1.
a. is the splitting field of
x5 − 1 over
, and
is separable as char
. By Example 4 §10.1,
where
σ(
u) =
u2 (because
. The lattices are:
Thus
H is the only intermediate field,
is Galois (as
H G), and
. We have
σ2(
u) =
u4 =
u−1 so
σ2(
u +
u4) = (
u +
u4). Hence
so, since
,
. Of course
c. splits (
x2 + 1)(
x2 − 3) over
, so it is a Galois extension. Clearly
x2 + 1 is the minimal polynomial of
i, and has roots {
i, −
i} in
E ; and
x2 − 3 is the minimal polynomial of
and has roots
It follows by Theorem 1 that
where
G = gal(
E :
Q) . Construct
such that
then extend
σ0 to
where
σ(
i) = −
i. Hence
σ G and
Similarly, construct
such that
τ0(
i) =
i ; then extend
τ0 to
where
Hence
τ G and
τ(
i) =
i. It follows easily that
σ2 =
ε and
τ2 =
ε, so
Now consider
Since
and
it follows that
If
H0 =
σ ,
H1 =
τ and
H2 =
στ , the lattices are
Here each
is Galois (because
Hi G) and
Hence
means
; then
because
. Similarly
Finally,
so
e. ,
; so
by Theorem 6 §10.1. Then
E is the splitting field of
x4 − 2 = (
x −
u)(
x +
u)(
x −
iu)(
x +
iu) so
is Galois. By Exercise 13 §10.1,
where
o(
σ) = 4,
o(
τ) = 2,
στσ =
τ and
The lattice diagrams are:
Here
σ2 ,
σ2,
τ ,
σ and
σ2,
τσ are normal in
G (because
σ2 =
Z(
G)), so
,
,
and
are Galois.
1. : Hence
σ2(
i) =
i;
σ(
u2) = −
u2 so
Thus
. Also
and so we are done because
. Now
by Theorem 6 §10.1.
3. : We have
τ(
u2) =
u2 and
σ2(
u2) =
u2 (in (1)) so
. But
and
5. : Clearly
and
as
x4 − 2 is irreducible.
6. : We have
as
τσ(
iu) = −
u and
τσ(
u) = −
iu. This is equality as
x4 + 8 is the minimum polynomial of
7. : Compute
;
has minimum polynomial
x4 − 2.
8. : We have
because
τσ3(
u) =
iu and
τσ3(
iu) =
u. The minimum polynomial of
is
x4 + 8.
2.
a. If
G =
gal(
E :
F) then |
G| =
p2 implies
G is abelian, so
or
G ≅
Cp ×
Cp by Theorem 7, §8.2. If
, the lattices are:
Here
σ2 ⊇
F is Galois because
σ2 G, and [
σ2 :
F] = 2 . If
G≅
Cp ×
Cp =
σ,
τ the lattices are:
Each of
σ ⊇
F and
τ ⊇
F are Galois because [
σ :
F] =
and [
τ :
F].
3. By Example 6 §10.1,
where
σ :
E →
F is the Frobenius automorphism given by
σ(
u) =
up. By the Dedekind-Artin theorem [
E :
G] = |
G| =
n. But
so, since
,
. Thus
is a Galois extension by Lemma 4.
Now the (inverted) lattice of subgroups of
G =
σ , when
o(
σ) = 12, is shown below at the right. Write
Ek =
σk = {
u E σk(
u) =
u} for each divisor
k of
n. Then the subfield lattice is shown below on the left.
Note that
so |Ek| = pk, and Ek ≅ GF(pk).
4. a. ,
σi X,
. Thus
u H is fixed by all
τ H if and only if
σ(
u) =
u for all
σ X.
5. a. Let
. Then
If char
F = 2, this always holds and
K =
EG =
E. Thus
t K so
m =
x −
t. If char
F ≠ 2, write
h(
t) =
f(
t)
g(−
t). Then
h(
t) =
h(−
t) so
h(
t) =
k(
t2) for some polynomial
k (because char
F ≠ 2) . Thus
f(
t)
g(−
t) =
k(
t2) . Similarly and
g(
t)
g(−
t) =
l(
t2) for some polynomial
l. Thus
, from which
K =
F(
t2) . It follows that
m =
x2 −
t2. Note that this shows [
E :
K] = 2 = |
G| in this case, as the Dedekind-Artin theorem guarantees.
