Presenting the direct method

The statement of cash flows begins with the cash from making profit, or cash flow from operating activities, as accountants call it. Operating activities is the term accountants adopted for sales and expenses, which are the operations that a business carries out to earn profit. Furthermore, the term operating activities also includes the transactions that are coupled with sales and expenses. For example, making a sale on credit is an operating activity, and so is collecting the cash from the customer at a later time. Recording sales and expenses can be thought of as primary operating activities because they affect profit. Their associated transactions are secondary operating activities because they don’t affect profit. However, they do affect cash flow, which we explain in this chapter.

Figure 4-1 presents the statement of cash flows for the product business example we introduce in Chapters 2 and 3 in this minibook. What you see in the first section of the statement of cash flows is called the direct method for reporting cash flow from operating activities. The dollar amounts are the cash flows connected with sales and expenses. For example, the business collected $25,550,000 from customers during the year, which is the direct result of making sales. The company paid $15,025,000 for the products it sells, some of which went toward increasing the inventory of products awaiting sale next period.

Note: Because we use the same business example in this chapter that we use in Chapters 2 and 3 in this minibook, you may want to take a moment to review the 2017 income statement in Figure 2-1. And you may want to review Figure 3-3, which summarizes how the three types of activities changed the business’s assets, liabilities, and owners’ equity accounts during the year 2017. (Go ahead, we’ll wait.)

The basic idea of the direct method is to present the sales revenue and expenses of the business on a cash basis, in contrast to the amounts reported in the income statement, which are on the accrual basis for recording revenue and expenses. Accrual basis accounting is real-time accounting that records transactions when economic events happen: Accountants record sales on credit when the sales take place, even though cash isn’t collected from customers until sometime later. Cash payments for expenses occur before or after the expenses are recorded. Cash basis accounting is just what it says: Transactions aren’t recorded until there’s actual cash flow (in or out).

The revenue and expense cash flows you see in Figure 4-1 differ from the amounts you see in the accrual accounting basis income statement (see Book 1, Chapter 2’s Figure 2-1). Herein lies a problem with the direct method. If you, a conscientious reader of the financial statements of a business, compare the revenues and expenses reported in the income statement with the cash flow amounts reported in the statement of cash flows, you may get confused. Which set of numbers is the correct one? Well, both are. The numbers in the income statement are the true numbers for measuring profit for the period. The numbers in the statement of cash flows are additional information for you to ponder.

Notice in Figure 4-1 that cash flow from operating activities for the year is $1,515,000, which is less than the company’s $1,690,000 net income for the year (refer to Book 1, Chapter 2’s Figure 2-1). The accounting rule-making board thought that financial report readers would want an explanation for the difference between these two important financial numbers. Therefore, the board decreed that a statement of cash flows that uses the direct method of reporting cash flow from operating liabilities should include a reconciliation schedule that explains the difference between cash flow from operating activities and net income.

Opting for the indirect method

Having to read both the operating activities section of the cash flow statement and a supplemental schedule gets to be rather demanding for financial statement readers. Accordingly, the accounting rule-making body decided to permit an alternative method for reporting cash flow from operating activities. The alternative method starts with net income and then makes adjustments in order to reconcile cash flow from operating activities with net income. This alternative method is called the indirect method, which we show in Figure 4-2. The rest of the cash flow statement is the same, no matter which option is selected for reporting cash flow from operating activities. Compare the investing and financing activities in Figures 4-1 and 4-2; they’re the same.

By the way, the adjustments to net income in the indirect method for reporting cash flow from operating activities (see Figure 4-2) constitute the supplemental schedule of changes in assets and liabilities that has to be included under the direct method. So the indirect method kills two birds with one stone: Net income is adjusted to the cash flow basis, and the changes in assets and liabilities affecting cash flow are included in the statement. It’s no surprise that the vast majority of businesses use the indirect method.

The indirect method for reporting cash flow from operating activities focuses on the changes during the year in the assets and liabilities that are directly associated with sales and expenses. We explain these connections between revenue and expenses and their corresponding assets and liabilities in Book 1, Chapter 2. (You can trace the amounts of these changes back to Book 1, Chapter 3’s Figure 3-2.)

