Chapter 7
Any man may make a mistake; none but a fool will stick to it.
M.T. Cicero, 51 B.C.
Time is the wisest counselor.
Pericles, 450 B.C.
When others agree wth me, I wonder what is wrong!
Author Unknown
As discussed in Chapter 5, a utility company strives to achieve a well-balanced distribution system in order to improve system voltage regulation by means of equally loading each phase. Figure 7.1 shows a primary system with either a three-phase three-wire or a three-phase four-wire main. The laterals can be either (1) three-phase three-wire, (2) three-phase four-wire, (3) single phase with line-to-line voltage, ungrounded, (4) single phase with line-to-neutral voltage, grounded, or (5) two-phase plus neutral, open wye.
Usually there are many laterals on a primary feeder that are not necessarily in three phase, for example, single phase, which causes the voltage drop and power loss due to load current not only in the phase conductor but also in the return path.
Assume that an overloaded single-phase lateral is to be changed to an equivalent three-phase three-wire and balanced lateral, holding the load constant. Since the power input to the lateral is the same as before,
S1ϕ=S3ϕ(7.1)
(From Gonen’s book Electric Power Distribution System Engineering, Figure 7.1 on page 324.) where the subscripts 1ϕ and 3ϕ refer to the single-phase and three-phase circuits, respectively. Equation 7.1 can be rewritten as
(√3×Vs)I1ϕ=3VsI3ϕ(7.2)
where Vs is the line-to-neutral voltage. Therefore, from Equation 7.2,
I1ϕ=√3×I3ϕ(7.3)
which means that the current in the single-phase lateral is 1.73 times larger than the one in the equivalent three-phase lateral. The voltage drop in the three-phase lateral can be expressed as
VD3ϕ=I3ϕ(Rcosθ+Xsinθ)(7.4)
and in the single-phase lateral as
VD1ϕ=I1ϕ(KRRcosθ+KXXsinθ)(7.5)
where
KR and KX are conversion constants of R and X and are used to convert them from their three-phase values to the equivalent single-phase values
KR = 2.0
KX = 2.0 when underground (UG) cable is used
KX ≅ 2.0 when overhead line is used, with approximately a ±10% accuracy
Therefore, Equation 7.5 can be rewritten as
VD1ϕ=I1ϕ(2Rcosθ+2Xsinθ)(7.6)
or substituting Equation 7.3 into Equation 7.6,
VD1ϕ=2√3×I3ϕ(Rcosθ+Xsinθ)(7.7)
By dividing Equation 7.7 by Equation 7.4 side by side,
VD1ϕVD3ϕ=2√3(7.8)
which means that the voltage drop in the single-phase ungrounded lateral is approximately 3.46 times larger than the one in the equivalent three-phase lateral. Since base voltages for the single-phase and three-phase laterals are
VB(1ϕ)=√3×Vs,L−N(7.9)
and
VB(3ϕ)=Vs,L−N(7.10)
Equation 7.8 can be expressed in per units as
VDpu,1ϕVDpu.3ϕ=2.0(7.11)
which means that the per unit voltage drop in the single-phase ungrounded lateral is two times larger than the one in the equivalent three-phase lateral. For example, if the per unit voltage drop in the single-phase lateral is 0.10, it would be 0.05 in the equivalent three-phase lateral.
The power losses due to the load currents in the conductors of the single-phase lateral and the equivalent three-phase lateral are
PLS,1ϕ=2×I21ϕR(7.12)
and
PLS,3ϕ=3×I23ϕR(7.13)
respectively. Substituting Equation 7.3 into Equation 7.12,
PLS,1ϕ=2(√3×I3ϕ)2R(7.14)
and dividing the resultant Equation 7.14 by Equation 7.13 side by side,
PLS,1ϕPLS,3ϕ=2.0(7.15)
which means that the power loss due to the load currents in the conductors of the single-phase lateral is two times larger than the one in the equivalent three-phase lateral.
