have the same 26 letters at my disposal, and so most of the
techniques I’ve just introduced still apply. Having said that,
there are some differences, and that’s what this section is about.
I’ve included writing for the web in my ‘After’ chapter because I
like to write my first draft in a media-neutral way, and then hone
it to suit its final format during the editing stage.
Incidentally, I won’t be discussing search engine optimisation
(SEO) here, for the simple reason that all through this book I’ve
advised you to write in a way that appeals to your reader. And this
reader is – one would hope –areal, live, human being.Writing for
a search algorithm is an entirely different ball of wax. Out goes all
that stuff about ‘don’t be dull’, ‘make it interesting’ and so on; in
comes ‘white hat’ SEO techniques, such as repeating key words
as often as possible, and ‘black hat’ methods, using hidden text
and links farms. The first is very dull, the second is very naughty.
Plus, the exact nature of the crawler algorithms used by the
major search engines changes over time – if I gave you advice
today it might be irrelevant in 18 months. SEO isn’t even appro-
priate for many websites – in these situations other web
marketing strategies can be much more effective. In short, you’re
far better off looking online for really specific, really up-to-date
information on this darkest of arts.
Back to writing for the web. I think people use the web in three
broad ways: as viewers who want a fast blast of entertainment
(YouTube, etc.), as seekers looking for specific information (train
times,TV schedules and so on), and as stayers who might – poss-
ibly – hang around long enough to read my copy. It’s this last lot
I’m interested in, so to win on the web I need to:
G Cut stuff up
G Write for skimming
G Use lots of links.
Let’s go over these in more depth.
After 87
M06_HORB7347_01_SE_C06.QXP:M06_HORB7347_01_SE_C06 2/6/09 09:50 Page 87