Chapter 1

Introduction

Abstract

This chapter introduces the background knowledge of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), including the history of discovery and commonly synthesized techniques. The merits and demerits of arc-discharge, laser ablation, and chemical vapor deposition techniques are discussed to show their application in mass production and high-quality CNTs. The molecular structures as well as their mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties of CNTs are briefly introduced. The general development and commercialization of CNTs in nanoscience and nanotechnology are also presented. It shows that worldwide annual production capacity of CNTs is under way to enter a rapid development period. Finally theoretical analysis mainly including three categories, i.e., atomistic simulations, continuum models, and hybrid approaches are presented for simulating the mechanical behaviors of CNTs.

Keywords

Carbon nanotubes; mass production; high quality; theoretical analysis

1.1 General

In 1991, Iijima [1] reported his discovery of needle-like carbon nanotubes (CNTs) using an arc-discharge evaporation method in NEC corporation. Shortly thereafter, Iijima and Ichihashi [2] and Bethune et al. [3] separately reported the growth of single-walled CNTs (SWCNTs) which opened a fresh chapter on nanoscience and nanotechnology. CNTs were marked as one of the top ten advances in “Materials Today” [4]. From the viewpoint of chemical composition, CNTs are the simplest materials, having pure C–C atomic bonding configuration. Nevertheless, the simple covalently bonded carbon network leads to an extremely unique nanostructure and makes CNTs perhaps the most diverse and richest among nanomaterials in regard to structures and structure–property relations [5]. In the past two decades, CNTs have attracted intense interest due to their exceptional mechanical, chemical, electrical, and thermal properties along with specific low density, being regarded as promising for a broad range of potential applications. For example, SWCNTs have exhibited great electrical conductivity, closely related with their chirality, which allows the miniaturization of electronics. From the viewpoint of chemical composition, CNTs are the simplest materials, having a pure C–C atomic bonding configuration. Nevertheless, the simple covalently bonded carbon network leads to an extremely unique nanostructure and makes CNTs perhaps the most diverse and richest among nanomaterials in regard to structures and structure–property relations [5].

The molecular structure of an SWCNT is regarded as a seamless hollow cylindrical structure formed by rolling up a graphene along a (m, n) index which determines its diameter and chirality. An SWCNT is an ideal slender structure with ultrahigh aspect ratio, typically approximately 1.5 nm in diameters and up to dozens of micrometers in lengths. An individual SWCNT with an atomically monolayered surface and curved π-boding configuration can be either metallic or semiconducting, depending on its chirality (the chiral angle between hexagons and the tube axis) and diameter [6]. As far as SWCNTs are concerned, their band gaps can be relatively large (~0.5 eV) or small (~10 meV) even if they have nearly identical diameters (typical diameter of 1.5 nm) [5]. More interestingly, the band gap of the same-chirality semiconducting SWCNT is inversely proportional to its diameter. Such an intriguing character of an SWCNT strongly motivates worldwide efforts to study its fundamental nature and explore the potential application. For instance, various kinds of SWCNTs have been promising for advanced electrical interconnects on the basis of their low resistivity [710], high thermal conductivities (~3500 W/m/K), and current-carrying capacities (~109 A/cm2) [11,12].

The covalently carbon hexagonal network creates an extremely stable structure. Arguably, CNTs are the strongest nanomaterial in nature. Elastic properties of CNTs have been measured by various means. Both experimental measurements and theoretical calculations reveal that the axial Young’s modulus of CNTs is typically in the range from 1 to 1.8 TPa [1320], while the breaking strength of SWCNT bundles is up to 50 GPa [20,21], corresponding to ~50 times that of density-normalized strength of steel wires [17]. Simultaneously, various derived geometrical patterns of CNTs, such as rings [22,23], X-, T-, and Y-junctions [24,25], quantum dots [26], and crossing objects [27] also have been experimental observed. Such abovementioned geometrical shapes give rise to novel properties which are desirable for the successful application of SWCNTs to the design and manufacture of devices. What’s more, material properties of CNTs are greatly sensitive to chemical modification or atomic doping which suggests a promising remarkable application for brand-new quantum materials. Therefore, there are infinite possibilities in these kinds of CNTs.

In the past two decades, intensive theoretical and experimental efforts have been made in order to illuminate the effect of atomic structures on the electronic properties of CNTs [2830]. CNTs can be synthesized by several means, such as arc-discharge, laser ablation, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods, and metallic and semiconducting CNTs have been found. As an ideal quasi-1D structure, metallic SWCNTs have been selected as model systems to explore the rich quantum phenomena, involving single-electron charging, Luttinger liquid, quantum interference, weak localization, and ballistic transport [28,29,31,32]. Besides, semiconducting CNTs have been utilized as novel building blocks in the field of nanoelectronics, such as transistors and logic, memory, and sensory devices [2830].

The recently rapid development and great progress in the synthesis of CNTs have greatly facilitated CNTs characterizations and nanodevice exploitations. Conversely, the strong requirements of various aspects of fundamental research and practical application have been positively motivating synthetic methods in order to acquire more perfect materials. They are mutually complementary and promote each other. Nowadays, the synthesis of CNTs becomes more focused in consciously controlling the growth rather than, as previously, enabling growth. As mentioned, the electronic properties are extremely sensitive to the atomic structure of CNTs which has led to rich scientific research. However, it encounters a significant challenge to precisely control the CNT diameter and chirality for chemical synthesis methods. It is necessary to exquisitely control atomic arrangements along the CNTs in order to synthesize CNTs with predictable properties. In reality, it is the ultimate task for chemists in the CNT synthesis field.

Various approaches, such as arc-discharge, laser ablation, and CVD, have been mainly adopted to synthesize CNTs [33]. The first two approaches use solid-state carbon precursors to provide carbon sources for CNT growth and vaporize carbon at thousands of degrees Celsius. These methods are well established to produce high-quality and ideal CNT structures, in spite of a mass of by-products associated with them. Hydrocarbon gases are used to provide sources for carbon atoms, while metal catalyst particles are utilized as “seeds” for CNTs growth by means of CVD which takes place at relatively lower temperatures (500–1000°C) [33]. However, as far as SWCNTs synthesis is concerned, none of the abovementioned three synthesis methods are capable of yielding bulk materials with homogeneous diameter and chirality thus far. It is noteworthy that SWCNTs with impressively narrow diameter distributions averaging ~1.4 nm have been produced by arc-discharge and laser ablation techniques. By utilizing electrical transport and microscopy and spectroscopy measurement, CVD methods have experienced a long process from producing carbon fibers, filaments, and MWCNTs to synthesizing SWCNTs [3339] with high crystallinity and perfection comparable to those of arc [40] and laser [41] materials.

1.2 Atomic Structure of CNTs

A graphene is a carbon-based repeated hexagonal cellular structure, in which each carbon atom is connected to three neighboring atoms. An SWCNT can be conceptualized as a three-dimensional seamless hollow cylindrical graphitic membrane, with a thickness of only one atom, by rolling up a graphene, while MWCNTs can be regarded as a form by rolling up multiple layers of graphene. The ends of CNTs can be either capped or not.

The chirality of an SWCNT is determined by the rolling direction Γ˜image on the graphene (shown in Fig. 1.1). The chirality and diameter of an SWCNT can be characterized by a (n, m) index and thus chiral vector Γ˜image is expressed by:

Γ˜=na˜1+ma˜2,nm (1.1)

image (1.1)

where a˜1image and a˜2image are unit vectors in the graphene. The length of the chiral vector is l=an2+m2+nmimage and the diameter is l/πimage, where a=3lbimage with lbimage being the C–C bond length. The chiral angle θ is calculated by:

θ=arctan(3m2n+m) (1.2)

image (1.2)
image
Figure 1.1 Illustration of an SWCNT formed by rolling up a planar graphene. θ is the chiral angle which is in the range of 0–30 degrees. Each atom is connected to three neighboring atoms by covalent bonds (shown in a dashed triangle).

