Appendix D
Because of various advantages involved, it is customary in power system analysis calculations to use impedances, currents, voltages, and powers in per-unit values (which are scaled or normalized values) rather than in physical values of ohms, amperes, kilovolts, and megavoltamperes (or megavars, or megawatts).
A per-unit system is a means of expressing quantities for ease in comparing them. The per-unit value of any quantity is defined as the ratio of the quantity to an “arbitrarily” chosen base (i.e., reference) value having the same dimensions. Therefore, the per-unit value of any quantity can be defined as physical quantity
Quantity in per unit =Physical quantityBase value of quantity(D.1)
where “physical quantity” refers to the given value in ohms, amperes, volts, etc. The base value is also called unit value since in the per-unit system it has a value of 1, or unity. Therefore, a base current is also referred to as a unit current.
Since both the physical quantity and base quantity have the same dimensions, the resulting perunit value expressed as a decimal has no dimension and, therefore, is simply indicated by a subscript pu. The base quantity is indicated by a subscript B. The symbol for per unit is pu, or 0/1. The percent system is obtained by multiplying the per-unit value by 100. Hence,
Quantity in percent=Physical quantityBase value of quantity×100(D.2)
However, the percent system is somewhat more difficult to work with and more subject to possible error since it must always be remembered that the quantities have been multiplied by 100.
Thus, the factor 100 has to be continually inserted or removed for reasons that may not be obvious at the time. For example, 40% reactance times 100% current is equal to 4000% voltage, which, of course, must be corrected to 40% voltage. Hence, the per-unit system is preferred in power system calculations. The advantages of using the per-unit system include the following:
In the event that any two of the four base quantities (i.e., base voltage, base current, base voltamperes, and base impedance) are “arbitrarily” specified, the other two can be determined immediately.
Here, the term arbitrarily is slightly misleading since in practice the base values are selected so as to force the results to fall into specified ranges. For example, the base voltage is selected such that the system voltage is normally close to unity.
Similarly, the base voltampere is usually selected as the kilovoltampere or megavoltampere rating of one of the machines or transformers in the system, or a convenient round number such as 1, 10, 100, or 1000 MVA, depending on system size. As aforementioned, on determining the base voltamperes and base voltages, the other base values are fixed. For example, current base can be determined as
IB=SBVB=VABVB(D.3)
where
Note that
SB=VAB=PB=QB=VBIB(D.4)
Similarly, the impedance base* can be determined as
ZB=VBIB(D.5)
where
ZB=XB=RB(D.6)
Similarly,
YB=BB=GB=IBVB(D.7)
Note that by substituting Equation D.3 into Equation D.5, the impedance base can be expressed as
ZB=VBVAB/VB=V2BVAB(D.8)
or
ZB=(kVB)2MVAB(D.9)
where
The per-unit value of any quantity can be found by the normalization process, that is, by dividing the physical quantity by the base quantity of the same dimension. For example, the per-unit impedance can be expressed as
Zpu=ZphysicalZB(D.10)
or
Zpu=ZphysicalV2B/(kVAB×1000)ZB(D.11)
or
Zpu=(Zphysical)(kVAB)(1000)V2B(D.12)
or
Zpu=(Zphysical)(kVAB)(kVB)2(1000)(D.13)
or
Zpu=(Zphysical)(kVB)2/MVAB(D.14)
or
Zpu=(Zphysical)(MVAB)(kVB)2(D.15)
Similarly, the others can be expressed as
Ipu=IphysicalIB(D.16)
or
Vpu=VPhysicalVB(D.17)
or
kVpu=kVphysicalkVB(D.18)
or
VApu=VAphysicalVAB(D.19)
or
kVApu=kVAphysicalkVAB(D.20)
or
MVApu=MVAphysicalMVAB(D.21)
Note that the base quantity is always a real number, whereas the physical quantity can be a complex number. For example, if the actual impedance quantity is given as Z∠θ Ω, it can be expressed in the per-unit system as
Zpu=Z∠θZB=Zpu∠θ(D.22)
that is, it is the magnitude expressed in per-unit terms.
