APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 2
Swap, Spot, and Forward Rates

A2.1 CONTINUOUS COMPOUNDING

Equation (2.7) gives the proceeds of investing upper F for upper N periods at the rate ModifyingAbove r With caret, which is compounded n times per year. By the definition of n, there are n upper T periods over upper T years. Therefore, with upper F equals 1, (2.7) becomes,

Under continuous compounding, interest is paid every instant, so that the proceeds of an investment that is continuously compounded over upper T years grows to the limit of Equation (A2.1) as n approaches infinity. Taking the logarithm of (A2.1) and rearranging terms,

Using l'Hôpital's rule, the limit of the right‐hand side of (A2.2) as n becomes large is ModifyingAbove r With caret upper T. Hence, the limit of (A2.1) is e Superscript ModifyingAbove r With caret upper T, where e is the base of the natural logarithm. Therefore, if interest is continuously compounded at the rate ModifyingAbove r With caret, an investment of one unit of currency will grow after upper T years to,

(A2.3)e Superscript ModifyingAbove r With caret upper T

Equivalently, the present value of one unit of currency to be received in upper T years is,

This section now defines discount factors, spot rates, and forward rates under continuous compounding. Let ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis be the t‐year continuously compounded spot rate. Let f left-parenthesis t minus normal upper Delta comma t right-parenthesis be the forward rate from t minus normal upper Delta to t, and define f left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis to be the continuously compounded forward rate at time t, that is, the limit of f left-parenthesis t minus normal upper Delta comma t right-parenthesis as normal upper Delta approaches zero.

By Equation (A2.4), spot rates and discount factors are related such that,

Linking forward rates and spot rates is the continuously compounded analog of Equation (2.21),

(A2.6)StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column e Superscript ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis upper T 2nd Column equals e Superscript integral Subscript 0 Superscript upper T Baseline f left-parenthesis s right-parenthesis d s EndLayout
(A2.7)StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis upper T 2nd Column equals integral Subscript 0 Superscript upper T Baseline f left-parenthesis s right-parenthesis d s EndLayout
(A2.8)StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis 2nd Column equals StartFraction 1 Over upper T EndFraction integral Subscript 0 Superscript upper T Baseline f left-parenthesis s right-parenthesis d s EndLayout

To link forward rates and discount factors, note that the continuously compounded analogue of Equation (2.20) is,

(A2.9)e Superscript ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t minus normal upper Delta right-parenthesis times left-parenthesis t minus normal upper Delta right-parenthesis Baseline e Superscript f left-parenthesis t minus normal upper Delta comma t right-parenthesis normal upper Delta Baseline equals e Superscript ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis t

Then substitute from Equation (A2.5) for each of the two spot rates and rearrange terms to get,

(A2.10)e Superscript f left-parenthesis t minus normal upper Delta comma t right-parenthesis times normal upper Delta Baseline equals StartFraction d left-parenthesis t minus normal upper Delta right-parenthesis Over d left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis EndFraction

Then take the natural logarithm of both sides and rearrange terms,

(A2.11)f left-parenthesis t minus normal upper Delta comma t right-parenthesis equals minus StartFraction ln left-bracket d left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis right-bracket minus ln left-bracket d left-parenthesis t minus normal upper Delta right-parenthesis right-bracket Over normal upper Delta EndFraction

Finally, take the limit of both sides of this equation, recognizing that the limit of the right‐hand side is the derivative of ln left-bracket d left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis right-bracket, to obtain,

(A2.12)f left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis equals minus StartFraction d prime left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis Over d left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis EndFraction

where d prime left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis is the derivative of the discount function with respect to term.

A2.2 RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SWAP OR PAR, SPOT, AND FORWARD RATES

This section will work with semiannually compounded rates, though it could easily be cast in terms of other compounding intervals.

Approximation: The t‐year spot rate is approximately equal to the average of all forward rates to year t.

Start from Equation (2.21), noting that, because interest rates themselves are small numbers, the product of two or more interest rates is particularly small. To illustrate, take the case of the one‐year spot rate, though the argument generalizes easily to longer‐term rates,

(A2.13)StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column left-parenthesis 1 plus StartFraction ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis 1.0 right-parenthesis Over 2 EndFraction right-parenthesis squared 2nd Column equals left-parenthesis 1 plus StartFraction f left-parenthesis 0.5 right-parenthesis Over 2 EndFraction right-parenthesis left-parenthesis 1 plus StartFraction f left-parenthesis 1 right-parenthesis Over 2 EndFraction right-parenthesis EndLayout

where the approximation from (A2.14) to (A2.15) comes from dropping the terms that multiply two rates.