CNTs can be classified into three categories according to the chirality. The chiral angle θ is 0 degrees when m=0 and 30 degrees when n=m, and these tubes are corresponding to zigzag and armchair, respectively. The others are chiral tube with a chiral angle 0 degree < θ < 30 degrees. The atomic structures of different kinds of SWCNTs are shown in Fig. 1.2A–C. Fig. 1.2D and E are the side view and top view of a DWCNT. It contains two layers of coaxial SWCNTs which correlate with each other by the weak vdW forces. The spacing between the outer and inner layers is determined by vdW force and approximately 0.34 nm slightly influenced by the total number of layers. Although graphene is always a semiconductor, CNTs can exhibit either metallic or semiconducting properties. The electrical properties are largely dependent on the chirality and diameter of CNTs [4245]. In general, CNTs are semiconductive. Nevertheless, CNTs exhibit a metallic property when the (n, m) index satisfies nm=3Iimage, where I is an integer [45]. Note that different from other kinds of CNTs, armchair CNTs are always metallic. As illustrated in Fig. 1.3, circled dots are metallic CNTs, while small dots are semiconducting CNTs.

image
Figure 1.2 Schematic of atomic structures of zigzag (A), chiral (B), armchair SWCNTs (C), and a double-walled CNTs side view (D) and top view (E).
image
Figure 1.3 The pairs of integers (n, m) in the 2D grapheme sheet specify chiral vectors Chimage (see Fig. 2.1) for CNTs, including zigzag, armchair, and chiral nanotubes [45].

On the other hand, capped CNTs are regarded as elongated fullerenes, in which the walls of the tubes consist of cylindrical graphenes with their ends capped by fullerene hemispheres [1]. We can specify an SWCNT by bisecting a C60 molecule at the equator and joining the two resulting hemispheres with a cylindrical tube one layer thick and of the same diameter as the C60 molecule. If the C60 molecule is bisected normal to a fivefold axis, an armchair nanotube is formed (see Fig. 1.4B), while if it is bisected normal to a threefold axis, then a zigzag nanotube is formed (see Fig. 1.4C) [46]. Armchair and zigzag CNTs with larger diameters and correspondingly larger caps can likewise be defined, as shown in Fig. 1.4B and C. In addition, a large number of capped chiral CNTs can be formed with a variety of hemispherical caps. A representative chiral CNT is shown in Fig. 1.4D.

image
Figure 1.4 Sketches of (A) fullerenes: C60, C70, and C80 molecules; and capped SWCNTs: (B) (5, 5) armchair CNT; (C) (9, 0) zigzag CNT; (D) (10, 5) chiral CNT [46].

1.3 General Development and Current Situation of CNTs in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology

In the mechanical properties testing of individual MWCNTs, an elastic modulus of ~1 TPa and a tensile strength of ~100 GPa, which is over 10-fold higher than any industrial fiber in nature, has been measured [47]. As far as the electrical properties are concerned, SWCNTs can be either metallic or semiconducting, relying on the their chirality, while MWCNTs are always metallic and can carry currents of up to 109 A/cm2 [48]. The thermal conductivity of an individual SWCNT can reach up to 3500 W/m/K at room temperature [11] which largely exceeds that of diamond (2000 W/m/K). Based on a more and more comprehensive understanding of CNTs, numerous potential applications have been proposed to full make use of their prominent superiority, including heat conductive and ultrahigh-strength composites, energy storage and conversion devices, sensors and high frequency oscillator, field emission displays and radiation sources, hydrogen storage media and drug encapsulation, nanometer-sized semiconductor devices and probes, interconnects, etc. So far, some of these applications have already been realized in products and others are still in the initial stage of exploring advanced devices.

So far, the low production output of CNTs has inhibited mass consumer products in spite of diverse potential applications reported to be utilizing CNTs. According to the statistics, CNT-related commercial activity has substantially and constantly increasingly grown during the past decade. The data demonstrates that the worldwide annual production capacity of CNTs has increased at least 10-fold in 2011, compared to that produced in 2006 [49]. Although there are more and more commercial suppliers of CNTs, such as BlueNano (USA), Chengdu Organic Chemical Co. Ltd. (China), Hyperion Catalysis (USA), NanoLab (USA), Nanocyl S.A. (Belgium), Southwest Nanotechnology Inc. (USA), Nanointegris (USA), Thomas & Swan Co. Ltd. (UK) and so on, it is still a serious challenge to meet the demand for CNTs. The main reason is that CNTs are too expensive, ranging from US$2.50 g−1 for MWCNTs (NanoLab) to US$2500 g−1 for SWCNTs (CNI) [50,51]. It is noted that since 2005 the low-cost production of CNTs were supplied by Cheap Tubes, Inc. [52] (US$275–300 g−1 for 90% pure SWCNT), prices of high-quality CNTs have little changed in the past 10 years. The high cost is argued to be related to the low production capacity. Similar to the other high-value materials in history such as silicon wafers and aluminum, the price of CNTs is expected to drop to an acceptable level or even much lower with the improvement of manufacture technology and increment [53]. Tables 1.11.3 list the worldwide known industrial activity and commercial products.

Table 1.1

Producers of CNT Powders and Dispersions [51]

Company Country URL
Arkema France/USA http://www.arkema-inc.com/
http://www.graphistrength.com
Bayer Material Science AG Germany

www.bayer.com

http://www.baytubes.com/

Blue Nano USA www.bluenanoinc.com
Catalytic Materials USA http://www.catalyticmaterials.com
Chengdu Organic Chemical Co. Ltd. China www.timesnano.com
Cnano China/USA http://www.cnanotechnology.com
Eden Energy Australia/India http://www.edenenergy.com.au/
Eikos USA www.eikos.com
Hanwha Nanotech Corporation South Korea www.hanwhananotech.com
Hodogaya Japan http://www.hodogaya.co.jp
Hyperion Catalysis USA www.hyperioncatalysis.com
Hythane Co. USA http://hythane.net/
Idaho Space Materials USA www.idahospace.com
Klean Carbon Canada http://www.kleancarbon.com/
Meijo-nano Carbon Japan www.meijo-nano.com
Mitsubishi Rayon Co. Japan http://www.mrc.co.jp
Mitsui Japan www.mitsui.com
Nanocyl S.A. Belgium www.nanocyl.com
Nanointegris USA www.nanointegris.com
Nanolab USA http://www.nano-lab.com/
Nanothinx Greece http://www.nanothinx.com
Nano-C USA http://www.nano-c.com
Raymor Industries Inc. Canada www.raymor.com
Rosseter Holdings Ltd. Cyprus/USA www.e-nanoscience.com
Shenzhen Nanotech Port Co. Ltd. China www.nanotubes.com.cn
Showa Denko K.K. Japan www.sdk.co.jp
SouthWest NanoTechnologies Inc. USA www.swentnano.com
Sun Nanotech Co. Ltd. China www.sunnano.com
Thomas Swan & Co. Ltd. England www.thomas-swan.co.uk
Toray Japan www.toray.com
Ube Industries Japan www.ube-ind.co.jp
Unidym Inc. USA www.unidym.com
Zyvex USA www.zyvex.com

Image

Table 1.2

Manufacturers of CNT Synthesis Systems [51]

Company URL
Aixtron www.aixtron.com
First Nano www.firstnano.com
Oxford Instruments www.oxford-instruments.com
Tokyo Electron Limited (TEL) www.tel.com

Table 1.3

Companies Developing and/or Selling CNT Products [51]

