AstraZeneca is a British pharmaceutical
firm, operating in more than 100 countries, with primary foci on cardiovascular
and metabolic diseases, oncology (cancer), and respiratory, inflammation
and autoimmunity issues.
AstraZeneca employ around
51,500 people worldwide, make drugs in 16 countries, and had 2012
sales over $25.7 billion (Astrazeneca.com). In the past few years,
the firm has made repeated news headlines as a possibly desirable
target for takeovers, something that by the end of 2014 its shareholders
had resisted.
The AstraZeneca stable
of products includes several blockbuster drugs. Included in these
is Crestor, which as of the middle of 2014 was the bestselling cholesterol
drug worldwide and the 9th highest selling drug overall of 2013. Crestor
alone enjoyed 2013 sales of some $6 billion for AstraZeneca.
Statistical testing
in clinical trials lies at the heart of the development process of
pharmaceutical drugs such as Crestor. The basis for a drug’s
fundamental usefulness, marketability, and approval by oversight bodies
such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is sufficient
evidence that a drug has a significantly positive effect in whatever
health issue it targets, and evidence that it does not cause unduly
deleterious side effects. In balance with the huge costs of drug development
(see the introductory case of Chapter 18 for more on this), the statistical
tests that help discover drugs and get them to market are at the center
of the industry.
Typically, many rounds
of clinical trials will seek to demonstrate that a drug has substantial
benefits to patients in contrast to not taking the drug, taking other
drugs, taking less of the drug, and the like. These tests often involve
measuring patient symptoms or the like over time, and comparing changes
in groups that take the drug with groups that do not get the drug
but instead get a placebo. In other tests, instead of looking at symptoms,
researchers will measure the incidence of undesirable side-effects
from the drug.
Generally, the success
of such tests is a key gateway for whether a drug gets accepted for
marketing by regulators or not. The tests also indicate the extent
to which the drug (seemingly) works well with relatively few side-effects,
and therefore how popular it will be with consumers and doctors, and
therefore whether it will sell well.
When implementing these
clinical trials, one fundamental finding in a given study might be
something like “CRESTOR given as a single daily dose (5 to
40 mg) over 6 weeks significantly reduced serum TG levels”
(rxlist.com). I have no idea what a serum TG level is, but the key
thing here is that is was ”significantly” reduced. The
statistical question will revolve around the size of the reduction
and whether this effect of the drug is big enough to be both substantial
and financially feasible.