APPROXIMATE METHODS 17
Note that the solution for u and
w
can be of any form and that these
functions
are
defined only on the boundary. In this particular example
the boundary reduces to two points, hence we have as unknowns, q
0
and q
l
(i.e. dw/dx at 1 and 0).
Consider now equation (c) and substitute into it the weighting
function (e). This gives,
•1
x
w
dx + [q w]
x
— \_q
w]
0
= 0
Jo
•1
xOS
1
cosx-hj8
2
s
i
nx
)
(
ix + ^i(jSiCOsl +/?
2
sin
1) —
q
0
(ßi) = 0
Jo
This gives the following equations (note that β
γ
and ß
2
are
arbitrary):
•1
xcosxdx =
—
(q
l
cos
1 —
q
0
)
f
Jo
f
ί
1
xsinxdx =
—
q
l
sin 1
o
COsl
i
l
1 r
sin
1
sin
1
These are exact boundary fluxes du/dx at x = 1 and du/dx at x = 0
1.5 BOUNDARY METHODS
The last example showed an application of
the
inverse relationship to
find a boundary solution. Let us now try to use the integrals seen in
Section 1.3 to establish boundary solutions. Assume for instance, that
we have a w function such that V
2
w = 0. Hence formula (1.34)
becomes,
I qwdr+ I qwdr= u^-άΓ + | ΰ^-άΓ (1.35)
Jr
2
Jr
t
Jr
2
Jr
x
This relationship is the starting point for the 'direct' boundary
element method.
If the same functions are used for
w
as for the approximate function
u, one can write,