1.
a. Not an additive group; only 0 has an inverse.
c. It is an additive abelian group (as in Example 4), unity is
, multiplication is associative (it is function composition). But
h (
f +
g) =
h f +
h g fails:
h (
f +
g)(
x) =
h[
f(
x) +
g(
x)] while
These may not be equal. Note that (
f +
g)
h =
f h +
g h does hold.
3.
a. Clearly
and
. If
and
are in
S then
and
because
because
c. Clearly
I, 0
S and A,
B S ⇒
A +
B and −
A S. To check multiplication
5. We have 1, 0
C(
X) as 1
x =
x =
x1 and 0
x = 0 =
x0 for all
x X. If
c,
d C(
x) then
show that −c, c + d, and cd are in C(x).
6.
a. If ab = 0 and a ≠ 0 then a−1 exists so b = a−1ab = 0.
7. If
then
that is
. Hence
c = 0 and
a =
d, so
. Similarly the fact that
A commutes with
forces
b = 0. Finally
shows
ar =
ra for all
r R; that is
a Z(
R). Conversely if
. Thus
8.
a. If (
a +
b)(
a −
b) =
a2 −
b2. Then
a2 +
ba −
ab −
b2 =
a2 −
b2; whence
ba −
ab = 0,
ab =
ba. Conversely if
ab =
ba then
9.
Hence a + b + a + b = a + a + b + b, so b + a = a + b (additive cancellation on the left and on the right).
10.
a. ab + ba = 1 gives aba + ba2 = a, so ba2 = a − aba. Similarly a2b = a − aba so a2b = ba2. Then ab = a3b = a(a2b) = aba2 = (1 − ba)a2 = a2 − ba. Hence a2 = ab + ba = 1.
11. If a2 = 0 implies a = 0, let an = 0, n ≥ 1. If a ≠ 0, let am = 0, am−1 ≠ 0. Then m ≥ 2 and so (am−1)2 = a2m−2 = 0 since 2m − 2 ≥ m (m ≥ 2). This contradicts the hypothesis. So a = 0. The converse is clear.
13. By the hint:
. Hence
is a unit, being a product of units [Theorem 2.5]. Thus
15. (3) ⇒ (1). Let
e be the unique right unity. Given
b R,
for all
r R. Hence
e +
eb −
b is a right unity too, so
e =
e +
eb −
b by uniqueness. Thus
eb =
b for all
b, that is
e is also a left unity.
16.
a. This is by the subring test since 0 = 01
R; 1
R = 11
R ;
k1
R +
m1
R = (
k +
m)1
R; −(
k1
R) = (−
k)1
R and (
k1
R)(
m1
R) = (
km)1
R. To see that
is central, let
s R. Then (
k1
R)
s = (
k1
R)(1
s) = (
k1)(1
Rs) =
ks by Theorem 2, and
s(
k1
R) =
ks in the same way.
c. If char
R = 0 define
by
σ(
k) =
k1
R. Then
σ(
km) =
σ(
k) ·
σ(
m) and
σ(
k +
m) =
σ(
k) +
σ(
m) as in (
b), and
σ(
k) =
σ(
m) ⇒ (
k −
m)1
R = 0 ⇒
k =
m because
o(1
R) =∞. Since
σ is clearly onto, it is an isomorphism.
17. If R has characteristic 1 then 1 · 1R = 0, 1R = 0. Hence R = 0, the zero ring.
18.
a. . The unity is (1, 1) so
k(1, 1) = 0
k1 = 0 in
and
k1 = 0 in
and
m|
k. So the characteristic of
c. .
k(1, 1) = 0
k1 = 0 in
and
k1 = 0 in
. So the characteristic of
is 0.
19. If
u R∗,
, then
k1 = 0 in
R ⇒
ku = 0. But
So o(u) = o(1) = char R (since char R< ∞).
21.
a. (1 − 2e)2 = (1 − 2e)(1 − 2e) = 1 − 2e − 2e + 4e2 = 1.
22.
a. If a = (1 − e)re then ea = 0 and ae = a. Hence a2 = (ae)a = a(ea) = 0. Similarly if b = er(1 − e), then eb = b, be = 0, so b2 = 0.
c. This follows from (a) and Example 17.
23. (2) ⇒ (1). If
r R,
f =
e + (1 −
e)
re is an idempotent, so
ef =
fe by (2). Hence
re =
ere. Similarly
re =
ere, so
re =
re and
e is central.
24. (1) ⇒ (2). If
an = 0 then 1 +
a is a unit [(1 +
a)
−1 = 1 −
a +
a2 −
]. Hence
r(1 +
a) = (1 +
a)
r for all
r R, that is
ra =
ar for all
r.