Both the direct method and the indirect method report the same cash flow from operating activities for the period. Almost always, this important financial metric for a business differs from the amount of its bottom-line profit, or net income, for the same period. Why? Read on.

Accounts receivable change

Synopsis: An increase in accounts receivable hurts cash flow; a decrease helps cash flow.

The accounts receivable asset shows how much money customers who bought products on credit still owe the business; this asset is a promise of cash that the business will receive. Basically, accounts receivable is the amount of uncollected sales revenue at the end of the period. Cash doesn’t increase until the business collects money from its customers.

The business started the year with $2.15 million and ended the year with $2.6 million in accounts receivable. The beginning balance was collected during the year, but the ending balance hadn’t been collected at the end of the year. Thus, the net effect is a shortfall in cash inflow of $450,000. The key point is that you need to keep an eye on the increase or decrease in accounts receivable from the beginning of the period to the end of the period. Here’s what to look for:

• Increase in accounts receivable: If the amount of credit sales you made during the period is greater than what you collected from customers during the period, your accounts receivable increased over the period, and you need to subtract from net income that difference between start-of-period accounts receivable and end-of-period accounts receivable. In short, an increase in accounts receivable hurts cash flow by the amount of the increase.
• Decrease in accounts receivable: If the amount you collected from customers during the period is greater than the credit sales you made during the period, your accounts receivable decreased over the period, and you need to add to net income that difference between start-of-period accounts receivable and end-of-period accounts receivable. In short, a decrease in accounts receivable helps cash flow by the amount of the decrease.

In our business example, accounts receivable increased $450,000. Cash collections from sales were $450,000 less than sales revenue. Ouch! The business increased its sales substantially over the last period, so its accounts receivable increased. When credit sales increase, a company’s accounts receivable generally increases about the same percent, as it did in this example. (If the business takes longer to collect its credit sales, its accounts receivable would increase even more than can be attributed to the sales increase.) In this example, the higher sales revenue was good for profit but bad for cash flow.

The lagging behind effect of cash flow is the price of growth — business managers, lenders, and investors need to understand this point. Increasing sales without increasing accounts receivable is a happy situation for cash flow, but in the real world, you usually can’t have one increase without the other.

Inventory change

Synopsis: An increase in inventory hurts cash flow; a decrease helps cash flow.

Inventory is usually the largest short-term, or current, asset of businesses that sell products. If the inventory account is greater at the end of the period than at the start of the period — because unit costs increased or because the quantity of products increased — the amount the business actually paid out in cash for inventory purchases (or for manufacturing products) is more than what the business recorded in the cost of goods sold expense for the period. To refresh your memory here: The cost of inventory is not charged to cost of goods sold expense until products are sold and sales revenue is recorded.

In our business example, inventory increased $725,000 from start-of-year to end-of-year. In other words, to support its higher sales levels in 2017, this business replaced the products that it sold during the year and increased its inventory by $725,000. The business had to come up with the cash to pay for this inventory increase. Basically, the business wrote checks amounting to $725,000 more than its cost of goods sold expense for the period. This step-up in its inventory level was necessary to support the higher sales level, which increased profit even though cash flow took a hit.

Prepaid expenses change

Synopsis: An increase in prepaid expenses (an asset account) hurts cash flow; a decrease helps cash flow.

A change in the prepaid expenses asset account works the same way as a change in inventory and accounts receivable, although changes in prepaid expenses are usually much smaller than changes in the other two asset accounts.

The beginning balance of prepaid expenses is charged to expense this year, but the cash of this amount was actually paid out last year. This period (the year 2017 in our example), the business paid cash for next period’s prepaid expenses, which affects this period’s cash flow but doesn’t affect net income until next period. In short, the $75,000 increase in prepaid expenses in this business example has a negative effect on cash flow.

As a business grows, it needs to increase its prepaid expenses for such things as fire insurance (premiums have to be paid in advance of the insurance coverage) and its stocks of office and data processing supplies. Increases in accounts receivable, inventory, and prepaid expenses are the cash-flow price a business has to pay for growth. Rarely do you find a business that can increase its sales revenue without increasing these assets.

Depreciation: Real but noncash expense

Synopsis: No cash outlay is made in recording depreciation. In recording depreciation, a business simply decreases the book (recorded) value of the asset being depreciated. Cash isn’t affected by the recording of depreciation (keeping in mind that depreciation is deductible for income tax).

