151]He, X.-D., Zhou, X.-Y. Portfolio choice via quantiles. Math. Finance 21, no. 2, (2011) 203–231.

[152]Heath, D. Back to the future. Plenary lecture, First World Congress of the Bachelier Finance Society, Paris (2000).

[153]Heath, D., Platen, E. Introduction to Quantitative Finance: a Benchmark Approach. Springer Finance. Springer, Berlin, 2006.

[154]Heath, D., Ku, H. Pareto equilibria with coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 14, no. 2 (2004), 163–172.

[155]Herstein, I. N., Milnor J. An axiomatic approach to measurable utility. Econometrica 21 (1953), 291–297.

[156]Hobson, D. Robust hedging of the loockback option. Finance Stoch. 2 (1998), 329–347.

[157]Hoeffding, W. Maszstabinvariante Korrelationstheorie. Schr. math. Inst. Inst. angew. Math. Univ. Berlin 5, 181–233 (1940).

[158]Huber, P. Robust statistics. Wiley Ser. Probab. Math. Statist., Wiley, New York, 1981.

[159]Huber, P., Strassen, V. Minimax tests and the Neyman-Pearson lemma for capacities. Ann. Statist. 1 (1973), 251–263.

[160]Hull, J. Options, futures, and other derivatives. 4th edition. Prentice Hall, London, 2000.

[161]Jacka, S. A martingale representation result and an application to incomplete financial markets. Math. Finance 2 (1992), 239–250.

[162]Jacod, J. and Shiryaev, A. N. Local martingales and the fundamental asset pricing theorems in the discrete-time case. Finance and Stochastics, 2 (1998), 259–273.

[163]Jaschke, S., Küchler, U. Coherent Risk Measures and Good-Deal Bounds. Finance Stoch. 5, no. 2 (2001), 181–200.

[164]Jeanblanc M., Yor M. and Chesney M. Mathematical Methods for Financial Markets. Springer-Verlag, 2009.

[165]Jouini, E., Kallal, H. Arbitrage in securities markets with short-sales constraints. Math. Finance 3 (1995), 197–232.

[166]Jouini, E., Kallal, H. Efficient trading strategies in the presence of market frictions. The Review of Financial Studies 14 (2001), 343–369.

[167]Jouini, E., Schachermayer, W., Touzi, N. Law invariant risk measures have the Fatou property. Advances in Mathematical Economics. Vol. 9, 49–71. In: Adv. Math. Econ., 9, Springer, Tokyo, 2006.

[168]Jouini, E., Schachermayer, W., Touzi, N. Optimal risk sharing for law invariant monetary utility functions. Math. Finance 18 (2008), no. 2, 269–292.

[169]Kabanov, Yu. M., Kramkov, D. O. No-arbitrage and equivalent martingale measures: An elementary proof of the Harrison-Pliska theorem. Theory Probab. Appl. 39 (1994), 523–527.

[170]Kabanov, Yu. M., Stricker, C. A teacher’s note on no-arbitrage criteria. Sém. Probab. 35, Lecture Notes in Math. 1755, Springer-Verlag, 2001, 149–152.

[171]Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (1979), 263–291.

[172]Karatzas, I. On the pricing of American options. App. Math. Optimization 17 (1988), 37–60.

[173]Karatzas, I. Lectures on the mathematics of finance. CRM Monogr. Ser. 8, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996.

[174]Karatzas, I., Kou, S. G. On the pricing of contingent claims under constraints. Ann. Appl. Probab. 6 (1996), 321–369.

[175]Karatzas, I., Kou, S. G. Hedging American contingent claims with constraint portfolios. Finance Stoch. 2 (1998), 215–258.

[176]Karatzas, I., Shreve, S. Brownian motion and stochastic calculus. Grad. Texts in Math. 113, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.

[177]Karatzas, I., Shreve, S. Methods of mathematical finance. Appl. Math., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.

[178]Karni, E., Schmeidler, D., Vind, K. On state-dependent preferences and subjective probabilities. Econometrica 51 (1983), 1021–1031.

[179]Karni, E., Schmeidler, D. Utility theory with uncertainty. In: Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. IV (W. Hildebrandt and H. Sonnenschein, eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991, 1763–1831.