Company URL Field of Application Notes
Adidas www.adidas.com Composites

Running shoe sole

http://www.sweatshop.co.uk/Details.cfm?ProdID=9007&category=0

Aldila http://www.aldila.com Composites

Golf shafts

http://www.aldila.com/products/vs-proto/

Amendment II http://www.amendment2.com/ Composites Armor vests
Amroy http://www.amroy.fi/ Composites Partnerships with Yachts, sports goods, and wind turbine blades manufacturers
Aneeve http://aneeve.com Microelectronics Biotechnology Printed FET; RFID
Sensing and diagnostics
ANS Synthetic fibers; EMI shielding; lightening protection http://www.appliednanostructuredsolutions.com Composites

Synthetic fibers; EMI shielding; lightning protection

Energy http://www.appliednanostructuredsolutions.com/archives/4 CNT based powder for battery electrodes
Axson www.axson-group.com Composites

EMI shielding; spark protection

Structural composites (Nanoledge)
Baltic http://www.balticyachts.com/ Composites Sailng yachts
BASF www.basf.com Composites

Conductive POM for fuel lines and filter housing (with Audi)

http://www.basf.com/group/corporate/de/literature-document:/Brand+Ultraform-Case+Studys--Fuel+filter+housing-English.pdf

BlueNano www.bluenanoinc.com Energy

CNT-based powder for battery electrodes

http://www.bluenanoinc.com/nanomaterials/carbon-nanomaterials.html

BMC www.bmc-racing.com Composites Bicycles (with Easton-Zyvex)
Canatu www.canatu.com Coatings Transparent conductor (nanobuds); touch screens; touch sensors
Canon www.canon.com Microelectronics Field emission display; SED TV
Eagle Windpower - Energy Wind turbine blades
Easton www.easton.com Composites

Archery arrows (with Amroy)

http://www.eastonarchery.com/

Baseball bat (with Zyvex)
Eikos www.eikos.com

Coatings

Transparent conductors

Energy Photovoltaics; copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) thin film solar cells
Evergreen - Energy Wind turbine blades
Fujitsu www.fujitsu.com Microelectronics Interconnect vias; thermal interfaces
General Electric www.ge.com Coatings Thermal sensing and imaging
General Nano http://www.generalnanollc.com/ Composites CNT forests; dry-spun yarns and sheets
Hexcel www.hexcel.com Composites

Conductive aerospace composites

Energy Wind turbine blades
Hyperion Catalysis www.hyperioncatalysis.com Composites Automotive fuel line parts; electrostatic painting
Iljin Nanotech www.iljin.co.kr

Coatings

Transparent conductors

Microelectronics Field emission display
Imec www.imec.be Microelectronics Interconnect via
Intel www.intel.com Microelectronics Electronics devices and switches; FET
Meijo-nano carbon www.meijo-nano.com Composites Yarns, sheets, and tapes
NanOasis http://www.nanoasisinc.fogcitydesign.com/ Energy Filtration membranes
Nanocomp www.nanocomptech.com Composites CNT yarns and sheets made directly from floating CNT by CVD
EMI shielding; spark protection flame retardant; ballistic shields
Nanocyl S.A. www.nanocyl.com Composites EMI shielding for electronic packages; prepreg antifouling paint; flame retardant coating
Coatings
NanoIntegris www.nanointegris.com Coatings Transparent conductors
Microelectronics FET; LED; IR sensing
Biotechnology Chemical sensing and diagnostics
Nanomix www.nano.com Biotechnology Sensing and diagnostics
Nantero www.nantero.com Microelectronics Electromechanical non-volatile memory
Coatings Chemical sensing and diagnostics; IR sensing (with Brewer Science)
NEC Corp. www.nec.co.jp Microelectronics Printed electronics; FET
Nokia www.nokia.com Coatings Transparent conductor (KINETIC with Toray)

Panasonic Boston

Labs

www.panasonic.com Coatings

Transparent conductor (with SWeNT); touch screen

http://swentnano.com/news/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1309490173&archive=

Paru Corporation - Microelectronics FET; RFID
Plasan Ltd. www.plasansasa.com Composites

Yarns (Cambridge method)

http://www.plasansasa.com/node/151

Porifera http://poriferanano.com/ Energy Filtration membranes
Q-flo www.q-flo.com Composites Yarns; conductive polymer composites (Cambridge start-up)
Renegade http://www.renegadematerials.com/ Composites Fuzzy fibers; Field emission display
Samsung www.samsung.com Coatings Transparent conductor (with Unidym)
Seldon http://seldontechnologies.com/ Energy

Water purification systems

http://seldontechnologies.com/products/

Showa Denko K.K www.sdk.co.jp Energy CNT based powder for battery electrode
Takiron Co. http://www.takiron.co.jp/ Coatings Electrostatic dissipative windows
Teco Nanotech Co. Ltd http://wwwe.teconano.com.tw/ Coatings Field emission display; touch sensor
Tesla nanocoating Ltd. www.teslanano.com Coatings Anti-corrosion coatings (lower Zinc and higher duability)
Top Nanosys www.topnanosys.com Coatings Transparent conductor; transparent displays
Toray www.toray.com Coatings Transparent conductor; anticorrosion; thermal sensing
Ube Industries www.ube-ind.co.jp Energy CNT based powder for battery electrode
Unidym Inc. www.unidym.com Coatings Transparent conductor (for resistive touch screen); Organic photovoltaics
Yonex www.yonex.com Composites

Badminton rackets; tennis rackets

http://www.yonex.com/tennis/technology/racquets.html

Zoz GmbH http://www.zoz-group.de Composites

Al-CNT alloys for sport equipment, machine parts, and aerospace

http://www.zoz-group.de/zoz.engl/zoz.main/content/view/147/165/lang,en/

Zyvex www.zyvex.com Composites Light weight composites for speedboats; Sporting goods (Epovex with Easton and BMC); prepreg (Arovex)