Therefore, one can conclude that by changing a single-phase lateral to an equivalent three-phase lateral, both the per unit voltage drop and the power loss due to copper losses in the primary line are approximately halved.
In general, this system is presently not used due to the following disadvantages. There is no earth current in this system. It can be compared to a three-phase four-wire balanced lateral in the following manner. Since the power input to the lateral is the same as before,
S1ϕ=S3ϕ(7.16)
or
Vs×I1ϕ=3×Vs×I3ϕ(7.17)
from which
I1ϕ=3×I3ϕ(7.18)
The voltage drop in the three-phase lateral can be expressed as
VD3ϕ=I3ϕ(Rcosθ+Xsinθ)(7.19)
and in the single-phase lateral as
VD1ϕ=I1ϕ(KRRcosθ+KXXsinθ)(7.20)
where
KR = 2.0 when a full-capacity neutral is used, that is, if the wire size used for neutral conductor is the same as the size of the phase wire
KR > 2.0 when a reduced-capacity neutral is used
KX ≅ 2.0 when overhead line is used
Therefore, if KR = 2.0 and KX = 2.0, Equation 7.20 can be rewritten as
VD1ϕ=I1ϕ(2Rcosθ+2Xsinθ)(7.21)
or substituting Equation 7.18 into Equation 7.21,
VD1ϕ=6×I3ϕ(Rcosθ+Xsinθ)(7.22)
Dividing Equation 7.22 by Equation 7.19 side by side,
VD1ϕVD3ϕ=6.0(7.23a)
or
VDpu,1ϕVDpu,1ϕ=2√3=3.46(7.23b)
which means that the voltage drop in the single-phase two-wire ungrounded lateral with full-capacity neutral is six times larger than the one in the equivalent three-phase four-wire balanced lateral.
The power losses due to the load currents in the conductors of the single-phase two-wire unigrounded lateral with full-capacity neutral and the equivalent three-phase four-wire balanced lateral are
PLS,1ϕ=I21ϕ(2R)(7.24)
and
PLS,3ϕ=3×I23ϕR(7.25)
respectively. Substituting Equation 7.18 into Equation 7.24,
PLS,1ϕ=(3×I3ϕ)2(2R)(7.26)
and dividing Equation 7.26 by Equation 7.25 side by side,
PLS,1ϕPLS,3ϕ=6.0(7.27)
Therefore, the power loss due to load currents in the conductors of the single-phase two-wire unigrounded lateral with full-capacity neutral is six times larger than the one in the equivalent three-phase four-wire lateral.
Figure 7.2 shows a single-phase two-wire lateral with multigrounded common neutral. As shown in the figure, the neutral wire is connected in parallel (i.e., multigrounded) with the ground wire at various places through ground electrodes in order to reduce the current in the neutral. Ia is the current in the phase conductor, Iw is the return current in the neutral wire, and Id is the return current in Carson’s equivalent ground conductor. According to Morrison [1], the return current in the neutral wire is
In=ζ1Ia where ζ1=0.25−0.33(7.28)
and it is almost independent of the size of the neutral conductor.
In Figure 7.2, the constant KR is less than 2.0 and the constant KX is more or less equal to 2.0 because of conflictingly large Dm (i.e., mutual geometric mean distance or geometric mean radius) of Carson’s equivalent ground (neutral) conductor. Therefore, Morrison’s data [1] (probably empirical) indicate that
VDpu,1ϕ=ζ2×VDpu,3ϕ where ζ2=3.8−4.2(7.29)
and
PLS,1ϕ=ζ3×PLS,3ϕ where ζ3=3.5−3.75(7.30)
Therefore, assuming that the data from Morrison [1] are accurate,
KR<2.0 and KX<2.0
the per unit voltage drops and the power losses due to load currents can be approximated as
VDpu,1ϕ≅4.0×VDpu,3ϕ(7.31)
and
PLS,1ϕ≅3.6×PLS,3ϕ(7.32)
for the illustrative problems.