Recording depreciation expense decreases the value of long-term, fixed operating assets that are reported in the balance sheet. The original costs of fixed assets are recorded in a property, plant, and equipment type account. Depreciation is recorded in an accumulated depreciation account, which is a so-called contra account because its balance is deducted from the balance in the fixed asset account (see Book 1, Chapter 3’s Figure 3-2). Recording depreciation increases the accumulated depreciation account, which decreases the book value of the fixed asset.

There’s no cash outlay when recording depreciation expense. Sales prices should be set high enough so that the cash inflow from revenue reimburses the business for the use of its long-term operating assets as they gradually wear out over time. The amount of depreciation expense recorded in the period is a portion of the original cost of the business’s fixed assets, most of which were bought and paid for years ago. (Chapters 2 and 3 in this minibook explain more about depreciation.) Because the depreciation expense isn’t a cash outlay this period, the amount is added to net income to determine cash flow from operating activities (see Figure 4-2). Depreciation is just one adjustment factor to get from net income reported in the income statement to cash flow from operating activities reported in the statement of cash flows.

For measuring profit, depreciation is definitely an expense — no doubt about it. Buildings, machinery, equipment, tools, vehicles, computers, and office furniture are all on an irreversible journey to the junk heap (although buildings usually take a long time to get there). Fixed assets (except for land) have a finite life of usefulness to a business; depreciation is the accounting method that allocates the total cost of fixed assets to each year of their use in helping the business generate sales revenue. In our example, the business recorded $775,000 depreciation expense for the year.

Instead of looking at depreciation only as an expense, consider the investment-recovery cycle of fixed assets. A business invests money in fixed assets that are then used for several or many years. Over the life of a fixed asset, a business has to recover through sales revenue the cost invested in the fixed asset (ignoring any salvage value at the end of its useful life). In a real sense, a business sells some of its fixed assets each period to its customers — it factors the cost of fixed assets into the sales prices that it charges its customers.

For example, when you go to a supermarket, a very small slice of the price you pay for that quart of milk goes toward the cost of the building, the shelves, the refrigeration equipment, and so on. (No wonder they charge so much!) Each period, a business recoups part of the cost invested in its fixed assets. In the example, $775,000 of sales revenue went toward reimbursing the business for the use of its fixed assets during the year.

Changes in operating liabilities

Synopsis: An increase in a short-term operating liability helps cash flow; a decrease hurts cash flow.

The business in our example, like almost all businesses, has three basic liabilities inextricably intertwined with its expenses:

• Accounts payable
• Accrued expenses payable
• Income tax payable

When the beginning balance of one of these liability accounts is the same as its ending balance (not too likely, of course), the business breaks even on cash flow for that liability. When the end-of-period balance is higher than the start-of-period balance, the business didn’t pay out as much money as was recorded as an expense in the year. You want to refer to the company’s comparative balance sheet of the business to compare the beginning and ending balances of these three liability accounts (see Book 1, Chapter 3’s Figure 3-2).

In our business example, the business disbursed $640,000 to pay off last year’s accounts payable balance. (This $640,000 was the accounts payable balance at December 31, 2016, the end of the previous fiscal year.) Its cash this year decreased $640,000 because of these payments. But this year’s ending balance sheet (at December 31, 2017) shows accounts payable of $765,000 that the business won’t pay until the following year. This $765,000 amount was recorded to expense in the year 2017. So the amount of expense was $125,000 more than the cash outlay for the year, or, in reverse, the cash outlay was $125,000 less than the expense. An increase in accounts payable benefits cash flow for the year. In other words, an increase in accounts payable has a positive cash flow effect (until the liability is paid). An increase in accrued expenses payable or income tax payable works the same way.

In short, liability increases are favorable to cash flow — in a sense, the business ran up more on credit than it paid off. Such an increase means that the business delayed paying cash for certain things until next year. So you need to add the increases in the three liabilities to net income to determine cash flow, as you see in the statement of cash flows (refer to Figure 4-2). The business avoided cash outlays to the extent of the increases in these three liabilities. In some cases, of course, the ending balance of an operating liability may be lower than its beginning balance, which means that the business paid out more cash than the corresponding expenses for the period. In that case, the decrease is a negative cash flow factor.

