3.2. All about Concatenation

Three types of concatenation schemes are possible under SONET and SDH. These are:

  • Standard contiguous concatenation

  • Arbitrary contiguous concatenation

  • Virtual concatenation

These concatenation schemes are described in detail next.

3.2.1. Standard Contiguous Concatenation in SONET and SDH

SONET and SDH networks support contiguous concatenation whereby a few standardized “concatenated” signals are defined, and each concatenated signal is transported as a single entity across the network [ANSI95a, ITU-T00a]. This was described briefly in the previous chapter.

The concatenated signals are obtained by “gluing” together the payloads of the constituent signals, and they come in fixed sizes. In SONET, these are called STS-Nc Synchronous Payload Envelopes (SPEs), where N = 3X and X is restricted to the values 1, 4, 16, 64, or 256. In SDH, these are called VC-4 (equivalent to STS-3c SPE), and VC-4-Xc where X is restricted to 1, 4, 16, 64, or 256.

The multiplexing procedures for SONET (SDH) introduce additional constraints on the location of component STS-1 SPEs (VC-4s) that comprise the STS-Nc SPE (VC-4-Xc). The rules for the placement of standard concatenated signals are [ANSI95a]:

  1. Concatenation of three STS-1s within an STS-3c: The bytes from concatenated STS-1s shall be contiguous at the STS-3 level but shall not be contiguous when interleaved to higher-level signals. When STS-3c signals are multiplexed to a higher rate, each STS-3c shall be wholly contained within an STS-3 (i.e., occur only on tributary input boundaries 1–3, 4–6, 7–9, etc.). This rule does not apply to SDH.

  2. Concatenation of STS-1s within an STS-Nc (N = 3X, where X = 1, 4, 16, 64, or 256). Such concatenation shall treat STS-Nc signals as a single entity. The bytes from concatenated STS-1s shall be contiguous at the STS-N level, but shall not be contiguous when multiplexed on to higher-level signals. This also applies to SDH, where the SDH term for an STS-Nc is an AU-4-Xc where X = N/3.

  3. When the STS-Nc signals are multiplexed to a higher rate, these signals shall be wholly contained within STS-M boundaries, where M could be 3, 12, 48, 192, or 768, and its value must be the closest to, but greater than or equal to N (e.g., if N = 12, then the STS-12c must occur only on boundaries 1–12, 13–24, 25–36, etc.). In addition to being contained within STS-M boundaries, all STS-Nc signals must begin on STS-3 boundaries.

The primary purpose of these rules is to ease the development burden for hardware designers, but they can seriously affect the bandwidth efficiency of SONET/SDH links.

In Figure 3-1(a), an STM-16 (OC-48) signal is represented as a set of 16 time slots, each of which can contain a VC-4 (STS-3c SPE). Let us examine the placement of VC-4 and VC-4-4c (STS-3c and STS-12c SPE) signals into this structure, in line with the rules above. In particular a VC-4-4c (STS-12c SPE) must start on boundaries of 4. Figure 3-1(b) depicts how the STM-16 has been filled with two VC-4-4c (STS-12c) and seven VC-4 signals. In Figure 3-1(c), three of the VC-4s have been removed, that is, are no longer in use. Due to the placement restrictions, however, a VC 4-4c cannot be accommodated in this space. In Figure 3-1(d), the STM-16 has been “regroomed,” that is, VC-4 #5 and VC-4 #7 have been moved to new timeslots. Figure 3-1(e) shows how the third VC-4-4c is accommodated.

Figure 3-1. Timeslot Constraints and Regrooming with Contiguous (Standard) Concatenation


3.2.2. Arbitrary Concatenation

In the above example, a “regrooming” operation was performed to make room for a signal that could not be accommodated with the standard contiguous concatenation rules. The problem with regrooming is that it is service impacting, that is, service is lost while the regrooming operation is in progress. Because service impacts are extremely undesirable, regrooming is not frequently done, and the bandwidth is not utilized efficiently.

To get around these restrictions, some manufacturers of framers, that is, the hardware that processes the SDH multiplex section layer (SONET line layer), offer a capability known as “flexible” or arbitrary concatenation. With this capability, there are no restrictions on the size of an STS-Nc (VC-4-Xc) or the starting time slot used by the concatenated signal. Also, there are no constraints on adjacencies of the STS-1 (VC-4-Xc) time slots used to carry it, that is, the signals can use any combination of available time slots. Figure 3-2 depicts how the sequence of signals carried over the STM-16 of Figure 3-1 can be accommodated without any regrooming, when the arbitrary concatenation capability is available.