[180]Kellerer, H. Markov-Komposition und eine Anwendung auf Martingale. Math. Ann. 198 (1972), 99–122.

[181]Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M., Mukerji, S. A smooth model of decision making under uncertainty. Econometrica, 73 (2005), 1849–1892.

[182]Knight, F. Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1921.

[183]Kolmogorov, A. Sur la notion de moyenne. Rend. Licei, 2o sem. fasc. 9 (1930).

[184]Komlós, J. A generalization of a problem of Steinhaus. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 18 (1967), 217–229.

[185]Korn, R. Optimal Portfolio. World Scientific, Singapore, 1997.

[186]Krätschmer, V. Robust representation of convex risk measures by probability. Finance Stochast. 9, (2005) 597–608.

[187]Krätschmer, V. Compactness in spaces of inner regular measures and a general portmanteau lemma. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 351 (2009), no. 2, 792–803.

[188]Kramkov, D. O. Optional decomposition of supermartingales and hedging contingent claims in incomplete security markets. Probab. Theory Related Fields 105 (1996), 459–479.

[189]Kramkov, D., Schachermayer, W. The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. 9, no. 3, (1999) 904–950.

[190]Kramkov, D., Schachermayer, W. Necessary and sufficient conditions in the problem of optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab., Vol. 13, no. 4. (2003).

[191]Krasnosel’skii, M., Rutickii, Ya. Convex functions and Orlicz spaces. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1961.

[192]Kreps, D. Arbitrage and equilibrium in economies with infinitely many commodities. J. Math. Econom. 8 (1981) 15–35.

[193]Kreps, D. Notes on the theory of choice. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1988.

[194]Kulldorff, M. Optimal control of favorable games with a time limit. SIAM J. Control Optim. 31 (1993), 52–69.

[195]Kunze, M. Verteilungsinvariante konvexe Risikomaße. Diplomarbeit, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2003.

[196]Kupper, M., Schachermayer, W. Representation results for law invariant time consistent functions. Math. Financ. Econ. 2 (2009), no. 3, 189–210.

[197]Kusuoka, S. On law invariant coherent risk measures. Adv. Math. Econ. 3 (2001), 83–95.

[198]Lacroix, S.F. Traité du calcul différentiel et du calcul intégral. Courcier, 1810.

[199]Lamberton, D., Lapeyre, B. Introduction to Stochastic Calculus Applied to Finance. English edition, translated by N. Rabeau and F. Mantion, Chapman & Hall, London, second edition, 2007.

[200]Lamberton, D., Lapeyre, B. Introduction au calcul stochastique appliqué à la finance. 2ème éd. Ellipses, Paris, 1997.

[201]Leland, H. Who should buy portolio insurance? J. Finance 35 (1980), 581–594.

[202]Lembcke, J. The necessity of strongly subadditive capacities for Neyman-Pearson minimax tests. Monatsh. Math. 105, (1988) 113–126.

[203]Leukert, P. Absicherungsstrategien zur Minimierung des Verlustrisikos. Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (1999).

[204]Li, P., Xia, J. Minimal martingale measures in discrete time. Acta Math. Appl. Sinica (2002).

[205]Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Rustichini, A. Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences, Econometrica 74, 1447–1498 (2006).

[206]Mas-Colell, A. The theory of general equilibrium: A differentiable approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.

[207]Mas-Colell, A., Zame, W. Equilibrium theory in infinite dimensional spaces. Handbook of Mathematical Economics 4, North-Holland, 1991.

[208]McNeil, A.J., Frey, R., Embrechts, P. Risk Management. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015.

[209]Melnikov, A. V., Nechaev, M. L. On the mean-variance hedging problem. Theory Probab. Appl. 43 (1998), 588–603; translation from Teor. Veroyatnost. i Primenen. 43 (1998), 672–691.

[210]Merton, R. Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J. Econom. Manag. Sci. 4 (1973), 141–183.

[211]Milgram, A. N. Partially ordered sets, separating systems and inductiveness. Rep. Math. Colloq. II Ser. 1, University of Notre Dame, 1939, 18–30.