Figure 7.3 shows an open-wye-connected lateral with two phase and neutral. The neutral conductor can be unigrounded or multigrounded, but because of disadvantages, the unigrounded neutral is generally not used. If the neutral is unigrounded, all neutral current is in the neutral conductor itself. Theoretically, it can be expressed that
V=ZI(7.33)
where
ˉVa=ˉZaˉIa(7.34)
ˉVb=ˉZbˉIb(7.35)
It is correct for equal load division between the two phases.
Assuming equal load division among phases, the two-phase plus neutral lateral can be compared to an equivalent three-phase lateral, holding the total kilovoltampere load constant. Therefore,
S2ϕ=S3ϕ(7.36)
or
2V5I2ϕ=3V5I3ϕ(7.37)
from which
I2ϕ=32I3ϕ(7.38)
The voltage-drop analysis can be performed depending upon whether the neutral is unigrounded or multigrounded. If the neutral is unigrounded and the neutral conductor impedance (Zn) is zero, the voltage drop in each phase is
VD2ϕ=I2ϕ(KRRcosθ+KXXsinθ)(7.39)
where
KR = 1.0
KX = 1.0
Therefore,
VD2ϕ=I2ϕ(Rcosθ+Xsinθ)(7.40)
or substituting Equation 7.38 into Equation 7.40,
VD2ϕ=32I3ϕ(Rcosθ+Xsinθ)(7.41)
Dividing Equation 7.41 by Equation 7.19, side by side,
However, if the neutral is unigrounded and the neutral conductor impedance (Zn) is larger than zero,
Therefore, in this case, some unbalanced voltages are inherent.
However, if the neutral is multigrounded and Zn > 0, the data from Morrison [1] indicate that the per unit voltage drop in each phase is
when a full-capacity neutral is used and
when a reduced-capacity neutral (i.e., when the neutral conductor employed is one or two sizes smaller than the phase conductors) is used.
The power loss analysis also depends upon whether the neutral is unigrounded or multigrounded. If the neutral is unigrounded, the power loss is
where
KR = 3.0 when a full-capacity neutral is used
KR > 3.0 when a reduced-capacity neutral is used
Therefore, if KR = 3.0,
or
On the other hand, if the neutral is multigrounded,
Based on the data from Morrison [1], the approximate value of this ratio is
which means that the power loss due to load currents in the conductors of the two-phase three-wire lateral with multigrounded neutral is approximately 1.64 times larger than the one in the equivalent three-phase lateral.
Example 7.1
Assume that a uniformly distributed area is served by a three-phase four-wire multigrounded 6-mile-long main located in the middle of the service area. There are six laterals on each side of the main. Each lateral is 1 mile apart with respect to each other, and the first lateral is located on the main 1 mile away from the substation so that the total three-phase load on the main is 6000 kVA. Each lateral is 10 mi long and is made up of #6 AWG copper conductors and serving a uniformly distributed peak load of 500 kVA, at 7.2/12.47 kV. The K constant of a #6 AWG copper conductor is 0.0016/kVA-mi. Determine the following:
Solution
Example 7.2
A three-phase express feeder has an impedance of 6 + j20 ohms per phase. At the load end, the line-to-line voltage is 13.8 kV, and the total three-phase power is 1200 kW at a lagging power factor of 0.8. By using the line-to-neutral method, determine the following:
Solution
Since in an express feeder, the line current is the same at the beginning or at the end of the line,
and
using this as the reference voltage, the sending-end voltage is found from
where
and
or
Example 7.3
Repeat Example 7.2 by using the single-phase equivalent method.
