‘Be the change you want to see.’
Mahatma Gandhi
In 2012, over nine out of ten managers experienced change programmes in their organisation,1 yet only 30 per cent said that senior managers managed change well.2 We also know that it makes employees uncomfortable, with 70 per cent of managers saying that change decreased morale in their organisations.
Here are some of the reasons changes fail:
All these elements are within the control of senior managers. I have been through major organisational changes in every single company I’ve worked for, and have led them as well as been led by them. Those that actually succeeded combined the approaches discussed in this chapter.
The first thing to do is to recognise when change is required, and why. The top five reasons in 2012, according to one study, were:
Change can also happen for external reasons, like changes in legislation or markets, but the most common reasons have negative consequences for employees. These can include decreased motivation, morale, loyalty, job security and well-being. Most employees see change as forcing them to work harder, faster and longer – especially when the change is driven by cost reduction. Many managers are also sceptical: over half thought decision-making wasn’t any faster and 45 per cent said their organisations were no more flexible as a result of change – nor did the majority think that profitability or productivity had increased.3
Most changes today are evolutionary, rather than revolutionary. And most involve strategy as well as operations, and transformation as well as transactions. For all types of change, however, you need to plan. And given that most people will have inherently negative views on change, it pays to involve them in the process.
When planning change, think about the different forces at work. There will be forces for and against the change. Try to picture these – list the top three things that are driving the change, and the top three things that will get in the way. Don’t forget behavioural issues when you are considering your change programme. Often those will be the things most difficult to change!
Plan for change in the way you would for any major programme. Cover:
It’s best to do this in a group. Try the power brainstorming technique described earlier in Chapter 9.
Look at change programmes in your organisation. Do you understand why the change is needed? Do you have a clear change plan? Do you understand the forces that are working in favour of, as well as those that are working against the change? Make sure you and your team are comfortable with all of these elements before you proceed to implement.
The best-known model for implementing change comes from John Kotter of the Harvard Business School. It involves an eight-step programme, illustrated in Figure 14.1, which builds on three phases: create a climate where change can occur; engage and enable your organisation; and implement and sustain the change.
Figure 14.1 Kotter’s eight-step programme for implementing change
Source: Kotter International (www.kotterinternational.com).
It is difficult in practice, although it works very well when you do it well. Most people fall down on the people aspects of change, rather than the business aspects. Here are some tips for how you can best engage people when it comes to implementing change.
Make sure you make a clear case for change that includes both business and cultural aspects. Why should you change? Are your costs growing faster than your income? Do you have a pension deficit to service? Is your business model under threat from new technologies? Thinking about tangible business reasons that everyone can grasp will help your case. But you’ll also need to think about cultural reasons. For example, if employees are not engaged, and the main reason is that they think directors don’t work together, then you can use the change to drive a more collaborative and participative culture.
The most difficult part of any change programme is convincing people of the need to do things differently. People will often take recommendations as a personal criticism, or have come to have very ingrained ways of doing things. Often people leave this task to outside consultants, but it is best owned by people within the organisation. Try getting a group together and asking them about things they do that could be done better. If the business isn’t growing, ask people what they think needs to be done differently. Most people understand that things need to change, but they are still fearful of it. Involving them lessens that.
About 80 per cent of changes involve organisational redesigns and restructurings. The best way to do this is to involve the people affected in the process, rather than leave it to HR and senior managers to draw up organisational charts behind closed doors. Even if you are making redundancies, you will get a much better organisation if you engage those who do the work in the design. Besides, it is virtually impossible for leaders to sit and design an entire organisation, from top to bottom. Involving people at the level of the changes and above in designing that part of the organisation will result in a better structure with fewer overlaps and greater ownership. Plus, involving people will help gain their commitment to the new roles, as well as stimulate their interest in applying for them.
Sometimes it can be helpful to consider change as an equation: C = A x B x D > X +Y
If you are dealing with organisations that have been doing things the same way for a long time, it may be easier to focus on B and D than on A, as it’s unlikely they will be keen to change the way things are done.
Source: Gateshead Council, Understanding and Managing Reactions to Change, 2009, p. 10
Remember that attention to organisational design and culture (see Chapter 12) is necessary. Here are ten disciplines that help:
‘Town hall’ type sessions that get customer-facing employees to contribute to better ways of doing things can often encourage change. In one organisation I worked in, the people manning the customer service lines knew that their time was not being well spent. They said they often spent time on the telephone with retired people who were no longer relevant for the services offered, and that they were mailing letters because we weren’t capturing email addresses. Listening to these examples informed and encouraged my grasp of the need for change by underpinning it with real examples. It also made them part of the programme. They became ‘front-line’ advocates for change.
This is the thing that most often goes wrong when managing change. People forget the very high and constant need for communication. It’s really not enough to announce a change programme and then expect everyone to ‘get on with it’. You will need to constantly repeat and position the reasons for change, and address people’s concerns.
Here are seven tips for managing the communication process:4
What is your ongoing communication plan for your change? Ask people in different departments and different levels in your organisation about the change – are their answers consistent? If not, address. Also ask them to give you ideas of what’s going well, what’s going ‘OK’, and what is going badly in the change process and adjust your communication and plan accordingly.
Despite your best efforts to do everything right, you will always be faced with blockers. According to research, the way people respond to change is fairly consistent:
The bottom 25 per cent are often referred to as the blockers or terrorists. They may actually actively try to sabotage the change efforts, or indeed pay lip service to them while undermining them in their own behaviours. Every organisation has these. When you are leading change, it is important to understand who is in which group. You will need to create a coalition of champions and early adopters at all levels. It’s important to recognise them and encourage them to be proactive, both in big groups but also back in their departments.
Equally, understanding the motivations of the wait and see types and the cynics is important. They are likely to be this way because of their own fears of disruption to the status quo. Understanding that people respond to change at different speeds is very important. The champions go through the process very quickly, while the cynics and blockers take much more time.
People go through common reactions and stages when dealing with change (Figure 14.2). These stages are as follows:5
Often, the blockers and cynics will be behind the curve, to the left of the champions, who have moved very swiftly to the right. Understanding the issues people are facing at each stage of the change process will help you to manage them better.
Figure 14.2 Common reactions and stages when dealing with change
Source: From Fisher, J. M., ‘A Time for Change’, Human Resource International vol 8: 2 (2005). Taylor & Francis Ltd, http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
For your area, plot out where you think everyone is on the path of change. Identify the champions and the blockers. Can you encourage the champions to help move people along and coach the blockers? If not, understand what the blockers’ concerns are and recognise how you might deal with them. Understanding and talking through their concerns will help them. By the end of the change we want people to reach a state of hope that this will be better in the future, and enthusiasm for the new way of working.
1 http://www.managers.org.uk/workinglife2012, exec summary, p. 6.
2 http://www.managers.org.uk/workinglife2012, pp. 13 and 21.
3 http://www.managers.org.uk/workinglife2012, pp. 12, 13, 15.
4 Lucas, Erica, Riding the Change Roller-Coaster, Professional Manager, 2002.
5 Kübler-Ross, Elizabeth, On Death and Dying, Routledge, 1969.
13.58.116.51