[212]Monat, P., Stricker, C. Föllmer-Schweizer decomposition and mean-variance hedging for general claims. Ann. Probab. 23 (1995), 605–628.

[213]Musiela, M., Rutkowski, M. Martingale methods in financial modelling. Appl. Math., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.

[214]Myeni, R. The pricing of the American option. Ann. Appl. Probab. 2 (1992), 1–23.

[215]Nagumo, M. Über eine Klasse der Mittelwerte. Japanase J. Math. 7 (1930), 71–79.

[216]von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O. Theory of games and economic behavior. 2nd. Ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1947.

[217]Neveu, J. Discrete-parameter martingales. North-Holland, Amsterdam–Oxford, 1975.

[218]Neyman, J., Pearson, E.S. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A 231, 289–337 (1933).

[219]Ogryczak, W., Ruszczynski, A. Dual stochastic dominance and related mean-risk models. SIAM J. Optim. 13 (2002), no. 1, 60–78.

[220]Penner, I. Dynamic convex risk measures: time consistency, prudence, and sustainability. Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2007.

[221]Pflug, G. Some remarks on the value-at-risk and the conditional value-at-risk. In: Probabilistic constrained optimization (Editor: S. Uryasev). Springer (2000), 272–281.

[222]Kovacevic, R. M. and Pflug, G. C. Are time consistent valuations information monotone? International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 17, 1450003 (2014).

[223]Pflug, G., Ruszczynski, A. Risk measures for income streams. Preprint, Universität Wien, 2001.

[224]Pham, H. Dynamic Lp-hedging in discrete time under cone constraints. SIAM J. Control Optim. 38 (2000), 665–682.

[225]Pliska, S. Introduction to Mathematical Finance. Blackwell Publishers, 1997.

[226]Protter, P. Stochastic integration and differential equations. Version 2.1, 2nd edition. Applications of Mathematics. Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability Vol. 21, Springer, Berlin, 2005.

[227]Quiggin, J. A Theory of Anticipated Utility. J. Economic Behavior and Organization, 3 (1982), 225–243.

[228]Rabin, M. Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica 68, no. 5 (2000), 1281–1292.

[229]Rader, J. The existence of a utility function to represent preferences. Rev. Econom. Stud. 30 (1963), 229–232.

[230]Reed, M., Simon, B. Methods of modern mathematical physics. Vol. 1: Functional analysis. Academic Press, New York–London, 1972.

[231]Riedel, F. Dynamic convex risk measures. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 112 (2004), 185–200.

[232]Rockafellar, R. T. Convex analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970.

[233]Rockafellar, R. T., Uryasev, S. Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking and Finance 26 (2002), 1443–1471.

[234]Roorda, B., Schumacher, J. M. Time consistency conditions for acceptability measures, with an application to Tail Value at Risk. Insurance Math. Econom. 40 (2007), 209–230.

[235]Rogers, L. C. G. Equivalent martingale measures and no-arbitrage. Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 51 (1994), 41–49.

[236]Ross, S. A. The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. J. Econom. Theory 13 (1976), 341–360.

[237]Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J. Increasing risk: I. A definition. J. Econom. Theory 2 (1970), 225–243.

[238]Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J. Increasing risk: II. Its economic consequences. J. Econom. Theory 3 (1971), 66–84.

[239]Rüschendorf, L. On the distributional transform, Sklar’s theorem, and the empirical copula process. J. Statistical Planning and Inference, 139 (2009) 3921–3927.

[240]Ryff, J. Orbits of L1-functions under doubly stochastic transformations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 117 (1965), 92–100.

[241]Samuelson, P. A. Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Rev. 4 (1965), 41–50.

[242]Samuelson, P. A. Rational theory of warrant pricing. Industrial Management Rev. 6 (1965), 13–31.

[243]Savage, L. J. The foundations of statistics. Wiley Publ. Stat., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1954.

[244]Schachermayer, W. A Hilbert space proof of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing in finite discrete time. Insurance Math. Econom. 11 (1992), 249–257.

[245]Schachermayer, W. Optimal Investment in Incomplete Financial Markets. Proceedings of the first World Congress of the Bachelier Society, Paris 2000, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.

