6.4 Finite Fields

1.
(a) In img, 22 = 4, 23 = 8, 24 = 5, 25 = − 1, so o(2) = 10. Thus 2 is a primitive element.
(c) img since x3 + x + 1 is irreducible in img. In this case GF(8) has order 7, so every nonzero element except 1 is primitive by Lagrange's theorem.
3. Both p and q have no root in img, so they are irreducible. Hence both rings are fields of order 23 and so are isomorphic by Theorem 4.
4. (a) img
5. First x4 + x + 1 is irreducible over img (it has no root, x2 + x + 1 is the only irreducible quadratic, and (x2 + x + 1)2 = x4 + x2 + 1). Hence

img

Now t3 ≠ 1 and t5 = t(t + 1) = t + t2 ≠ 1, so o(t) = 15. Thus t is primitive. Since 16 = 24 the subfields of GF(24) are GF(2), GF(22) and GF(24). Clearly img and GF(24) = GF(16). Finally o(t5) = 3 so by the discussion following Corollary 2 of Theorem 7,

img

7. E is finite so img Thus img, whence E = F(u).
9. If imgand |G| = n, then img. Thus G = Un —the group of all nth roots of unity.
11. The Frobenius automorphism σ : FF is given by σ(b) = bp. This is onto, so each a img F has the form a = σ(b) = bp for some b img F.
13. Write f = a0 + a1x + img + anxn, img. If σ : EE is the Frobenius map defined by σ(t) = tp, then σ(a) = a for all img by Fermat's theorem. Since 0 = f(u) = a0 + a1u + img + anun, we obtain

img

15. If u GF(2n) is a root of x2 + x + 1 then u2 = u + 1. Hence img. Then

img

In general img. But img here because |GF(2n)| = 2n, so we have a contradiction because n is odd.
17. Let d = gcd (f, f′) and write d = fg + fh where g and h are in F[x]. If d = 1, suppose f has a repeated root a in EF. Then xa divides both f and f′ in E[x], and so divides d = 1, a contradiction. Conversely, if d ≠ 1, let E be a splitting field of f over F. Then d|f implies d has a root a in E, so xa divides f and f′, a contradiction by Theorem 3.
18.
a. Let f have no repeated root in a splitting field EF, and suppose that f′ = 0 . If f(a) = 0, a img E, then f′ = 0 implies (xa) divides f′, so a is a repeated root by Theorem 3. Conversely, if f′ ≠ 0 let d = gcd (f, f′). Then d|f so d = 1 or d = because f is irreducible. But d = f is impossible because f does not divide f′. So d = 1, say 1 = fg + fh with g, h img F[x]. Now let a be a repeated root of f in a field EF. Then xa divides f and f′ by Theorem 3, so xa divides 1 in E[x], a contradiction.
19. Use Exercise 18(a). If img then img means iai = 0 for i ≥ 1. Thus ai = 0 if p does not divide i, so

img

where g = a0+ apx + a2px2 + img. Conversely, if f = g(xp), Theorem 2 gives f′ = g′(xp) · pxp−1 = 0.
21. Let img be a splitting field of f. Suppose that u img E satisfies f(u) = 0. If img, then

img

Thus img consists of p distinct roots of f, and so is the set of all roots of f (since °f = p) . Since E is generated over img by these roots, we have img
22. Write img
a. Let img be a field containing a root u of f. Since f is irreducible, it is the minimal polynomial of u over img. If we write img then img and so |E| = pn. Then u is a root of h so f|h in E[x], say h = qf. But h = q0f + r in img by the division algorithm, so this holds in E[x]. By the uniqueness in E[x], we get img and img
c. Here img, so the irreducible divisors are of degree 1 or 3 by (b). Then

img

23. If char F = 2 then |F| = 2n so img for all a. Thus img. So assume char F = p ≠ 2. Write X = {u2 |u img F}. If F = {0, u1, − u1, u2, − u2, . . . } then img. If we write |F| = q, then img. Now let u img F and write Y = {au2 | u F}. Then |X| = |Y| so both sets have more than img elements. Thus XY ≠ , say img, u, img, so img
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.119.19.217