Alternatively, if the impedance has been given in rectangular form as
Z=R+jX(D.23)
then
Zpu=Rpu+jXpu(D.24)
where
Rpu=RphysicalZB(D.25)
and
Xpu=XphysicalZB(D.26)
Similarly, if the complex power has been given as
S=P+jQ(D.27)
then
Spu=Ppu+jQpu(D.28)
where
Ppu=PphysicalSB(D.29)
and
Qpu=QphysicalSB(D.30)
If the actual voltage and current values are given as
V=V∠θv(D.31)
and
I=I∠θI(D.32)
the complex power can be expressed as
S=VI*(D.33)
or
S∠θ=(V∠θv)(I∠−θI)(D.34)
Therefore, dividing through by SB,
S∠ϕSB=(V∠θv)(I∠θI)SB(D.35)
However,
SB=VBIB(D.36)
Thus,
S∠θSB=(V∠θv)(I∠−θI)VBIB(D.37)
or
Spu∠θ=(vpu∠θV)(Ipu∠−θI) (D.38)
or
Spu=VpuI*pu(D.39)
Example D.1
A 240/120 V single-phase transformer rated 5 kVA has a high-voltage winding impedance of 0.3603 Ω. Use 240 V and 5 kVA as the base quantities and determine the following:
Solution:
IB(HV)=SBVB(HV)=5000VA240V=20.8333A
ZB(HV)=VB(HV)IB(HV)=240V20.8333A=11.52Ω
Zpu(HV)=ZHVZB(HV)=0.3603Ω11.51Ω=0.0313pu
%ZHV=Zpu(HV)×100=(0.0313pu) 100=3.13%
n=VHVVLV=240 V120V=2
IB(LV)=SBVB(LV)=5000VA120V=41.6667A
or
IB(LV)=nIB(LV)=2(20.8333A)=41.6667
ZB(LV)=VB(LV)IB(LV)=120V41.667A=2.88Ω
or
ZB(HV)=ZB(LV)n2=2.88 Ω
ZLV=ZHVn2=0.3603Ω22=0.0901Ω
Therefore,
Zpu(LV)=ZLVZB(LV)=0.0901Ω2.88Ω=0.0313Ω
or
Zpu(LV)=Zpu(HV)=0.0313pu
Notice that in terms of per units the impedance of the transformer is the same whether it is referred to the high-voltage side or the low-voltage side.
Example D.2
Redo the Example D.1 by using MATLAB®.
Solution:
% MATLAB SCRIPT for Example D.1
clear
clc
%System Parameters
VBhv = 240;
VBlv = 120;
SB = 5e3;
Zhv = 0.3603;
%Solution for part (a)
IBhv = SB/VBhv
%Solution for part (b)
ZBhv = VBhv/IBhv
%Solution for part (c)
Zpu_hv = Zhv/ZBhv
%Solution for part (d)
percent_Zhv = Zpu_hv*100
%Solution for part (e)
n = VBhv/VBlv
%Solution for part (f)
IBlv = SB/VBlv
IBlv = n*IBhv
%Solution for part (g)
ZBlv = VBlv/IBlv
ZBlv = ZBhv/n^2
%Solution for part (h)
Zlv = Zhv/n^2
Zpu_lv = Zlv/ZBlv
Zpu_lv = Zpu_hv
IBhv =
20.8333
ZBhv =
11.5200
Zpu_hv =
0.0313
percent_Zhv =
3.1276
n =
2
IBlv =
41.6667
IBlv =
41.6667
ZBlv =
2.8800
ZBlv =
2.8800
Zlv =
0.0901
Zpu_lv =
0.0313
Zpu_lv =
0.0313
>>
The physical values (or system values) and per-unit values are related by the following relationships:
I=Ipu×IB(D.40)
V=Vpu×VB(D.41)
Z=Zpu×ZB(D.42)
R=Rpu×ZB(D.43)
X=Xpu×ZB(D.44)
VA=VApu×VAB(D.45)
P=Ppu×VAB(D.46)
Q=Qpu×VAB(D.47)
In general, the per-unit impedance of a power apparatus is given based on its own voltampere and voltage ratings and consequently based on its own impedance base. When such an apparatus is used in a system that has its own bases, it becomes necessary to refer all the given per-unit values to the system base values. Assume that the per-unit impedance of the apparatus is given based on its nameplate ratings as
Zpu(given)=(Zphysical)MVAB(given)[kVB(given)]2(D.48)
and that it is necessary to refer the very same physical impedance to a new set of voltage and voltampere bases such that
Zpu(new)=(Zphysical)MVAB(new)[kVB(new)]2(D.49)
By dividing Equation D.48 by Equation D.49 side by side,
Zpu(new)=Zpu(old)[MVAB(old)MVAB(given)][kVB(given)kVB(old)]2(D.50)
In certain situations, it is more convenient to use subscripts 1 and 2 instead of subscripts “given” and “new,” respectively. Then Equation D.50 can be expressed as
Zpu(2)=Zpu(1)[MVAB(2)MVAB(1)][kVB(1)kVB(2)]2(D.51)
In the event that the kV bases are the same but the MVA bases are different, from Equation D.50,
Zpu(new)=Zpu(given)MVAB(new)MVAB(given)(D.52)
Similarly, if the megavoltampere bases are the same but the kilovolt bases are different, from Equation D.50,
Zpu(new)=Zpu(given)[kVB(given)kVB(new)]2(D.53)
Equations D.49 through D.52 must only be used to convert the given per-unit impedance from the base to another but not for referring the physical value of an impedance from one side of the transformer to another [3].
