10.8. ESTIMATION OF MASS-TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS FOR PACKED TOWERS

10.8A. Experimental Determination of Film Coefficients

The individual film mass-transfer coefficients and depend generally upon Schmidt number, gas and liquid mass velocities, and the size and shape of the packing. The interactions among these factors are quite complex. Hence, the correlations for mass-transfer coefficients are highly empirical. The reliability of these correlations is not too satisfactory. Deviations of up to 25% are not uncommon. A major difficulty arises because it is an overall coefficient or resistance that is measured experimentally, which represents the two film resistances in series. To obtain the single-phase film coefficient, the experiment must be so arranged that the other film resistance is negligible or can be approximately calculated.

To measure the liquid film mass-transfer coefficient , a system for absorption or desorption of very insoluble gases such as O2 or CO2 in water is used. The experiment gives , which equals (which can give HL), since the gas-phase resistance is negligible.

To measure the gas-phase film coefficient , we desire to use a system such that the solute is very soluble in the liquid and the liquid-phase resistance is negligible. Most such systems, for example, NH3–air–water, have a liquid-phase resistance of about 10%. By subtracting this known liquid-phase resistance (obtained by correcting data for absorption of CO2 or O2 to NH3 data for ) from the overall resistance in Eq. (10.4-24), we obtain the coefficient or HG. Details of these systems are discussed elsewhere (G1, S1, S2).

10.8B. Correlations for Film Coefficients

Correlations for experimental coefficients can be expressed in terms of HL and HG or and , which are related by Eqs. (10.6-39) and (10.6-40). For the first generation of packings, such as Raschig rings and Berl saddles, extensive correlations are available (T1). However, comprehensive data on the individual coefficients HL and HG for the newer packings, which have higher mass-transfer coefficients and capacity, are not generally available. These newer packings are more commonly used today.

However, as an alternative method for comparing the performance of different types and sizes of these newer random packings, the system CO2–air–NaOH solution is often used (P2, S4). Air containing 1.0 mole CO2 at 24°C (75°F) is absorbed in a packed tower using 1.0 N (4 wt %) NaOH solution (E2, E3, P2, S4). An overall coefficient KGa is measured.

In this system, the liquid film is controlling but the gas film resistance is not negligible. The fast chemical reaction between NaOH and CO2 takes place close to the interface, which gives a steeper concentration gradient for CO2 in the water film. Hence, the value of KGa is muc h larger than for absorption of CO2 in water. Because of this, these experimental values are not used to predict the absorption for other systems in towers.

These experimental results, however, can be used to compare the performances of various packings. To do this, the ratio fp of KGa for a given packing to that for -in. Raschig rings at a liquid velocity Gx of 5000 lbm/h · ft2 (6.782 kg/s · m2) and Gy of 1000 lbm/h · ft2 (1.356 kg/s · m2) is obtained; these are given in Table 10.6-1. The fp value is a relative ratio of the total interfacial areas, since the reaction of CO2 in NaOH solution takes place in the relatively static holdup pools and in the dynamic holdup. Some fp data have been obtained at Gy = 500 lbm/h · ft2 instead of 1000 (E3). Eckert et al. (E2) showed that there is no effect of Gy in the range of 200–1000 lbm/h · ft2 on the overall KGa. This is expected where the liquid film resistance controls (S1). Values of fp for various investigators agree within ±10% or less.

10.8C. Predicting Mass-Transfer Film Coefficients

For estimating the performance HL(Hx) and HG(Hy) of a new packing, the values of fp can be used to correct the experimental Hx values for oxygen absorption or desorption and the Hy value for NH3 absorption with -in. Raschig rings. These values must also be corrected for Schmidt number, liquid viscosity, and flow rates.

