Delivering successful training begins by planning to succeed. Here is list of considerations, trainer characteristics, and goals you should try to achieve in your training.
Make proper arrangements at the training location. Notify participants and their supervisors of the training’s location, time, and other requirements. Arrange for refreshments or lunch, if appropriate. Prepare enough handouts and training materials for each participant. Distribute name tags or name tents (placards). Gather all your supplies and equipment, including your training plan, videos, flipchart, markers, business cards, and so on. Decide if you want to use music at the beginning of class as people enter or during breaks. Prepare the room by adjusting the seating and making sure the lighting and temperature are comfortable.
Dress appropriately for the training you’ll be giving; you don’t want to be significantly overdressed or more casual than the participants.
Be in the training area before the participants arrive, and greet them as they arrive. Materials should be laid out for the participants; the furniture arranged as you want it; and media equipment in place, booted up, and focused correctly on the screen.
If you choose to use an icebreaker of any sort, make sure it’s both relevant and appropriate to the audience. Keep in mind that if it’s a short program, the icebreaker also needs to be short, or omitted entirely.
Start on time. That sets a good example: It shows that you take the training seriously and expect participants to, as well.
At the very start, deal with any housekeeping issues, such as letting people know a general schedule (including when breaks will probably happen), where the restrooms are located, any rules on interruptions (cell phones, knocks at the door), any rules on food and drink in the training room, and so on.
Participants need to know why you are the trainer and to feel confident that they can learn something from you. In business training, it is seldom enough just to have academic credentials. Participants want to hear what you’ve done that relates to the training. It’s even better if you’ve done it in their company or at least know about their company.
Of course, now and then, trainers are put into situations where they are required to train on something they don’t know all that well. If you find yourself in this situation, here are a couple of suggestions. Explain why you have been designated as the trainer. Maybe it’s because you are their supervisor or have some position of authority in the organization. Maybe it’s because you have some special knowledge of the topic, even if you don’t have experience. Go around the class and ask what experience the participants bring. If their experience is more than yours, point out how much they can add to the program and emphasize your role as a facilitator rather than as a subject-matter expert. Also, you might begin with relevant stories from inside or outside the organization, which will get participants involved in the subject and indicate that you have planned effectively to cover the topic.
Above all, do not exaggerate your experience, but also never undermine your credibility by drawing attention to your inexperience. If you are asked questions you can’t answer, tell the participants that you’ll get back to them, and then do it. Exaggerating your experience or guessing at an answer will undercut your credibility quickly, and, once lost, credibility can’t be regained. If you have planned an effective lesson, you should have the confidence to carry it off well.
People come to training programs for a variety of reasons. Some volunteer to come, whereas others are directed to come. Some are excited about learning new things, whereas others are concerned about keeping their jobs. Some merely will be filling a seat or attending only because they must. Although it’s not good to let those people off the hook too easily, you should be wary of letting them drag down the rest of the group or letting them sap too much of your energy. If everyone else “gets into” the training, they may come along; if not, just accept that you can’t force a horse to drink (or a learner to think).
As you learn the strengths and weaknesses of individual participants, you can structure the learning experience for them, either with or without their help. First, determine if the group is homogeneous or heterogeneous in terms of levels of experience with the subject matter.
Groups that are either “all experienced” or “all inexperienced” can be easier to deal with from a training plan point of view, because they all need the same information. But a mixed group can also provide benefits for the trainer—for example, using the skills and experience of the participants to help teach the less experienced. This has two advantages: Adult students learn better when they teach others, and the novices gain the benefit of their classmates’ experience.
If the group consists of all novices, the trainer will have to rely more on his or her personal experiences, plus any case studies, readings, exercises, and other materials selected to help bring the points home. Obviously, course topics such as decision making can be related to many things, which even novices have experienced.
If the participants are all “old hands” at the subject, it is important to guard against the “I-know-it-all” syndrome. This may be particularly true if you are seen as either a “peer” or as an “academic” who has not been on the firing line. Sometimes a pretest can raise awareness, by helping learners recognize the gaps in their understanding. You may also need to point out that changes in the workplace require that everyone needs to keep current, even if he or she performs his or her current job very well. The fact is, bad habits creep into everyone’s work, and training is one way to help get back on track.
Mixed groups of learners present the biggest challenge to handle. Recruiting the more skilled to help train the less skilled is one option. This can be done by creating mixed teams of skilled and unskilled learners. Another technique is to vary the training style with a range of exercises so that even the experienced students are actively engaged. Sometimes it is possible to modularize the training and allow more skilled people to skip portions they already have mastered.
Adults often come into a class feeling they should know it all already. They may be defensive and reluctant to admit their weaknesses. They need to see a clear purpose and application for the training—it has to be practical. Be sure to tie in examples with their own experiences. Talkwith them, not at them. Even subject-matter experts can contribute in the classroom, and they often prefer to participate rather than just listen to a lecture.
Most training sessions comprise one or more cycles and will go through a predictable sequence of activities. The following stages are common in effective training plans and may be repeated as needed:
See Worksheets 5–1 and 5–2 for suggested end-of-module and end-of-program evaluation forms. You may also modify them to add, change, or delete questions, to better serve the purpose of evaluation in your organization.
Because of the many differences, teaching decision making in a business setting should not be handled the same way as teaching science in high school. Table 4–1 highlights many of these distinctions.