Solution
Here, the single-phase equivalent current is found from
where
or
Figure 7.4 shows a typical four-wire multigrounded common neutral distribution system. Because of the economic and operating advantages, this system is used extensively. The assorted secondaries can be, for example, either (1) 120/240 V single-phase three wire, (2) 120/240 V three-phase four wire connected in delta, (3) 120/240 V three-phase four-wire connected in open delta, or (4) 120/208 V three-phase four wire connected in grounded wye. Where primary and secondary systems are both existent, the same conductor is used as the common neutral for both systems. The neutral is grounded at each distribution transformer, at various places where no transformers are connected and to water pipes or driven ground electrodes at each user’s service entrance. The secondary neutral is also grounded at the distribution transformer and the service drops (SDs).
Typical values of the resistances of the ground electrodes are 5, 10, or 15 Ω. Under no circumstances should they be larger than 25 Ω. Usually, a typical metal water pipe system has a resistance value of less than 3 Ω. A part of the unbalanced, or zero sequence, load current flows in the neutral wire, and the remaining part flows in the ground and/or the water system. Usually the same conductor size is used for both phase and neutral conductors.
Example 7.4
Assume that the circuit shown in Figure 7.5 represents a single-phase circuit if dimensional variables are used; it represents a balanced three-phase circuit if per unit variables are used. R + jX represents the total impedance of lines and/or transformers. The power factor of the load is cosθ = cos(θVR – θT). Find the load power factor for which the voltage drop is maximum.
Solution
The line voltage drop is
By taking its partial derivative with respect to the θ angle and equating the result to zero,
or
therefore
and from the impedance triangle shown in Figure 7.6, the load power factor for which the voltage drop is maximum is
also
Example 7.5
Consider the three-phase four-wire 416-V secondary system with balanced per-phase loads at A, B, and C as shown in Figure 7.7. Determine the following:
Solution
the voltage drop for each load can be calculated as
Therefore, the total voltage drop is
or
or
Therefore, the total per-phase real power is
or
Therefore, the total per-phase reactive power is
Thus the total (or three-phase) kilovoltampere output of the distribution transformer is
Hence, the load power factor of the distribution transformer is
Example 7.6
This example is a continuation of Example 6.1. It deals with voltage drops in the secondary distribution system. In this and the following examples, a single-phase three-wire 120/240 V directly buried underground residential distribution (URD) secondary system will be analyzed, and calculations will be made for motor-starting voltage dip (VDIP) and for steady-state voltage drops at the time of annual peak load. Assume that the cable impedances given in Table 7.2 are correct for a typical URD secondary cable.
Transformer data. The data given in Table 7.1 are for modern single-phase 65°C OISC distribution transformers of the 7200-120/240 V class. The data were taken from a recent catalog of a manufacturer. All given per unit values are based on the transformer-rated kilovoltamperes and voltages.
Single-Phase 7200-120/240-V Distribution Transformer Data at 65°C
Rated (kVA, kW) |
Core Lossa (kW) |
Copper Lossb (kW) |
R (pu) |
X (pu) |
Excitation Current (A) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 |
0.083 |
0.194 |
0.0130 |
0.0094 |
0.014 |
25 |
0.115 |
0.309 |
0.0123 |
0.0138 |
0.015 |
37.5 |
0.170 |
0.400 |
0.0107 |
0.0126 |
0.014 |
50 |
0.178 |
0.537 |
0.0107 |
0.0139 |
0.014 |
75 |
0.280 |
0.755 |
0.0101 |
0.0143 |
0.014 |
100 |
0.335 |
0.975 |
0.0098 |
0.0145 |
0.014 |
a At rated voltage and frequency.
b At rated voltage and kilovoltampere load.
The 2400 V-class transformers of the sizes being considered have about 15% less R and about 7% less X than the 7200 V transformers. Ignore the small variation of impedance with rated voltage and assume that voltage drop calculated with the given data will suffice for whichever primary voltage is used.
URD secondary cable data. Cable insulations and manufacture are constantly being improved, especially for high-voltage cables. Therefore, any cable data soon become obsolete. The following information and data have been abstracted from recent cable catalogs.