1. Gas film coefficient Hy

Using the NH3 absorption data corrected for the liquid film resistance of approximately 10%, HG has been found to vary as Gy to an exponent between 0.3 and 0.4 (S1, T1) for values of Gy up to about 700 lbm/h · ft2 (0.949 kg/s · m2). A value of 0.35 is used. For liquid flows of Gx from 500 to 5000 lbm/h · ft2 (0.678–6.782 kg/s · m2), Hy varies as , with the value of used. Also, the value of Hy has been found to be proportional to of the gas phase. A value for Hy of 0.74 ft (0.226 m) is obtained from the correlation for -in. Raschig rings for the NH3 system (S1) corrected for the small liquid film resistance of 10% at Gx = 5000 lbm/h · ft2 (6.782 kg/s · m2) and Gy = 500 lbm/h · ft2 (0.678 kg/s · m2). The value of Gy = 500 will be used instead of 1000, since there is no effect of Gy on fp in this range. For the NH3 system, NSc = 0.66 at 25°C. Then, for estimation of HG for a new solute system and packing and flow rates of Gx and Gy using SI units,

Equation 10.8-1


where fp for the new packing is given in Table 10.6-1 and HG is in m.

2. Liquid film coefficient Hx

For gas flow rates up to loading or about 50% of the flooding velocity, the effect of Gy on Hx is small and can be neglected (S1). Using the oxygen desorption data, Hx is proportional to the liquid . The NSc = 372 at 25°C for O2 in water and the viscosity μ is 0.8937 × 103 kg/m · s. Data for different packings show that Hx is proportional to (Gx/μ) to the 0.22–0.35 exponent, with an average of (Gx/μ)0.3. A value of Hx = 1.17 ft (0.357 m), where Gx = 5000 lbm/h · ft2 is obtained from the correlation (S1) for the O2 system and -in. Raschig rings. Then, to predict Hx for a new solute system and packing at velocities of Gx and Gy using SI units,

Equation 10.8-2


These equations can be used for values of Gy up to almost 1000 lbm/h · ft2 and Gx up to 5000 and remain below loading.

EXAMPLE 10.8-1. Prediction of Film Coefficients for CO2 Absorption

Predict HG, HL, and HOL for absorption of CO2 from air by water in a dilute solution in a packed tower with -in. metal Pall rings at 303 K (30°C) and 101.32 kPa pressure. The flow rates are Gx = 4.069 kg/s · m2 (3000 lbm/h · ft2) and Gy = 0.5424 kg/s · m2 (400 lbm/h · ft2).

Solution: From Appendix A.3-18, for CO2 at 1 atm, pA = 1.86 × 103xA. Hence, yA = pA/1.0 = 1.86 × 103xA (mole fraction units). Also, from Appendix A.3-3 for air at 303 K, μ = 1.866 × 105 kg/m · s and the density ρ = 1.166 kg/m3. The diffusivity for CO2 at 276.2 K from Table 6.2-1 is 0.142 × 104 m2/s. Correcting this to 303 K by Eq. (6.2-45), DAB = 0.142 × 104 (303/276.2)1.75 = 0.1670 × 104 m2/s. Hence,


From Table 10.6-1 the relative mass-transfer coefficient for -in. metal Pall rings compared to that for -in. Raschig rings is fp = 1.34. Substituting into Eq. (10.8-1),


From Appendix A.2-4, the viscosity of water at 303 K is 0.8007 × 103 kg/m · s and the density ρ = 995.68 kg/m3. At 298 K the viscosity of water is 0.8937 × 103 kg/s · m.

From Table 6.3-1, the DAB of CO2 in water is 2.00 × 109 m2/s at 25°C. Using Eq. (6.3-9) to correct it to 303 K, DAB = (0.8937 × 103/0.8007 × 103)(303/298) (2.00 × 109) = 2.270 × 109 m2/s. Then,


Substituting into Eq. (10.8-2),


To calculate the value of HOL, the molar flow rates are calculated, where for dilute air, V = Gy/MW = 0.5424/28.97 = 0.01872 kg mol/s · m2, and for water, L = Gx/MW = 4.069/18.0 = 0.2261 kg mol/s · m2. Substituting into Eq. (10.6-58),


The percent resistance in the gas film is 0.001575(100)/0.2322 = 0.68%. This shows that for a very insoluble gas, even though HG is similar in value to HL, the large value of m causes the gas-phase resistance to be very small. Hence, HOLHL. For a soluble gas like NH3, where m = 1.20 at 303 K compared to 1.86 × 103 for CO2, the percent resistance in the gas film would be about 90%. (See Problem 10.8-1.) The different gas and liquid Schmidt numbers for NH3 would have only a small effect on the results.


..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.117.91.153