FACTOR | ACADEMIC LEARNING | ORGANIZATIONAL TRAINING |
Trainer or teacher credentials | Academic achievement is often the sole criteria, although some colleges, especially two-year and teaching schools, will also consider work experience and the teacher’s skills in interpersonal communications. | Skill or knowledge in the relevant subject, regardless of academic achievement; skill in interpersonal communications will also be more critical. |
Course content | Content is usually broad and theoretical; certain fields such as computer science may also have a practical element. | Content is focused and application-oriented; it deals mostly with facts and procedures and only rarely with concepts. |
Objectives | The most common objectives are knowledge-based and occasionally skill-based; job performance objectives are usually only a peripheral issue. | Although training often includes knowledge and skill-level objectives, job performance is the outcome of most concern. |
Timing and scheduling | The schedule is usually lock step and tied to a semester or quarter system. | The schedule is typically short-term and more self-paced; new groups start as needed. |
Grading system | Grades are typically “A” through “F.” | Many programs are not graded at all, but are usually pass-fail; some are proficiency-based. |
Presentation style | Lecture and other inductive forms are common, though workshops and lab applications may be used. | Participative (interactive) experiences are often used, even in a classroom form; a hands-on format is most common for on-the-job training. |
Reason for participation | The goal is to obtain a degree, certificate, or other credential; sometimes classes are taken for self-satisfaction, but usually for career and employment reasons. | Participants are usually required to attend training by employer to support the organization’s needs; it may be a condition of keeping their job or getting a promotion. |
Students or learners | Students work as individuals, and working together on assignments may be considered cheating; the teacher’s “client” is the individual student. | Group learning is common; the trainer’s “client” is the organization in which the participant works. |
Learning or training materials | Comprehensive textbooks and outside research materials are used. | Company materials and trainer-designed materials are used; although books may be used, it is rare. |
© 2004 Robert H. Vaughn
Here are some ways that you can improve the knowledge transfer for your participants.
Ask Frequent Questions. Design the lesson so that the material is grouped in bite-sized chunks. Don’t just lecture for half an hour and then ask for questions. Learners should go through a questioning cycle every five to eight minutes.
Present information in a variety of ways: by lecture, demonstrations, and exercises, or with visuals or anything else that affects one or more of the senses of the learners. Then, to find out if what you’ve presented has been heard, seen, understood, and accepted, you need to elicit feedback from the learners in some way. The final part of a questioning cycle is letting the participants know if they’ve “got it.”
Use Variety in the Training Design. Have the learners get up from their seats and move around occasionally, to talk with each other or try an experiment or exercise. Use more than one style to present the material. Three or four different approaches—perhaps a lecture, a discussion, a slide presentation, and an exercise—in a half-day session will help keep participants involved and learning.
Over-plan. First-time trainers are sometimes badly surprised when their planned one-hour presentation is completed in only 14 minutes. Even worse yet, sometimes it’s not completed in 90 minutes.
Experienced trainers agree that it pays to over-prepare and that it’s a good idea to practice a new training program in a dry run with a video recorder and a timer.
Be sure to have some contingency plans, especially if the training plan is deductive or interactive. Know what can be skimmed over or skipped completely if the training is running longer than planned, and keep an eye on the clock when time is a concern. Have extra material or additional exercises available if training runs short, or just let class out early, if it is appropriate to do so and if the training objectives have been met.
Ask for Help. A number of sources inside and outside your organization may be able to suggest ideas to improve the training. Talk with people who have taught similar programs. Valuable professional contacts may be found in such organizations as the local chapter of ASTD, the International Society for Performance Improvement (ISPI), or others. Even the participants may be willing to lend a hand in certain parts of the training where they have personal experience.
How Do I Encourage Participation? Unless you are lecturing or using some other one-way process from start to finish, you’ll need participation by the class. When you encourage participation, take care to make it a challenging but nonthreatening experience. Participants don’t mind training that is challenging, but they don’t like to be embarrassed in front of their peers. They also learn more if they are involved. Here are some suggestions to get responses and involvement from your participants:
Using subgroups in a training program has many advantages for both the participants and the trainer. Many adults are quite willing to learn from each other, and they may feel less threatened by their peers than by the trainer, especially if the trainer is an outsider. Peers may be better able to put new ideas and skills into the language and context of the workplace, thus making it easier for participants to apply the new knowledge to their jobs.
When peers help others in the class, they refine their own abilities and knowledge as they explain things to their peers. Teaching provides them an intrinsic reward, as well. The trainer who uses groups reaps an additional benefit: Fewer people are vying for his or her attention. This can provide time to catch your breath or deal with administrative items such as setting up equipment or reviewing lesson plans—or a few minutes of quiet time.
Using groups in training sessions also has risks. Groups may make it easier for individual participants to “hide,” as their peers cover for them or let them be “free riders” on the backs of others in the group. Also, negative group dynamics may get in the way of effective learning if personalities or other issues keep the group from functioning properly.
For short questions, groups of two (“turn to your neighbor”) is quick and practical. Groups of three might provide more richness or work better in situations where you need an observer (such as role plays). Larger groups of four to six may be good for case studies, but the instructor may need to provide more structure, such as having the group elect a spokesperson, giving specific roles to different people, and so on. It’s often a good idea to mix up the groups at least daily so varying strengths and weakness of individual participants can be controlled, and so disparities in group levels don’t become exacerbated.
Although first impressions are important, so are the last impressions. As the training comes to an end, a variety of tasks need to be accomplished.
Consider what you will do to “plan to succeed”:
3.145.172.56