Example D.3
Consider Example B.1 and select 300/150 V as the base voltages for the high-voltage and the low-voltage windings, respectively. Use a new base power of 10 kVA and determine the new per-unit, base, and physical impedances of the transformer referred to the high-voltage side.
Solution:
By using Equation D.50, the new per-unit impedance can be found as
Zpu(new)=Zpu(old)[MVAB(old)MVAB(given)][kVB(given)kVB(old)]2=(0.0313pu)(10,000VA300V)(240V300V)2=33.334 A
The new current base is
IB(HV)new=SBVB(HV)new=10,000VA300V=33,334 A
Thus,
ZB(HV)new=VB(HV)newIB(HV)new=300V33.334 A=9Ω
Therefore, the physical impedance of the transformer is still
ZHV=Zpu,new×ZB(HV)new=(0.0401pu)(9Ω)=0.3609Ω
The three-phase problems involving balanced systems can be solved on a per-phase basis. In that case, the equations that are developed for single-phase systems can be used for three-phase systems as long as per-phase values are used consistently. Therefore,
IB=SB(1ϕ)VB(L−N)(D.54)
or
IB=VAB(1ϕ)VB(L−N)(D.55)
and
ZB=VB(L−N)IB(D.56)
or
ZB=[kVB(L−N)]2(1000)kVAB(1ϕ)(D.57)
or
ZB=[kVB(L−N)]2MVAB(1ϕ)(D.58)
where the subscripts 1ϕ and L–N denote per phase and line to neutral, respectively. Note that, for a balanced system,
VB(L−N)=VB(L−L)√3(D.59)
and
SB(3ϕ)=SB(3ϕ)3(D.60)
However, it has been customary in three-phase system analysis to use line-to-line voltage and three-phase voltamperes as the base values. Therefore,
IB=SB(3ϕ)√3VB(L−L)(D.61)
or
IB=kVAB(3ϕ)√3kVB(L−L)(D.62)
and
ZB=VB(L−L)√3IB(D.63)
ZB=[kVB(L−L)]2(1000)kVAB(3ϕ)(D.64)
or
ZB=[kVB(L−L)]2MVAB(3ϕ)(D.65)
where the subscripts 3ϕ and L–L denote per three phase and line, respectively. Furthermore, base admittance can be expressed as
YB=1ZB(D.66)
or
(D.67)
where
YB=BB=GB(D.68)
The data for transmission lines are usually given in terms of the line resistance R in ohms per mile at a given temperature, the line inductive reactance XL in ohms per mile at 60 Hz, and the line shunt capacitive reactance Xc in megohms per mile at 60 Hz. Therefore, the line impedance and shunt susceptance in per units for 1 mi of line can be expressed as
Zpu=(Z,Ω/mi)MVAB(3ϕ)[kVB(L−L)]2pu(D.69)
where
Z=R+jXL=Z∠θ Ω/mi
and
Bpu=[kVB(L−L)]2×10−6[MVAB(3ϕ)][Xc,MΩ/mi](D.70)
In the event that the admittance for a transmission line is given in microsiemens per mile, the perunit admittance can be expressed as
Ypu=[kVB(L−L)]2(Y,μS)[MVAB(3ϕ)]×106(D.71)
Similarly, if it is given as reciprocal admittance in megohms per mile, the per-unit admittance can be found as
Ypu=[kVB(L−L)]2×10−6[MVAB(3ϕ)][Z,MΩ/mi](D.72)
Figure 4.29 shows conventional three-phase transformer connections and associated relationships between the high-voltage and low-voltage side voltages and currents. The given relationships are correct for a three-phase transformer as well as for a three-phase bank of single-phase transformers. Note that in the figure, n is the turns ratio, that is,
n=N1N2=V1V2=I2I1(D.73)
where the subscripts 1 and 2 are used for the primary and secondary sides. Therefore, an impedance Z2 in the secondary circuit can be referred to the primary circuit provided that
Z1=n2Z2(D.74)
Thus, it can be observed from Figure 4.29 that in an ideal transformer, voltages are transformed in the direct ratio of turns, currents in the inverse ratio, and impedances in the direct ratio squared, and power and voltamperes are, of course, unchanged. Note that a balanced delta-connected circuit of ZΔ Ω/phase is equivalent to a balanced wye-connected circuit of ZY Ω/phase as long as
ZY=13ZΔ(D.75)
The per-unit impedance of a transformer remains the same without taking into account whether it is converted from physical impedance values that are found by referring to the high-voltage side or low-voltage side of the transformer. This can be accomplished by choosing separate appropriate bases for each side of the transformer (whether or not the transformer is connected in wye–wye, delta–delta, delta–wye, or wye–delta since the transformation of voltages is the same as that made by wye–wye transformers as long as the same line-to-line voltage ratings are used). In other words, the designated per-unit impedance values of transformers are based on the coil ratings.