ImageImage

1.4 Fundamental Properties and General Behaviors of CNTs

Many experiments have been conducted to excavate the intrinsic property of CNTs. These kinds of methods can provide intuitive knowledge of fundamental properties and general behaviors of CNTs. Pan et al. [54] produced a very long (approximately 2 mm) MWCNTs using pyrolysis of acetylene over iron/silica substrates method. In accordance with the theoretical prediction, Qin et al. [55] reported the possible smallest CNT with a diameter of 0.4 nm which is imprisoned inside an MWCNT. They found that these smallest CNTs are always metallic no matter what their helicities or chiralities are. Inspired by the good toughness of spider silk, Dalton et al. [56] spun 100 μm-long CNT fibers to make supercapacitors and wove them into textiles. They predicted these supercapacitors CNT textiles show promising to be applied in sensors, electronic interconnects, electromagnetic shields, antennas, and batteries. Dillon et al. [57] found that hydrogen was condensed to high density inside SWCNTs from temperature-programmed desorption spectroscopy. This suggests that CNTs have potential to be used in hydrogen-storage. Iijima and Ichihashi [2] synthesized single-shell tubes with diameters of approximately 1 nm in abundance. Ruoff et al. [58] exhibited flat morphology deformed by vdW forces between adjacent nanotubes and predicted this effect is observable. The experimental study of Dai et al. [59] showed the potential of CNTs to be used for SPM because of their flexibility and slenderness. As materials would exhibit unique properties owing to their morphologies, Ajayan and Tour [60] coaxed carbon atoms into several topologies to study their application in composite. Cumings et al. [61] successfully peeled and removed the outer layers at the end of MWCNTs to produce a sharpened structure. Under the help of an improved electric arc technique, Sun et al. [62] created a CNT with a diameter of 0.5 nm. Journet et al. [40] produced abundant SWCNTs using the electric-arc technique and suggested that the growth mechanism of SWCNTs was independent on the technique. Treacy et al. [18] measured the Young’s modulus of individual CNTs by transmission electron microscopy and found it could reach an order of terapascals. Odom et al. [63] reported the atomic structure and electronic properties of SWCNTs using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), and suggested that SWCNTs exhibit different structures and the electronic properties of CNTs are dependent on diameter and helicity. Wildöer et al. [64] examined electronic properties of individual SWCNTs by STM and spectroscopy. Both metallic and semiconducting CNTs are observed and electronic properties are in fact dependent on wrapping angle. Falvo et al. [65] reported that MWCNTs could be repeatedly bent over large angles by means of AFM which confirms CNTs are remarkably flexible and resilient. Tsang et al. [66] opened CNTs at the end and filled them with a variety of metal oxides using wet chemical techniques. Lu [67] obtained an average Young’s modulus of approximately 1 TPa by testing a series of SWCNTs. The experimental results indicated that the modulus is insensitive to the tube’s radius and chirality. Wagner et al. [68] observed fragmentation in SWCNTs and obtained a tensile strength of 55 GPa. Walters et al. [21] conducted large elastic strain tests and applied a tensile load on the lateral wall in ropes of SWCNTs using an AFM. The elastic strains of the ropes were investigated when freely supported with tension proportional to lengthening. The results produced by elastic deformation for more than 10 cycles indicate that the maximum strain of SWCNTs ropes is 5.8% (±0.9%), which corresponds to a lower circumscription of 45 (±7) GPa for the tensile strength. Yu et al. [20] investigated the mechanical properties of 15 separate SWCNT bundles by applying a tensile load on the perimeter of each bundle. The results demonstrated that the average tensile strength of SWCNTs ranges from 13 to 52 GPa with the maximum tensile strain of 5.3%. Yu et al. [13] measured the mechanical properties of 19 individual MWCNTs by tensile loading. They found that the tensile strain of MWCNTs breaking is approximately 12%, corresponding to a tensile strength in the outermost layer ranging from 11 to 63 GPa. Li et al. [69] reported an average tensile strength of 22 GPa by measuring a resin-based SWCNT composite using the hypothesis of treating the interfacial load applied on the composite. Demczyk et al. [70] reported the results of pulling and bending tests on individual CNTs, demonstrating that the tensile strength of breaking a CNT is approximately 150 GPa. Considering the temperature effect on the mechanical properties of CNTs, Huang et al. [71] conducted large deformation tests of individual SWCNTs at high temperatures, demonstrating that they can undergo superplastic deformation. The CNTs can be lengthened by nearly 280% and narrowed 15 times before fracturing. These results are useful for the fabrication of composite materials and the toughening of ceramics at high temperatures. In addition, experimental studies of vibration characteristics of carbon nanostructures [7275] show CNTs are good candidates as electromechanical oscillator and resonators.

1.5 Theories for Mechanical Behaviors of CNTs

The aforementioned experimental results show that CNTs have higher levels of stiffness and strength than other known structures. However, there is a broad discrepancy in these results on the stiffness and strength. This is mainly due to the very small size of CNTs. The variations reveal that, despite their visualization, experimental tools can provide only rough results and are limited to the study of certain mechanisms and lack universality. In addition, it is difficult to accurately conduct and control experiments when the specimen size reaches to the nanometer level. Therefore, strenuous efforts have been made by theoretical researchers in an effort to explore the inherent mechanisms underlying the mechanical behaviors of nanomaterials. Theoretical analysis is an accurate tool to investigate the material characteristics of these carbon nanostructures as it is easy to conduct and control the boundary conditions. In general, theoretical approaches mainly include three categories: atomistic simulations, continuum models, and hybrid approaches.

1.5.1 Atomistic Simulations

Atomistic simulations, the most widely used methods in the nanomechanics field, are important numerical methods for the investigation of magnetic, electronic, chemical, and mechanical properties of carbon nanostructures since these modeling approaches can accurately trace atomic position and precisely capture the microscale physical mechanism, such as buckling. There has been already much research of carbon nanostructures using atomistic simulation.

Yakobson et al. [76] studied the large deformation of CNTs using MD simulation. The change of each morphological pattern occurs accompanying an abrupt release of energy. Liew et al. [7781] investigated the thermal stability, the elastic and plastic properties of CNTs and twisting effect, as well as buckling on CNTs bundles using MD simulation which employs the second-generation of reactive empirical bond-order potential and Lennard–Jones potential to describe the atomic interaction. Liu et al. [82,83] proposed an atomic-scale finite element method, which has the same framework as the traditional finite element method, for numerical simulation of CNTs. Feng and Liew [84,85] employed MD simulation to analyze the stability and buckling of carbon nanorings by the definition of stability as no buckling occurring when mapping nanorings from CNTs. The temperature effect on the elastic properties has been examined by Hsieh et al. [86] and Zhang et al. [87].

For the purpose of showing the promising application as nanoresonators and mass detectors, Li and Chou [8890] presented a molecular–structural–mechanics method to simulate vibration behaviors of CNT. Their results demonstrated that SWCNTs have ultrahigh fundamental frequency, a level of 10 GHz–1.5 THz for cantilevered or bridged boundary conditions. It was also observed that the fundamental frequencies of double-walled CNTs (DWCNTs) are 10% lower than those of SWCNTs of the same outer diameter and the noncoaxial vibration started at the third vibration mode. Chowdhury et al. [91] adopted a molecular mechanics approach to investigate the vibration properties of two kinds of SWCNTs and found natural frequencies of zigzag CNTs are higher than those of the counterpart armchair cases. Hashemnia et al. [92] determined the fundamental frequency of CNTs and graphene sheets by the means of molecular–structural–mechanics approach. It is observed that fundamental frequencies of CNTs are greater than those of graphene sheets. Reddy et al. [93] employed atomistic simulations and continuum shell modeling to analyze free vibration of SWCNTs. They pointed out that a minimum potential configuration of CNT was important for the computation of the stiffness matrix.

In spite of the precise trace of the atomic displacement of CNTs, these atomistic simulations are highly expensive in terms of computational resources. Therefore, their applications are extremely limited to a simple system with a small number of atoms, and do not meet the demand of engineering application. For examples, Liew et al. [77,81] spent 36 h studying the buckling behavior of a (10, 10) SWCNT containing 2000 atoms with MD simulation in a single SGI origin 2000 CPU, whereas the investigation of a four-walled CNT containing 15,097 atoms required 4 months.

1.5.2 Continuum Models

In view of these aforementioned problems of MD simulation, there is an urgent need to establish an effective and efficient computational method. Researchers have sought to adopt alternative approaches, e.g., continuum simulation methods [94101], instead of working from an atomic perspective. Continuum simulation has been found to be computationally very efficient. These continuum simulation methods, which can largely reduce the degrees of freedom, are much faster solution techniques than atomistic simulations for analyzing nanostructures. Thus, they are much more attractive in the practical application.