7. a. K′ is a subgroup of the abelian group G, so it is normal. Then the main theorem applies.
9.
a. If
H →
H is onto, and
K is an intermediate field, then
K =
H for a subgroup
H, so
K′ =
H′
=
H′ =
K. Thus
K is closed. Conversely, if all intermediate fields
K are closed then
K =
K′
is the image of
K′, and the map is onto.
11. Write
G =
gal(
E :
F) = {
σ autE σ fixes
F}. Since
K ⊇
F we have
13. If [
E :
K] = 6 then
, so
K′ is a subgroup of
A4 of order 6. There is no such subgroup (Exercise 34 §2.6).
15. a. By its definition,
K L is the smallest intermediate field containing both
K and
L. Since the Galois connection
K →
K′ is order reversing, (
K L)′ is the largest subgroup of
G =
gal(
E :
F) contained in both
K′ and
L′; that is (
K L)′ =
K′ ∩
L′.
17. If
K =
σ(
K1) let
. If
write
,
u K1. Then
so
σK′
σ−1 ⊆
K′. On the other hand, if
μ K′ then
for all
, so
μ[
σ(
u)] =
σ(
u) for all
u K1. Hence
, so
. This proves
Conversely, assume
, that is
. If
u K1 then
μ(
u) =
u for all
, so
σ−1λσ(
u) =
u for all
λ K′, that is
λ[
σ(
u)] =
σ(
u) for all
λ K′, that is
σ(
u)
K′
. Since
E ⊇
F is Galois,
K′
=
K, so this shows
σ(
u)
K,
u σ−1(
K). Hence
K1 ⊆
σ−1(
K), so
σ(
K1) ⊆
K. Similarly
K ⊆
σ(
K1).
19. a. Let
E =
F(
u1,
u2, . . .,
um) where
X = {
u1,
u2, . . .,
um} is the set of distinct roots of
f in
E. If
σ G then
σ(
ui)
X for all
i so
σ :
X →
X is one-to-one (hence onto). Thus
σ induces a permutation of these roots:
Now the map
is a group homomorphism
G →
Sm because
for all
σ,
τ in
G. Moreover
means
σ(
ui) =
ui for all
i, so
σ =
ε in
G by Theorem 3 §10.1. Thus
is an embedding.
20.
a. If
then, given
But
τσ traces all of
G as
σ does, so
. This is true for all
τ G, so
. The proof that
T(
u) is in
F is analogous.
c. If
K ⊇
F is Galois and
H =
gal(
K :
F), then |
H| =
n by Theorem 3, Corollary 3. Now
p splits in
K and has distinct roots
u1,
u2, . . .,
um (Theorem 3). Hence
p = (
x −
u1)(
x −
u2)
(
x −
un). For each
i there exists
σi H such that
σi(
u) =
ui, so
p = ∏
σG(
x −
σ(
u)). Thus the coefficients of
xn−1 and 1 are, respectfully
21. If
define
for
τ G. Thus
fτ = ∏
σG[
x −
τσ(
u)] =
f because
τσ runs through
G as
σ does. It follows that
for all
τ G, whence
for each
j. Thus
f F[
x]. Since
f(
u) = 0,
p|
f where
p is the minimal polynomial of
u over
F. Write
f =
pmg where
p and
g are relatively prime in
F[
x]. If
g ≠ 1, let
q be an irreducible factor of
g. Since
q|
f, 0 =
q[
σ(
u)] =
σ[
q(
u)] for some
σ G, so
q(
u) = 0. Since
p(
u) = 0 this is a contradiction because gcd(
p,
q) = 1 in
F[
x]. In fact, 1 =
pr +
qs gives 1 = 0 when we substitute
x =
u.