36 ◾ Transforming Teams
Even back then, Eliza could tell that Kirby was good
at his job. He was cautious, critical, and analytical.
Scott was aggressive, impatient, brusque, and tactless.
Scott came to view Kirby not as a team player, but as
an obstacle, “a weak, whining hippie,” as he had once
described him.
In Eliza’s estimation, Scott grew to seriously dislike
Kirby because he dug up problems and because he
was a bit of an “odd duck.” Eventually, Scott wanted
Kirby red and took the matter to Eliza, who had just
been named CEO. Indeed, this was her rst big man-
agement challenge.
Because she was new to HDS Tech and because
Kirby was a valued employee, Scott’s pressure to re
Kirby led Eliza to undertake an investigation, something
she was open and straightforward about with both Kirby
and Scott. She also informed the board about her inten-
tion to investigate Scott’s concerns and possibly make
some personnel changes. The board was highly con-
cerned, given that many board members had leveraged
signicant resources to fund the company based on the
performance of HDS Tech’s production quality. It was, to
say the least, a high-visibility, high-risk situation.
Eliza interviewed members of the production team.
She started with Scott and Kirby. Scott made his case
for Kirby’s ring, arguing that he was a control freak
and too introverted and obsessed with nding fault in
every aspect of production. This, he said, was bad for
the company and bad for morale. Kirby simply stated
that he was just doing his job, which was to antici-
pate and intercept quality problems in the production