Wang and Hu [100] examined the flexural wave propagation in SWCNTs using continuum beam models such as nonlocal elastic Timoshenko beam, traditional Timoshenko beam and Euler beam, and MD simulation. Yoon et al. [102] suggested a multielastic beam model to determine noncoaxial vibration frequencies and mode shapes of an isolated MWCNT. Wu et al. [103] employed a beam-bending model to investigate the vibration frequency of a cantilevered CNT-based mass sensor. He et al. [104] derived an explicit formula to describe the vdW interaction between any two layers and analyze vibration behaviors of multilayered graphene sheets using a stacked plate model. Govindjee and Sackman [94] applied the Euler beam theory to simulating mechanical properties of CNTs. Ru [95,96] treated an SWCNT as a single-layer shell with an effective bending stiffness and modeled mechanical responses of CNTs under axial compression. Li and Chou [97] employed a molecular–structural–mechanics method to predict elastic properties of SWCNTs. He et al. [98] and Liew et al. [99] employed a continuum cylindrical shell model to account for the vdW interaction between different walls of CNTs. Wang and Hu [100] and Wang et al. [101] investigated the longitudinal and flexural wave propagation in CNTs by modeling a CNT as a nonlocal elastic cylindrical shell and employing continuum mechanics. Wei and Srivastava [105] used a continuum elastic theory and derived a general analytical expression that there is a relationship of cos4θ between Young’s modulus of an SWCNC and that of an equivalent SWCNT. He et al. [106] employed an elastic multiple shell model and considered vdW interaction between any two layers as the radius-dependent function for vibration analysis of MWCNTs. For a MWCNT with a small radius, their numerical results demonstrated that the interlayer vdW interaction exhibited a significant influence on vibration behaviors. Natsuki et al. [107] presented a wave propagation approach for vibration analysis of CNTs as well as embedded CNTs and Yoon et al. [108] studied a short CNT using Timoshenko beam model. Their results showed that the order of vibration frequencies of CNTs reached a level of terahertz but in a wide range. Wang and Varadan [109] developed a nonlocal continuum mechanics model based on elastic beam theories to analyze the vibration characteristic of both SWCNTs and DWCNTs. Lu et al. [110] provided consistent equations of motion for the nonlocal Timoshenko beam model to study wave and vibration properties of CNTs. Hsu et al. [111] derived an analytical solution of fundamental frequency for chiral SWCNTs subjected to thermal vibration, using the Timoshenko beam model. On comparing results obtained by the Timoshenko beam model with the Euler beam model, it is found that the former’s frequency is lower than the latter. Considering two nanotubes shells coupled by vdW interaction, Natsuki et al. [112] employed Euler–Bernoulli beam theory to analyze vibration characteristics of DWCNTs and studied the vibration of fluid-filled CNTs by employing wave propagation approach [113]. Yang et al. [114] applied nonlocal Timoshenko beam theory to study nonlinear free vibration of SWCNTs and found the nonlocal parameter to have a slight effect on the nonlinear mode shape but considerable effect on frequencies. Wang et al. [115] developed an elastic Bernoulli–Euler beam model based on the thermal elasticity mechanics theory to analyze the vibration and instability of fluid-conveying SWCNTs. It was found that the temperature change plays a significant role in buckling stability and natural frequency of a fluid-conveying SWCNT. Later, Yan et al. [116] treated triple-walled CNTs (TWCNTs) as Euler–Bernoulli beam, considering the interlayer vdW interactions, to study natural frequencies and stability problems of the fluid-conveyed TWCNTs. It was found that interlayer vdW interactions have a large effect on natural frequencies and the internal moving fluid on instability of TWCNTs. Using the Timoshenko beam model, Chang and Lee [117] analyzed flexural vibration behaviors of SWCNTs which contain a fluid flow. A significant effect of rotary inertia and transverse shear deformation on vibration frequencies is observed. Georgantzinos and Anifantis [118] modeled MWCNTs using springs and lumped masses to study the vibration characteristic. It is observed that fundamental frequencies of CNTs are far larger than those of graphene sheets. Firouz-Abadi et al. [119] adopted a nonlocal continuum model to examine the free vibration of CNCs. Kitipornchai et al. [120] developed a continuum-plate model by a explicitly derived formal to reflect the vdW interaction between any two layers of multilayered graphene sheets. Ansari et al. [121] introduced a nonlocal elastic plate model considering the small scale to study vibration behaviors of multilayered graphite sheets under various boundary conditions.

Nevertheless, while continuum mechanics is capable of studying large atomic systems, severe challenges can be encountered in considering the information of atomic structure. Therefore, the practicability of continuum mechanics depends on additional introduced material properties so that it is restricted to certain mechanical behaviors of nanomaterials. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the size effect becomes significant in the mechanical behaviors of graphene as the size of specimens approach to the nanometer level.

1.5.3 Hybrid Approaches

Most continuum models are restricted to small deformations. In addition, as the general continuum models directly employ the theory of continuum mechanics, the material parameters need to be fitted based on the available data. In recent years, a series of hybrid techniques have emerged as feasible and efficient tools, possessing the advantages of both atomistic simulation and continuum mechanics, for analyzing large-size system problems within the fields of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

Tadmor et al. [122,123] analyzed complex Bravais crystals using an FEM framework incorporating atomic interaction. Shenoy et al. [124] proposed a quasicontinuum method by mixed atomistic simulations and continuum methods which gives rise to a reduction of atomistic degrees of freedom. Liew et al. [125] examined the elastic modulus and fracturing of SWCNTs using an atomistic-based continuum method and found a good agreement with the results of previous experiments and atomistic simulations.

One newly hybrid approach in the study of CNTs can be traced back to the atomistic-continuum method [126], in which the constitutive model is constructed based on the Cauchy–Born rule. Due to the lack of centrosymmetry of the hexagonal lattice structures in CNTs, internal relaxation needs to be adopted to ensure the minimum energy of the atomic system. Zhang et al. [126128] introduced this internal relaxation method when studying CNTs. They recommended a combination of interatomic potentials with a continuum model and studied linear elastic modulus fracture nucleation. However, Arroyo and Belytschko [129131] argued that this application of the standard Cauchy–Born rule may be inadequate. Essentially, SWCNTs are curved crystalline sheets with a one-atom thickness. Therefore, the curved effect should not be neglected. Arroyo and Belytschko’s numerical simulation demonstrated that the constitutive relationship constructed based on the Cauchy–Born rule fails to truly describe buckling behaviors of CNTs because of the neglect of bending effect. Sunyk and Steinmann [132] noted that deformations of the underlying crystal must be sufficiently homogeneous when the standard Cauchy–Born rule is to be applied. Later, Guo et al. [133] and Wang et al. [134] proposed a higher-order Cauchy–Born rule for analysis of elastic properties of SWCNTs. In the higher-order gradient theory, the second deformation gradient can accurately describe the bending effect which makes the results much closer to the actual case. Liew and Sun [135] and Sun and Liew [135137] developed a mesh-free method based on the higher-order deformation gradient continuum theory to simulate the buckling behaviors of SWCNTs under various loadings.

One remarkable advantage here is that this atomistic-continuum approach avoids the difficulties of the thickness issue. A significant degree of debate remains regarding the definition of the thickness of CNTs. There is currently no agreed thickness concept in the open literature [138140] which gives rise to a great variety of elastic properties. In the study of CNTs based on the continuum mechanism, the stiffness is related to the moment of inertia; as such, remarkably different results will be obtained when a scattering of thicknesses are used. In the present atomistic-continuum approach, the constitutive model is constructed on the basis of the atomic interaction so that its stiffness matrix is entirely unrelated to thickness. Therefore, the present atomistic-continuum method can effectively avoid the thickness issue. Moreover, in the atomistic-continuum approach, the selected representative cell can reflect the atomic structure so that the chiral angle can be incorporated. Thus, its effect on structural parameters and elastic properties can be studied directly. As the atomic interaction of CNTs is included within the constitutive model, the constitutive relationship of CNTs updates at each iterative step; thus the material nonlinearity can be exactly captured in this approach. Furthermore, based on the higher-order gradient continuum theory, the contribution of the second-order gradient to the stiffness matrix is considered, reflecting the geometrical nonlinearity, and this is where a further advantage of this approach lies. Therefore, by combining the constitutive model with an appropriate numerical method, this hybrid approach is capable of accurately capturing the physical behaviors, including buckling and postbuckling behaviors.

References

1. Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature. 1991;354(6348):56–58.

