![](http://imgdetail.ebookreading.net/business/41/9780273732921/9780273732921__business-exposed__9780273732921__bg19.png)
Business Exposed44
look so good. They have the funds to spare and therefore they are
inclined to do too much of a good thing.
Andrew Grove, former CEO of Intel, understood this well. Intel’s
best-selling product – microprocessors – had endowed them
with much cash to spare. However, he resisted the temptation
to spend it on other initiatives and entering adjacent businesses,
telling his people, “This is all a distraction; focus on job 1 [micro-
processors]”. It made them one of the most successful companies
ever.
However, companies in distress – such as in a downturn – often
do the reverse. In academic research, we call this the “threat-
rigidity” effect. They focus on their core business, shedding all
other things, doing more of what they did before, and which
they consider their strongest points, while trying to reduce their
cost base to weather the storm.
By itself, minimizing one’s cost base is never a bad idea (also in
prosperous times!) but these companies forget one thing: you
have to manage not only your costs but also your revenues. And,
what’s more, the composition of a revenue base in lean times
will have to look different from its composition when times are
good. Where in happy times rms are often seduced to spread
out too much, while they would be better off focusing on job 1,
in meager times rms are often inclined to focus too much, when
diversifying one’s revenue base makes more sense.
So why does spreading one’s revenue base in meager times make
more sense? It is, among other reasons, because no job will be
big enough to sustain the whole rm. What keeps rms aoat is
accessing a variety of smaller pockets of revenues. Hence, rather
than focus on job 1, hoping it will be enough to sustain the
rm, the company’s effort should be aimed at identifying and
creating additional sources of revenue. In the downturn, none of
these additional sources will be big enough by itself. Moreover,
many of these sources would not be attractive in prosperous
times, because the rm would not be able to make them grow.
However, this is not a time of growth, but of survival.