Much of the 600 V-class cables now commonly used for secondary lines (SLs) and services have Al conductor and cross-linked PE insulation, which can stand 90°C conductor temperature. The triplexed cable assembly shown in Figure 7.8 (quadruplexed for three-phase four-wire service) has three or four insulated conductors when aluminum is used. When copper is used, the one grounded neutral conductor is bare. The neutral conductor typically is two AWG sizes smaller than the phase conductors.
The twin concentric cable assembly shown in Figure 7.9 has two insulated copper or aluminum phase conductors plus several spirally served small bare copper binding conductors that act as the current-carrying grounded neutral. The number and size of the spiral neutral wires vary so that the ampacity of the neutral circuit is equivalent to two AWG wire sizes smaller than the phase conductors. Table 7.2 gives data for twin concentric aluminum/copper XLPE 600 V-class cable.
Twin Concentric Al/Cu XLPE 600 V Cable Data
Size |
R (Ω/1000 ft) per Conductor |
X (Ω/1000 ft) per Phase Conductor |
Ampacity (A) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase Conductor 90°C |
Neutral Conductor 80°C |
90% PF |
50% PF |
|||
2 AWG |
0.334 |
0.561 |
0.0299 |
180 |
0.02613 |
0.01608 |
1 AWG |
0.265 |
0.419 |
0.0305 |
205 |
0.02098 |
0.01324 |
1/0 AWG |
0.210 |
0.337 |
0.0297 |
230 |
0.01683 |
0.01089 |
2/0 AWG |
0.167 |
0.259 |
0.0290 |
265 |
0.01360 |
0.00905 |
3/0 AWG |
0.132 |
0.211 |
0.0280 |
300 |
0.01092 |
0.00752 |
4/0 AWG |
0.105 |
0.168 |
0.0275 |
340 |
0.00888 |
0.00636 |
250 kcmil |
0.089 |
0.133 |
0.0280 |
370 |
0.00769 |
0.00573 |
350 kcmil |
0.063 |
0.085 |
0.0270 |
445 |
0.00571 |
0.00458 |
500 kcmil |
0.044 |
0.066 |
0.0260 |
540 |
0.00424 |
0.00371 |
a Per unit voltage drop per 104 A • ft (amperes per conductor times feet of cable) based on 120 V line-to-neutral or 240 V line to line. Valid for the two power factors shown and for perfectly balanced three-wire loading.
The triplex and twin concentric assemblies obviously have the same resistance for a given size of phase conductors. The triplex assembly has very slightly higher reactance than the concentric assembly. The difference in reactances is too small to be noted unless precise computations are undertaken for some special purpose. The reactances of those cables should be increased by about 25% if they are installed in iron conduit. The reactances given in the following text are valid only for balanced loading (where the neutral current is zero).
The triplex assembly has about 15% smaller ampacity than the concentric assembly, but the exact amount of reduction varies with wire size. The ampacities given are for 90°C conductor temperature, 20°C ambient earth temperature, direct burial in earth, and 10% daily load factor. When installed in buried duct, the ampacities are about 70% of those listed later. For load factors less than 100%, consult current literature or cable standards. The increased ampacities are significantly large.
Arbitrary criteria
and adapt it to per unit data when computing transformer voltage drops and adapt it to ampere and ohm data when computing SD and SL voltage drops. Obtain all voltage-drop answers in per unit based on 240 V.
Load Data
Circuit Element |
Load (kV) |
---|---|
SD |
1 class 2 load (10 kVA) |
SL |
1 class 2 load (10 kVA) + 3 diversified class 2 loads (6.0 kVA each) |
Transformer |
1 class 2 load (10 kVA) + either 3 diversified class 2 loads (6.0 kVA each) or 11 diversified class 2 loads (4.4 kVA each) |
Source: Lawrence, R.F. et al., AIEE Trans., pt. III, PAS-79, 199, 1960.
Assumptions
Using the given data and assumptions, calculate the constant for any one of the secondary cable sizes, hoping to verify one of the given values in Table 7.2.
