Introduction to Communications-Based Train Control ◾ 3
is simple train signaling system is similar to road trac light signaling systems.
Due to its simplicity, this train control philosophy has served the industry well and
continues in service operation at many major train transit systems around the world.
Nevertheless, with this train signaling architecture, the wayside logic does not know
the exact location of the train in the track circuit. Instead, it only knows that the
train is located somewhere in the block. Because the blocks cannot move, this kind
of systems is known as xed block systems. e main drawback of this system is that
the achievable train throughput and operational exibility are limited by the xed-
block, track circuit conguration and associated wayside signal aspects.
e next evolution in train signaling was also track circuit-based with the way-
side signals replaced by in-cab signals, providing continuous ATP through the use of
speed codes transmitted from the wayside through the running rails to the train. Such
coded track circuits were developed by signaling suppliers in the United States around
the middle of the last century. Although they were not immediately applied to transit
railways, they ultimately made a signicant contribution to the next- generation train
control systems. With this train control architecture, a portion of the train control
logic and equipment is transferred to the train, with equipment capable of detecting
and reacting to speed codes, and displaying movement authority information (per-
mitted speed and signal aspects) to the train operator. is generation of train control
technology permits automatic driving modes, but train throughput and operational
exibility are still limited by the track circuit layout and the number of available
speed codes. is generation of signaling technology entered service in the latter half
of the twentieth century, including the Washington (WMATA), Atlanta (MARTA),
and San Francisco (BART) systems in the United States, the London Underground’s
Victoria Line, and the initial rail lines in Hong Kong and Singapore. Many rail transit
agencies also adopted this technology in order to transit ATO with continuous ATP,
such as London Underground’s Central Line resignaling.
e next signicant evolution in the train signaling architecture continued the
trend to provide more precise control of train movements by increasing the amount
of data transmitted to the train such that the train could now be controlled and
supervised to follow a specic speed–distance prole, rather than simply respond-
ing to a limited number of individual speed codes. is generation of train control
technology, also referred to as “distance-to-go” technology, can support automatic
driving modes and improve train throughput. Under this train control architec-
ture, the limits of a train’s movement authority are still determined by track circuit
occupancies, as illustrated in Figure1.2.
e wayside processor in Figure1.2, knowing the location of all trains via track
circuits, can generate coded messages to each track circuit. is information con-
tains the permitted line speed, the target speed for the train, and the distance-to-go
to the target speed. Using this information, the train’s onboard equipment calculates
the speed–distance prole for the train to follow. In addition, a track map database
with grade, curvature, station location, and civil speed limit information is stored
within each train’s cab signaling equipment. e train knows which track circuit it