Proposition 1:

Proof: Define upper S as the left‐hand side of (A2.16). Then,

z upper S equals sigma-summation Underscript t equals a plus 1 Overscript b plus 1 Endscripts z Superscript t

and it follows that,

StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column upper S minus z upper S 2nd Column equals sigma-summation Underscript t equals a Overscript b Endscripts z Superscript t Baseline minus sigma-summation Underscript t equals a plus 1 Overscript b plus 1 Endscripts z Superscript t Baseline 2nd Row 1st Column upper S left-parenthesis 1 minus z right-parenthesis 2nd Column equals z Superscript a Baseline minus z Superscript b plus 1 Baseline 3rd Row 1st Column upper S 2nd Column equals StartFraction z Superscript a Baseline minus z Superscript b plus 1 Baseline Over 1 minus z EndFraction EndLayout

as was to be shown.

Proposition 2: If the term structure of spot rates is flat, then the term structure of par rates is flat at that same rate.

Proof: Denote the semiannually compounded par rate of maturity upper T as upper C left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis. If spot rates are flat at the rate ModifyingAbove r With caret, then, by definition of upper C left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis,

(A2.17)StartFraction upper C left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis Over 2 EndFraction sigma-summation Underscript t equals 1 Overscript 2 upper T Endscripts StartFraction 1 Over left-parenthesis 1 plus StartFraction ModifyingAbove r With caret Over 2 EndFraction right-parenthesis Superscript t Baseline EndFraction plus StartFraction 1 Over left-parenthesis 1 plus StartFraction ModifyingAbove r With caret Over 2 EndFraction right-parenthesis Superscript 2 upper T Baseline EndFraction equals 1

Applying Equation (A2.16) of Proposition 1 with z equals 1 slash left-parenthesis 1 plus ModifyingAbove r With caret slash 2 right-parenthesis,

But solving (A2.18) for upper C left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis shows that upper C left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis equals ModifyingAbove r With caret. Hence, the term structure of par rates is flat at ModifyingAbove r With caret, as was to be shown.

Proposition 3: f left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis greater-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t minus 0.5 right-parenthesis if and only if ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis greater-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t minus 0.5 right-parenthesis.

Proof: The condition f left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis greater-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t minus 0.5 right-parenthesis is equivalent to,

But, using Equation (2.20) to rewrite the left‐hand side of (A2.19),

(A2.20)left-parenthesis 1 plus StartFraction ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis Over 2 EndFraction right-parenthesis Superscript 2 t Baseline greater-than left-parenthesis 1 plus StartFraction ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t minus 0.5 right-parenthesis Over 2 EndFraction right-parenthesis Superscript 2 t
(A2.21)ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis greater-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t minus 0.5 right-parenthesis

as was to be shown.

Proposition 4: f left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis less-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t minus 0.5 right-parenthesis if and only if ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis less-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t minus 0.5 right-parenthesis.

Proof: Reverse the inequalities in the proof of Proposition 3.

Proposition 5: If ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis 0.5 right-parenthesis less-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis 1.0 right-parenthesis less-than midline-horizontal-ellipsis less-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis, then upper C left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis less-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis.

Proof: By the definition of the par rate, upper C left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis,

It is easy to show from Equation (A2.16), setting z equals 1 slash left-parenthesis 1 plus upper C left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis slash 2 right-parenthesis, that,

And, because the term structure of spot rates is assumed to be increasing,

Note that the spot rates in the summation on the top line are ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis, while those in the summation in the bottom line are all ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis.

Now, because the left‐hand sides of Equations (A2.22), (A2.23), and (A2.24) are all equal to one, the left‐hand side of (A2.23) can replace the left‐hand side of (A2.24), that is,

which implies that upper C left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis less-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis, which was to be proved.

Proposition 6: If ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis 0.5 right-parenthesis greater-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis 1.0 right-parenthesis greater-than midline-horizontal-ellipsis greater-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis, then upper C left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis greater-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis.

Proof: Reverse the inequalities of Equations (A2.24) and (A2.25) in the previous proof to conclude that upper C left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis greater-than ModifyingAbove r With caret left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis, as was to be proved.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.222.21.30