Index

Page numbers followed by f and t refer to figures and tables, respectively.

  •  
  • Access, to low-end innovations, 132–133
  • Active resistance, 26
  • Adaptations, defined, xii. See also specific examples
  • AECS, see Aravind Eye Care System
  • Amabile, T. M., 16
  • Amazon, 50
  • Ambiguity, 124, 175–176
  • Anxiety, 22, 53–54
  • Apple, 44, 50, 55
  • Apprenticeships, 31
  • Aravind Eye Care System (AECS), 155, 156, 158–163
  • Arthur Andersen, 76
  • Attribute association, 45–46
  • Aurolab, 161–162
  • Autonomy, 180
  • Avon, 132, 156
  • Ayondo Markets, 47
  •  
  • Background research, on market, 146–147
  • Bangladesh, 144, 171
  • Bangladesh Rehabilitation Assistance Committee, 155–156
  • Barton, Dominic, 76–77
  • Behaviors, anti-knowledge-sharing, 23–27
  • BlackBerry, 55
  • Boo, K., 178
  • Bottom-of-pyramid (BoP) customer segment, see Emerging markets
  • Branding, purpose-driven, 162–163
  • Buckley, 46
  • Business strategies, inclusive, 157–163
  • BuzzFeed, 49
  •  
  • Cambodia, 144–151
  • Caretta, 32
  • Carlile, P. R., 23
  • Chesterton, G. K., 168
  • Clarity seeking, 40, 49–50
  • Clorox, 55–56
  • Coca-Cola, 49, 55
  • Collaboration, 110–111, 112t, 115, 152
  • Collaborative prototyping, 31
  • Coming closer stage, 28, 28t
  • Commercial needs, see Sustainability constraints
  • Communication, 98, 101
  • Communication Practices, in VTM, 99, 103–107, 104f, 115
  • Communities of practice, 179
  • Component substitution and sourcing, 127
  • Consumers, 124, 128–129. See also Psychological constraints of consumers
  • Consumer management, 40
  • Contextual ambidexterity, 126
  • Cooper, R. G., 140
  • Cooperation, 64
  • Corporate sustainability agendas, 13–15
  • Cost reduction, 126–127
  • Creative thinking, 131–132, 131f
  • Creativity:
    • constraints as enablers of, 9–11, 10f
    • corporate sustainability agenda and, 14–15, 15f
    • in innovation process, 6–8, 8f
    • for virtual teams, 110–111
  • Cross-purposes, talking at, 24
  • Culture, 124–126
  • “Curse of knowledge” bias, 11
  • Customers, 1, 2–3
    • for low-end innovations, 124
  •  
  • Dacia, 126, 127
  • Delivery models and processes, 127, 162
  • Dell, 132
  • Designaffairs, 51
  • Design Thinking workshops, 68
  • Developed markets, 142, 143f
  • Dewey & LeBoeuf, 76
  • Disabling activities, in NPD process, xvi
  • Dispersion, on virtual teams, 97, 98
  • Diversity, in virtual teams, 105–107, 115
  • DollarShaveClub.com, 133
  • Dow Corning, 132
  • DropboxTM, 110
  •  
  • 80/20 listening, 116
  • Email communication, 104–105, 115
  • Emerging markets, 155–164
    • delivery models in, 162
    • inclusive strategies in, 157–163
    • internalizing resources in, 161–162
    • market/innovation constraints in, 156–157
    • purpose-driven branding in, 162–163
    • relationships with intermediaries in, 160
    • social embeddedness of strategies in, 160–161
  • Emotions, constraints based on, 51–55
  • Emotional resilience, 54–55
  • Empathic design, 152
  • Employees, 1, 2
  • Engagement, in virtual meetings, 108–109
  • Engineers Without Borders, 142, 145
  • Environment, for Innovation Think Tank, 71
  • Expertise, of professionals, 77
  • External cooperation, 64
  •  
  • Failure mode analysis, 148, 149f
  • Fairphone, 55
  • Feedback, 72–73, 129–130
  • Feminized labor, 171
  • Field research and testing, 147–148, 152
  • Fiji, 172, 173–175
  • “First Kiss” campaign, 53–54
  • FISHstep program, 79–80
  • Fly-on-the-wall ethnography, 147
  • Follower tendency, 42–44
  • Freedom, for innovative thinking, 67–68
  • Fuzziness boundary, 22, 29
  • Fuzziness constraint, 124
  •  
  • Gatekeepers, partnerships with, 133–134
  • Gender-related constraints, 169–173, 170t
  • General Electric (GE), 121, 127, 156
  • George Washington University, 81–83
  • Getting to work stage, 34
  • Goals, 64, 88–89, 101, 102, 169f
  • Google Glass, 42
  • Grameen Bank, 155, 156
