Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA.
Benz, A. (2007) Governance in connected arenas – political science analysis of coordination and control in complex control systems, in New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations: From Disciplinary Theories towards Interfaces and Integration (ed. D. Jansen), Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 3–22.
Bimber, B. and Guston, D. (1997) The end of OTA and the future of technology assessment. Technol. Forecast. Soc., 54(2), 125–130.
Boon, W.P.C., Moors, E.H.M., Kuhlmann, S., and Smits, R.E.H.M. (2008) Demand articulation in intermediary organisations: The case of orphan drugs in the Netherlands. Technol. Forecast. Soc., 75, 644–671.
Callon, M. (1991) Techno-economic networks and irreversibility, in A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (ed. J. Law), Routledge, London, pp. 132–165.
Callon, M. (2005) Disabled persons of all countries, unite, in Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (ed. B. Latour and P. Weibel), ZKM/MIT, Karlsruhe, pp. 308–313.
Chesbrough, H.W. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School, Boston.
Coates, V. (1975) Readings in Technology Assessment, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Collingridge, D. (1980) The Social Control of Technology, Pinter, London.
De Solla Price, D.J. (1963) Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York.
Dosi, G. (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy, 11, 147–162.
Edler, J., Joly, P.-B., Kuhlmann, S. et al. (2006) Understanding “Fora of Strategic Intelligence for Research and Innovation.” The PRIME Forum Research Project, Karlsruhe.
Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., Hofman, P.S., and Green, K. (2004) Socio-technical scenarios as a tool for transition policy: An example from the traffic and transport domain, in System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy (ed. B. Elzen, F. Geels, and K. Green), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 251–328.
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., and Nelson, R.R. (2006) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Felt, U., Wynne, B., Callon, M. et al. (2007) Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously, European Commission, Brussels.
Garud, R. and Ahlstrom, D. (1997) Technology assessment: A socio-cognitive perspective. J. Eng. Technol. Manage., 14, 25–48.
Geels, F.W. and Schot, J. (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res. Policy, 36(3), 399–417.
Hackett, E.J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., and Wajcman, J. (eds) (2007) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Joly, P.B. and Rip, A. (2007) A timely harvest. Nature, 450(8), 1–11.
Kemp, R., Schot, J., and Hoogma, R. (1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technol. Anal. Strateg., 10(2), 175–198.
Konrad, K., Truffer, B., and Voss, J.-P. (2008) Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: Evidence from German utility sectors. J. Cleaner Production, 16, 1190–1202.
Kuhlmann, S., Boekholt, P., Georghiou, L. et al. (1999) Improving Distributed Intelligence in Complex Innovation Systems. Final report of the Advanced Science & Technology Policy Planning Network (ASTPP), a Thematic Network of the European Targeted Socio-Economic Research Programme (TSER), Brussels/Luxembourg 1999, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, http://publica.fraunhofer.de/eprints/urn:nbn:de:0011-n-555104.pdf (accessed April 14, 2012).
Kuhlmann, S. (2001) Governance of innovation policy in Europe: Three scenarios. Res. Policy, 30, 953–976.
Kuhlmann, S. (2007) Governance of innovation: Practice, policy, and theory as dancing partners. Inaugural Lecture, University of Twente.
Kuhlmann, S. (2010) TA als Tanz: Zur Governance technologischer Innovation. Neue Aufgaben des Technology Assessment, in Technology Governance: Der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabschätzung (ed. G. Aichholzer, A. Bora, S. Bröchler, M. Decker, and M. Latzer), Edition Sigma, Berlin, pp. 41–60.
Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C., and von Hippel, E. (2005) User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking. Res. Policy, 34(6), 951–965.
Markard, J. and Truffer, B. (2008) Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Res. Policy, 37(4), 596–615.
Mayntz, R. and Scharpf, F.W. (1995) Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus, in Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung (ed. H.G. Dieselben), Campus, Frankfurt, pp. 39–72.
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1977) In search of a useful theory of innovation. Res. Policy, 6, 36–76.
Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
van Oost, E.C.J., Verhaegh, S.J.S., and Oudshoorn, N.E.J. (2008) From innovation community to community innovation user-initiated innovation in wireless Leiden. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val., 34(2), 182–205.
Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T. (eds) (2003) How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rabeharisoa, V. and Callon, M. (2004) Patients and scientists in French muscular dystrophy research, in States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order (ed. S. Jasanoff), Routledge, London, pp. 142–160.
Rip, A. (1992) Science and technology as dancing partners, in Technological Development and Sciences in the Industrial Age (ed. P. Kroes and M. Bakker), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 231–270.
Rip, A. (2001) Assessing the impacts of innovation: New developments in technology assessment. In OECD Proceedings, Social Sciences and Innovation, Paris (OECD), pp. 197–213.
Rip, A. (2006) A coevolutionary approach to reflexive governance – and its ironies, in Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development (ed. J.-P. Voss, D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham UK, pp. 82–100.
Rip, A. (2008) “A Theory of TA?” Lecture delivered at ITAS, Karlsruhe, February 11.
Rip, A. and te Kulve, H. (2008) Constructive technology assessment and socio-technical scenarios, in The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Vol. 1: Presenting Futures (ed. E. Fisher, C. Selin, and J.M. Wetmore), Springer, Berlin, pp. 49–70.
Rip, A. and Kemp, R. (1998) Technological change, in Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 2: Resources and Technology (ed. S. Rayner and L. Malone), Batelle Press, Washington, DC, pp. 327–400.
Rip, A., Misa, T., and Schot, J. (eds) (1995) Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, Pinter, London.
Robinson, D.K.R. (2010) Constructive Technology Assessment of Newly Emerging Nanotechnologies: Experiments in Interactions. PhD dissertation, University of Twente.
Scharpf, F.W. (2000) Interaktionsformen: akteurzentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung, Leske + Budrich, Opladen.
Schot, J. and Rip, A. (1997) The past and the future of constructive technology assessment. Technol. Forecast. Soc., 54, 251–268.
Silbey, S. (2006) Science and technology studies, in The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology (ed. B. Turner), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 536–540.
Smits, R. and Kuhlmann, S. (2004) The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. Int. J. Foresight and Innovation Policy (IJFIP), 1(1–2), 4–32.
Smits, R. and Leyten, A. (1991) Technology Assessment: Waakhond of Speurhond (Technology Assessment: Watchdog or Tracker? Towards an Integral Technology Policy), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Smits, R., Leyten, A., and den Hertog, P. (1995) Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe: New concepts, new goals, new infrastructures. Policy Sci., 28(3), 272–299.
Smits, R., van Merkerk, R., Guston, D., and Sarewitz, D. (2010) Strategic intelligence: The role of TA in systemic innovation policy, in The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy: An International Research Handbook (ed. R. Smits, S. Kuhlmann, and P. Shapira), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 387–416.
Stemerding, D. and Swierstra, T.E. (2006) How might scenario studies help us to think about the normative implications of genomics and predictive medicine? In Questions éthiques en médecine prédictive (ed. A. de Bouvet, P. Boitte, and G. Aiguier), John Libbey Eurotext, Paris, pp. 81–88.
TAMI project (2003) Europäische Akademie et al., Technology Assessment in Europe: Between Method and Impact, European Commission, STRATA project, http://www.ta-swiss.ch/?redirect=getfile.php&cmd[getfile][uid]=944 (accessed April 14, 2012).
Te Kulve, H. (2011) Anticipatory Interventions and the Co-Evolution of Nanotechnology and Society. PhD dissertation, University of Twente.
Van den Ende, J. and Kemp, R. (1999) Technological transformations in history: How the computer regime grew out of existing computing regimes. Res. Policy, 28, 833–851.
Van Lente, H. (1993) Promising Technology: The Dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments, WMW-Publikatie 17, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Voss, J-.P., Bauknecht, D. and Kemp, R. (eds) (2006) Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.