Figure 3-2. Timeslot Usage with Arbitrary Concatenation


3.2.3. Virtual Concatenation

As we saw earlier, arbitrary concatenation overcomes the bandwidth inefficiencies of standard contiguous concatenation by removing the restrictions on the number of components and their placement within a larger concatenated signal. Standard and arbitrary contiguous concatenation are services offered by the network, that is, the network equipment must support these capabilities. The ITU-T and the ANSI T1 committee have standardized an alternative, called virtual concatenation. With virtual concatenation, SONET and SDH PTEs can “glue” together the VCs or SPEs of separately transported fundamental signals. This is in contrast to requiring the network to carry signals as a single concatenated unit.

3.2.3.1. HIGHER-ORDER VIRTUAL CONCATENATION (HOVC)

HOVC is realized under SONET and SDH by the PTEs, which combine either multiple STS-1/STS-3c SPEs (SONET), or VC-3/VC-4 (SDH). Recall that the VC-3 and STS-1 SPE signals are nearly identical except that a VC-3 does not contain the fixed stuff bytes found in columns 30 and 59 of an STS-1 SPE. A SONET STS-3c SPE is equivalent to a SDH VC-4.

These component signals, VC-3s or VC-4s (STS-1 SPEs or STS-3c SPEs), are transported separately through the network to an end system and must be reassembled. Since these signals can take different paths through the network, they may experience different propagation delays. In addition to this fixed differential delay between the component signals, there can also be a variable delay component that arises due to the different types of equipment processing the signals and the dynamics of the fiber itself. Note that heating and cooling effects can affect the propagation speed of light in a fiber, leading to actual measurable differences in propagation delay.

The process of mapping a concatenated container signal, that is, the raw data to be transported, into a virtually concatenated signal is shown in Figure 3-3. Specifically, at the transmitting side, the payload gets packed in X VC-4s just as if these were going to be contiguously concatenated. Now the question is, How do we identify the component signals and line them up appropriately given that delays for the components could be different?

Figure 3-3. Mapping a Higher Rate Payload in a Virtually Concatenated Signal (from [ITU-T00a])


The method used to align the components is based on the multiframe techniques described in Chapter 2. A jumbo (very long) multiframe is created by overloading the multiframe byte H4 in the path overhead. Bits 5–8 of the H4 byte are incremented in each 125µs frame to produce a multiframe consisting of 16 frames. In this case, bits 5–8 of H4 are known as the multiframe indicator 1 (MFI1). This multiframe will form the first stage of a two-stage multiframe. In particular, bits 1–4 of the H4 byte are used in a way that depends on the position in the first stage of the multiframe. This is shown in Table 3-1.

Within the 16-frame first stage multiframe, a second stage multiframe indicator (MFI2) is defined utilizing bits 1–4 of H4 in frames 0 and 1, giving a total of 8 bits per frame. It is instructive to examine the following:

  1. How long in terms of the number of 125µs frames is the complete HOVC multiframe structure? Answer: The base frame (MFI1) is 16 frames long, and the second stage is 28 = 256 frames long. Since this is a two-stage process, the lengths multiply giving a multiframe that is 16 × 256 = 4096 frames long.

  2. What is the longest differential delay, that is, delay between components that can be compensated? Answer: The differential delay must be within the duration of the overall multiframe structure, that is, 125µS × 4096 = 512mS, that is, a little over half a second.

  3. Suppose that an STS-1-2v is set up for carrying Ethernet traffic between San Francisco and New York such that one STS-1 goes via a satellite link and the other via conventional terrestrial fiber. Will this work? Answer: Assuming that a geo-synchronous satellite is used, then the satellite's altitude would be about 35775 km. Given that the speed of light is 2.99792 × 108 m/sec, this leads to a round trip delay of about 239 ms. If the delay for the fiber route is 20 ms, then the differential delay is 209 ms, which is within the virtual concatenation range. Also, since the average circumference of the earth is only 40,000 km, this frame length should be adequate for the longest fiber routes.

    Table 3-1. Use of Bits 1–4 in H4 Byte for First Stage Multiframe Indication (MFI1)
    Multi-Frame Indicator 1 (MFI1)Meaning of Bits 1–4 in H4
    02nd multiframe indicator MFI2 MSB (bits 1–4)
    12nd multiframe indicator MFI2 LSB (bits 5–8)
    2–13Reserved (0000)
    14Sequence indicator SQ MSB (bits 1–4)
    15Sequence indicator SQ LSB (bits 5–8)

Now, the receiver must be able to distinguish the different components of a virtually concatenated signal. This is accomplished as follows. In frames 14 and 15 of the first stage multiframe, bits 1–4 of H4 are used to give a sequence indicator (SQ). This is used to indicate the components (and not the position in the multiframe). Due to this 8-bit sequence indicator, up to 256 components can be accommodated in HOVC. Note that it is the receiver's job to compensate for the differential delay and to put the pieces back together in the proper order. The details of how this is done are dependent on the specific implementation.

