1.
a. No. 0∉ U.
c. No. 0 ∉ U and not closed under addition.
2.
a. Yes. This is because (2
f)(
x) = 2
f(
x) and (
f +
g)(
x) =
f(
x) +
g(
x) for all
f,
g F[
x].
c. No. 0 ∉ U.
3.
4.
a. The inclusion ⊇ is clear. Since
and similarly for
and
, 89 we have also proved the inclusion ⊆.
5. We have
, so adding −(
av) to both sides gives
Similarly
yields
7.
a. Dependent. (1, 2, 3) + 2(4, 0, 1) + 3(2, 1, 0) = (0, 0, 0).
c. Independent. a(x2 + 1) + b(x + 1) + cx = 0 gives a = 0, b + c = 0, a + b = 0; so a = b = c = 0.
9.
a. If
then
;
. Thus 2
ab = 0 and
a2 + 2
b2 = 3
c2. If
a = 0,
b ≠ 0 then
, a contradiction. If
a ≠ 0,
b = 0 then
, a contradiction. So
a =
b = 0 =
c.
11. {(1, − 1, 0), (1, 1, 1), (
a, 0, 0)};
a ≠ 0 in
13. If rf + sg = 0 then rf(a) + sg(a) = 0 so s = 0; and rf(b) + sg(b) = 0 implies that a = 0.
15. Since dim M2(F) = 4, the matrices I, A, A2, A3, A4 cannot be independent by the fundamental theorem. The result follows.
17. If
Mn(
F) =
span{
A1, . . .,
Ak} then
,
ai F. Then for all
V Mn(
F)
, a contradiction.
19.
a. {1,
r, . . .,
rn} is not independent because dim
F R =
n. So
for some
ai not all zero. Thus
p(
r) = 0 when
in
F[
x].
21. Clearly each of
so it follows that span
span
. If
a1 ≠ 0 the other inclusion follows by the same argument because
.
22.
a. If {
u1, . . .,
um} ⊆ {
u1, . . .,
um, . . .,
un} —independent, then
implies
where
am+1 =
=
an = 0. So
ai = 0 for all
i by the independence of {
u1, . . .,
um, . . .,
un}.
23.
a. Given such a set
, let
. Then
implies
is independent (Lemma 1), contrary to the choice of the
so
for all
; that is
25. If
then
, so
is dependent. If it is dependent, then
,
ai not all
0. If
ak ≠ 0 then
26.
a. Clear by the subspace test.
c. Pick a basis {
x1, . . .,
xk} of
U ∩
V. By Theorem 8, extend to a basis {
x1, . . .,
xk,
u1, . . .,
um} of
U and a basis
of
W. It suffices to prove the following Claim.
Claim: is a basis of
U +
W. It clearly spans. If
write
,
and
; it suffices to prove
. We have
so
. Thus
that is
. Since {
ui,
xj} is linearly independent, this forces
u = 0. Then
so, similarly,
27. If
U =
span{
ui} and
then
28.
a. They are clearly subspaces. For example
p,
q even means
If
p(
x)
U ∩
W then
p(
x) = −
p(−
x) = −
p(
x), so
p(
x) = 0 (because 2 ≠ 0 in
F). Thus
U ∩
W = 0. If
f(
x)
V then
f(
x) =
p(
x) +
q(
x) where
and
. So
V =
U +
W.
29. W is clearly a subspace. Let {
u1, . . .,
um} be a basis of
U.
Case 1. . Then
W =
U so dim
U =
m.
Case 2. . Then
is independent (Lemma 1) and is clearly a basis of
W (definition of
W). So dim
W =
m + 1.
31.
a. They are additive subgroups by group theory. If
then
for all
a F. If
, say
, then
c. Let {
u1, . . .,
um} be a basis of ker
ϕ; extend to a basis
of
V. It suffices to show that
is a basis of
imϕ.
Independent. If
then
, so
Thus
, so
bj = 0 for all
j.