Oscillator 91
5.10.15.0
52
56
60
64
68
Frequency (GHz)
Vtune (V)
Mode0
Mode1
Mode2
Mode3
Mode4
Mode5
Mode6
Figure 4.20: Measured tuning curve s under different band selection
modes for the 60-GHz asymmetric VCO.
achieved by adjusting locations of switches. The obtained oscillation frequency
varie s from 51.9 to 67.3 GHz, which covers tho whole 60-GHz band in IEE E
802.15.3c standard and provides a FTR of 25.8%. The effective K
V CO
in each
band varies from 2.1 to 3.8 GHz/V. Note the tuning voltage (0.5 ∼ 1.5V)
is selected to provide maximum tuning range for varactor, and can be ea sily
changed to 0 ∼ 1 V by adding a serial capacitor between vara ctor and power
supply.
A sample phase noise plot is shown in Figure 4.21(a). At 60 GHz, the
phase noise is -106.7 dBc/Hz at 10MHz offset. The measured phase noise
performance for all modes is shown in Figure 4.21(b). Due to the low output
power, there is around 10dB deviation in phase noise from simulation, which
may be due to the low output power, inaccurate noise model and non-ideal
ground around VCO. Moreover, as expected in Sectio n 4.4.2.1, degradation
in phase noise variatio n is obs erved in Figure 4.21(b), which mainly comes
from asymmetric sub-band selection top ology. As a result, a large phase noise
variation (σ
P N
) of 8.2 dB is observed.
4.4.2 60-GHz VCO Prototype with Symmetric
Implementation of Inductive Tuning
Though the top ology presented in Section 4.4.2 can achieve a maximized FTR,
the asymmetric layout would degrade the phase noise performance. To solve
this problem, in this section, another to polog y is designed with a symmetric
layout implementation and optimized tuning mechanism for the switches [151].
Both phase noise and phase noise variation are thus improved. The penalty
is the use of more switches than in the first topology, leading so a relatively
narrower FTR. These two topologies ca n be utilized for different applications
with different design targets. A comparison is also made between the two
top ologies.