  • “Hide-and-seek,” playing, 25
  • High-volume scaling, for low-end innovations, 127–128
  • Hindustan Unilever Limited, 144, 172–173
  • Hoegl, M., 102
  • Home Depot, 132
  • Honda, 130
  • Hornbach, 51
  • “How I am” constraints, 41–46, 43t
  • “How I feel” constraints, 51–55, 52t
  • “How I think” constraints, 47–51, 48t
  •  
  • I-am-not-an-innovator boundary, 23, 26, 32
  • I-Corps, 89
  • Identification, in stakeholder model, 133
  • Identifying “your” innovation practice stage, 28–34
  • IKEA, 51
  • Immersion experiences, 152, 178
  • Implementation:
    • balancing creativity and, 7–8, 8f
    • constraints as enablers of, 11–12
    • of innovation support function, 88–91, 88f
    • of knowledge-sharing practices, 34
  • Incentives, for innovation support, 90–91
  • Inclusive strategies, of social enterprises, 157–163, 159t
  • India. See also Emerging markets
    • healthcare market in, 156–157, 157t
    • new products in, 144
    • women market traders in, 171–173
  • Individual constraints, xv, 2–3, 2f. See also specific types
  • Individual leadership, 100–101, 114–115
  • Indo-Fijian market traders, 173–175
  • Information technology, 179–180
  • Infrastructure, 64–65, 81–83
  • Initiation and Structure, in VTM, 99–103, 114–115
  • Innovation:
    • challenges to, xii–xiii, xiiif
    • constraints as enablers of, 9–13
    • factors in successful, xi–xii
    • in professional service organizations, 76–77
    • role of professionals in, 77–78
    • rule breaking with, 168–169
    • uncertainty in, 6–8, 8f
  • Innovation barriers, xii
  • Innovation champions, 77, 77f, 87
  • Innovation constraints:
    • defined, xii
    • in emerging markets, 156–157
    • identification of, 63–70
    • and NPD process, xiv–xv
    • occurrence vs. effect for, xv–xvi, xvif
    • structure of, 63f
  • Innovation failures, xi, xii, 80
  • Innovation Institute, 83–85
  • Innovation practice, identifying your, 28–34
  • Innovation projects, supporting, 69–70
  • Innovations in Telemedicine, 85
  • Innovation support function, 85–91
  • Innovation Think Tank, 68, 70–73
  • Innovative action, restriction of, 65
  • Intangibility, of professional services, 78
  • Integration, in stakeholder model, 134
  • Interaction, in stakeholder model, 133
  • Interests:
    • boundaries of, 20, 22–23, 25–26, 27f
    • reframing, 32
  • Intermediaries, 150,160. See also specific types
  • Internal cooperation, 64
  • Internal resources, 161–162
  • Intersectional constraints, 175–176
  • Iteration processes, in NPD, 129–130
  •  
  • Juicy Juice, 55
  •  
  • Knowledge, restructuring of, 7
  • Knowledge Management, in VTM, 100, 110–112, 115
  • Knowledge sharing, 19–35
    • Coming closer stage in, 28, 36
    • Getting to work stage in, 34
    • Identifying “your” innovation practice stage in, 28–34
    • process for improving, 23–24
    • Tracing hints stage in, 24–27
    • in virtual teams, 109, 109t, 111, 113
  • Knowledge-sharing boundaries:
    • identifying types of, 28, 28t
    • mechanisms for crossing, 30f
    • types of, 20–23, 21f
  • Kornacki, M. J., 89
  • Kristal, Phyllis, 79–80
  • Kristiansen, Kjeld Kirk, 11
  •  
  • Language, communication and, 29, 105–107, 115
  • Latin America, 171
  • Leadership:
  • Lean new product development, 95–97, 96t
  • Learning, in Innovative Think Tank, 71
  • Leary, Michael, 125, 133
  • LEGO, 11–12, 34, 53
  • LEGO Serious Play, 31, 33, 34
  • Lessons learned reviews, 111, 115
  • Lidl, 45, 46
  • Lions Aravind Institute of Community Opthalmology, 161
  • Listening, 116
  • Location, of virtual meetings, 107–108
  • Low-end innovations, 121–137
    • access to, 132–133
    • capability development for, 134–136, 134f–136f
    • constraints for, 122–124
    • cost reduction for, 126–127
    • and culture/management commitment, 124–126
    • high-volume scaling for, 127–128
    • importance of, 122
    • market feedback in product development for, 129–130