2. Iijima S, Ichihashi T. Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature. 1993;363(6430):603–605.

3. Bethune DS, Klang CH, Vries MSD, et al. Cobalt-catalysed growth of carbon nanotubes with single-atomic-layer walls. Nature. 1993;363(6430):605–607.

4. Wood J. The top ten advances in materials science. Mater Today. 2008;11(07):40–45.

5. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Eklund PC. Science of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1996.

6. Hamada N, Si S, Oshiyama A. New one-dimensional conductors: graphitic microtubules. Phys Rev Lett. 1992;68(10):1579–1581.

7. White CT, Todorov TN. Carbon nanotubes as long ballistic conductors. Nature. 1998;393(6682):240–242.

8. Quinn BM, Lemay SG. Single-walled carbon nanotubes as templates and interconnects for nanoelectrodes. Adv Mater. 2006;18(18):855–859.

9. Naeemi A, Meindl JD. Design and performance modeling for single-walled carbon nanotubes as local, semiglobal, and global interconnects in gigascale integrated systems. IEEE Trans Electron Devices. 2007;54(1):26–37.

10. Cho H, Koo KH, Kapur P, Saraswat KC. Performance comparisons between cu/low-κ, carbon-nanotube, and optics for future on-chip interconnects. IEEE Elect Device Lett. 2008;29(1):122–124.

11. Pop E, Mann D, Wang Q, Goodson KE, Dai HJ. Thermal conductance of an individual single-wall carbon nanotube above room temperature. Nano Lett. 2006;6(1):96–100.

12. Yao Z, Kane CL, Dekker C. High-field electrical transport in single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett. 2000;84(13):2941–2944.

13. Yu MF, Lourie O, Dyer MJ, Moloni K, Kelly TF, Ruoff RS. Strength and breaking mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under tensile load. Science. 2000;287(5453):637–640.

14. Pan ZW, Xie SS, Lu L, et al. Tensile tests of ropes of very long aligned multiwall carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett. 1999;74(21):3152–3154.

15. Poncharal P, Wang ZL, Ugarte D, Heer WAD. Electrostatic deflections and electromechanical resonances of carbon nanotubes. Science. 1999;283(5407):1513–1516.

16. Salvetat JP, Briggs GAD, Bonard JM, et al. Elastic and shear moduli of single-walled carbon nanotube ropes. Phys Rev Lett. 1999;82(5):944–947.

17. Wong EW, Sheehan PE, Lieber CM. Nanobeam mechanics: elasticity, strength, and toughness of nanorods and nanotubes. Science. 1997;277(5334):1971–1975.

18. Treacy MMJ, Ebbesen TW, Gibson JM. Exceptionally high Young’s modulus observed for individual carbon nanotubes. Nature. 1996;381(6584):678–680.

19. Khang DY, Xiao J, Kocabas C, et al. Molecular scale buckling mechanics in individual aligned single-wall carbon nanotubes on elastomeric substrates. Nano Lett. 2008;8(1):124–130.

20. Yu MF, Files BS, Arepalli S, Ruoff RS. Tensile loading of ropes of single wall carbon nanotubes and their mechanical properties. Phys Rev Lett. 2000;84(24):5552–5555.

21. Walters DA, Ericson LM, Casavant MJ, et al. Elastic strain of freely suspended single-wall carbon nanotube ropes. Appl Phys Lett. 1999;74(25):3803–3805.

22. Watanabe H, Manabe C, Shigematsu T, Shimizu M. Dual-probe scanning tunneling microscope: Measuring a carbon nanotube ring transistor. Appl Phys Lett. 2001;78(78):2928–2930.

23. Cohen G, Hod O, Rabani E. Constructing spin interference devices from nanometric rings. Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 2007;76(23):4692.

24. Terrones M, Banhart F, Grobert N, Charlier JC, Terrones H, Ajayan PM. Molecular junctions by joining single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;89(7):075505.

25. Wei D, Liu Y. ChemInform abstract: the intramolecular junctions of carbon nanotubes. Adv Mater. 2008;20(15):2815–2841.

26. Kim H, Lee J, Kahng SJ, et al. Direct observation of localized defect states in semiconductor nanotube junctions. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;90(21):216107.

27. Gao B, Komnik A, Egger R, Glattli DC, Bachtold A. Evidence for Luttinger-liquid behavior in crossed metallic single-wall nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett. 2004;92(21):216804.

28. Dekker C. Carbon nanotubes as molecular quantum wires. Phys Today. 1999;52(5):22–28.

29. Mceuen PL. Single-wall carbon nanotubes. Physics World. 2000;13(6):31–36.

30. Dai H. Controlling nanotube growth. Phys World. 2000;13:43–47.

31. Liang W, Bockrath M, Bozovic D, Hafner JH, Tinkham M, Park H. Fabry–Perot interference in a nanotube electron waveguide. Nature. 2001;411(6838):665–669.

32. Kong J, Yenilmez E, Tombler TW, et al. Quantum interference and ballistic transmission in nanotube electron waveguides. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;87(10):106801.

33. Dai H. Nanotube growth and characterization: carbon nanotubes Berlin: Springer; 2001.

34. Kong J, Soh HT, Cassell AM, Quate CF, Dai H. Synthesis of individual single-walled carbon nanotubes on patterned silicon wafers. Nature. 1998;395(6705):878–881.

35. Hafner JH, Bronikowski MJ, Azamian BR, et al. Catalytic growth of single-wall carbon nanotubes from metal particles. Chem Phys Lett. 1998;296(1):195–202.

36. Satishkumar BC, Govindaraj A, Sen R, Rao CNR. Single-walled nanotubes by the pyrolysis of acetylene-organometallic mixtures. Chem Phys Lett. 1998;293(1-2):47–52.

37. Nikolaev P, Bronikowski MJ, Bradley RK, et al. Gas-phase catalytic growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes from carbon monoxide. Chem Phys Lett. 1999;313(1–2):91–97.

38. Su M, Zheng B, Liu J. A scalable CVD method for the synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes with high catalyst productivity. Chem Phys Lett. 2000;322(5):321–326.

39. Colomer JF, Stephan C, Lefrant S, et al. Large-scale synthesis of single-wall carbon nanotubes by catalytic chemical vapor deposition (CCVD) method. Chem Phys Lett. 2000;317(1–2):83–89.

40. Journet C, Maser WK, Bernier P, et al. Large-scale production of single-walled carbon nanotubes by the electric-arc technique. Nature. 1997;388(6644):756–758.

41. Thess A, Lee R, Nikolaev P, et al. Crystalline ropes of metallic carbon nanotubes. Science. 1996;273(5274):483–487.

42. Dai H, Wong EW, Lieber CM. Probing electrical transport in nanomaterials: conductivity of individual carbon nanotubes. Science. 1996;272(5261):523–526.

43. Ebbesen T, Lezec H, Hiura H, Bennett J, Ghaemi H, Thio T. Electrical-conductivity of individual carbon nanotubes. Nature. 1996;382(6586):54–56.

44. Calvert P. Nanotube composites: a recipe for strength. Nature. 1999;399(6733):210–211.

45. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Saito R. Physics of carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y. 1995;33(7):883–891.

46. Dresselhaus M, Dresselhaus G, Saito R. Carbon fibers based on C 60 and their symmetry. Phys Rev B. 1992;45(11):6234.

47. Peng B, Locascio M, Zapol P, et al. Measurements of near-ultimate strength for multiwalled carbon nanotubes and irradiation-induced crosslinking improvements. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008;3(10):626–631.

48. Wei BQ, Vajtai R, Ajayan PM. Reliability and current carrying capacity of carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett. 2001;79(8):1172–1174.

49. De Volder MF, Tawfick SH, Baughman RH, Hart AJ. Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications. Science. 2013;339(6119):535–539.