Putting the cash flow pieces together

Taking into account all the adjustments to net income, the company’s cash balance increased $1,515,000 from its operating activities during the course of the year. The operating activities section in the statement of cash flows (refer to Figure 4-2) shows the stepping-stones from net income to the amount of cash flow from operating activities.

Recall that the business experienced sales growth during this period. The downside of sales growth is that assets and liabilities also grow — the business needs more inventory at the higher sales level and also has higher accounts receivable. The business’s prepaid expenses and liabilities also increased, although not nearly as much as accounts receivable and inventory. Still, the business had $1,515,000 cash at its disposal. What did the business do with this $1,515,000 in available cash? You have to look to the remainder of the cash flow statement to answer this very important question.

Understanding investing activities

The second section of the statement of cash flows (see Figure 4-1 or 4-2) reports the investment actions that a business’s managers took during the year. Investments are like tea leaves indicating what the future may hold for the company. Major new investments are sure signs of expanding or modernizing the production and distribution facilities and capacity of the business. Major disposals of long-term assets and shedding off a major part of the business could be good news or bad news for the business, depending on many factors. Different investors may interpret this information differently, but all would agree that the information in this section of the cash flow statement is very important.

Certain long-lived operating assets are required for doing business. For example, Federal Express and UPS wouldn’t be terribly successful if they didn’t have airplanes and trucks for delivering packages and computers for tracking deliveries. When these assets wear out, the business needs to replace them. Also, to remain competitive, a business may need to upgrade its equipment to take advantage of the latest technology or to provide for growth. These investments in long-lived, tangible, productive assets, which are called fixed assets, are critical to the future of the business. In fact, these cash outlays are called capital expenditures to stress that capital is being invested for the long haul.

One of the first claims on the $1,515,000 cash flow from operating activities is for capital expenditures. Notice that the business spent $1,275,000 on fixed assets, which are referred to more formally as property, plant, and equipment in the cash flow statement (to keep the terminology consistent with account titles used in the balance sheet; the term fixed assets is rather informal).

A typical statement of cash flows doesn’t go into much detail regarding what specific types of fixed assets the business purchased (or constructed): how many additional square feet of space the business acquired, how many new drill presses it bought, and so on. Some businesses do leave a clearer trail of their investments, though. For example, in the footnotes or elsewhere in their financial reports, airlines generally describe how many new aircraft of each kind were purchased to replace old equipment or to expand their fleets.

Usually, a business disposes of some of its fixed assets every year because they reached the end of their useful lives and will no longer be used. These fixed assets are sent to the junkyard, traded in on new fixed assets, or sold for relatively small amounts of money. The value of a fixed asset at the end of its useful life is called its salvage value. The disposal proceeds from selling fixed assets are reported as a source of cash in the investing activities section of the statement of cash flows. Usually, these amounts are fairly small. Also, a business may sell off fixed assets because it’s downsizing or abandoning a major segment of its business; these cash proceeds can be fairly large.

Looking at financing activities

Note that in the annual statement of cash flows for the business example, cash flow from operating activities is a positive $1,515,000, and the negative cash flow from investing activities is $1,275,000 (refer to Figure 4-1 or 4-2). The result to this point, therefore, is a net cash increase of $240,000, which would have increased the company’s cash balance this much if the business had no financing activities during the year. However, the business increased its short-term and long-term debt during the year, its owners invested additional money in the business, and it distributed some of its profit to stockholders. The third section of the cash flow statement summarizes these financing activities of the business over the period.

The managers didn’t have to go outside the business for the $1,515,000 cash increase generated from its operating activities for the year. Cash flow from operating activities is an internal source of money generated by the business itself, in contrast to external money that the business raises from lenders and owners. A business doesn’t have to go hat in hand for external money when its internal cash flow is sufficient to provide for its growth. Making profit is the cash flow spigot that should always be turned on.

A business that earns a profit could, nevertheless, have a negative cash flow from operating activities — meaning that despite posting a net income for the period, the changes in the company’s assets and liabilities cause its cash balance to decrease. In contrast, a business could report a bottom-line loss for the year yet have a positive cash flow from its operating activities. The cash recovery from depreciation plus the cash benefits from decreases in accounts receivable and inventory could be more than the amount of loss. However, a loss usually leads to negative cash flow or very little positive cash flow.