Solution
Let the secondary cable size be #2 AWG, arbitrarily. Also let the I current be 100 A and the length of the SL be 100 ft. Using the values from Table 7.2, the resistance and reactance values for 100 ft of cable can be found as
and
Therefore, using the approximate voltage-drop equation,
or, in per unit volts,
which is very close to the value given in Table 7.2 for the constant, that is, 0.02613 pu V/(104A · ft) of cable.
Example 7.7
Use the information and data given in Examples 6.1 and 7.3. Assume a URD system. Therefore, the SLs shown in Figure 6.12 are made of UG secondary cables. Assume 12 services per distribution transformer and two transformers per block that are at the locations of poles 2 and 5, as shown in Figure 6.12. Service pedestals are at the locations of poles 1, 3, 4, and 6. Assume that the selected equipment sizes (for ST, ASL, ASD) are of the nearest standard size that are larger than the theoretically most economical sizes and determine the following:
Solution
Therefore, selecting a 50 kVA transformer,
Thus, the per unit voltage drop in the transformer is
As shown in Figure 7.10, the load on each SL (that portion of the wiring between the transformer and the service pedestal) is similarly calculated as
or 116.7 A. If the SL is selected to be #4/0 AWG with the constant of 0.0088 from Table 7.2, the per unit voltage drop in each SL is
The load on each SD is given to be 10 kVA or 41.6 A from Table 7.3. If each SD of 70 ft length is selected to be #1/0 AWG with the constant of 0.01683 from Table 7.2, the per unit voltage drop in each SD is
Therefore, the total steady-state voltage drop in per units at the most remote consumer’s meter is
which exceeds the given criterion of 0.035 pu V.
The per unit VDIP in the SL of #4/0 AWG cable is
The per unit VDIP in the SD of #1/0 AWG cable is
Therefore, the total VDIP in per units due to motor starting at the most unfavorable location is
which meets the given criterion of 0.03 pu V.
Also, selecting one-size-larger cable, that is, #2/0 AWG, for the SD, the new per unit voltage drop in the SD becomes
Therefore, the new total steady-state voltage drop in per units at the most remote consumer’s meter is
which is still larger than the criterion. Thus, select 350 kcmil cable size for the SLs and #2/0 AWG cable size for the SDs to meet the criteria.
Example 7.8
Figure 7.11 shows a residential secondary distribution system. Assume that the distribution transformer capacity is 75 kVA (use Table 7.1), all secondaries and services are single-phase three wire, nominally 120/240 V, and all SLs are of #2/0 A1/Cu XLPE cable, and SDs are of #1/0 Al/Cu XLPE cable (use Table 7.2). All SDs are 100 ft long, and all SLs are 200 ft long. Assume an average lagging-load power factor of 0.9 and 100% load diversity factors and determine the following:
Solution
or, in per units,
Therefore, the total voltage drop is
Example 7.9
Figure 7.12 shows a three-phase four-wire grounded-wye distribution system with multigrounded neutral, supplied by an express feeder and mains. In the figure, d and s are the width and length of a primary lateral, where s is much larger than d. Main lengths are equal to cb = ce = s/2. The number of the primary laterals can be found as s/d. The square-shaped service area (s2) has a uniformly distributed load density, and all loads are presumed to have the same lagging power factor. Each primary lateral, such as ba, serves an area of length s and width d. Assume that
Use the given information and data and determine the following:
The primary lateral ba, that is, VDpu,ba
Note that the equations to be developed should contain the constants D, s, d, impedances, θ, load power-factor angle, VL-L, etc., but not current variable I.
