24 2. RELAXATION TYPE RESIDUAL STRESS MEASUREMENT METHODS
2.5 SPLITTING METHOD
e Splitting Method illustrated in Figure 2.3a has some geometric similarities to the Two-
Groove Method, but typically uses only a single slot. e measurement concept derives from
the deformations seen in material that has cracked due to excessive residual stresses, for example,
as shown in Figures 1.6, 1.13 and 1.14 in Chapter 1. A deep cut is sawn into a specimen such as in
Figure 2.3a and the opening or closing of the adjacent material indicates the sign and the average
size of the residual stresses present. An opening motion indicates perpendicular residual stresses
that are tensile on the outer surfaces and compressive in the interior, while closing indicates
the opposite. is method is convenient as a quick comparative test for quality control during
material production.
Figure 2.3: e splitting method, (a) for longitudinal stresses in rods, (b) for axial stresses in
wood (from Fuller (1995)), and (c) for circumferential stresses in tubes.
A similar material response can occur when sawing wood. As seen in Figure 1.13 in
Chapter 1, wood can contain significant residual stresses. In the case shown, these are “growth
stresses,” which are formed in the living tree to enhance its overall bending strength. Further
substantial residual stresses can be created during the wood drying process, especially when ac-
celerated by the use of drying kilns. Residual stress induced deformations can be problematic in
sawmills when cutting the dried wood. If the material motion happens to be inward, the wood
will close up on the sawblade during cutting, possibly quite tightly. Should the wood workpiece
not be secured sufficiently, the saw will grab the wood and throw it out from the machine at high
speed, creating a serious safety hazard. us, it is common to test for the presence of residual
stresses in kiln-dried lumber. is is done using the “prong” test illustrated in Figure 2.3b.
An interesting variation of the prong test involves using a specimen similar to that shown
in Figure 2.3a and to measure the lateral force required at the open end to maintain the original
spacing between the two cut sides. is use of a force measurement instead of a displacement
measurement is of interest because it gives a surface stress result that does not require explicit
knowledge of Young’s modulus. is feature is attractive when working with a natural material