The term financing refers to a business raising capital from debt and equity sources — by borrowing money from banks and other sources willing to loan money to the business and by its owners putting additional money in the business. The term also includes the flip side — that is, making payments on debt and returning capital to owners. The term financing also includes cash distributions by the business from profit to its owners. (Keep in mind that interest on debt is an expense reported in the income statement.)

Most businesses borrow money for the short term (generally defined as less than one year) as well as for longer terms (generally defined as more than one year). In other words, a typical business has both short-term and long-term debt. (Book 1, Chapter 3 explains that short-term debt is presented in the current liabilities section of the balance sheet.)

The business in our example has both short-term and long-term debt. Although this isn’t a hard-and-fast rule, most cash flow statements report just the net increase or decrease in short-term debt, not the total amounts borrowed and total payments on short-term debt during the period. In contrast, both the total amounts of borrowing from and repayments on long-term debt during the year are generally reported in the statement of cash flows — the numbers are reported gross, instead of net.

In our example, no long-term debt was paid down during the year, but short-term debt was paid off during the year and replaced with new short-term notes payable. However, only the $100,000 net increase is reported in the cash flow statement. The business also increased its long-term debt by $150,000 (refer to Figure 4-1 or 4-2).

The financing section of the cash flow statement also reports the flow of cash between the business and its owners (stockholders of a corporation). Owners can be both a source of a business’s cash (capital invested by owners) and a use of a business’s cash (profit distributed to owners). The financing activities section of the cash flow statement reports additional capital raised from its owners, if any, as well as any capital returned to the owners. In the cash flow statement, note that the business issued additional stock shares for $150,000 during the year, and it paid a total of $750,000 cash dividends from profit to its owners.

Reading actively

As a business lender or investor, your job is to ask questions (at least in your own mind) when reading an external financial statement. You should be an active reader, not a ho-hum passive reader, when reading the statement of cash flows. You should mull over certain questions to get full value out of the financial statement.

The statement of cash flows reveals what financial decisions the business’s managers made during the period. Of course, management decisions are always subject to second-guessing and criticism, and passing judgment based on reading a financial statement isn’t totally fair because it doesn’t capture the pressures the managers faced during the period. Maybe they made the best possible decisions in the circumstances. Then again, maybe not.

One issue comes to the forefront when reading the company’s statement of cash flows. The business in our example (see Figure 4-1 or 4-2) distributed $750,000 cash from profit to its owners — a 44 percent payout ratio (which equals the $750,000 distribution divided by its $1,690,000 net income). In analyzing whether the payout ratio is too high, too low, or just about right, you need to look at the broader context of the business’s sources of and needs for cash.

The company’s $1,515,000 cash flow from operating activities is enough to cover the business’s $1,275,000 capital expenditures during the year and still leave $240,000 available. The business increased its total debt $250,000. Combined, these two cash sources provided $490,000 to the business. The owners also kicked in another $150,000 during the year, for a grand total of $640,000. Its cash balance didn’t increase by this amount because the business paid out $750,000 in dividends from profit to its stockholders. Therefore, its cash balance dropped $110,000.

If we were on the board of directors of this business, we certainly would ask the chief executive why cash dividends to shareowners weren’t limited to $240,000 to avoid the increase in debt and to avoid having shareowners invest additional money in the business. We’d probably ask the chief executive to justify the amount of capital expenditures as well.

Some small and privately owned businesses don’t report a statement of cash flows — though according to current financial reporting standards that apply to all businesses, they should. We’ve seen several small, privately owned businesses that don’t go to the trouble of preparing this financial statement. Perhaps someday accounting standards for private and smaller businesses will waive the requirement for the cash flow statement. (We discuss developments of accounting standards for larger public versus smaller private companies in Book 1, Chapter 1.) Without a cash flow statement, the reader of the financial report could add back depreciation to net income to get a starting point. From there on, it gets more challenging to determine cash flow from profit. Adding depreciation to net income is no more than a first step in determining cash flow from profit — but we have to admit it’s better than nothing.