50. NanoLab. Nanolab website. http://www.nano-lab.com/.

51. CNI. Carbon nanotechnologies website. http://www.cnanotech.com/pages/store/6-0_online_store.html.

52. Mike. Cheap Tubes Inc. website. http://www.cheaptubesinc.com/.

53. Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, de Heer WA. Carbon nanotubes—the route toward applications. Science. 2002;297(5582):787–792.

54. Pan ZW, Xie SS, Chang BH, et al. Very long carbon nanotubes. Nature. 1998;394(6694):631–632.

55. Qin LC, Zhao XL, Hirahara K, Miyamoto Y, Ando Y, Iijima S. Materials science—the smallest carbon nanotube. Nature. 2000;408(6808):50.

56. Dalton AB, Collins S, Munoz E, et al. Super-tough carbon-nanotube fibres—these extraordinary composite fibres can be woven into electronic textiles. Nature. 2003;423(6941):703.

57. Dillon AC, Jones KM, Bekkedahl TA, Kiang CH, Bethune DS, Heben MJ. Storage of hydrogen in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature. 1997;386(6623):377–379.

58. Ruoff RS, Tersoff J, Lorents DC, Subramoney S, Chan B. Radial deformation of carbon nanotubes by Van-Der-Waals Forces. Nature. 1993;364(6437):514–516.

59. Dai HJ, Hafner JH, Rinzler AG, Colbert DT, Smalley RE. Nanotubes as nanoprobes in scanning probe microscopy. Nature. 1996;384(6605):147–150.

60. Ajayan PM, Tour JM. Materials science—nanotube composites. Nature. 2007;447(7148):1066–1068.

61. Cumings J, Collins PG, Zettl A. Materials—peeling and sharpening multiwall nanotubes. Nature. 2000;406(6796):586.

62. Sun LF, Xie SS, Liu W, et al. Materials—creating the narrowest carbon nanotubes. Nature. 2000;403(6768):384.

63. Odom TW, Huang JL, Kim P, Lieber CM. Atomic structure and electronic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature. 1998;391(6662):62–64.

64. Wildoer JWG, Venema LC, Rinzler AG, Smalley RE, Dekker C. Electronic structure of atomically resolved carbon nanotubes. Nature. 1998;391(6662):59–62.

65. Falvo MR, Clary GJ, Taylor RM, et al. Bending and buckling of carbon nanotubes under large strain. Nature. 1997;389(6651):582–584.

66. Tsang SC, Chen YK, Harris PJF, Green MLH. A simple chemical method of opening and filling carbon nanotubes. Nature. 1994;372(6502):159–162.

67. Lu JP. Elastic properties of carbon nanotubes and nanoropes. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;79(7):1297–1300.

68. Wagner HD, Lourie O, Feldman Y, Tenne R. Stress-induced fragmentation of multiwall carbon nanotubes in a polymer matrix. Appl Phys Lett. 1998;72(2):188–190.

69. Li F, Cheng HM, Bai S, Su G, Dresselhaus MS. Tensile strength of single-walled carbon nanotubes directly measured from their macroscopic ropes. Appl Phys Lett. 2000;77(20):3161–3163.

70. Demczyk BG, Wang YM, Cumings J, et al. Direct mechanical measurement of the tensile strength and elastic modulus of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Mat Sci Eng a-Struct. 2002;334(1-2):173–178.

71. Huang JY, Chen S, Wang ZQ, et al. Superplastic carbon nanotubes—conditions have been discovered that allow extensive deformation of rigid single-walled nanotubes. Nature. 2006;439(7074):281.

72. Garcia-Sanchez D, Paulo AS, Esplandiu MJ, et al. Mechanical detection of carbon nanotube resonator vibrations. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;99(8):085501.

73. Chiu HY, Hung P, Postma HWC, Bockrath M. Atomic-scale mass sensing using carbon nanotube resonators. Nano Lett. 2008;8(12):4342–4346.

74. Sazonova V, Yaish Y, Ustunel H, Roundy D, Arias TA, McEuen PL. A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator. Nature. 2004;431(7006):284–287.

75. Wang ZL, Poncharal P, de Heer WA. Measuring physical and mechanical properties of individual carbon nanotubes by in situ TEM. J Phys Chem Solids. 2000;61(7):1025–1030.

76. Yakobson BI, Brabec CJ, Bernholc J. Nanomechanics of carbon tubes: Instabilities beyond linear response. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;76(14):2511–2514.

77. Liew KM, He XQ, Wong CH. On the study of elastic and plastic properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes under axial tension using molecular dynamics simulation. Acta Mater. 2004;52(9):2521–2527.

78. Liew KM, Wong CH, Tan MJ. Twisting effects of carbon nanotube bundles subjected to axial compression and tension. J Appl Phys. 2006;99(11):114312.

79. Liew KM, Wong CH, Tan MJ. Buckling properties of carbon nanotube bundles. Appl Phys Lett. 2005;87(4):041901.

80. Liew KM, Wong CH, He XQ, Tan MJ. Thermal stability of single and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 2005;71(7):075424.

81. Liew KM, Wong CH, He XQ, Tan MJ, Meguid SA. Nanomechanics of single and multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 2004;69(11):115429.

82. Liu B, Huang Y, Jiang H, Qu S, Hwang KC. The atomic-scale finite element method. Comput Method Appl M. 2004;193(17–20):1849–1864.

83. Liu B, Jiang H, Huang Y, Qu S, Yu MF, Hwang KC. Atomic-scale finite element method in multiscale computation with applications to carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 2005;72(3):035435.

84. Feng C, Liew KM. Energetics and structures of carbon nanorings. Carbon N Y. 2009;47(7):1664–1669.

85. Feng C, Liew KM. A molecular mechanics analysis of the buckling behavior of carbon nanorings under tension. Carbon N Y. 2009;47(15):3508–3514.

86. Hsieh JY, Lu JM, Huang MY, Hwang CC. Theoretical variations in the Young’s modulus of single-walled carbon nanotubes with tube radius and temperature: a molecular dynamics study. Nanotechnology. 2006;17(15):3920–3924.

87. Zhang YC, Chen X, Wang X. Effects of temperature on mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol. 2008;68(2):572–581.

88. Li CY, Chou TW. Single-walled carbon nanotubes as ultrahigh frequency nanomechanical resonators. Phys Rev B. 2003;68(7):073405.

89. Li CY, Chou TW. Vibrational behaviors of multiwalled-carbon-nanotube-based nanomechanical resonators. Appl Phys Lett. 2004;84(1):121–123.

90. Li CY, Chou TW. Mass detection using carbon nanotube-based nanomechanical resonators. Appl Phys Lett. 2004;84(25):5246–5248.

91. Chowdhury R, Adhikari S, Wang CY, Scarpa F. A molecular mechanics approach for the vibration of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Comp Mater Sci. 2010;48(4):730–735.

92. Hashemnia K, Farid M, Vatankhah R. Vibrational analysis of carbon nanotubes and graphene sheets using molecular structural mechanics approach. Comp Mater Sci. 2009;47(1):79–85.

93. Reddy CD, Rajendran S, Liew KM. Vibration properties of single walled carbon nanotubes—a comparison between the atomistic simulations and continuum shell modelling. J Comp Theor Nanosci. 2010;7(8):1400–1406.

94. Govindjee S, Sackman JL. On the use of continuum mechanics to estimate the properties of nanotubes. Solid State Commun. 1999;110(4):227–230.

95. Ru CQ. Effective bending stiffness of carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 2000;62(15):9973–9976.

96. Ru CQ. Axially compressed buckling of a doublewalled carbon nanotube embedded in an elastic medium. J Mech Phys Solids. 2001;49(6):1265–1279.

97. Li CY, Chou TW. Elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes in transverse directions. Phys Rev B. 2004;69(7):073401.