    • partnerships to support, 133–134
    • as total solutions, 130–132
    • understanding consumer needs for, 128–129
  •  
  • McDonald's, 46, 131, 132
  • Mad cow disease, 54
  • Management commitment to low-end innovations, 124–126
  • Manufacturing processes, reducing costs in, 127
  • Market constraints, xv, 119, 124, 156–157. See also specific types of markets
  • Market feedback, 129–130
  • Market immersion, 152, 178
  • Market traders, see Women market traders
  • Martín, Vaquero, 133–134
  • Meetings and Protocols, in VTM, 99, 107–109, 115
  • Merchant relationship managers, 172–173, 177–180
  • Merton, Robert K., 168
  • Metro Group, 132, 133
  • Microsoft, 50
  • Microsoft ProjectTM, 110
  • Microsoft SharePointTM, 110
  • MindjetTM, 110
  • Misdirection, by market traders, 175–176
  • Monsanto, 53
  • Mosquito Magnet, 128
  • Motivation, 66
  • Motorola, 42, 44
  • M-PESA, 122
  • Myanmar, 150
  •  
  • Narayana Health, 155, 156
  • Needs, consumer or user, 128–129, 142–151
  • Networking, 72
  • NewProd study, xi
  • New product development (NPD) process:
    • impact of constraints on, xiv–xvi
    • innovation constraints exterior to, xiv–xv
    • lean, 95–97, 96t
    • for low-end innovations, 123t
    • market feedback in, 129–130
    • for professional service organizations, 85–86, 86f
    • standard/traditional, xiii–xiv, xivf, 96t, 123t, 140
    • for underresourced markets, 151–153
  • New service development:
    • defining process for, 89–90
    • efficiency of, 81–83
    • innovation support function for, 89
    • need for, 76–77
    • project selection for, 83–85
    • time commitment for, 76, 79–81
  • Norma (restaurant), 9
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NUST), 144–145
  • NPD process, see New product development process
  •  
  • Operational autonomy, 180
  • Operational restrictions, 66–67
  • Organizational ambidexterity, 125–126
  • Organizational constraints, xv, 59–73. See also specific types
    • about, 59
    • common manifestations of, 67–70
    • empirical research on, 62
    • identification of, 63–70
    • and Innovation Think Tank, 70–73
    • recognizing symptoms of, 63–65
    • understanding causes of, 65–66
  • Organizational structure, in VTM, 99–103, 114–115
  • Overstock.com, 47
  •  
  • Pakistan, 171
  • Participation, in virtual meetings, 108
  • Partnerships, 133–134, 142–150
  • Pepsi Cola, 40, 49, 50
  • Performance monitoring, 90
  • Personality traits, consumers', 40, 41
  • Petrochemical industry, virtual team in, 98–99
  • Philips, 133, 156
  • Picture Cook (Shelly), 49
  • Pigeonhole thinking, 47, 49
  • Policy autonomy, 180
  • “Possum,” playing, 26, 32
  • Power, loss in, 22
  • Pragmatic boundaries, see Interests, boundaries of
  • Prahalad, C. K., 168
  • Prevention focus, consumers with, 44–45
  • Procter & Gamble, 127, 129
  • Product development process, defined, xiii
  • Professionals, in innovation process, 77–78
  • Professional service organizations, 75–92
    • defined, 75
    • innovation in, 76–77
    • innovation support function for, 85–91
    • NPD model for, 86, 86f
    • role of professionals in innovation process, 77–78
    • time as constraint in, 78–85
  • Promotion, of Innovation Think Tank, 72
  • Proserpio, L., 102
  • Protein World, 55
  • Protos plant oil stove, 144
  • Prototypes, 31
  • Psychological constraints of consumers, 39–57, 41t
    • and consumer management by firms, 40
    • defined, 41
    • emotion-related, 51–55
    • self-identity related, 41–46
    • thinking-related, 47–51
    • uncovering, 55–57
  • Purpose-driven branding, 162–163
  •  
  • Quality standards, in virtual teams, 115
  • Questions, for identifying sustainability constraints, 12–13, 12t
  •  
  • Redzepi, René, 9
  • Reframing interests, 32
  • Rejection, of ideas, 68–69
  • Renault, 126–127
  • Resilience, emotional, 54–55
  • Rice cooker project, in Cambodia, 145–151
