]>
We discussed Green’s function briefly (Section 7.2). The one-dimensional Green’s function of the Laplace equation, with Dirichlet boundary conditions, is the solution of the differential equation
subject to the boundary conditions
and is shown to be
For an arbitrary input f(x), the response y(x) can be obtained from a superposition integral
The differential equation for y is
and the boundary conditions are
Equation 7A.3 for y is the solution to Equation 7A.4, where G is given by Equation 7A.2. Equation 7A.3 may be written more explicitly, by considering the solution in the two domains 0 ≤ x ≤ x′ and x′ ≤ x ≤ L:
Note: Some books define the Green’s function using a positive impulse for the input strength:
Then the solution will be of opposite sign to Equations 7A.2a and 7A.2b:
We also considered the one-dimensional Helmholtz equation, with Dirichlet boundary conditions,
The procedure used in Section 7.2 is to solve the homogeneous equation in the two domains excluding the point x = x′ where the impulse is applied. Using the boundary conditions, and the source conditions, the undetermined constants were determined. The result is Green’s function in closed form. An alternative form will now be determined using eigenfunction expansion.
Let us solve Equation 7A.6 using this technique. The solution will be written as an infinite series
Note that each of the terms on the RHS of Equation 7A.10 satisfies the boundary conditions of G = 0 at x = 0 or L. From Equation 7A.10, we obtain
By substituting Equation 7A.11 into Equation 7A.6, multiplying by sin mπx/L, and then integrating from 0 to L, we obtain
From the orthogonality property,
Thus, from Equation 7A.12, we get
Thus, we have
Equation 7A.14 is an alternative form to Equations 7A.7a and 7A.7b, although Equation 7A.14 appears as an infinite series. The solution of
can be written as
The solution converges due to the term 1/n2 in Equation 7A.16.
A generalization of the series method for a one-dimensional problem with a general second-order differential equation is formulated in terms of a Sturm–Liouville operator L:
where
Let ψn be a complete set of orthonormal eigenfunctions for the L operator, that is,
subject to the same boundary condition as the original problem of Equation 7A.17a. If G(x, x′) is Green’s function
subject to the same boundary condition as the original problem, then
We will show two examples [1] of series form of Green’s function for two particular problems obtained from Equation 7A.20.
Example 1
Equation 7A.6 is a particular case of Equation 7A.19 where
The eigenfunctions are obtained from
subject to the boundary conditions
Thus,
which is the same as Equation 7A.14. The second example is Green’s function of Helmholtz equation (in series form)
Example 2
Equation 7A.21a is a particular case of Equation 7A.19, where
The orthonormal equations are
Hence,
To complete this section, here we will write down Green’s function in closed form for the Sturm–Liouville problem:
where h1(x) is the solution form of the homogeneous equation, in the interval 0 < x < x′, and h2(x) is the solution form of the homogeneous equation, in the interval x′ < x < a:
and w(x′) is the Wronskian of h1 and h2 at x = x′:
The closed solution of Green’s function given in Equation 7A.9a and 7A.9b can be obtained from the general solution given in (7A.23) by noting
and the Wronskian w(x′) is obtained as
The difference in sign between Equations 7A.24 and 7A.9 is because Equation 7A.9 is the response when the impulse is of strength −1.
Let us first write
Here, we formulated such that the boundary conditions at the walls x = 0 or a are satisfied.
By substituting Equation 7A.26 into Equation 7A.25a, we obtain
Multiply both sides of Equation 7A.27 by sin nπx/a and integrate with respect to x from 0 to a.
From orthogonality property, the LHS is
and the RHS is
Thus, the differential equation in y is obtained as
Equation 7A.28 can now be solved by using the recipe of Equations 7A.23a and 7A.23b.
The homogeneous form of Equation 7A.28 is
subject to the boundary condition gm = 0, y = 0 or b (Figure 7A.1):
Now the Wronskian from Equation 7A.23e, after simplification, becomes
From Equation 7A.23a, we obtain
From Equation 7A.23b, we obtain
Now the complete Green’s function is given as
We can develop an alternative form of Green’s function by first satisfying the boundary conditions at the walls y = 0 or b, that is, instead of Equation 7A.2 start with
and develop the solution. The result is given in Equations 14.83a and b of Balanis [1].
For series solution of Green’s function, we need the orthonormal eigenfunction ψmn for this two-dimensional problem.
These are the solutions of (for Laplace equation)
subject to boundary condition
Of course, we know that the orthogonal eigenfunctions that satisfy the boundary conditions (Equation 7A.34b) are
From orthogonality property,
Thus, Amn=2/√ab,
Using the bilinear form (7A.20), we get
Note that λ = 0, for the Laplace equation.
One can use Equation 7A.36 to solve Poisson’s equation:
By using Equation 7A.36 and the superposition integral, we obtain
Green’s function with homogeneous, Dirichlet boundary condition is given by
with boundary conditions
For this case, λ = β2:
and Equation 7A.36, gets modified as
Till now, we derived Green’s function that satisfied homogenous Dirichlet boundary conditions; in all the examples, the potential also satisfied the homogenous Dirichlet boundary condition.
Let us now investigate whether we can use a more general Green’s function that has an impulse source but not necessarily satisfying the Dirichlet homogenous boundary condition. The scalar Helmholtz equation is
and Green’s function for the problem is G(r, r′) satisfying the equation
Green’s first and second identities are given below.
Green’s first identity
In the above, s is a closed surface bounding a volume V, Φ and ψ are two scalar functions, and ˆn is the unit vector normal to the surface.
Green’s second identity
Multiply Equation 7A.41 with G(ˉr,ˉr′) and Equation 7A.42 with Φ(ˉr), we obtain
By subtracting Equation 7A.45 from Equation 7A.46 and integrating over the volume V, we obtain
Applying Equation 7A.44 to the RHS of Equation 7A.47 and also evaluating the first term on the LHS of Equation 7A.47, we get
Since ˉr′ is an arbitrary point in V and ˉr′ is a dummy variable, G(ˉr,ˉr′)=G(ˉr′,ˉr).
We can write (7A.48) as (exchanging ˉr and ˉr′)
In the above, the differentiations are with respect to primed (′) coordinates.
If we have homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions, satisfied by Φ as well as G on s, the second integral (surface integral) becomes zero, and hence
This is exactly the superposition integral we used in all the previous discussions. In all those discussions, we had the homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition satisfaction both by Φ and G. Equation 7A.48 is the modified superposition integral for the general case. To use Equation 7A.48, we need to know Φ, ∂Φ/∂n, G, and ∂G/∂n on the closed boundary s.
Three-dimensional Green’s function in free space for the scalar Helmholtz equation
is given by
By making k = 0 in Equations 7A.50 and 7A.51, we obtain the Laplace equation and the associated Green’s function.
Green’s function ˉΓ(ˉr,ˉr′), called Green’s dyadic, satisfies the equation
where ˉu is a unit dyadic given as
In Equation 7A.53, ˆem, in Cartesian coordinates are ˆx, ˆy, ˆz for m = 1, 2, 3, respectively. δmn is the Kronecker delta and given by
A good account of dyads and their properties are given in [2,3]. In this connection, one can also define the double gradient ˉ∇ˉ∇:
From the properties of dyadic operations [2,3], we can show that dyadic Green’s function
Equation 7A.56 relates the scalar Green’s function G given by Equation 7A.51 with dyadic Green’s function given by Equation 7A.56.
Thus, the equation for the electric field
can be solved as a superposition integral in terms of dyadic Green’s function ˉΓ:
18.117.153.38