98. He XQ, Kitipornchai S, Liew KM. Buckling analysis of multi-walled carbon nanotubes: a continuum model accounting for van der Waals interaction. J Mech Phys Solids. 2005;53(2):303–326.

99. Liew KM, He XQ, Kitipornchai S. Buckling characteristics of embedded multi-walled carbon nanotubes. P Roy Soc a-Math Phy. 2005;461(2064):3785–3805.

100. Wang LF, Hu HY. Flexural wave propagation in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 2005;71(19):195412.

101. Wang LF, Hu HY, Guo WL. Validation of the non-local elastic shell model for studying longitudinal waves in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology. 2006;17(5):1408–1415.

102. Yoon J, Ru CQ, Mioduchowski A. Noncoaxial resonance of an isolated multiwall carbon nanotube. Phys Rev B. 2002;66(23):233402.

103. Wu DH, Chien WT, Chen CS, Chen HH. Resonant frequency analysis of fixed-free single-walled carbon nanotube-based mass sensor. Sensor Actuat a-Phys. 2006;126(1):117–121.

104. He XQ, Kitipornchai S, Liew KM. Resonance analysis of multi-layered graphene sheets used as nanoscale resonators. Nanotechnology. 2005;16(10):2086–2091.

105. Wei CY, Srivastava D. Nanomechanics of carbon nanofibers: structural and elastic properties. Appl Phys Lett. 2004;85(12):2208–2210.

106. He XQ, Eisenberger M, Liew KM. The effect of van der Waals interaction modeling on the vibration characteristics of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Appl Phys. 2006;100 124317-1-12.

107. Natsuki T, Endo M, Tsuda H. Vibration analysis of embedded carbon nanotubes using wave propagation approach. J Appl Phys. 2006;99.

108. Yoon J, Ru CQ, Mioduchowski A. Terahertz vibration of short carbon nanotubes modeled as Timoshenko beams. J Appl Mech-T Asme. 2005;72(1):10–17.

109. Wang Q, Varadan VK. Vibration of carbon nanotubes studied using nonlocal continuum mechanics. Smart Mater Struct. 2006;15(2):659–666.

110. Lu P, Lee HP, Lu C, Zhang PQ. Application of nonlocal beam models for carbon nanotubes. Int J Solids Struct. 2007;44(16):5289–5300.

111. Hsu JC, Chang RP, Chang WJ. Resonance frequency of chiral single-walled carbon nanotubes using Timoshenko beam theory. Phys Lett A. 2008;372(16):2757–2759.

112. Natsuki T, Ni QQ, Endo M. Analysis of the vibration characteristics of double-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y. 2008;46(12):1570–1573.

113. Natsuki T, Ni QQ, Endo M. Vibrational analysis of fluid-filled carbon nanotubes using the wave propagation approach. Appl Phys a-Mater. 2008;90(3):441–445.

114. Yang J, Ke LL, Kitipornchai S. Nonlinear free vibration of single-walled carbon nanotubes using nonlocal Timoshenko beam theory. Physica E. 2010;42(5):1727–1735.

115. Wang L, Ni Q, Li M, Qian Q. The thermal effect on vibration and instability of carbon nanotubes conveying fluid. Physica E. 2008;40(10):3179–3182.

116. Yan Y, He XQ, Zhang LX, Wang CM. Dynamic behavior of triple-walled carbon nanotubes conveying fluid. J Sound Vib. 2009;319(3-5):1003–1018.

117. Chang WJ, Lee HL. Free vibration of a single-walled carbon nanotube containing a fluid flow using the Timoshenko beam model. Phys Lett A. 2009;373(10):982–985.

118. Georgantzinos SK, Anifantis NK. Vibration analysis of multi-walled carbon nanotubes using a spring-mass based finite element model. Comp Mater Sci. 2009;47(1):168–177.

119. Firouz-Abadi RD, Fotouhi MM, Haddadpour H. Free vibration analysis of nanocones using a nonlocal continuum model. Phys Lett A. 2011;375(41):3593–3598.

120. Kitipornchai S, He XQ, Liew KM. Continuum model for the vibration of multilayered graphene sheets. Phys Rev B. 2005;72(7):075443.

121. Ansari R, Arash B, Rouhi H. Vibration characteristics of embedded multi-layered graphene sheets with different boundary conditions via nonlocal elasticity. Compos Struct. 2011;93(9):2419–2429.

122. Tadmor EB, Smith GS, Bernstein N, Kaxiras E. Mixed finite element and atomistic formulation for complex crystals. Phys Rev B. 1999;59(1):235–245.

123. Tadmor EB, Ortiz M, Phillips R. Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids. Philos Mag A. 1996;73(6):1529–1563.

124. Shenoy VB, Miller R, Tadmor EB, Rodney D, Phillips R, Ortiz M. An adaptive finite element approach to atomic-scale mechanics—the quasicontinuum method. J Mech Phys Solids. 1999;47(3):611–642.

125. Liew KM, Chen BJ, Xiao ZM. Analysis of fracture nucleation in carbon nanotubes through atomistic-based continuum theory. Phys Rev B. 2005;71(23):235424.

126. Zhang P, Huang Y, Geubelle PH, Klein PA, Hwang KC. The elastic modulus of single-wall carbon nanotubes: a continuum analysis incorporating interatomic potentials. Int J Solids Struct. 2002;39(13-14):3893–3906.

127. Zhang P, Jiang H, Huang Y, Geubelle PH, Hwang KC. An atomistic-based continuum theory for carbon nanotubes: analysis of fracture nucleation. J Mech Phys Solids. 2004;52(5):977–998.

128. Zhang P, Huang Y, Gao H, Hwang KC. Fracture nucleation in single-wall carbon nanotubes under tension: a continuum analysis incorporating interatomic potentials. J Appl Mech-T Asme. 2002;69(4):454–458.

129. Arroyo M, Belytschko T. An atomistic-based finite deformation membrane for single layer crystalline films. J Mech Phys Solids. 2002;50(9):1941–1977.

130. Arroyo M, Belytschko T. Finite element methods for the non-linear mechanics of crystalline sheets and nanotubes. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 2004;59(3):419–456.

131. Arroyo M, Belytschko T. Finite crystal elasticity of carbon nanotubes based on the exponential Cauchy-Born rule. Phys Rev B. 2004;69(11):115415.

132. Sunyk R, Steinmann P. On higher gradients in continuum-atomistic modelling. Int J Solids Struct. 2003;40(24):6877–6896.

133. Guo X, Wang JB, Zhang HW. Mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes based on higher order Cauchy-Born rule. Int J Solids Struct. 2006;43(5):1276–1290.

134. Wang JB, Guo X, Zhang HW, Wang L, Liao JB. Energy and mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes predicted using the higher order Cauchy-Born rule. Phys Rev B. 2006;73(11):115428.

135. Liew KM, Sun YZ. Elastic properties and pressure-induced structural transitions of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 2008;77(20):205437.

136. Sun YZ, Liew KM. Mesh-free simulation of single-walled carbon nanotubes using higher order Cauchy-Born rule. Comp Mater Sci. 2008;42(3):444–452.

137. Sun YZ, Liew KM. The buckling of single-walled carbon nanotubes upon bending: the higher order gradient continuum and mesh-free method. Comput Method Appl M. 2008;197(33–40):3001–3013.

138. Chowdhury R, Adhikari S, Scarpa F, Friswell MI. Transverse vibration of single-layer graphene sheets. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2011;44.

139. DiBiasio CM, Cullinan MA, Culpepper ML. Difference between bending and stretching moduli of single-walled carbon nanotubes that are modeled as an elastic tube. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;90(20):203116.

140. Huang Y, Wu J, Hwang KC. Thickness of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 2006;74(24):245413.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
3.144.193.129