  • Role-playing, as field research, 147–148
  • “Rolling the money,” 171
  •  
  • Samsung, 54
  • Sankara Nethralaya, 158, 160, 161
  • SAPPHO study, xi
  • “Saving face,” 150
  • Scaling, 77–78, 127–128
  • Self-efficacy, 50–51
  • Self-identity, consumers', 41–46
  • Semantic boundaries, see Understanding, boundaries of
  • Service organizations, see Professional service organizations
  • Shared goals, of virtual teams, 101, 102
  • Shelly, Katie, 49
  • Siliguri eye hospital, 158–160
  • Silversin, J., 89
  • Simplification, 127
  • Site visits, 113, 115
  • Skills, organizational constraints and, 65–66
  • Skype, 122
  • Social class, constraints related to, 173–175
  • Social embeddedness, 160–161
  • Social enterprises, 155, 157–163
  • Social needs, see Sustainability constraints
  • Societal goals, means and, 169f
  • Solo attempts, 26
  • Sony, 44
  • Southwest, 121
  • Stage-GateTM Process, xiii–xiv, xivf, 140, 146
  • Stakeholders, partnerships with, 133–134, 150
  • Steamz, 45
  • Strategic goals, 88–89
  • Strategic restrictions, 66
  • Structural ambidexterity, 125–126
  • Subsistence markets, 168, 169. See also Women market traders
  • Subway (company), 46
  • Sustainability constraints, 5–17
    • corporate sustainability agendas, 13–15
    • and creativity–implementation balance, 7–8
    • defined, 5
    • as enablers of innovation, 9–13
    • negative effects of adopting, 15–16
    • and uncertainty 4, 6–7
  • Systems engineering, 115
  •  
  • Target, 45, 46
  • Target market studies, 55–57, 56t
  • Tata, 127
  • Team formation, virtual, 101, 103, 103t, 115
  • Technology, 101–102, 108, 179–180
  • Telemedicine, 81–83
  • Telenor, 156
  • Terminology boundary, 22, 25, 31
  • Tesla, 45
  • Thinking processes, constraints related to, 47–51
  • Thomson Reuters, 114–116
  • Time:
    • in Innovative Think Tank, 71
    • for new service development, 76, 79–81
    • for virtual meetings, 107–108
  • Time constraint,:
    • alleviating, 87–88
    • in professional service organizations, 76
    • understanding, 78–85
  • Total solutions, low-end innovations as, 130–132
  • Tracing hints stage, 24–27, 27f, 27t
  • Training, 178–179
  • Trait anxiety, 53–54
  • Trajectory boundary, 23, 25, 31–32
  • Translators, 31
  • Tunsai water filtration device, 144
  • 2bAHEAD Think Tank, 22
  •  
  • Unbalanced mental model boundary, 22, 31
  • Uncertainty, 2, 6–8, 8f, 14–15, 15f, 176
  • Underresourced markets, 139–153
    • adapting NPD process for, 151–153
    • defined, 139
    • designing for, 140–142, 149
    • knowledge about users and partnerships in, 142–149
    • research on, 141t
    • rice cooker project in, 145–151
    • in traditional NPD process, 140
    • understanding, 150–151
  • Understanding, boundaries of (semantic boundaries), 20–22, 24–25, 27f
  • Unilever, 156
  • United States, social class in, 173
  • Users' needs, in underresourced markets, 142–151
  •  
  • Venkataswamy, Govindappa, 158
  • Virtual teams, 95–116
    • communication challenges in, 98
    • effective/successful, 98–100, 114
    • lean NPD with, 96–97
    • traits of, 97
  • Virtual team model (VTM), 98–116, 99f
    • Communication Practices in, 103–107
    • Initiation and Structure in, 100–103
    • Knowledge Management in, 110–112
    • Leadership in, 112–113
    • Meetings and Protocols in, 107–109
    • in petrochemical industry, 98–99
    • at Thomson Reuters, 114–116
  • Volkswagen Group, 45, 125, 128
  • VTM, see Virtual team model
  •  
  • Walmart, 14, 45–46, 127
  • Wix.com, 51
  • Women market traders, 167–181
    • adaptations for, 177–180
    • class-based constraints for, 173–175
    • gender-based constraints for, 169–173
    • intersectional constraints for, 175–176
    • rule breaking by, 167–169
  • Work structure, in Innovative Think Tank, 71
  •  
  • Zofi, Y., 97
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.191.208.203