Solution
Therefore,
Example 7.10
Figure 7.13 shows a square-shaped service area (A = 4 mi2) with a uniformly distributed load density of D kVA/mi2 and 2 mi of #4/0 AWG copper overhead main from a to b. There are many closely spaced primary laterals that are not shown in the square-shaped service area of the figure. In this voltage-drop study, use the precalculated voltage-drop curves of Figure 4.17 when applicable. Use the nominal primary voltage of 7,620/13,200 V for a three-phase four-wire wye-grounded system. Assume that at peak loading, the load density is 1000 kVA/mi2 and the lumped load is 2000 kVA, and that at off-peak loading, the load density is 333 kVA/mi2 and the lumped load is still 2000 kVA. The lumped load is of a small industrial plant working three shifts a day. The substation bus voltages are 1.025 pu V of 7620 base volts at peak load and 1.000 pu V during off-peak load.
The transformer located between buses c and d has a three-phase rating of 2000 kVA and a delta-rated high voltage of 13,200 V and grounded-wye-rated low voltage of 277/480 V. It has 0 + j0.05 per unit impedance based on the transformer ratings. It is tapped up to raise the low voltage 5.0% relative to the high voltage, that is, the equivalent turns ratio in use is (7620/277) × 0.95. Use the given information and data for peak loading and determine the following:
Solution
Thus the total kilovoltampere load on the main is
From Figure 4.17, for #4/0 copper, the K constant is found to be 0.0003. Therefore, the percent voltage drop from the substation to point a is
The percent voltage drop from point a to point b is
The percent voltage drop from point b to point c is
To find the percent voltage drop from point c to bus d,
Note that usually in a simple problem like this, the reduced voltage at point c is ignored. In that case, for example, the per unit current would be 1.0 pu A rather than 1.056 pu A. Since
and
therefore
Thus, to find the percent voltage drop at bus d, first it can be found in per unit as
but since the low voltage has been tapped up 5%,
Therefore,
or
Here, the negative sign of the voltage drop indicates that it is in fact a voltage rise rather than a voltage drop.
Example 7.11
Use the relevant information and data given in Example 7.10 for off-peak loading and repeat Example 7.10, and find the Vd voltage at bus d in line-to-neutral volts. Also write the necessary codes to solve the problem in MATLAB.
Solution
Thus the total kilovoltampere load on the main is
Therefore, the percent voltage drop from the substation to point a is
The percent voltage drop from point a to point b is
The percent voltage drop from point b to point c is
To find the percent voltage drop from point c to bus d, the percent voltage drop at bus d can be found as before
Note that the voltages at bus d during peak and off-peak loading are nearly the same.
Here is the MATLAB script:
clc
clear
% System parameters
St = 2000;% in kVA
D = 1000;% in kVA/mi^2
An = 4;% in mi^2
K40 = 0.0003;% from Figure 4.17 for 4/0 AWG
K4 = 0.0009;% from Figure 4.17 for 4 AWG
L1 = 1;% distanced from substation to point a in miles
L2 = 2;% distanced from point a to b in miles
kV = 13.2;
Xt = 0.05;
PF = 0.9;
Vopu = 1.025;
VBp = 7620;% Voltage base primary
VBs = 277;% Voltage base secondary
% Solution for part a
Sn = D*An
% Total kVA on main
Sm = Sn + St
% Per unit voltage drop from substation to point a
VDoapu = (K40*Sm*L1)/100
% Per unit voltage drop from point a to point b
VDabpu = (K40*Sn*(L2/2)+K40*St*L2)/100
% Per unit voltage drop from point b to point c
VDbcpu = (K4*St*L2)/100
I = St/(sqrt(3)*0.947*kV);
IB = St/(sqrt(3)*kV);
Ipu = I/IB
% Per unit voltage drop from point c to point d
VDcdpu = Ipu*(Xt*sin(acos(PF)))-0.05
% Solution for part b in per units
Vapu = Vopu-VDoapu
Vbpu = Vapu-VDabpu
Vcpu = Vbpu-VDbcpu
Vdpu = Vcpu-VDcdpu
% Solution for part c in per units
Va = Vapu*VBp
Vb = Vbpu*VBp
Vc = Vcpu*VBp
Vd = Vdpu*VBs
Example 7.12
Figure 7.14 shows that a large number of small loads are closely spaced along the length l. If the loads are single phase, they are assumed to be well balanced among the three phases.
