5.10 Proofs for Section 4.9 “Sampling of SC Processes”

5.10.1 Proof of Theorem 4.9.2 Strictly Band-Limited Spectrally Correlated Processes

The strictly band-limitedness condition (4.204) considered in the frequency domain implies that

(5.179) equation

where img. In the case of jointly SC processes, replacing (4.209a) into (5.179) leads to

(5.180) equation

Let

(5.181) equation

(5.182) equation

Without lack of generality, the functions img and img in (4.209a) and (4.209b) can be chosen such that both img and img are at most countable (Definition 4.2.4 and Theorem 4.2.7). Let us assume that the number of possible accumulation points (cluster points) of img and img is at most finite. Thus, from (5.180) it necessarily results that img

(5.183) equation

where img, with cl denoting set closure, represents the set of points fi where there is no curve intersection (or accumulation points of such fi). Consequently, condition in (4.210a) holds almost everywhere (a.e.). However, since img is at most countable and with at most a finite number of accumulation points, the cross-correlation (4.24b) (with img) is not modified by assuming img also for f1 such that |f1| > B1 and img. Therefore, we can assume that (4.210a) holds everywhere using suitable modifications of img. Furthermore, from (5.180) it follows that for strictly band-limited SC processes the functions img are undetermined for img. Thus, img for img can be assumed in order to have these functions with compact support. The proof of (4.210b) is similar and, analogously, img can be assumed for img.

The proof of the converse is straightforward.

5.10.2 Proof of Theorem 4.9.4 Loève Bifrequency Spectrum of Sampled Jointly Spectrally Correlated Processes

The Fourier transform (4.185) of the sequence xi(n) is linked to the Fourier transform (4.5) of the continuous-time signal xa,i(t) by the relationship (Lathi 2002, Section 9.5)

(5.184) equation

Thus, accounting for (4.209a), one obtains

(5.185) equation

from which (4.213) follows by a scale change in the argument of the Dirac delta (Zemanian 1987, Section 1.7).

5.10.3 Proof of Theorem 4.9.5 Loève Bifrequency Spectrum of Sampled Strictly Band-Limited Jointly SC Processes

For strictly band-limited processes xa,i(t), according to Corollary 4.9.3, the support of the replica with p1 = p2 = 0 in (4.213) is such that

(5.186) equation

Since the functions img have compact support contained in [− B1, B1], are invertible, and have values in [− B2, B2] (Theorem 4.9.2), under the assumption fsi ≥ 2Bi, the result is that for every img and img there exists only one pair (ν1, ν2) img [p1 − 1/2, p1 + 1/2) × [p2 − 1/2, p2 + 1/2) such that img in the argument of the Dirac delta in the right-hand side of (5.185). Consequently, (5.185) can be written as

(5.187) equation

from which (4.190a) with (4.220a) and (4.221a) immediately follow. In addition, since replicas in (5.187) are separated by 1 in both variables ν1 and ν2 and the functions (of ν1) img and img have compact support contained in [− B1/fs1, B1/fs1], condition fs1 ≥ 2B1 assures that replicas in (4.220a) and (4.221a) do not overlap.

The proof of (4.190b) with (4.220b) and (4.221b) is similar.

5.10.4 Proof of Theorem 4.9.6

Let us assume that fsi ≥ 2Bi, (i = 1, 2). Thus, according to Theorem 4.9.5, replicas in (5.187) do not overlap. However, mappings (4.222), (4.223) do not necessarily hold ∀ν1 img [− 1/2, 1/2].

From fs1 ≥ 2B1 it immediately follows that ∀ν1 img [− 1/2, 1/2]

(5.188) equation

Due to condition (4.226) for img, it results that ∀ν1 img [− 1/2, 1/2]

(5.189) equation

Then in (5.187), for ν1 img [− 1/2, 1/2] the support curve img of the replica with p1 = p2 = 0 can overlap support curves of other replicas (p1 ≠ 0 and/or p2 ≠ 0) only if on these other curves the spectral correlation density is zero. In fact, 1 − B1/fs1 [1 − B2/fs2] is the smallest |ν1| [|ν2|] such that replicas with p1 = ± 1 [p2 = ± 1] can have nonzero spectral correlation density. Thus conditions (4.222), (4.223) hold ∀ν1 img [− 1/2, 1/2]. (5.188) and (5.189) holding img prove sufficiency of condition (4.226).

Analogous considerations lead to prove sufficiency of condition (4.227).

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.216.131.214