25. If
r3 =
r then
e =
r2 is idempotent. Iterating
r3 =
r:
r9 =
r3 =
r,
r27 =
r3 =
r, and in general
for
k ≥ 1. Hence if
rn = 0 then
for any
k such that if 3
k ≥
n. Thus
R has no nonzero nilpotents. Hence idempotents in
R are central by Example 18, so
r2 is central for all
r. Finally, if
r,
s R,
rs = (
rs)
3 = (
rs)
2rs =
r(
rs)
2s =
r2srs2 =
s2srr2 =
s3r3 =
sr.
26.
a. If ab = 1 and R = {r1, r2, . . ., rn} then br = bs ⇒ r = s in R. But then br1, br2, . . ., brn are all distinct, so {br1, br2, . . ., brn} = R. In particular bc = 1 for some c. Then a = a(bc) = (ab)c = c so 1 = bc = ba.
27.
a. If
am =
am+n then
Then am+t = am+t+kn for all t ≥ 0, so ar+kn = ar for all r ≥ m and for all k ≥ 1. We want r and k such that r + kn = 2r; that is kn = r. Since n ≥ 1 choose k such that kn ≥ m, and take r = km. Then ar is an idempotent.
28.
a. . Units: ±1; idempotents: 0,1; nilpotents: 0.
c.
29. It is clearly an additive abelian group and
. The associative and distributive laws hold for all matrices. Units:
; nilpotents:
; idempotents:
.
31. If
m is odd then
m2 −
m = (
m − 1)
m is a multiple of 2
m. Thus
in
33. If
r2 =
r for all
r R, then
Hence 0 =
r +
r = 2
r. Since
R ≠ 0, this shows that
R has characteristic 2. In particular, −
r =
r for all
r R. If
r,
s R, then
Thus rs + sr = 0, so sr = − rs = rs. Thus R is commutative.
35. Define
It is clear that σ is a bijection and preserves addition. As to multiplication
Hence σ is an isomorphism.
36.
a. If
is an isomorphism let
. Then
which is impossible for
. So no such isomorphism exists.
c. If
is an isomorphism and
, then
a contradiction in
So no such isomorphism exists.
37. Put
σ(1) =
e. Given
r′
R′, write
r′ =
σ(
r),
r R. Then
Similarly r′e = r′, so e is the unity of R′.
38. Let
be an isomorphism.
a. If
z Z(
R) let
s S, say
s =
σ(
r). Then
so
σ(
z)
Z(
S). If
z′
Z(
S) and
, then for any
Since
σ is one-to-one,
wr =
rw. Thus
. It follows that
σ :
Z(
R) →
Z(
S) is onto. It is clearly one-to-one and so is an isomorphism of rings.
39. It is a routine matter to verify that
α +
β and
αβ are again endomorphisms. The distributive law
α(
β +
γ) =
αβ +
αγ follows because, for all
x X:
The other distributive law is similar, as are the rest of the axioms. The zero is the zero endomorphism
θ :
X →
X where
θ(
x) = 0 for all
x X, and 1
X is the unity.
41. If
a (
eRe)
∗, let
ab =
e,
b (
eRe)
∗. Write
f = 1 −
e, so
ef = 0 =
fe and
e +
f = 1. Then
because af = (ae)f = 0 and fb = f(eb) = 0. Thus σ : (eRe)∗ → R∗ is a mapping, and (∗) shows it is a group homomorphism. It is one-to-one because σ(a) = σ(b) means a + f = b + f, so a = b.
42.
a. Let
,
pi distinct primes,
ni ≥ 1. If
is nilpotent in
then
km ≡ 0 (mod
n) so
n|
km. Hence
pi|
km for all
i so
pi|
k. Conversely, if
pi|
k for all
i then
p1p2 pr|
k because the
pi are relatively prime in pairs. Hence if
m = max {
n1, . . .,
nr} then
km = 0.
c. Let
in
. Hence
n|
e(1 −
e). Then we can write
n =
ab,
a|
e,
b|(1 −
e). [Exercise 35 §1.2], say
e =
xa, 1 −
e =
yb. Thus 1 =
xa +
yb and
e =
xa.
43. Let |
R| = 4. This is an additive group of order 4, so
o(1) = 4 or
o(1) = 2. If
o(1) = 4 then
R = {0, 1, 2, 3} is isomorphic to
via the obvious map. So assume
o(1) = 2; that is the characteristic of
R is 2. Hence
r +
r = 0 for all
r in
R. If
a ≠ 0, 1 then 1 +
a ≠ 0, 1,
a. Hence
R = {0, 1,
a, 1 +
a}. Thus
the addition table is as shown (it is the Klein group). All but four entries in the multiplication table are prescribed as shown. The rest of the table is determined by the choice of a2.
1. a2 = 1 +
a. The table is then as shown. This is clearly a field if it is associative. (See Section 4.3).
2. a2 =
a. The table is as shown. This is isomorphic to
with
a = (1, 0) and 1 +
a = (0, 1).
3. a2 = 1. The table is as shown. This is isomorphic to
with
and
4. a2 = 0. If b = 1 + a then 1 + b = a and b2 = 1 + a2 = 1. Hence this is the same as Case 3.