A three-phase four-wire wye-grounded 7.62/13.2 kV primary line is to be built along the length l and fed through a distribution substation transformer from a high-voltage transmission line. Assume that the uniform (or linear) distribution of the connected load along the length l is
The 30-min annual demand factor of all loads is 0.60, the diversity factor (FD) among all loads is 1.08, and the annual loss factor (FLS) is 0.20. Assuming a lagging power factor of 0.9 for all loads and a 37 in. geometric mean spacing of phase conductors, use Figure 4.17 for voltage-drop calculations for copper conductors. Use the relevant tables in Appendix A for additional data about copper and ACSR conductors and determine the following:
Locate the distribution substation where you think it would be the most economical, considering only the 13.2 kV system, and then find
Solution
To achieve the minimum voltage drop, the substation should be located at the middle of the line 1, and therefore
Thus the peak load of each main on the substation transformer is
or
hence
in each main out of the substation. Therefore, from the tables of Appendix A, it can be recommended that either #4 AWG copper conductor or #2 AWG ACSR conductor be used.
clc
clear
% System parameters
D = 333;% off-peak load density in kVA/mi^2
An = 4;% in mi^2
K40 = 0.0003;% from Figure 4.17 for 4/0 AWG
K4 = 0.0009;% from Figure 4.17 for 4 AWG
L1 = 1;% distanced from substation to point a in miles
L2 = 2;% distanced from point a to b in miles
St = 2000;% in kVA Vopu = 1.0;
VBp = 7620;
VBs = 277;
% Solution for part a
Sn = D*An
% Total kVA on main
Sm = Sn + St
% Per unit voltage drop from substation to point a
VDoapu = (K40*Sm*L1)/100
% Per unit voltage drop from point a to point b
VDabpu = (K40*Sn*(L2/2)+K40*St*L2)/100
% Per unit voltage drop from point b to point c
VDbcpu = (K4*St*L2)/100
VDcdpu = -0.027% as before
% Solution for part b in per units
Vapu = Vopu-VDoapu
Vbpu = Vapu-VDabpu
Vcpu = Vbpu-VDbcpu
Vdpu = Vcpu-VDcdpu
% Solution for part c in per units
Va = Vapu*VBp
Vb = Vbpu*VBp
Vc = Vcpu*VBp
Vd = Vdpu*VBs
Example 7.13
Now suppose that the line in Example 7.12 is arbitrarily constructed with #4/0 AWG ACSR phase conductor and that the substation remains where you put it in part (a). Assume 50°C conductor temperature and find the total annual I2R energy loss (TAELCu), in kilowatthours, in the entire line length.
Solution
The total I2R loss in the entire line length is Therefore,
Therefore, the total I2R energy loss is
Example 7.14
Figure 7.15 shows a single-line diagram of a simple three-phase four-wire wye-grounded primary feeder. The nominal operating voltage and the base voltage are given as 7,200/12,470 V. Assume that all loads are balanced three phase and all have 90% power factor, lagging. The given values of the constant K in Table 7.4 are based on 7,200/12,470 V. There is a total of a 3000 kVA uniformly distributed load over a 4 mi line between b and c. Use the given data and determine the following:
K Constants
Run |
Conductor Type |
Distance (mi) |
K, % VD/(kVA · mi) |
---|---|---|---|
Sub. to a |
#4/0 ACSR |
1.0 |
0.0005 |
a to b |
# 1 ACSR |
2.0 |
0.0010 |
a to c |
#1 ACSR |
2.0 |
0.0010 |
a to d |
#lACSR |
2.0 |
0.0010 |
Solution
therefore the percent voltage drop at point a is
Similarly, the load flowing through the line between points a and b is
Therefore,
and the line-to-line voltage is
18.224.109.21