Since the ratings of coils cannot be altered by a simple change in connection (e.g., from wye–wye to delta–wye), the per-unit impedance remains the same regardless of the three-phase connection. The line-to-line voltage for the transformer will differ. Because of the method of choosing the base in various sections of the three-phase system, the per-unit impedances calculated in various sections can be put together on one impedance diagram without paying any attention to whether the transformers are connected in wye–wye or delta–wye.
Example D.4
Assume that a 19.5 kV 120 MVA three-phase generator has a synchronous reactance of 1.5/Ω and is connected to a 150 MVA 18/230 kV delta–wye connected three-phase transformer with a 0.1/Ω reactance. The transformer is connected to a transmission line at the 230 kV side. Use the new MVA base of 100 MVA and 240 kV base for the line and determine the following:
Solution:
Zpu(new)=Zpu(old)[MVAB(new)MVAB(old)][kVB(old)kVB(old)]2
But, first determining the new kV base for the generator,
kVgenB(new)=(240kV)(18kV230kV)=18.783kV
Thus, the new and adjusted synchronous reactance of the generator is
XgenB(new)=XgenB(new)[MVAB(new)MVAB(old)][kVB(old)kB(new)]2=(1.5pu)[100MVA120MVA][19.5kV18.783kV]2=1.347pu
Xtrfpu(new)=(0.1)[100MVA150MVA][230kV240kV]2=0.061pu
And referred to the low-voltage side is
Xtrfpu(new)=(0.1pu)[100MVA150MVA][18KV18.783KV]2=0.061pu
Note that the transformer reactance referred to the high-voltage side or the low-voltage side is the same, as it should be!
Example D.5
A three-phase transformer has a nameplate ratings of 20 MVA, 345Y/34.5Y kV with a leakage reactance of 12% and the transformer connection is wye–wye. Select a base of 20 MVA and 345 kV on the high-voltage side and determine the following:
Solution:
or from
where n is defined as the turns ratio of the windings.
Example D.6
A three-phase transformer has a nameplate ratings of 20 MVA, and the voltage ratings of 345Y/34.5Δ kV with a leakage reactance of 12% and the transformer connection is wye–delta. Select a base of 20 MVA and 345 kV on the high-voltage side and determine the following:
Solution:
and
Thus, the transformer reactance referred to the delta-connected low-voltage side is
Similarly,
Thus,
Alternatively, if the line-to-line voltages are used,
and therefore,
as before.
Example D.7
Consider a three-phase system that has a generator connected to a 2.4/24 kV, wye–wye connected, three-phase step-up transformer T1. Suppose that the transformer is connected to three-phase power line. The receiving end of the line is connected to a second, wye–wye connected, three-phase 24/12 kV step-down transformer T2. Assume that the line length between the two transformers is negligible and the three-phase generator is rated 4160 kVA, 2.4 kV, and 1000 A and that it supplies a purely inductive load of Ipu = 2.08∠–90° pu. The three-phase transformer T1 is rated 6000 kVA, 2.4Y–24Y kV, with leakage reactance of 0.04 pu. Transformer T2 is made up of three single-phase transformers and is rated 4000 kVA, 24Y–12Y kV, with leakage reactance of 0.04 pu. Determine the following for all three circuits, 2.4, 24, and 12 kV circuits:
Solution:
and
the base voltages for the 24 and 12 kV circuits are determined to be 25 and 12.5 kV, respectively.
and
and
and
and
Therefore, the new reactances of the two transformers can be found as
and
Results of Example D.7
Quantity |
2.4 kV Circuit |
24 kV Circuit |
12 kV Circuit |
---|---|---|---|
kVAB(3ϕ) |
2080 kVA |
2080 kVA |
2080 kVA |
kVB(L-L) |
2.5 kV |
25 kV |
12.5 kV |
ZB |
3005 Ω |
300.5 Ω |
75.1 Ω |
IB |
480 A |
48 A |
96 A |
Iphysical |
1000 A |
100 A |
200 A |
Ipu |
2.08 pu |
2.08 pu |
2.08 pu |
Vpu |
0.96 pu |
0.9334 pu |
0.8935 pu |
Spu |
2.00 pu |
1.9415 pu |
1.8585 pu |
* It is defined as that impedance across which there is a voltage drop that is equal to the base voltage if the current through it is equal to the base current.
3.129.87.138