[246]Schachermayer, W. Introduction to the mathematics of financial markets. Lectures on probability theory and statistics (Saint-Flour, 2000), Lecture Notes in Math., 1816, Springer, Berlin (2003), 107–179.

[247]Schaefer, H. Topological vector spaces. Grad. Texts in Math. 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.

[248]Schäl, M. On quadratic cost criteria for option hedging. Math. Oper. Research 19 (1994), 121–131.

[249]Schied, A. On the Neyman-Pearson problem for law-invariant risk measures and robust utility functionals. Ann. Appl. Probab. 14 (2004), 1398–1423.

[250]Schied, A. Optimal investments for robust utility functionals in complete market models. Math. Oper. Research. 30, no. 3, 750–764 (2005).

[251]Schied, A. Risk measures and robust optimization problems. Stochastic Models 22, (2006) 753–831.

[252]Schied, A. Optimal investments for risk- and ambiguity-averse preferences: a duality approach. Finance Stochast. 11 (2007) 107–129.

[253]A. Schied and C.-T. Wu, Duality theory for optimal investments under model uncertainty. Stat. Decisions 23, no. 3, (2005) 199–217.

[254]Schmeidler, D. Integral representation without additivity. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 97 (1986), no. 2, 255–261.

[255]Schweizer, M. Hedging of options in a general semimartingale model. Diss ETH Zürich no. 8615, 1988.

[256]Schweizer, M. Risk-minimality and orthogonality of martingales. Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 30 (1990), 123–131.

[257]Schweizer, M. Variance-optimal hedging in discrete time. Math. Oper. Res. 20 (1995) 1–32.

[258]Schweizer, M. A Guided Tour through Quadratic Hedging Approaches. In: Option pricing, interest rates, and risk management (Jouini, E., Musiela, M., Cvitanic, J., eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001, 538–574.

[259]Sekine, J. Dynamic minimization of worst conditional expectation of shortfall. Math. Finance. 14, (2004) 605–618.

[260]Shreve, S. Stochastic Calculus Models for Finance: Discrete Time. Springer, 2004.

[261]Shreve, S. Stochastic Calculus Models for Finance, II: Continuous Time Models. Springer, 2004.

[262]Shiryaev, A. N. Probability. 2nd ed. Grad. Texts in Math. 95, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.

[263]Shiryaev, A. N. Essentials of stochastic finance. Adv. Ser. Stat. Sci. Appl. Probab. 3, World Scientific, Singapore, 1999.

[264]Snell, L. Applications of the martingale systems theorem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1952), 293–312.

[265]Sprenkle, C. Warrant prices as indicators of expectations and preferences. Yale Economic Essays 1 (1964), 178–231.

[266]Strassen, V. The existence of probability measures with given marginals. Ann. Math. Stat. 36 (1965), 423–439.

[267]Staum, J. Fundamental theorems of asset pricing for good deal bounds. Math. Finance 14, no. 2 (2004), 141–161.

[268]Stricker, C. Arbitrage et lois de martingale. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 26 (1990), 451–460.

[269]Talay, D., Zheng, Z. Worst case model risk management. Finance Stochast. 6, (2002) 517–537.

[270]Turner, A. The Turner review: a regulartory response to the global banking crisis. Financial Services Authority, London, 2009.

[271]Tutsch, S. Update rules for convex risk measures. Quant. Finance 8, (2008), 833–843.

[272]Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5 (1992), 297–323.

[273]Wang, S., Dhaene, J. Comonotonicity, correlation order and premium principles. Insurance Math. Econom. 22 (1998), 235–242.

[274]Weber, S. Distribution-invariant dynamic risk measures. Mathematical Finance 16, (2006) 419–442.

[275]von Weizsäcker, H. Can one drop L1-boundedness in Komlós’ Subsequence Theorem? American Math. Monthly 111 (2004), 900–903.

[276]Yaari, M. The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55 (1987), 95–116.

[277]Yan, J.-A. Caractérisation d’une classe d’ensembles convexes de L1 ou H1. Seminaire de probabilités XIV, 1978/79 (J. Azéma and M. Yor, eds.), Lecture Notes in Math. 784, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980, 220–222.