3.2.3.2. LOWER-ORDER VIRTUAL CONCATENATION (LOVC)

The virtual concatenation of lower-order signals such as VT1.5s (VC-11), VT2 (VC-12), and so on are based on the same principles as described earlier. That is, a sequence number is needed to label the various components that make up the virtually concatenated signal, and a large multiframe structure is required for differential delay compensation. In the lower-order case, however, there are fewer overhead bits and bytes to spare so the implementation may seem a bit complex. Let us therefore start with the capabilities obtained.

LOVC Capabilities and Limitations

Table 3-2 lists the LOVC signals for SONET/SDH, the signals they can be contained in and the limits on the number of components that can be concatenated. The last two columns are really the most interesting since they show the range of capacities and the incremental steps of bandwidth.

LOVC Implementation

Let us first examine how the differential delay compensating multiframe is put together. This is done in three stages. Recall that the SONET VT overhead (lower-order SDH VC overhead) is defined in a 500 µs multiframe, as indicated in the path layer multiframe indicator H4. This makes available the four VT overhead bytes V5, J2, Z6, and Z7, from one SONET/SDH frame byte. Since a number of bits in these bytes are used for other purposes, an additional second stage of multiframe structure is used to define extended VT signal labels.

This works as follows (note that SDH calls the Z7 byte as K4 but uses it the same way): First of all, the V5 byte indicates if the extended signal label is being used. Bits 5 through 7 of V5 provide a VT signal label. The signal label value of 101 indicates that a VT mapping is given by the extended signal label in the Z7 byte. If this is the case, then a 1-bit frame alignment signal “0111 1111 110” is sent in bit 1 of Z7, called the extended signal label bit. The length of this second stage VT level multiframe (which is inside the 500 µs VT multiframe) is 32 frames. The extended signal label is contained in bits 12–19 of the multiframe. Multiframe position 20 contains “0.” The remaining 12 bits are reserved for future standardization.

Table 3-2. Standardized LOVC Combinations and Limits
Signal SONET/SDHCarried in SONET/SDHXCapacity (kbit/s)In steps of (kbit/s)
VT1.5-Xv SPE/VC-11-XvSTS-1/VC-31 to 281600 to 448001600
VT2-Xv SPE/VC-12-XvSTS-1/VC-31 to 212176 to 456962176
VT3-Xv SPESTS-11 to 143328 to 465923328
VT6-Xv SPE/VC-2-XvSTS-1/VC-31 to 76784 to 474486784
VT1.5/VC-11-XvSTS-3c1 to 641600 to 1024001600
VT2/VC-12-XvSTS-3c1 to 632176 to 1370882176
VT3-Xv SPESTS-3c1 to 423328 to 1397763328
VT6-Xv SPE/VC-2-XvSTS-3c1 to 216784 to 1424646784
VT1.5/VC-11-Xvunspecified1 to 641600 to 1024001600
VT2/VC-12-Xvunspecified1 to 642176 to 1392642176
VT3-Xv SPEunspecified1 to 643328 to 2129923328
VT6-Xv SPEunspecified1 to 646784 to 4341766784
Note: X is limited to 64 due the sequence indicator having 6 bits.

Bit 2 of the Z7 byte is used to convey the third stage of the multistage multiframe in the form of a serial string of 32 bits (over 32 four-frame multi-frames and defined by the extended signal label). This is shown in Figure 3-4. This string is repeated every 16 ms (32 bits × 500 µs/bit) or every 128 frames.

Figure 3-4. Third Stage of LOVC Multiframe Defined by Bit 2 of the Z7 Byte over the 32 Frame Second Stage Multiframe


The third stage string consists of the following fields: The third stage virtual concatenation frame count is contained in bits 1 to 5. The LOVC sequence indicator is contained in bits 6 to 11. The remaining 21 bits are reserved for future standardization.

Let us now consider a concrete example. Suppose that there are three stages of multiframes with the last stage having 5 bits dedicated to frame counting. What is the longest differential delay that can be compensated and in what increments? The first stage was given by the H4 byte and is of length 4, resulting in 4 × 125 µs = 500 µs. The second stage was given by the extended signal label (bit 1 of Z7) and it is of length 32. Since this is inside the first stage, the lengths multiply, resulting in 32 × 500 µs = 16 ms. The third stage, which is within the 32-bit Z7 string, has a length of 25 = 32 and is contained inside the second stage. Hence, the lengths multiply, resulting in 32 × 16 ms = 512 ms. This is the same compensation we showed with HOVC. Since the sequence indicator of the third stage is used to line up the components, the delay compensation is in 16 ms increments.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
3.143.214.56