6.1 Vector Spaces

1.
a. No. 0∉ U.
c. No. 0 ∉ U and not closed under addition.
2.
a. Yes. This is because (2f)(x) = 2f(x) and (f + g)(x) = f(x) + g(x) for all f, g img F[x].
c. No. 0 ∉ U.
3. img
4.
a. The inclusion ⊇ is clear. Since

img

and similarly for img and img, 89 we have also proved the inclusion ⊆.
5. We have img, so adding −(av) to both sides gives img Similarly img yields img
7.
a. Dependent. (1, 2, 3) + 2(4, 0, 1) + 3(2, 1, 0) = (0, 0, 0).
c. Independent. a(x2 + 1) + b(x + 1) + cx = 0 gives a = 0, b + c = 0, a + b = 0; so a = b = c = 0.
9.
a. If img then img; img. Thus 2ab = 0 and a2 + 2b2 = 3c2. If a = 0, b ≠ 0 then img, a contradiction. If a ≠ 0, b = 0 then img, a contradiction. So a = b = 0 = c.
11. {(1, − 1, 0), (1, 1, 1), (a, 0, 0)}; a ≠ 0 in img
13. If rf + sg = 0 then rf(a) + sg(a) = 0 so s = 0; and rf(b) + sg(b) = 0 implies that a = 0.
15. Since dim M2(F) = 4, the matrices I, A, A2, A3, A4 cannot be independent by the fundamental theorem. The result follows.
17. If Mn(F) = span{A1, . . ., Ak} then img, ai img F. Then for all
V img Mn(F) img, a contradiction.
19.
a. {1, r, . . ., rn} is not independent because dim F R = n. So

img

for some ai not all zero. Thus p(r) = 0 when img in F[x].
21. Clearly each of img so it follows that spanimg spanimg. If a1 ≠ 0 the other inclusion follows by the same argument because img.
22.
a. If {u1, . . ., um} ⊆ {u1, . . ., um, . . ., un} —independent, then img implies img where am+1 = img = an = 0. So ai = 0 for all i by the independence of {u1, . . ., um, . . ., un}.
23.
a. Given such a set img, let img. Then img implies img is independent (Lemma 1), contrary to the choice of the img so img for all img; that is img
25. If img then img, so
img is dependent. If it is dependent, then img, ai not all
0. If ak ≠ 0 then img
26.
a. Clear by the subspace test.
c. Pick a basis {x1, . . ., xk} of UV. By Theorem 8, extend to a basis {x1, . . ., xk, u1, . . ., um} of U and a basis img of W. It suffices to prove the following Claim.
Claim:img is a basis of U + W. It clearly spans. If

img

write img, img and img; it suffices to prove img. We have img so img. Thus img that is img. Since {ui, xj} is linearly independent, this forces u = 0. Then img so, similarly, img
27. If U = span{ui} and img then img
28.
a. They are clearly subspaces. For example p, q even means

img

If p(x) UW then p(x) = − p(− x) = − p(x), so p(x) = 0 (because 2 ≠ 0 in F). Thus UW = 0. If f(x) V then f(x) = p(x) + q(x) where

img

and img. So V = U + W.
29. W is clearly a subspace. Let {u1, . . ., um} be a basis of U.
Case 1. img. Then W = U so dim U = m.
Case 2. img. Then img is independent (Lemma 1) and is clearly a basis of W (definition of W). So dim W = m + 1.
31.
a. They are additive subgroups by group theory. If img then img for all a F. If img, say img, then

img

c. Let {u1, . . ., um} be a basis of ker ϕ; extend to a basis img of V. It suffices to show that img is a basis of imϕ.
Span. If imgϕ and img then

img

Independent. If img then img, so

img

Thus img, so bj = 0 for all j.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
3.138.110.119