The following table provides a comparison between the Spiral model and the traditional Waterfall model:
Sr.No. |
Waterfall |
Spiral |
1 |
In the software development life cycle, business requirements are frozen after the initial phase. |
In the spiral model, requirements are not frozen by the end of the initial phase. It is kind of executed in a continuous mode. |
2 |
In terms of project execution, there is a high level of risk and uncertainty because of the missing stringent risk management. |
By design, the spiral model is modeled to handle better risk management |
3 |
The Waterfall framework type is more of a linear sequential model. |
The framework type of the spiral model is based on an iterative process; within each iteration, the linear model is preferred. |
4 |
As the user involvement is only at the beginning of the process, it turns down communication between the customer and developer throughout the development cycle. |
User involvement and communication is at a high-degree level between the end user and the engineer. |
5 |
As the model is kind of one-time execution, the reusability factor is least possible here. |
During execution of the multiple iterations, the possibility of reusability is quite necessary and developed by nature. |